I believe it started with a religiously inspired anti-masturbation craze in the late 19th century though it didn't really catch on until mid 20th century, as something to do for "hygiene.Git Mobile wrote:I'd like to point out for the record that I have a fully functioning and intact, err, battle station.katamari Damassi wrote:He's right. It is bad form to ask someone if they're Jewish. I usually just ask to exam their circumcisions.Git wrote:What the fuck do you expect when you go around asking people if they are Jewish? A fucking bagel?welch wrote:
He already godwin'd. He even did it in pink. I have to admit, I'd never seen Godwin in Pink. It's no Rhapsody in Blue, but still, points for original.
Also, wtf is it with North Americans and the whole widespread circumcision thing they have going there?
Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
-
- .
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:32 am
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Didn't PZ announce that Slymepitters are all pre-banned? Think he might have called it the 'LYMEPIT' rule or some such...Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:The posts were:AndTestI think I'm being too controversial right now...Testing again
-
- .
- Posts: 6658
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
- Location: Middlesbrough
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Hi all.
Has anybody discussed the situation in Israel/Palestine lately?
Has anybody discussed the situation in Israel/Palestine lately?
Re: ophelia pain
LOL - Wind wouldn't feel quite so welcome if she/he knew what we were saying about him/her on the Slymepit secret forum.Dick Strawkins wrote: Yes, it's Ophelia Benson, who blogs at Butterflies and Wheels.
You are the famous 'wind', of A+ secret forum fame?
Welcome to the Slymepit!
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
We work in shifts. This is a 24 hour program.incognito wrote:Oooohhh...I was thinking "Wow, there sure are a lot of fellow insomniacs around here!"
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Smash the Patri-starchy!Yet, when people blame foods that made them fat, the meat gets all the blame and all carbs walk away scot-free. Super Size Me is a great example of this, but we can only assume what he ate during that month because he refuses to share that information.
-
- .
- Posts: 5859
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
It's the pastry-archy!cunt wrote:Smash the Patri-starchy!Yet, when people blame foods that made them fat, the meat gets all the blame and all carbs walk away scot-free. Super Size Me is a great example of this, but we can only assume what he ate during that month because he refuses to share that information.
Re: ophelia pain
Yeah. I can see now part of why y'all have a hate-on for the FTB crowd. I've never really even lurked there.Dick Strawkins wrote:Yes, it's Ophelia Benson, who blogs at Butterflies and Wheels.incognito wrote:Is this from FTBs?Apples wrote:On Ophie's "Writing to be Understood" thread from the other day, the comments continued into this morning. Coelsblog carried on a scrupulously polite back-and-forth with Ophelia, even while being snarked at by other commenters.
From his last comment:
coelsblog wrote:Anyhow, realising that arguing for a dissenting point of view on FTB usually just inflames people (which is not my intent, and as I said I’d not really intended getting into things this far) I’ll try not to inflame further. I’ll read any replies to me, but will try not to comment further unless people directly ask me to. (Though, as RagingBee has noted, I'm "drawn to it, day after agonizing day, by a dark compulsion he can neither explain nor resist…'' :-))
Lastly, I reiterate that I don’t regard anyone on FTB (bloggers or commentariat) as my enemy; if people want to regard me as their enemy then ok but I refuse to reciprocate. There is sexism in society and you are going a laudable and necessary task in challenging it.Ophelia Benson wrote:coelsblog –
That is bullshit. You just outed yourself. Goodbye.Anyhow, realising that arguing for a dissenting point of view on FTB usually just inflames peoplehttp://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... nderstood/Mao Tse Tung wrote:Conscientious practice of self-criticism is still another hallmark distinguishing our Party from all other political parties.
http://www.freezepage.com/1359579167HPLICGHXVE
(noob here, A+ defector [wind], ignorant of the FTB issues.)
You are the famous 'wind', of A+ secret forum fame?
Welcome to the Slymepit!
Re: ophelia pain
Yes - see link above. From comments in Ophelia Benson's blog, Butterflies & Wheels (or Butterlies & Squeals, as it is sometimes called). I added the Mao quote for lulz - it wasn't an actual blog comment. Also - wind? For realz? If so, you should know you're kind of a famous martyr over here.incognito wrote: http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... nderstood/
http://www.freezepage.com/1359579167HPLICGHXVE
Is this from FTBs?
(noob here, A+ defector (wind), ignorant of the FTB issues.)
http://1x57.com/wp-content/uploads/2011 ... e-tank.jpg
-
- .
- Posts: 1127
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:05 pm
- Location: Florida, US of A
- Contact:
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
@ Zen (1801)
Thanks Zen.
@ incognito:
Wow, a celebrity. Welcome.
Thanks Zen.
@ incognito:
Wow, a celebrity. Welcome.
Re: ophelia pain
SCREW YOU GUYS I"M GOIN HOME!Tigzy wrote:LOL - Wind wouldn't feel quite so welcome if she/he knew what we were saying about him/her on the Slymepit secret forum.Dick Strawkins wrote: Yes, it's Ophelia Benson, who blogs at Butterflies and Wheels.
You are the famous 'wind', of A+ secret forum fame?
Welcome to the Slymepit!
-
- .
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:43 pm
Re: ophelia pain
incognito wrote: Yeah. I can see now part of why y'all have a hate-on for the FTB crowd. I've never really even lurked there.
