Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

Old subthreads
Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: there once was a glob named funct...

#361

Post by Michael K Gray »

Apples wrote:Heh. Glob the Funct, the A-plusser who wrote a completely innocent limerick about bankers and ended up being shamed and temp-banned in the aftermath, came back to start a thread titled, "Kafkaesque."
Glob the Funct wrote:I was banned for a week, for reasons I'm still not clear about.
When I asked for clarification, I was told by a moderator to drop the issue, or my ban would become permanent.

This bothers me deeply.
Is there not a safe space within a safe space where we can discuss this openly?
Piegasm wrote:Right, so permaban it is then...
Gotta love the "off with his head!" efficiency of these folks.
http://amodernmilitarymother.com/wp-con ... r-head.jpg

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3782
Arbitrary & undocumented rules are the staple tool of the religious.
Islam is full of them, as is Judaism, Communism & Scientology.
Tread ever-so carefully as you never ever know what innocent behaviour may be deemed to be unlawful until after you have committed it! There are no written rules on these matters. They are always decided by an unelected parasitic sooper-secret elite council.
The penalties will be utterly capricious, and bear no relation whatsoever to the supposed crime.
This is done on purpose, as it keeps the suckers very much on their toes, and unwilling to even think aloud anything but accepted dogma. It shuts down rational thought. Deliberately.

Apples
.
.
Posts: 2405
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#362

Post by Apples »

'Pitters, limber up your petition-signing digits - A+ has sounded the tocsin: we must get "transphobia" into the OED and the Microsoft Office dictionary.
mood2, quoting change.org petition wrote:"Transphobia" is not in the dictionary, yet words such as "homophobia" and "xenophobia" are. When writing the word "transphobia" into Microsoft Word a dashed red line appears underneath to indicate a misspelling or made-up word. However, "transphobia" is in fact spelt correctly and the correct term to describe either a fear or range of negative attitudes towards transsexual or transgender people.
boo! hiss! golem hates dashed red line!!!
mood2, quoting change.org petition wrote: The Oxford English Dictionary is one of the most renowned dictionaries in the world and even includes the vernacular and rather derogatory term ‘Chav’, yet it does not include a word used to describe the terrible prejudice faced by a whole subsection of society, and neither, in fact, does the dictionary and spell check of the most popular word possessor [sic] Microsoft Word. The omission of the word "transphobia" from the dictionary could in fact be said to be a reflection of the transphobia in our society.
Hear hear! Down with cis-normative word-possessors!

[quote="mood2, quoting etc.]
It is said that the beginning of overcoming a problem is identifying it.[/quote]

It is known, Khaleesi.



http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=3788
https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/ ... dictionary

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#363

Post by Michael K Gray »

Reap wrote: Does Melody say "Everyone has to follow the harassment policy PRIOR TO and during the conference" How does that work? If you EVER violate the harassment policy then you are not allowed to attend? What is the scope of this control over a persons actions? I hope she means threats and such but if I go on an ass-grabbing spree the night before and it doesn't involve anyone attending does that mean I'm banned from the conference?
As I said previously, that assertion is not enforceable, as a pure point of contract law. (Unless one agrees to the condition before committing to pay for the tickets, in which case one is fucking stoopid.)

Scented Nectar
.
.
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#364

Post by Scented Nectar »

Michael K Gray wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:Maybe YOU should join feminism. They highly approve of false accusations, especially of child rape. Look up the false memory craze of the 80s and 90s, where any bad dream or depression meant that a quack feminist therapist would tell the patient that she was raped by her father when too young to remember and that that's the root of the bad dreams or depressions. Many families were needlessly destroyed by that.
Back in the early 80s, my wife was firmly convinced by her stupid shrink that she was repeatedly raped by her (deceased) father in a specific month, or months, of a specific year. Her harridan of a mother took it on as truth as well, railing day and night about how you can't trust men and she knew it all along. Until I asked the mother where the father was at that time. (He was a merchant seaman). It turns out that for the 9 months bounding that period, he was at sea in the northern hemisphere! Couldn't possibly have done it. Yet my wife still kept visiting the fraud of a shrink!
Bahhh spit!
Trick-cyclists: Pure Voodoo.
That's horrible. They really fucked things up for people, all because they are determined to find rape and abuse everywhere. I hope her father never knew she was making those claims. That's the kind of shit that ruins lives. Fuck, that's sad.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#365

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

nippletwister wrote:I have limited experience in this sort of thing, but in my younger days, I had, at different times, two women grab my ass, one woman grope my crotch, and one try to force a kiss on me while drunk at a friend's work-related party.
Fap, fap, fap.

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#366

Post by Michael K Gray »

Dick Strawkins wrote:The 'Women in Secularism 2' harrasment policy is here:
http://www.womeninsecularism.org/policy.html
...Prohibited conduct includes, but is not limited to, harassment based on race, gender, sexual orientation, disability, or any other protected group status, as provided by local, state, or federal law.
This clause can be seen to render the whole thing as null & void.
Stating that these Federal & State criminal offenses will be banned but, by implication, no other crimes, is very problematic.
Those behaviours are already "banned" by the government, and the police force is required to act, not conference organisers (as they imply).
Having CFI become the cops, judge, jury and executioner as a substitute for Law Enforcement Agencies is, itself, illegal.

Whoever wrote that policy should hand back their phoney Junior School graduation certificate.

(Did anyone notice in their cherry-picked list of crimes, intolerance based on religious beliefs is not specified? Funny that.)

ladysetar
.
.
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:57 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#367

Post by ladysetar »

16bitheretic wrote:
ladysetar wrote:[quote="Al Stefanelli"
I'm sure you mean 'Aplus inner rectum,' amirite?
Rectum ? Are you calling me an asshole ? THAT'S SEXIST !!!!! Oh wait

and that amirite stuff, we call it poppers, great before taking a huge dick in by boy pussy.
http://i1322.photobucket.com/albums/u58 ... 78797.jpeg[/quote]

Yes yes yes, I like that, especially the way the outfit picks upon the green background of the flag.

