No offense taken. Not familiar enough with MtMB to know whether I'd call him an extreme liberal, and no, I most definitely don't think frequently-wrong people can't get things right or put them elegantly. But who a person chooses as their source tends to be revealing both about who they think their audience is and what they think of the source in general.AndrewV69 wrote:Well there you go. Turns out I am actually guilty of the same thing I attributed to some, making an unwarranted assumption without checking in with the person and verifying if my take reflected what they actually think.Apples wrote: Amusing that anyone would think I was actually "shocked" by what Andrew posted from Vox Day and Sailer, or -- even more laughable -- that I am an "extreme liberal" (not that there would be anything wrong with that -- some of my closest friends are extreme liberals). I was actually quite serious when I suggested he tell us more about his admiration for Vox Day, and I'd be even more entertained by a Slymepit debate about "race realism."
Would you consider Mike the Mad Biologist an example of an an "extreme liberal"? And if so, would that negate everything he had to say even when he is right about something?
I was actually just rattling your cage because you seem to be a Vox Day and Steve Sailer fan and I was hoping to spark some fireworks by getting you to defend them. My question for you would be -- what do you think either of them gets wrong (if anything)? No need to answer if you don't feel like it.