Wait, what? Isn't FtB required reading to be part of A+ ?????
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Mykeru - we need a cow gif about now.Philip of Tealand wrote:Now come on, comparing him to a moaning cow is an insult to moaning cows!Pitchguest wrote:No you hang up! :lol:Philip of Tealand wrote:Ok, I'm an idiot, I have not learned my lesson at all and I've only got myself to blame
http://teafueledmadness.blogspot.co.uk/ ... n-you.html
Why oh why did I not just remember that attempting to engage a Pharyngula poster in a discussion as to whether or not the Tweet "Pro tip: if you are European, I don't give a good flying fuck how not racist you think you and your history are" was really saying what I thought it did is just utterly futile?
Hey ho, you can read the whole exchange on my Twitter feed should you want to laugh at how idiotic I am and how angry Crommunist actually is
https://twitter.com/AssamTii
I am a stupid, stupid man and I think I need more Tea!
Crommunist is a moaning cow.
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Entirely carbitrary.Dick Strawkins wrote:It's the pastry-archy!cunt wrote:Smash the Patri-starchy!Yet, when people blame foods that made them fat, the meat gets all the blame and all carbs walk away scot-free. Super Size Me is a great example of this, but we can only assume what he ate during that month because he refuses to share that information.
-
- .
- Posts: 11165
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Wind; Have you seen/heard this yet?
-
- .
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:00 pm
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Yes, it was decided that too much bread in the diet of the region caused both Israeli and Palestinian militants to get violent after their insulin levels spiked. It also didn't help the peace talks that they had to spend 30 minutes first thing in the morning reading Butterflies and Wheels.Tony Parsehole wrote:Hi all.
Has anybody discussed the situation in Israel/Palestine lately?
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
<obligatory superfluous rant> Where's the bloody spoiler button! </obligatory superfluous rant>Lsuoma wrote:If anyone new is wondering about context, the basic story is the Euliwoo, who claims to a be a 12-year-old gird made a stalky, semi-pornographic post her targeted at a blogger on FfTB, then asked for pictures of dicks to be posted.Lsuoma wrote:I've not decided yet. Your long ranty posts worry me. Right now I have little or no confidence you won't post something that will get me into trouble (you are a minor, after all).Eucliwood wrote:Lsuoma,is there anything I can do to get off of moderation? For me, instead of being kicked out of the house, it's like being chained in the basement with special hours for upstairs play time (when you're here to approve my posts).
If so, should I kiss your feet or something?
On a more serious note... if not, then tell me - if there is nothing that can be done by me. I'd have to start looking for some place to replace this place, but it's better to be told upfront than to sit as the months pass by and realize "okay, this is not going to be lifted no matter what I do."
I'll talk to my SIL this weekend, but don't hold your breath.
You took a shit with your clothes on when you threatened us/me with "agents". AFAIAC you still smell.
After people pointed out that this wasn't really suitable, even for the Pit, she claimed to be in contact with "agents" (presumably FBI) who were very child-friendly.
So, she got put on moderation on legal advice from my sister-in-law, who is a criminal trial attorney and also works with Child Protective Services in Washington State.
I don't really believe that she is a 12-year-old girl, but threatening me and the pit was a bridge too far.
I'm still undecided whether to remove moderation status, and at present lean towards not so doing. If I do, though, it will be after taking further legal advice.
Oh, and pissed off a phenomenal number of regulars here - she is blocked as a foe by more than twice as many posters here as the next person.
I beg to differ with your comment, thus:
This was a blatantly obvious attempt to be in the spirit of the pit and take the piss out of those asking for boobs pictures. Equal opportunities, etc.then asked for pictures of dicks to be posted
One would have to be a grumpy old bugger with unresolved issues about being sent to work in Las Vegas to see it any differently.
As for the slash fic? Meh.
-
- .
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:43 pm
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Well, I thought the problem was misogyny, all those people in Israel and Palestine needed to check their privilege, and realise that if they just stopped being part of the patriarchy, there could be peace and happiness for all!16bitheretic wrote:Yes, it was decided that too much bread in the diet of the region caused both Israeli and Palestinian militants to get violent after their insulin levels spiked. It also didn't help the peace talks that they had to spend 30 minutes first thing in the morning reading Butterflies and Wheels.Tony Parsehole wrote:Hi all.
Has anybody discussed the situation in Israel/Palestine lately?
If I had known it was a high-grain diet causing war, then I would have recommended paleo or some other nonsense instead
Re: ophelia pain
Apples wrote:Yes - see link above. From comments in Ophelia Benson's blog, Butterflies & Wheels (or Butterlies & Squeals, as it is sometimes called). I added the Mao quote for lulz - it wasn't an actual blog comment. Also - wind? For realz? If so, you should know you're kind of a famous martyr over here.incognito wrote: http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... nderstood/
http://www.freezepage.com/1359579167HPLICGHXVE
Is this from FTBs?
(noob here, A+ defector (wind), ignorant of the FTB issues.)
http://1x57.com/wp-content/uploads/2011 ... e-tank.jpg
Ha! I wish I could say I did it for the lulz, but those bastards actually made me cry a few times.
Fuckers.
Reading a mod say simply refusing to respond to shitheads like Setar than they're screaming profanities at you is "tone policing" kinda pushed me over the edge. I mean, I can do total anarchy, but it has to go both ways.