It is actually a pretty good likeness of me, how did you know ? Are you stalking me ? tee hee

I do have a few tiny suggestions though. Please, could you remove the facial hair, it's sooooooooo butch and IRL I would never be caught dead sporting something like that. In fact I shave foru times a day to keep my baby's behind smooth complexion. Speaking of could you please add in a little color to my lips and cheeks, nothing garish or slutty please. I knoe some girls like that luck but as we all know they're been brainwashed by the patriarchy and know not what they do. poor dears.

A little color above the eyes would be nice, just to balance the look, again nothing shocking, but demure, pretty, subtle, romantic, like mom, Oh and the hat, that has to go, I see something with a wide brim, maybe a floral motife rather than the tools of deathe that look currently features,

Giggle, I love the phallic symbol of the cigar because as they taught us in gender studies, a cigar is NEVER just a cigar.


Apples
.
.
Posts: 2405
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#369

Post by Apples »

Fucken quote tagges, how do they worke?

Anyway, Todrick Hall's "Ghetto Gangnam Style." Not quite as fab as "Beauty and the Beat," but good.

[youtube]nei3K326Avc[/youtube]

16bitheretic
.
.
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#370

Post by 16bitheretic »

ladysetar wrote:
16bitheretic wrote:
ladysetar wrote:[quote="Al Stefanelli"
I'm sure you mean 'Aplus inner rectum,' amirite?
Rectum ? Are you calling me an asshole ? THAT'S SEXIST !!!!! Oh wait

and that amirite stuff, we call it poppers, great before taking a huge dick in by boy pussy.
http://i1322.photobucket.com/albums/u58 ... 78797.jpeg
Yes yes yes, I like that, especially the way the outfit picks upon the green background of the flag.

It is actually a pretty good likeness of me, how did you know ? Are you stalking me ? tee hee

I do have a few tiny suggestions though. Please, could you remove the facial hair, it's sooooooooo butch and IRL I would never be caught dead sporting something like that. In fact I shave foru times a day to keep my baby's behind smooth complexion. Speaking of could you please add in a little color to my lips and cheeks, nothing garish or slutty please. I knoe some girls like that luck but as we all know they're been brainwashed by the patriarchy and know not what they do. poor dears.

A little color above the eyes would be nice, just to balance the look, again nothing shocking, but demure, pretty, subtle, romantic, like mom, Oh and the hat, that has to go, I see something with a wide brim, maybe a floral motife rather than the tools of deathe that look currently features,

Giggle, I love the phallic symbol of the cigar because as they taught us in gender studies, a cigar is NEVER just a cigar.[/quote]

Makeup is a tool of oppression by the patriarchy, and by asking me to alter colors you have offended all brown people. Plus you had no trigger warnings in that post.

I

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4675
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#371

Post by another lurker »

16bitheretic wrote:
ladysetar wrote:
16bitheretic wrote:
ladysetar wrote:[quote="Al Stefanelli"
I'm sure you mean 'Aplus inner rectum,' amirite?
Rectum ? Are you calling me an asshole ? THAT'S SEXIST !!!!! Oh wait

and that amirite stuff, we call it poppers, great before taking a huge dick in by boy pussy.
http://i1322.photobucket.com/albums/u58 ... 78797.jpeg
Yes yes yes, I like that, especially the way the outfit picks upon the green background of the flag.

It is actually a pretty good likeness of me, how did you know ? Are you stalking me ? tee hee

I do have a few tiny suggestions though. Please, could you remove the facial hair, it's sooooooooo butch and IRL I would never be caught dead sporting something like that. In fact I shave foru times a day to keep my baby's behind smooth complexion. Speaking of could you please add in a little color to my lips and cheeks, nothing garish or slutty please. I knoe some girls like that luck but as we all know they're been brainwashed by the patriarchy and know not what they do. poor dears.

A little color above the eyes would be nice, just to balance the look, again nothing shocking, but demure, pretty, subtle, romantic, like mom, Oh and the hat, that has to go, I see something with a wide brim, maybe a floral motife rather than the tools of deathe that look currently features,

Giggle, I love the phallic symbol of the cigar because as they taught us in gender studies, a cigar is NEVER just a cigar.
Makeup is a tool of oppression by the patriarchy, and by asking me to alter colors you have offended all brown people. Plus you had no trigger warnings in that post.

I[/quote]


Ladysetar also used the word 'slutty'. tsk tsk

Altair
.
.
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:44 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#372

Post by Altair »

UnbelieveSteve wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:Someone drank the Kool-aid ...

http://i1158.photobucket.com/albums/p60 ... 950aea.png

So what "happened" to them? :roll:
....(crickets).....
http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/6898/tweetn.png

The quest to expand the definition of "attacked" to include "being mentioned in a forum" continues. (The link he includes goes to BarnOwl's post)

Skeptic_Duh
.
.
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:59 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#373

Post by Skeptic_Duh »

justinvacula wrote:

It's also missing this idea, unless I am overlooking something (?), that people need to follow the policy prior to conferences. Not that I'm in violation of it or anything, but...
CFI and its affiliates have a zero-tolerance policy for hostile and harassing conduct. If a person engages in hostile or harassing conduct, appropriate remedial action will be taken, which may include, but is not limited to, expulsion from the conference. Threats of hostile conduct that are made prior to a conference may result in exclusion from the conference.

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#374

Post by Mykeru »

16bitheretic wrote: I'm pretty sure I got hit because I made a post in the #BlockSaturday tag mocking the SJWs for their internet activities on Twitter when real social justice fighters in India were trying to stop actual gang rapes. I also had baboon unapproved people in my follow/following lists.
Well, here's some salve for that wound in the form of total pwnage:

Aratina "peachy" Cage faces off with defending champ Matt "MadMax" Hone

Not only is Aratina an abuser of the Twitter system, like Melody Hensley, makes up rules as s/h/it goes along.