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Since Mykeru doesn't seem to be logged in, I'll just leave this here:KiwiInOz wrote:Mykeru - we need a cow gif about now.
http://i1112.photobucket.com/albums/k49 ... bd-285.gif
-
- .
- Posts: 4740
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm
Re: ophelia pain
incognito wrote:Apples wrote:Yes - see link above. From comments in Ophelia Benson's blog, Butterflies & Wheels (or Butterlies & Squeals, as it is sometimes called). I added the Mao quote for lulz - it wasn't an actual blog comment. Also - wind? For realz? If so, you should know you're kind of a famous martyr over here.incognito wrote: http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... nderstood/
http://www.freezepage.com/1359579167HPLICGHXVE
Is this from FTBs?
(noob here, A+ defector (wind), ignorant of the FTB issues.)
http://1x57.com/wp-content/uploads/2011 ... e-tank.jpg
Ha! I wish I could say I did it for the lulz, but those bastards actually made me cry a few times.
Fuckers.
Reading a mod say simply refusing to respond to shitheads like Setar than they're screaming profanities at you is "tone policing" kinda pushed me over the edge. I mean, I can do total anarchy, but it has to go both ways.
My first run-in with radfems made me cry a few times, too. They seem to take a special pleasure in just being plain mean.
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Hello, wind! If you don't mind me asking- how did you originally find your way to A+?incognito wrote:Yeah. I can see now part of why y'all have a hate-on for the FTB crowd. I've never really even lurked there.
I got that impression as well.nippletwister wrote:I'd bet what he DOES hear is something like "well, it's not really the same situation here in Europe, we don't have a KKK, and you can't say racist stuff publicly without getting trouble over it, we haven't had slavery forever, we have better equality laws, etc" or some such like that, and then Crommunist twists a simple comparison into "we don't have racism here, we're Europeans, oooooooohhh".
Re: ophelia pain
Seriously?? A tiny collection of no-mark spunkbubbles on a moribund internet forum made you cry?incognito wrote: Ha! I wish I could say I did it for the lulz, but those bastards actually made me cry a few times.
Fuckers.
That's as funny as fuck. :lol:
Re: ophelia pain
It does appear to be.incognito wrote:Is this from FTBs?Apples wrote:On Ophie's "Writing to be Understood" thread from the other day, the comments continued into this morning. Coelsblog carried on a scrupulously polite back-and-forth with Ophelia, even while being snarked at by other commenters.
....
http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... nderstood/
http://www.freezepage.com/1359579167HPLICGHXVE
(noob here, A+ defector [wind], ignorant of the FTB issues.)
So you are wind from A+. My goodness! That was certainly an interesting exchange you had with the mods about their secret forum(s).
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 2669
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:05 pm
- Location: New Westminster, BC, Canada
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
incognito, for a somewhat more detailed explanation of the reason for the existence of the Slymepit, go here: http://phawrongula.wikia.com/wiki/Phawrongula_Wiki
It details and highlights a great deal of the fundmental hypocrisy and dishonesty of FfTB, Skepchick.org, and the A+ fiasco. It is that hypocrisy and deceit that, for the most part, drives the Pit.
It details and highlights a great deal of the fundmental hypocrisy and dishonesty of FfTB, Skepchick.org, and the A+ fiasco. It is that hypocrisy and deceit that, for the most part, drives the Pit.
-
- .
- Posts: 1832
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:48 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
A call for civil discussion, an end to the in-fighting?
http://skepticink.com/justinvacula/2013 ... iscussion/
From the post:
Lee Moore of the A-News Podcast has invited me to participate in a series of talks which aim to put a stop to the current in-fighting in the atheist/skeptic community. He writes, “…I am calling for representatives from both camps in these blog wars to sit down with me in what may be the first of many live and public google hangouts to discuss grievances and come back to the world of civil discussion and cooperation.â€
It would be nice to step back from the ‘atheist/skeptic in-fighting,’ wouldn’t it?
Would others be willing not only to participate in a series of talks, but also to put a stop to the in-fighting?
Unfortunately, positions similar to mine pertaining to issues relating to the ‘in-fighting’ are not optimistic. Diplomacy has been attempted on several occasions and has only resulted in misrepresentation, character attacks, and more smearing; the rhetoric ‘dials up’ and the character attacks continue.
Can there be a change in discourse?
From the post:
Lee Moore of the A-News Podcast has invited me to participate in a series of talks which aim to put a stop to the current in-fighting in the atheist/skeptic community. He writes, “…I am calling for representatives from both camps in these blog wars to sit down with me in what may be the first of many live and public google hangouts to discuss grievances and come back to the world of civil discussion and cooperation.â€
It would be nice to step back from the ‘atheist/skeptic in-fighting,’ wouldn’t it?
Would others be willing not only to participate in a series of talks, but also to put a stop to the in-fighting?
Unfortunately, positions similar to mine pertaining to issues relating to the ‘in-fighting’ are not optimistic. Diplomacy has been attempted on several occasions and has only resulted in misrepresentation, character attacks, and more smearing; the rhetoric ‘dials up’ and the character attacks continue.
Can there be a change in discourse?
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Metalogic42 wrote:Funny how we get equally worked up over Israel/Palestine and bread.
hahaha!