(Posted by request of the Ophelia Poe. No, it's not me, Ophelia. Keep guessing)

Apples
.
.
Posts: 2405
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#375

Post by Apples »

:) Nice work, Scented! At first I thought Amy had simply been on a polyamorous date with Marv Albert, Kobe Bryant, and Banksy, but now I understand.

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#376

Post by Michael K Gray »

free thoughtpolice wrote:...I believe we need to find a cheap and clean energy source such as usable fusion power technology to sustain anywhere near our present population levels much less our standard and quality of living.
There, the solution to all the worlds' problems.
We already have all the fusion power that we need.
The fusion reactor is called "the Sun".

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4675
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#377

Post by another lurker »

Altair wrote:
UnbelieveSteve wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:Someone drank the Kool-aid ...

http://i1158.photobucket.com/albums/p60 ... 950aea.png

So what "happened" to them? :roll:
....(crickets).....
http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/6898/tweetn.png

The quest to expand the definition of "attacked" to include "being mentioned in a forum" continues. (The link he includes goes to BarnOwl's post)

I wonder if 'being attacked' is considered to be a badge of honour amongst the horde? I wonder if one achieves greater 'in-group' status by simply saying 'hey, the mean misogynists attacked me'. If this is the case, and if I desperately wanted to be accepted by these people - I would brag about how often I am 'attacked' by the evil misogynist pitters!

16bitheretic
.
.
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#378

Post by 16bitheretic »

Who the hell is this Bjarte Foghat, and why does he think we care?


welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#380

Post by welch »

ladysetar wrote:CHECK YOUR PRIVLEGE BITCHES !!!!!!!!!!!!

Why can't you fucking fuckers just leave us in peace ? We;re going to change the world any you dinosaurs are going to end up extinct. We don't need no comet, we have the internet and the furure is ours.

It's payback time bitches and yes I've had a few too many cosmoploitans but that's only to help with the severe anxiety attacks I get whenever sombody mentions the word slime or pit

We are Atheeissm Pluss and we WILL DOMINATE !!!
But can you dominate my dick

Altair
.
.
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:44 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#381

Post by Altair »

16bitheretic wrote:Who the hell is this Bjarte Foghat, and why does he think we care?
FSM knows. After checking his timeline, it appears that he´s a strong supporter of the FC(n), and that's probably why he was RT'ed by Ophelia Benson.

Za-zen
.
.
Posts: 2636
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:39 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#382

Post by Za-zen »

16bitheretic wrote:Who the hell is this Bjarte Foghat, and why does he think we care?
I made the mistake of asking him what the fuck he was on about, guess that constitutes attacking.

TheMan
.
.
Posts: 709
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:56 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia.
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#383

Post by TheMan »

Michael K Gray wrote:
TheMan wrote:
Michael K Gray wrote:
AnonymousCowherd wrote:That implies you have also fixed the continuing growth in resource consumption issue. Reduce the population as far as you like. As long as it is non-zero, if the resource demands continue to rise year on year then you eventually exceed whatever limit you put on them.
Now, that is just being disingenuous there, oh Custardy Coward.
If I reduce it to the extremum of just one human, then makes a mockery of your scenario.
There was once a time when the human population was sustainable. This (again) demolishes your above assertion.
This is a continuum, not black & white, sir.
'Fess up and admit that I am correct.

Your "As long as it is non-zero..." nonsense is a travesty against mathematics, physics, poetry & common sense.
Leave it out, sunshine.
Sorry but at what time were things sustainable? I'm not aware of a time in history that there were no famine, starvation etc.
You mistake what I mean by "sustainable".
I mean that very thing: sustainable over the long-term (millennia).
Vis - consuming resources at their replacement rate.

I did not mean nor imply it to mean "perfect".
Especially not "famine free".
Dunno how you grabbed that end of the stick!
I took sustainable to mean forever. Sustainability to me implies that no-one is left hungry and wanting. am I over reaching sustainability?

It's never "perfect".

We're spoilt aren't we....

nippletwister
.
.
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:17 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#384

Post by nippletwister »

Michael K Gray wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:Maybe YOU should join feminism. They highly approve of false accusations, especially of child rape. Look up the false memory craze of the 80s and 90s, where any bad dream or depression meant that a quack feminist therapist would tell the patient that she was raped by her father when too young to remember and that that's the root of the bad dreams or depressions. Many families were needlessly destroyed by that.
Back in the early 80s, my wife was firmly convinced by her stupid shrink that she was repeatedly raped by her (deceased) father in a specific month, or months, of a specific year. Her harridan of a mother took it on as truth as well, railing day and night about how you can't trust men and she knew it all along. Until I asked the mother where the father was at that time. (He was a merchant seaman). It turns out that for the 9 months bounding that period, he was at sea in the northern hemisphere! Couldn't possibly have done it. Yet my wife still kept visiting the fraud of a shrink!
Bahhh spit!
Trick-cyclists: Pure Voodoo.
b]Ah, fuck....my condolences, and I hope your wife got better.

I just finished Sagan's "Demon Haunted World"...I was pleasantly surprised that he spent a bit of time looking critically at false memory syndrome and the related "satanic ritual abuse" panic of the 80's and 90's. He winds through a narrative taking a look at alien abductees, religious witch hunts, and false memory "abuse" cases through the same perspective, pointing out how eerily similar most of the claims are. I think the only weakness in Sagan's critique is that he , in his usual diplomatic manner, doesn't go quite far enough in his criticisms(he mentioned the known phenomenon of false rape claims as they relate to false memory syndrome, but I think he didn't want to piss off his more liberal supporters), but that might also have been limited by the lack of available data.