Re: ophelia pain
Well, for what it's worth, you had a lot of people rooting for you. :popcorn:incognito wrote: http://1x57.com/wp-content/uploads/2011 ... e-tank.jpg
Ha! I wish I could say I did it for the lulz, but those bastards actually made me cry a few times.
Fuckers.
Reading a mod say simply refusing to respond to shitheads like Setar than they're screaming profanities at you is "tone policing" kinda pushed me over the edge. I mean, I can do total anarchy, but it has to go both ways.
General consensus seems to be that A+ is one of the least *safe* spaces around, especially with Ceepolk and Flewellyn running amok. As for Setar, in that Capricious Mods thread I was always hoping someone would quote his own post sig to him:
"The system protects itself with indignation against a challenge to the right of deceit in the service of power, and the very idea of subjecting the ideological system to rational inquiry elicits incomprehension or outrage, though it is often masked in other terms." ~ Noam Chomsky, Necessary Illusions
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
I've been a member at the JREF for about 7 years, and remember posting alongside RW and thinking she was funny. Then I ran across the Slate article in Oct 2012 and somehow found my way to A+.windy wrote:Hello, wind! If you don't mind me asking- how did you originally find your way to A+?incognito wrote:Yeah. I can see now part of why y'all have a hate-on for the FTB crowd. I've never really even lurked there.
-
- .
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:00 pm
Re: ophelia pain
As someone who was on the outside of that asylum and watching it as a lurker, the bipolar nature of that place was always puzzling. For a forum that claimed it was so protective of people who had been harmed by the larger society, and tried to claim it was a "safe space", I was always shaking my head at how certain key members like Setar, Ceepolk, Grimalkin and the mod staff could be as abusive as they wanted to anyone they wanted, oftentimes displaying behavior far worse than most other online venues I had ever seen.incognito wrote:Ha! I wish I could say I did it for the lulz, but those bastards actually made me cry a few times.
Fuckers.
Reading a mod say simply refusing to respond to shitheads like Setar than they're screaming profanities at you is "tone policing" kinda pushed me over the edge. I mean, I can do total anarchy, but it has to go both ways.
As for the anarchy bit, I think of this forum as controlled anarchy. I expect that if I say something dumb I'll get called out, and if I am really annoying about it I'll probably get called a name or two or given a suggestion of what to do with myself, but at least I know I have the freedom to respond back, I won't get censored or memory holed, and I've entered into this place knowing that there's probably as many different ideas on single subjects as there is people (The recent Israel/Palestine debate for example).
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
incognito wrote:
Ha! I wish I could say I did it for the lulz, but those bastards actually made me cry a few times.
Fuckers.
Reading a mod say simply refusing to respond to shitheads like Setar than they're screaming profanities at you is "tone policing" kinda pushed me over the edge. I mean, I can do total anarchy, but it has to go both ways.[/quote]
This is one of the main reasons I hate FTB so much. They had the oh so brilliant idea for A+, they went around promoting it, they paraded it as a label that meant they were the "good guys". After that, eh, fuck it. Leave it the hands of a few obvious psychopaths and be on our merry little way. God our farts smell good.
Myers going round the conference scene telling people that this a new movement, a safe space for people to go to deal with issues of marginalization and social justice. In actual fact, he knows nothing and only showed up to pat himself on the back for being there and make a few "Hurrr, those slimepitters will probably say i'm the leader now. HURRR" posts. No, we would never credit any of them with that, it would mean taking responsibility for something, and fucking owning it.
Meanwhile, people with the best of intentions go to A+ and get hurt by it eventually in one way or the other. FTB don't even know, much less give a flying fuck.
-
- .
- Posts: 5859
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm
Re: ophelia pain
I wouldn't describe our attitude towards FTB as hate.incognito wrote: Yeah. I can see now part of why y'all have a hate-on for the FTB crowd. I've never really even lurked there.
For the most part we are just laughing at their desperate hypocrisy and censorial behavior.
They hate us because we document their lies.
We, in the slymepit, are skeptics, and for real skeptics there is nothing worse that a situation where you are banned from asking: "where's the evidence for that?" - a question that's got many of us banned from certain FTB sites.
Re: Now baked by [spoiler]Aliens[/spoiler]
endangered species that isMichael K Gray wrote:Yes.Lapsang Souchong wrote:olive oil <drool> Is there anything better than a bit of French bread dipped in olive oil?
Great sex, for one thing.
Great sex with non-virgin olive oil, in fact.
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
he was an original founder of DragonCon. He's not just a board member. He owns 37% of the business now. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_E._Kramercomslave wrote:Even if he was convicted, unless there's a rule in the articles of incorporation for dragoncon that says they can deny him payment, whatever he did doesn't matter. I mean, if I get caught speeding, the companies I hold stock in can't use that as an excuse not to pay me.Metalogic42 wrote:No, this one is actually somewhat legit; however it's been delayed for years because (so I'm told) he's in very poor health. But innocent until proven guilty.sacha wrote:"shareholder who just so happens to be accused of pedophilia"
accused by his estranged wife who wants full custody of the children, or what?
The sticking point for Twatson is that "OMG a pedophile is receiving money from DragonCon!" What she doesn't give a shit about is that he's a shareholder, and that the current directors have been trying really hard to get him out of the system entirely (without destroying the Con at the same time).
Re: A call for civil discussion, an end to the in-fighting?
Are we talking about a two-state solution? What about Jerusalem?justinvacula wrote:It would be nice to step back from the ‘atheist/skeptic in-fighting,’ wouldn’t it?
Would others be willing not only to participate in a series of talks, but also to put a stop to the in-fighting?
Unfortunately, positions similar to mine pertaining to issues relating to the ‘in-fighting’ are not optimistic. Diplomacy has been attempted on several occasions and has only resulted in misrepresentation, character attacks, and more smearing; the rhetoric ‘dials up’ and the character attacks continue.
Can there be a change in discourse?
And what do you think of this picture of Ed Brayton building a wall to keep out Thunderf00t, with Reap and Mykeru stuck between the bricks?
http://s1.ibtimes.com/sites/www.ibtimes ... -times.jpg
-
- .
- Posts: 4740
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
So, misandry doesn't exist, right?
http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in ... 00993.html
http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in ... 00993.html
I wonder what Anita Sarkeesian would have to say about this??Apple has a zero-tolerance policy for apps that contain nudity, and they're usually quick to shut down any that promote violence against women. But an app that encourages girls to abuse their significant other is apparently fair game.
Boyfriend Trainer, which is available in both the App Store and the Android market, lets players slap, electrocute, or mace a virtual boyfriend for what most people would call minor transgressions, including drinking their girlfriend’s drink or leaving his shirt on the ground.
"Crack that whip and teach your guy a thing or two about being the Perfect Boyfriend!" reads the game's description. "When scolding doesn’t work, just zap him, whack him and train him to be your ideal man!"
Re: ophelia pain
I went there thinking it was a skeptic forum for lefties. And I'm a skeptic, and a leftie. I'm actually pretty knowledgeable about the whole cornucopia of SJ issues, have done IRL activism, etc.Dick Strawkins wrote:I wouldn't describe our attitude towards FTB as hate.incognito wrote: Yeah. I can see now part of why y'all have a hate-on for the FTB crowd. I've never really even lurked there.
For the most part we are just laughing at their desperate hypocrisy and censorial behavior.
They hate us because we document their lies.
We, in the slymepit, are skeptics, and for real skeptics there is nothing worse that a situation where you are banned from asking: "where's the evidence for that?" - a question that's got many of us banned from certain FTB sites.
What I found at the end of the rainbow was something antithetical to anything even remotely resembling skepticism or even SJ. It's just a weird, toxic little band of about 20 nuts, with a few exceptions. There are a few cool people over there, still, but I have to assume it's just a matter of time before they also log out of the matrix.
-
- .
- Posts: 863
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Welcome! You might remember me from JREF, it's nice to have you here.incognito wrote:I've been a member at the JREF for about 7 years, and remember posting alongside RW and thinking she was funny. Then I ran across the Slate article in Oct 2012 and somehow found my way to A+.windy wrote:Hello, wind! If you don't mind me asking- how did you originally find your way to A+?incognito wrote:Yeah. I can see now part of why y'all have a hate-on for the FTB crowd. I've never really even lurked there.
-
- .
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:00 pm
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Probably the same thing she's said since she got all that Kickstarter money, which is:another lurker wrote:So, misandry doesn't exist, right?
http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in ... 00993.html
I wonder what Anita Sarkeesian would have to say about this??Apple has a zero-tolerance policy for apps that contain nudity, and they're usually quick to shut down any that promote violence against women. But an app that encourages girls to abuse their significant other is apparently fair game.
Boyfriend Trainer, which is available in both the App Store and the Android market, lets players slap, electrocute, or mace a virtual boyfriend for what most people would call minor transgressions, including drinking their girlfriend’s drink or leaving his shirt on the ground.
"Crack that whip and teach your guy a thing or two about being the Perfect Boyfriend!" reads the game's description. "When scolding doesn’t work, just zap him, whack him and train him to be your ideal man!"
...
...
...
...
...
-
- .
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:17 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Git wrote:Well that says quite a lot about you. He provided nothing but the boring whiny pro-fakestinian propaganda that they've been pumping out the last fifty years to try and convince gullible western useful idiots that they should support their would-be-genocide.John Greg wrote:Well, as far as I am concerned, nippletwister owned Git.
Incidentally, whilst one can stop being a religious Jew, one is still a ethnic Jew. Hence Jewish atheists, for example.
And you are still a lying sack of idiot dogshit....please feel free to point out ONE, just ONE thing I said that was pro-anything to do with Palestine or anything on the Islamic agenda.
Please, go right ahead. I fucking dare you, you slimy dick-drip.
I did, in fact, say TWICE that I am pro-Israel, based not on any kind of supremacy, but on their unfortunate current position, surrounded by angry, supremacist religious fascists. I do not expect them to die or give up anything, and I do not blame them for defending themselves at all. I pointed out that I am not particularly sympathetic towards any Islamic society, or their excuses for violence, based in part on their habit of official approval of anti-jewish hatred and general Islamic supremacy. I even pointed out that I do not agree with what I think the cartoonist was trying to say.
But I STILL hold the right to criticize media campaigns and special pleading and accusations of hatred and genocidal tendencies, especially when pointed at westerners who are being accused of anti-semitism and being pro-genocide based on one interpretation of vague imagery, feelings of oppression, jewish "specialness" or (as often happens) basic criticism of Israelis or Israeli policy. I also criticize other victimized minority groups and their often over-the-top claims of victimhood, and their silencing and shaming tactics. Criticizing Al Sharpton or Obama doesn't make me a racist, and criticizing Netanyahu or the ADL doesn't make me an anti-semite.