I have a bit of personal experience in this area as well, which is part of what informs my extreme dislike of certain manifestations of religion, pseudo-science, and anti-scientific, politicized feminism and other ideologies that seem to idolize victimization. One of my high school girlfriends started confiding to me, after we'd been together for well over a year, that she was an abuse victim. At first, I was lead to believe that one of her uncles had sexually abused her. I still don't know if this one claim is true, but some of her family did seem creepy and suspicious of outsiders(not that that constitutes any kind of evidence of anything). As she revealed more over time, it became a completely insane conspiracy involving multiple uncles, a hidden uncle with powerful criminal connections, years of abduction, rape, and elaborate torture, and a host of other highly unlikely claims. After a while, there was even a "body double" of her to cover her abductions, which ended up being a long-standing but somewhat suppressible Multiple Personality Disorder. At 17, I had no fucking clue that people could seem so very normal and yet be utterly delusional. The other delusionals and mentally unstable people I had known all gave off great flashing warning signs. What really scares the shit out of me is that this person is now a dorm counselor at a well-known christian college...I sure hope she got better first.

None of her family ever mentioned any of this to me, though they all knew. At first, I was mad as hell at them, and thought that their conservative religious views might be making things worse or at least preventing better help from getting to her. They would only allow her to see properly "christian" therapists, who had clearly done no good. I thought maybe her family even believed her wild tales to some degree...but they didn't seem that stupid or crazy. Looking back, given the sorry state of psychoanalysis at the time(late 80's, early 90's), and the somewhat intrusive state child protection system in California, it occurred to me that they may have been making a hard but prudent choice to keep her with the family, although I can't help thinking that their very conservative religious beliefs and taboos didn't help her...but they may not have harmed her much, either. I can't say. I suppose a shit-ton of extra religion-based shaming might have made things worse, but I don't really know how bad it was within her family. They seemed pretty decent.

Since then, I have had an extremely low opinion of people who would encourage any of this sort of thing for profit, or even in a misguided attempt to help people. I've heard of other cases like this, and even seen things like this ruin lives of people accused of crimes so ridiculous they wouldn't even be put in a faked snuff film.

I think all of these topics need a shit-ton of real research, not wild speculation by the gullible and exploitative political ploys or profiteering by the cynical. It may be rare these days, or at least more rare for such delusions to be widely believed and acted on, but the pile of victims, on all sides of these delusions, is huge and reaches back throughout history.


If anyone here at the Pit has any reading recommendations on any of these subjects that go deeper than Sagan's skeptical treatment, I would very much appreciate if you would speak up. I am very interested, but unaware of any solid but accessible work. Any aspect or perspective is ok... psychology, empirical studies, perspectives from social sciences, notes of other similar delusions, perspectives from victims, whatever. Books, studies, youtube videos, blogs, anything.

Thank you in advance if you have any suggestions.

Za-zen
.
.
Posts: 2636
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:39 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#385

Post by Za-zen »

Elevatorgate has a picture of bart attempting to strangle himself with sulkyamy things, well worth seeing. I'm thinking he's git some kind of fetish going on there, asphyxiation by ramic because he's a bad bad patriarchy boy.

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#386

Post by Mykeru »

Za-zen wrote:
16bitheretic wrote:Who the hell is this Bjarte Foghat, and why does he think we care?
I made the mistake of asking him what the fuck he was on about, guess that constitutes attacking.

Well, it is under the Melody Hensley standard of "communication=harassment".

Nice work if you can get it.

Za-zen
.
.
Posts: 2636
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:39 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#387

Post by Za-zen »


I have to say this is why i love the pyt. This should be context framed as high satire.

UnbelieveSteve
.
.
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:37 pm
Location: Sydney Australia
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#388

Post by UnbelieveSteve »

Mykeru wrote:
16bitheretic wrote: I'm pretty sure I got hit because I made a post in the #BlockSaturday tag mocking the SJWs for their internet activities on Twitter when real social justice fighters in India were trying to stop actual gang rapes. I also had baboon unapproved people in my follow/following lists.
Well, here's some salve for that wound in the form of total pwnage:

Aratina "peachy" Cage faces off with defending champ Matt "MadMax" Hone

Not only is Aratina an abuser of the Twitter system, like Melody Hensley, makes up rules as s/h/it goes along.

(Posted by request of the Ophelia Poe. No, it's not me, Ophelia. Keep guessing)
Just to piss off the pit i capped it. Goddamn twitter is some funny shit. This aratina is a lazy thinker.
Anyway fuck you.
http://i.imgur.com/7laiyuQ.jpg

VickyCaramel
.
.
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:24 am
Location: Sitting with feet up
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#389

Post by VickyCaramel »

another lurker wrote:
Altair wrote:
UnbelieveSteve wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:Someone drank the Kool-aid ...

http://i1158.photobucket.com/albums/p60 ... 950aea.png

So what "happened" to them? :roll:
....(crickets).....
http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/6898/tweetn.png

The quest to expand the definition of "attacked" to include "being mentioned in a forum" continues. (The link he includes goes to BarnOwl's post)

I wonder if 'being attacked' is considered to be a badge of honour amongst the horde? I wonder if one achieves greater 'in-group' status by simply saying 'hey, the mean misogynists attacked me'. If this is the case, and if I desperately wanted to be accepted by these people - I would brag about how often I am 'attacked' by the evil misogynist pitters!
Must be doing something wrong?

They are attention whores, the worst thing we could do is to ignore them. Lets face it, we are doing them all a huge, huge favour.

Submariner
.
.
Posts: 1127
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:05 pm
Location: Florida, US of A
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#390

Post by Submariner »

16bitheretic wrote:Who the hell is this Bjarte Foghat, and why does he think we care?
he's A+ 's Slow Ride(er)

Apples
.
.
Posts: 2405
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#391

Post by Apples »

Za-zen wrote:I have to say this is why i love the pyt. This should be context framed as high satire.
Totally agree. All it's missing is a head:

http://headinavice.files.wordpress.com/ ... .jpg?w=584

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#392

Post by cunt »

I'm gunning for you now Bjarte. Hey. You're in my crosshairs! Might as well sit your ass down in the twitter mud right now, face first. Start begging in advance. Start gurgling those tweets! You'll be sucking that twit mud through a straw soon enough!! You're a good little sucker aren't you? You're such a pretty little sucker.

ladysetar
.
.
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:57 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#393

Post by ladysetar »

welch wrote:
ladysetar wrote:CHECK YOUR PRIVLEGE BITCHES !!!!!!!!!!!!