Please pull your head out of your ass and see the distinction. Or just keep lying about people. Whatever.
Here's something I'll give you, though....I have a lot more respect for Israelis and modern jews than I have for pro-islamist muslims in any country. The jews have really come a long way, and are a good example of how to preserve a heritage without giving in to the temptations of supremacist ideology(even though it is part and parcel of their holy book, like everyone else's). The jews have risen above their beginnings. Muslims have a lot to learn from them, IMO. That said, I couldn't give a rat's ass about jewish tradtions, religion, or respecting their heritage, that's their job...I respect human beings and the real-world principles they can live by, not heritage and ideology. On a practical and humanist level, yarmulkes are just as stupid as praying five times a day, but neither is my problem.
Goddamit to hell. Sorry, Pit, for going there again....but I don't like being lied about when FTB'ers do it, and I don't like being lied about when this idiot shit-fuck does it either.
And Git, because you are a liar, and you bore the fuck out of me, and we're boring the fuck out of everyone else, I will not respond to you any further unless you speak in good faith. No more bullshit accusations, no more hyperbole about being pro-genocide, no more lying about what I say. Respond to what I say or don't respond. Back up your bullshit or leave me alone. If you want to convince me that the artist had genocidal intentions or hates jews, convince me with facts, evidence , logic. A few professional whiners whining doesn't cut it. Acting like jews are the only real victims in history doesn't cut it. Acting like the whole western world hates jews and believes islamic propaganda doesn't cut it. Be real or fuck off.
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Okay, so Peez has a post up about Steven Novella's latest missive. And the sheer WTFukkery about it is quite something to behold.
A few choice excerpts that caught my eye. Now, if you can read this without your jaw dropping, I can only conclude that your gimp mask smells really nice on the inside:
Still, you did say 'leaders of the movement', so I guess it doesn't apply to your tubby ass.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... n-novella/
http://www.freezepage.com/1359585901ODIHADPUUA
A few choice excerpts that caught my eye. Now, if you can read this without your jaw dropping, I can only conclude that your gimp mask smells really nice on the inside:
Well, for a start, we can wonder why he would presume that the bulk of the vitriol directed at Watson is based on anti-feminism, but let's let that pass. Anyways...The real reason skeptics refuse to consider “political, moral, and social†issues to be subject to rational analysis is that there are a great number of ideologically committed people within the movement who react with emotional fury to any attempt to address significant issues that might actually force them to change their minds about something...
...The most prominent example right now is feminism, and I’m sure Steven Novella is fully acquainted with the furious backlash against that, since he regularly works with one of the prime targets of the haters.
Are you taking the fuckin piss, Peez?? Well, maybe you are, considering that the kind of skeptical enquiry which let you to accept that such constructs as the patriarchy and rape-culture exist without question must be something along the lines of what led David Icke to conclude that most of the problems in the world are down to alien lizard rapists who have frat parties in Bohemian Grove.The pretense that skepticism is politically neutral is a commonly promoted lie, an excuse that allows a lot of nonsense to fester unquestioned. There is also no virtue in being neutral in the face of the evidence. These subjects, political positions and the social agenda, are amenable to evidence-based inquiry...
...So no, I’m not saying that all true skeptics have to adhere to my positions in all the things; I’m saying I have no respect for the denial we see in the skeptical movement for skeptical inquiry into questions that make many of the leaders of the movement uncomfortable. Ask the questions. Assess the responses. Don’t run away and pretend it doesn’t fit into your tent. Your ‘tent’ is a process that can be applied to a great many important and humanly relevant concerns, not just Bigfoot.
Still, you did say 'leaders of the movement', so I guess it doesn't apply to your tubby ass.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... n-novella/
http://www.freezepage.com/1359585901ODIHADPUUA
-
- .
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:17 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Dick Strawkins wrote:I've created a new thread for Israel-Palestine discussion here:
http://www.slymepit.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=247
Could we all please agree to confine discussion of that subject to just that thread in future. :pray:
That is all.
Sorry I kept going, I hadn't got there yet.
And really, I never argued anything to do with Israel/Palestine anyway....I was arguing that Git is a lying bastard professional victim asshole, just like some other people we're all familiar with.
And I'm done either way. Apologies.
freedom fries
Hey Phil - I guess you're asleep over there in France, but just so you know, Peezus is showing you some love at Thunderdome:
http://www.freezepage.com/1359586943STJDRTPWAA
http://www.wcreplays.com/forums/image.p ... 1172096807
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... erdome-17/PZ wrote:Now that asshole Phil Giordana is probing, trying to get past the filters to post here. Give it up, jerk: you’re BANNED. That means I don’t want you posting here at all. The same goes for all the other slymers: once you’re banned, you don’t get to comment anywhere here.
http://www.freezepage.com/1359586943STJDRTPWAA
http://www.wcreplays.com/forums/image.p ... 1172096807
-
- .
- Posts: 11165
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
rocko!!! Get in here! Dramatic reading please!nippletwister wrote:Git wrote:Well that says quite a lot about you. He provided nothing but the boring whiny pro-fakestinian propaganda that they've been pumping out the last fifty years to try and convince gullible western useful idiots that they should support their would-be-genocide.John Greg wrote:Well, as far as I am concerned, nippletwister owned Git.
Incidentally, whilst one can stop being a religious Jew, one is still a ethnic Jew. Hence Jewish atheists, for example.
And you are still a lying sack of idiot dogshit....please feel free to point out ONE, just ONE thing I said that was pro-anything to do with Palestine or anything on the Islamic agenda.
Please, go right ahead. I fucking dare you, you slimy dick-drip.
I did, in fact, say TWICE that I am pro-Israel, based not on any kind of supremacy, but on their unfortunate current position, surrounded by angry, supremacist religious fascists. I do not expect them to die or give up anything, and I do not blame them for defending themselves at all. I pointed out that I am not particularly sympathetic towards any Islamic society, or their excuses for violence, based in part on their habit of official approval of anti-jewish hatred and general Islamic supremacy. I even pointed out that I do not agree with what I think the cartoonist was trying to say.
But I STILL hold the right to criticize media campaigns and special pleading and accusations of hatred and genocidal tendencies, especially when pointed at westerners who are being accused of anti-semitism and being pro-genocide based on one interpretation of vague imagery, feelings of oppression, jewish "specialness" or (as often happens) basic criticism of Israelis or Israeli policy. I also criticize other victimized minority groups and their often over-the-top claims of victimhood, and their silencing and shaming tactics. Criticizing Al Sharpton or Obama doesn't make me a racist, and criticizing Netanyahu or the ADL doesn't make me an anti-semite.
Please pull your head out of your ass and see the distinction. Or just keep lying about people. Whatever.
Here's something I'll give you, though....I have a lot more respect for Israelis and modern jews than I have for pro-islamist muslims in any country. The jews have really come a long way, and are a good example of how to preserve a heritage without giving in to the temptations of supremacist ideology(even though it is part and parcel of their holy book, like everyone else's). The jews have risen above their beginnings. Muslims have a lot to learn from them, IMO. That said, I couldn't give a rat's ass about jewish tradtions, religion, or respecting their heritage, that's their job...I respect human beings and the real-world principles they can live by, not heritage and ideology. On a practical and humanist level, yarmulkes are just as stupid as praying five times a day, but neither is my problem.
Goddamit to hell. Sorry, Pit, for going there again....but I don't like being lied about when FTB'ers do it, and I don't like being lied about when this idiot shit-fuck does it either.
And Git, because you are a liar, and you bore the fuck out of me, and we're boring the fuck out of everyone else, I will not respond to you any further unless you speak in good faith. No more bullshit accusations, no more hyperbole about being pro-genocide, no more lying about what I say. Respond to what I say or don't respond. Back up your bullshit or leave me alone. If you want to convince me that the artist had genocidal intentions or hates jews, convince me with facts, evidence , logic. A few professional whiners whining doesn't cut it. Acting like jews are the only real victims in history doesn't cut it. Acting like the whole western world hates jews and believes islamic propaganda doesn't cut it. Be real or fuck off.
Re: freedom fries
Not surprising Myers has turned his back on the Pandas Thumb regulars, since hes turned his back on science.Apples wrote:Hey Phil - I guess you're asleep over there in France, but just so you know, Peezus is showing you some love at Thunderdome:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... erdome-17/PZ wrote:Now that asshole Phil Giordana is probing, trying to get past the filters to post here. Give it up, jerk: you’re BANNED. That means I don’t want you posting here at all. The same goes for all the other slymers: once you’re banned, you don’t get to comment anywhere here.
http://www.freezepage.com/1359586943STJDRTPWAA
http://www.wcreplays.com/forums/image.p ... 1172096807
Re: freedom fries
PZ jumped the shark so long ago that the shark is now hakarl.Apples wrote:Hey Phil - I guess you're asleep over there in France, but just so you know, Peezus is showing you some love at Thunderdome:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... erdome-17/PZ wrote:Now that asshole Phil Giordana is probing, trying to get past the filters to post here. Give it up, jerk: you’re BANNED. That means I don’t want you posting here at all. The same goes for all the other slymers: once you’re banned, you don’t get to comment anywhere here.
http://www.freezepage.com/1359586943STJDRTPWAA
http://www.wcreplays.com/forums/image.p ... 1172096807
Re: freedom fries
http://i.imgur.com/EYwKXN9.jpgERV wrote: Not surprising Myers has turned his back on the Pandas Thumb regulars, since hes turned his back on science.
-
- .
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:17 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Tony Parsehole wrote:Hi all.
Has anybody discussed the situation in Israel/Palestine lately?
Dude, really? You might want to edit that out.....
-
- .
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:32 am
Re: A call for civil discussion, an end to the in-fighting?
It's cute how some people still give the FCn the benefit of the doubt and think it's just a miscommunication somewhere and that it can be worked out with a little diplomacy. Henson, Wachs, Myers, Benson, Watson, Thimbledick, and the Cowntess know exactly what they're doing and have no interest in building bridges.justinvacula wrote:http://skepticink.com/justinvacula/2013 ... iscussion/
From the post:
Lee Moore of the A-News Podcast has invited me to participate in a series of talks which aim to put a stop to the current in-fighting in the atheist/skeptic community. He writes, “…I am calling for representatives from both camps in these blog wars to sit down with me in what may be the first of many live and public google hangouts to discuss grievances and come back to the world of civil discussion and cooperation.â€
It would be nice to step back from the ‘atheist/skeptic in-fighting,’ wouldn’t it?