Why can't you fucking fuckers just leave us in peace ? We;re going to change the world any you dinosaurs are going to end up extinct. We don't need no comet, we have the internet and the furure is ours.

It's payback time bitches and yes I've had a few too many cosmoploitans but that's only to help with the severe anxiety attacks I get whenever sombody mentions the word slime or pit

We are Atheeissm Pluss and we WILL DOMINATE !!!
But can you dominate my dick
Why yes I believe I can. I've been seeing this woman lately, for feminization therapy, she likes to dress up in leather and chain me up in humilliating positions then tell me what a little cunt I am as she weilds her whips and paddles. To bad the kkkapitalist system forces me to pay for this therapy out of my own pocket and it's fucking expensive !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If you want that kind of service I can provide it, for a fee of course, oh and bring me a black corset, and a pair of those thigh high boots, mens size 14 and some stockings then your dick and I can have our little session. Speaking of penesis, did you know that if you keep the i and the n of penis then change all the other letters and add one extra letter, you get vagina. yes indedee.

Speaking of penisis again ( no I'm not obsessed ) did you know I named mine ? Oh Yes, I named her Virginia because it sounds very close to, well you know, something that's supposed to be in panties and when my therapy is finally over and I can afford it I'm going to tattoo that name along the entire 3 inch length of her.

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5448
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#394

Post by Gumby »

ladysetar wrote: Speaking of penisis again ( no I'm not obsessed ) did you know I named mine ? Oh Yes, I named her Virginia because it sounds very close to, well you know, something that's supposed to be in panties and when my therapy is finally over and I can afford it I'm going to tattoo that name along the entire 3 inch length of her.
I named my penis "Secret", because it's strong enough for a man, but made for a woman.

:rimshot:

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4675
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#395

Post by another lurker »

VickyCaramel wrote:
another lurker wrote:
Altair wrote:
UnbelieveSteve wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:Someone drank the Kool-aid ...

http://i1158.photobucket.com/albums/p60 ... 950aea.png

So what "happened" to them? :roll:
....(crickets).....
http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/6898/tweetn.png

The quest to expand the definition of "attacked" to include "being mentioned in a forum" continues. (The link he includes goes to BarnOwl's post)

I wonder if 'being attacked' is considered to be a badge of honour amongst the horde? I wonder if one achieves greater 'in-group' status by simply saying 'hey, the mean misogynists attacked me'. If this is the case, and if I desperately wanted to be accepted by these people - I would brag about how often I am 'attacked' by the evil misogynist pitters!
Must be doing something wrong?

They are attention whores, the worst thing we could do is to ignore them. Lets face it, we are doing them all a huge, huge favour.

Even if the pit was to do nothing, they would still brag about 'hey the pitters attacked me.' They can simply lie about it, and gain status as a result. Everyone will agree 'yes, you must be doing something right, misogynists are *attacking* you - why don't you join us in the fight against eeevil.

Matt
.
.
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 4:36 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#396

Post by Matt »

Mykeru wrote:
16bitheretic wrote: I'm pretty sure I got hit because I made a post in the #BlockSaturday tag mocking the SJWs for their internet activities on Twitter when real social justice fighters in India were trying to stop actual gang rapes. I also had baboon unapproved people in my follow/following lists.
Well, here's some salve for that wound in the form of total pwnage:

Aratina "peachy" Cage faces off with defending champ Matt "MadMax" Hone

Not only is Aratina an abuser of the Twitter system, like Melody Hensley, makes up rules as s/h/it goes along.

(Posted by request of the Ophelia Poe. No, it's not me, Ophelia. Keep guessing)
Hello Pitters! It seemed like quite a few of you guys decided to follow me on Twitter - thanks for that. In regards to the Aratina Cage conversation, I got involved because I was pissed off with Ophelia Benson (she blocked me on Twitter because I questioned her stated reasons for banning Noelplum99 from her blog), and I didn't like her attempts to shut down a parody account.

I read a bit of ERV's blog back in the day but I wasn't a commenter. What I knew about the Pit wasn't much more than the lies PZ Myers liked to tell. I started to dislike PZ in the months prior to Elevatorgate, I noticed the mask was slipping. He wasn't the cuddly teddy bear he wanted us to think he was. He seemed to like to talk shit about things he knew nothing about, arguments from ignorance were more and more common. He was developing the classic PZ hallmark - "Some people are saying this YouTube video is awful. I haven't watched it, but I agree with them." Then Elevatorgate happened and I watched with astonishment as PZ went crazy, and it seemed like all of the Pharyngula commenters followed suit. Their treatment of Richard Dawkins annoyed the hell out of me. They've gone after Ayaan Hirsi Ali (because she works for a conservative thinktank and has some neocon beliefs - BURN THE WITCH!), Sam Harris, Lawrence Krauss, Christopher Hitchens, Michael Shermer, and DJ Grothe. Rebecca Watson and others like her became uncriticisable - make a single negative comment about them, you're a misogynist, you're an asshole, you're scum.

I spent the last year completely ignoring the atheist movement, but recently I got interested again. I'm not sure who gets the credit, but I've been doing a lot of YouTubing. There's some really interesting people on there - Noelplum99, Justin Vacula, Al Stefanelli, Justicar, Renee Hendricks, Wooly Bumblebee, Girlwriteswhat, Scentednectar, Spinozaspsyche. They are honest people who haven't allowed themselves to be shamed and silenced by Myers and his gang. Thanks to them I've now caught up with what's been happening with Atheism+ and all that bollocks.

It reveals much that simply being a member of this forum is enough to get you permanently banned from Myers' blog without an acknowledgement. It reminds me of Rapture Ready - the moment they get suspicious, you're out. Gone. It is sad to see this behaviour from an atheist, and a supposed rationalist and freethinker.

Anyway, sorry about the TLDR and the rant, but getting it all out helps. There's a character limit on YouTube and Twitter. Being able to say it all in one go means I won't constantly be whining about it from now on.

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5448
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#397

Post by Gumby »

Matt wrote:
Mykeru wrote:
16bitheretic wrote: I'm pretty sure I got hit because I made a post in the #BlockSaturday tag mocking the SJWs for their internet activities on Twitter when real social justice fighters in India were trying to stop actual gang rapes. I also had baboon unapproved people in my follow/following lists.
Well, here's some salve for that wound in the form of total pwnage:

Aratina "peachy" Cage faces off with defending champ Matt "MadMax" Hone

Not only is Aratina an abuser of the Twitter system, like Melody Hensley, makes up rules as s/h/it goes along.

(Posted by request of the Ophelia Poe. No, it's not me, Ophelia. Keep guessing)
Hello Pitters! It seemed like quite a few of you guys decided to follow me on Twitter - thanks for that. In regards to the Aratina Cage conversation, I got involved because I was pissed off with Ophelia Benson (she blocked me on Twitter because I questioned her stated reasons for banning Noelplum99 from her blog), and I didn't like her attempts to shut down a parody account.

I read a bit of ERV's blog back in the day but I wasn't a commenter. What I knew about the Pit wasn't much more than the lies PZ Myers liked to tell. I started to dislike PZ in the months prior to Elevatorgate, I noticed the mask was slipping. He wasn't the cuddly teddy bear he wanted us to think he was. He seemed to like to talk shit about things he knew nothing about, arguments from ignorance were more and more common. He was developing the classic PZ hallmark - "Some people are saying this YouTube video is awful. I haven't watched it, but I agree with them." Then Elevatorgate happened and I watched with astonishment as PZ went crazy, and it seemed like all of the Pharyngula commenters followed suit. Their treatment of Richard Dawkins annoyed the hell out of me. They've gone after Ayaan Hirsi Ali (because she works for a conservative thinktank and has some neocon beliefs - BURN THE WITCH!), Sam Harris, Lawrence Krauss, Christopher Hitchens, Michael Shermer, and DJ Grothe. Rebecca Watson and others like her became uncriticisable - make a single negative comment about them, you're a misogynist, you're an asshole, you're scum.

I spent the last year completely ignoring the atheist movement, but recently I got interested again. I'm not sure who gets the credit, but I've been doing a lot of YouTubing. There's some really interesting people on there - Noelplum99, Justin Vacula, Al Stefanelli, Justicar, Renee Hendricks, Wooly Bumblebee, Girlwriteswhat, Scentednectar, Spinozaspsyche. They are honest people who haven't allowed themselves to be shamed and silenced by Myers and his gang. Thanks to them I've now caught up with what's been happening with Atheism+ and all that bollocks.

It reveals much that simply being a member of this forum is enough to get you permanently banned from Myers' blog without an acknowledgement. It reminds me of Rapture Ready - the moment they get suspicious, you're out. Gone. It is sad to see this behaviour from an atheist, and a supposed rationalist and freethinker.

Anyway, sorry about the TLDR and the rant, but getting it all out helps. There's a character limit on YouTube and Twitter. Being able to say it all in one go means I won't constantly be whining about it from now on.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/e ... omemat.jpg

Welcome Matt!

/pun

fascination
.
.
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:31 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#398

Post by fascination »

nippletwister wrote: Snipped


If anyone here at the Pit has any reading recommendations on any of these subjects that go deeper than Sagan's skeptical treatment, I would very much appreciate if you would speak up. I am very interested, but unaware of any solid but accessible work. Any aspect or perspective is ok... psychology, empirical studies, perspectives from social sciences, notes of other similar delusions, perspectives from victims, whatever. Books, studies, youtube videos, blogs, anything.

Thank you in advance if you have any suggestions.
Other than Sagan I know Shermer has written a bit about it. I think it was in "Why People Believe Weird Things", but I'll have to double check. I think John Douglas (the FBI Profiler) has touched upon it in some of his books but only briefly. I really can't think of anyone else right now. You can probably do an Amazon search. If you're interested in specific cases I know they made a movie about the McMartin case. I'm sure there were books written about it also. The movie was pretty good. It was called "Indictment: The McMartin Trial". It may be on Netflix.
Speaking of Netflix, I saw a really disturbing movie last night on streaming. It was Lars Vans Triers' "Antichrist". Woah

Apples
.
.
Posts: 2405
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#399

Post by Apples »

welcome, matt! have some clam juice!

http://myjerkbaby.files.wordpress.com/2 ... demon1.png

Metalogic42
.
.
Posts: 1252
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 10:56 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#400

Post by Metalogic42 »

Apples wrote:welcome, matt! have some clam juice!

http://myjerkbaby.files.wordpress.com/2 ... demon1.png
That looks like mountain dew.

fascination
.
.
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:31 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#401

Post by fascination »

Welcome to the Pit Matt!

Altair
.
.
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:44 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#402

Post by Altair »

An interesting tweet by Rebecca Watson

http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/4359/tweetr.png

In case you don't know (I didn't), Jack Donaghy is Alec Baldwin's character on "30 Rock".

The full quote goes like this:
Jack Donaghy: Your show can't cost NBC any money at all.
Liz Lemon: That's impossible.
Donaghy: Impossible? Would any of your female heroes say that? Would Amelia Earhart, or Dian Fossey, or Joan of Arc... Boy, women who try to do things sure get killed a lot.
It could be that Rebecca just found that phrase funny, but I would bet that she's using it to imply (for the 1000000th time) that there are people men out there who just want to keep women down and who use harassment, threats and apparently even murder to stop women from "doing things".

There is a problem with the original quote, which is only magnified by Rebecca's reading of the quote (if I'm right about my Rebecca's implied message).