Would others be willing not only to participate in a series of talks, but also to put a stop to the in-fighting?
Unfortunately, positions similar to mine pertaining to issues relating to the ‘in-fighting’ are not optimistic. Diplomacy has been attempted on several occasions and has only resulted in misrepresentation, character attacks, and more smearing; the rhetoric ‘dials up’ and the character attacks continue.
Can there be a change in discourse?
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Coming soon to the skeptic movement: An overweight 50 something biologist regurgitates the latest political opinion piece he's read, mixed up with a Tim Wise book he's skimmed. Will he further mix it up with Jon Stewart jokes from 2009?
Tickets are $70.
Tickets are $70.
Re: freedom fries
He explicitly allows a 'racist troll' to post there, as opposed to people like Phil, Noel Plum or Edward Gemmer... someone should remind him that "you are judged by the company you keep"!Apples wrote:Hey Phil - I guess you're asleep over there in France, but just so you know, Peezus is showing you some love at Thunderdome:
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
:lol:cunt wrote:Coming soon to the skeptic movement: An overweight 50 something biologist regurgitates the latest political opinion piece he's read, mixed up with a Tim Wise book he's skimmed. Will he further mix it up with Jon Stewart jokes from 2009?
Tickets are $70.
-
- .
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:30 pm
Re: ophelia pain
How did you end up in A+forums then? The idea was spawned out of there.incognito wrote: Yeah. I can see now part of why y'all have a hate-on for the FTB crowd. I've never really even lurked there.
-
- .
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:30 pm
Re: ophelia pain
Ignore that. You already answered. Thanks.Mr Danksworth wrote:How did you end up in A+forums then? The idea was spawned out of there.incognito wrote: Yeah. I can see now part of why y'all have a hate-on for the FTB crowd. I've never really even lurked there.
Re: freedom fries
'Probing'? 'Trying to get past the filters'?Apples wrote:Hey Phil - I guess you're asleep over there in France, but just so you know, Peezus is showing you some love at Thunderdome:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... erdome-17/PZ wrote:Now that asshole Phil Giordana is probing, trying to get past the filters to post here. Give it up, jerk: you’re BANNED. That means I don’t want you posting here at all. The same goes for all the other slymers: once you’re banned, you don’t get to comment anywhere here.
http://www.freezepage.com/1359586943STJDRTPWAA
http://www.wcreplays.com/forums/image.p ... 1172096807
Phil, did you attempt to rape the Thunderdome by asking it for some coffee, or something?
Anyways, despite Peez's narrative, it looked more to me - judging from Phil's earlier post - that he was simply testing Peez's assertion that the Thunderdome is unmoderated...and finding that Peez's assertion is incorrect. Oh well.
I love the idea that Peez thinks people he's banned from his blog are desperately trying to get back in (I mean, hey, what can you expect from such potential rapists, huh??), and that his banhammer is a mighty weapon to be as feared as King Kong's donger. He reminds me of this guy who used to play the same Zynga game as me years ago - I took the piss out of him a bit on FB, and he got his revenge on me...by attacking my Zynga character. I did ask him if I was supposed to be upset by this, so he got even more revengez by attacking my character again.
Fucking bizarre. Funny tho.
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]newbie dick[/spoiler]
In case no one has already done so, allow me...Apples wrote:As someone who was a lurker through the original PToS threads at ERV (desperately seeking refuge and an alternative pov to the suffocating SJW atmosphere), and who tremulously witnessed the fragile beginnings of the 'Pit, congrats and thanks to you and the regulars for keeping the torch lit. It's the undying fleshlight in the darkness of the atheoskeptical moovement.Lsuoma wrote: Actually that's wrong. Abbie shut up shop and I decided to do this independently.
Abbie mentioned it, but it was very slow over here for a while. It began to pick up its own momentum when most of the regulars at ERV decided it wasn't a bad replacement.
http://images.sodahead.com/polls/000261 ... large.jpeg
You're welcome.
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
I agree with Peezus regarding the atheism part - "religious skeptics" and their enablers are idiotic cunts who stifle debate.
However, it is a strawman and a trojan-horse argument he uses to smuggle in his evidence-free brand of feminism.
However, it is a strawman and a trojan-horse argument he uses to smuggle in his evidence-free brand of feminism.
-
- .
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 1:37 pm
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Speaking for myself, I wish the entire middle east and all its cuntitudinous religious fucktardery would do the planet a favour and sink into the sea, and stay fucking gone.
-
- .
- Posts: 2480
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
- Contact:
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Yeah! Like, say, a skeptic sticking to a scientifically bonkers position that wholemeal bread has negative nutritional value!katamari Damassi wrote:I'm just perplexed as to how a skeptic can have such a one sided view that completely lacks nuance.
Some "skeptics" actually do that. You must be perplexed by that barmy notion, I'm sure.
Re: Now sponsored by [spoiler]my dick[/spoiler]
Spoilers.nippletwister wrote:Tony Parsehole wrote:Hi all.
Has anybody discussed the situation in Israel/Palestine lately?
Dude, really? You might want to edit that out.....