Amelia Earhart wasn't killed, she disappeared in 1937 while attempting a round-the-world flight. An interesting tidbit is that she was flying with a navigator called Fred Noonan, who is almost never mentioned.
Joan of Arc was a soldier, and apparently her trial for heresy had political motivations, so her death can hardly be attributed to being a woman.
Dian Fossey would be their best example since she WAS killed, but her killing, although unsolved, seems to be related to her opposition to poachers and animal traders, and not to her gender.
Also, if this bit of information is true, Fossey sounds like the kind of person who would earn a lot of enemies:
Wikipedia wrote: Six months before her murder, AP East Africa Correspondent Barry Shlachter quoted Fossey in one of her last interviews as saying that she was habituating gorillas only to whites because blacks were the poachers. They said Rwandans whom she suspected of poaching had been stripped and beaten with stinging nettles by Fossey, who removed their animist amulets, set fire to one villager's home and kidnapped their child, holding the little girl hostage for days. This extreme case of Dian's vengeance, combined with reports of the torture of poachers, triggered real concern from conservationists and Rwandan officials about Fossey’s mental stability and responsibility as a research center director. After her murder, Fossey's National Geographic editor, Mary Smith, told Shlachter that the famed gorilla expert on visits to the United States would "load up on firecrackers, cheap toys and magic tricks as part of her method to mystify the (Africans) -- hold them at bay."[27]

Writing in The Wall Street Journal in 2002, Tunku Varadarajan described Fossey at the end of her life as colourful, controversial, and "a racist alcoholic who regarded her gorillas as better than the African people who lived around them."[16][28]
Maybe I'm reading too much in Rebecca's tweet, but at least it got me searching, and I learned a couple of new things tonight.

Apples
.
.
Posts: 2405
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#403

Post by Apples »

fascination wrote:Speaking of Netflix, I saw a really disturbing movie last night on streaming. It was Lars Vans Triers' "Antichrist". Woah
I like von Trier, but haven't liked any of his later stuff as much as his original miniseries "The Kingdom" -- subsequently borked by Stephen King in an English-language remake.

It caught my eye at a video store back in the 90s with the tag-line, "Like ER on acid."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Kingdo ... iseries%29

Altair
.
.
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:44 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#404

Post by Altair »

Matt wrote:
Hello Pitters! It seemed like quite a few of you guys decided to follow me on Twitter - thanks for that. In regards to the Aratina Cage conversation, I got involved because I was pissed off with Ophelia Benson (she blocked me on Twitter because I questioned her stated reasons for banning Noelplum99 from her blog), and I didn't like her attempts to shut down a parody account.

(The rest of the post was snipped because Lsuoma commited spoilercide a little while ago)

Anyway, sorry about the TLDR and the rant, but getting it all out helps. There's a character limit on YouTube and Twitter. Being able to say it all in one go means I won't constantly be whining about it from now on.
[youtube]o1tj2zJ2Wvg[/youtube]

BarnOwl
.
.
Posts: 3311
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:18 pm
Location: The wrong trouser of Time
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#405

Post by BarnOwl »

Altair wrote:
UnbelieveSteve wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:Someone drank the Kool-aid ...

http://i1158.photobucket.com/albums/p60 ... 950aea.png

So what "happened" to them? :roll:
....(crickets).....
http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/6898/tweetn.png

The quest to expand the definition of "attacked" to include "being mentioned in a forum" continues. (The link he includes goes to BarnOwl's post)
Oh dear, and to think I've utterly neglected to set up a Twitter account. No Facebook account either.

It's like forgetting to have children, only with many more annoyances avoided. :think:

ladysetar
.
.
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 1:57 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#406

Post by ladysetar »

another lurker wrote: Makeup is a tool of oppression by the patriarchy, and by asking me to alter colors you have offended all brown people. Plus you had no trigger warnings in that post.

Ladysetar also used the word 'slutty'. tsk tsk
Yes but but ( pours another cosmopolitan, a double this time ) Makeup has been used for centuries as a way to define womwn's feminity and express their non-masculinity. It's been a meeting place, common ground for all women to express themselves in cultures where clothing was utilitarian and religious thought often only allowed this as the only acceptable form of female bonding. It's only the kkkapitalist system in modern western society that has transferred the sacred female rite into patriarichal hands and made it the tool op the oppresser.

Like the word slut womwn will reclaim it as their own, (see slutwalk) in the same manner that we they have reclaimed bitch

bitch

Apples
.
.
Posts: 2405
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#407

Post by Apples »

Altair wrote:Maybe I'm reading too much in Rebecca's tweet, but at least it got me searching, and I learned a couple of new things tonight.
Men who try to do things sure get killed a lot.

http://api.ning.com/files/eA*FhumF3aXjE ... /d_day.gif

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10932
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#408

Post by Lsuoma »

Anyone know which country the A+Theism Setar comes from?

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4675
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#409

Post by another lurker »

ladysetar wrote:
another lurker wrote: Makeup is a tool of oppression by the patriarchy, and by asking me to alter colors you have offended all brown people. Plus you had no trigger warnings in that post.

Ladysetar also used the word 'slutty'. tsk tsk
Yes but but ( pours another cosmopolitan, a double this time ) Makeup has been used for centuries as a way to define womwn's feminity and express their non-masculinity. It's been a meeting place, common ground for all women to express themselves in cultures where clothing was utilitarian and religious thought often only allowed this as the only acceptable form of female bonding. It's only the kkkapitalist system in modern western society that has transferred the sacred female rite into patriarichal hands and made it the tool op the oppresser.

Like the word slut womwn will reclaim it as their own, (see slutwalk) in the same manner that we they have reclaimed bitch

bitch

You should tell us what you think about the skirt and it's role in the oppression of women. I for one would love to know.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#410

Post by cunt »

Lsuoma wrote:Anyone know which country the A+Theism Setar comes from?
Salish unceded territory. (Vancouver)

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4675
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#411

Post by another lurker »

Lsuoma wrote:Anyone know which country the A+Theism Setar comes from?
Canada, vancouver to be exact.

Will probably be on either Telus, Rogers or Shaw cable.

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5448
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#412

Post by Gumby »

Lsuoma wrote:Anyone know which country the A+Theism Setar comes from?
Dumbfuckistan.

nippletwister
.
.
Posts: 425
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:17 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#413

Post by nippletwister »

fascination wrote:
nippletwister wrote: Snipped


If anyone here at the Pit has any reading recommendations on any of these subjects that go deeper than Sagan's skeptical treatment, I would very much appreciate if you would speak up. I am very interested, but unaware of any solid but accessible work. Any aspect or perspective is ok... psychology, empirical studies, perspectives from social sciences, notes of other similar delusions, perspectives from victims, whatever. Books, studies, youtube videos, blogs, anything.

Thank you in advance if you have any suggestions.
Other than Sagan I know Shermer has written a bit about it. I think it was in "Why People Believe Weird Things", but I'll have to double check. I think John Douglas (the FBI Profiler) has touched upon it in some of his books but only briefly. I really can't think of anyone else right now. You can probably do an Amazon search. If you're interested in specific cases I know they made a movie about the McMartin case. I'm sure there were books written about it also. The movie was pretty good. It was called "Indictment: The McMartin Trial". It may be on Netflix.
Speaking of Netflix, I saw a really disturbing movie last night on streaming. It was Lars Vans Triers' "Antichrist". Woah
Thank you, every bit helps. I hadn't seen Shermer's input, and the Sagan book refernced the FBI guy...at least there's some leads. I'm no research wizard, and I've tried to look a bit, but it seems there isn't much solid stuff on the subject, especially satanic ritual abuse, ritual sexual abuse, and false memory stuff, and it is NOT a subject that will get you very far on any feminist oriented sites, I think because of the connection with female psychosis and false rape/false abuse accusations.

I would probably distance myself from the subjects as well for political expediency, but the effect it has had on my life was bad enough, and I was never really even closely involved.

Any and all suggestions are appreciated.

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 10769
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#414

Post by free thoughtpolice »

Michael K Gray wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:...I believe we need to find a cheap and clean energy source such as usable fusion power technology to sustain anywhere near our present population levels much less our standard and quality of living.
There, the solution to all the worlds' problems.
We already have all the fusion power that we need.
The fusion reactor is called "the Sun".
Harnessing solar power, hydro, wind is good but limited for total needs. Ocean currents have huge potential but at this point the energy required to maintain the infrastructure is greater than the harvest. It would seem to me that although the energy is there it would never be cheap or practical without a huge technology breakthrough.
The ultimate tech breakthrough will be harnessing of local fusion power.

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#415

Post by Mykeru »

Matt wrote: Anyway, sorry about the TLDR and the rant, but getting it all out helps. There's a character limit on YouTube and Twitter. Being able to say it all in one go means I won't constantly be whining about it from now on.
Nice takedown, Matt

Meanwhile...

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8360/8417 ... d7b4_z.jpg

Spence
.
.
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:52 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by my dick

#416

Post by Spence »

Apples wrote:welcome, matt! have some clam juice!

http://myjerkbaby.files.wordpress.com/2 ... demon1.png
Mmmm! I got a chunky bit!
chunky.jpg
(31.26 KiB) Downloaded 209 times

fascination
.
.
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:31 am
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#417

Post by fascination »

Scented Nectar wrote: That's CasesAndMaterials. He also has a number of sock accounts. He's one of the most brain dead youtubers ever. He also gets freaked out around old people and for some reason, my eyes. They scare the fuck out of him which is quite funny actually. I can usually identify his sock accounts because they are full of freakout insults about my age and eyes. Notice his entire argument against Renee is to make fun of her appearance. He's for real somewhat retarded, I think. That's not just an insult; I think he really is. Also he hangs around with an absolutely bonkers insane woman called Buntzums. She is just as stupid.

Video snipped
Have you seen the two videos where he was on DPR Jones' blog tv sesssion? He had been trying to get DPR's attention for weeks by making these offensive videos about him. DPR just kept ignoring him until he finally got pissed off enough to have him on to explain himself. Casesandmaterials comes off sounding like he has a weird obsession with DPR. It is really creepy. Then he goes on to show that he knows fuckall about evolution. I wasn't going to embed the videos or post the links unless someone was interested because the sound quality is so poor. Ill go ahead and just leave them here but you have been warned about the sound. Both videos are short (part one and two):
[youtube]rQ1JM-k7GQg[/youtube]
[youtube]rBsKgUULzfs[/youtube]

JackSkeptic
.
.
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#418

Post by JackSkeptic »

Hi low life's. I've just registered to show my appreciation for this site. Without your uncanny ability to point me to the relentless entertainment provided by FTB and A+ my life would have been intolerable. They seem so convincing too, I wonder how much they get paid? It has to be worth a sitcom with the 'stern' women and the grumpy grandpa who really needs a shave. Mom can be doing her 'all men are rapists' thing while desperately fighting off the milkman trying to join her in the lift. The kids can be reporting their mates to the teachers for being 'socially awkward'. Great japes are had trying to get the headmaster sacked because he said he likes WHITE coffee. The racist!!!

Anyway it passes the time while reality flows in on a daily basis. Stuff like real rapes and real abuse and real hate. Not stuff made up by deluded scriptwriters. It's a shame that nothing those clowns say or do adds anything to real world issues but, hey, it's fun all the same.

shy spy

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#419

Post by shy spy »

nipple twister,
Elizabeth Loftus is the expert on False Memory Syndrome
http://www.skepdic.com/falsememory.html
http://fora.tv/2009/07/14/Elizabeth_Lof ... ith_Memory

sacha
.
.
Posts: 2450
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:31 am
Location: Gender Traitors International
Contact:

Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]

#420

Post by sacha »

decius wrote:Dubbing is disgraceful and an insult to the art of acting and movie-making. to those watching
fixed that for you

Locked