Slyme Pit Orgy, Sponsored by Vicky's Bewbs

#301

FARK's rules. Note the part about: Don't encourage others to perform illegal acts.

http://i.imgur.com/x4eEWYm.jpg

http://www.fark.com/farq/posting/

#302

AbsurdWalls wrote:If Vicky's rack has successfully managed to bounce Eucliwood into moderation then they've done more for this forum than I've ever managed to.

:lol: I think we've found our lucky charms.

#303

AbsurdWalls wrote:What happened Vicky?

What did your boobs doooooo~?

[spoiler]They chilled
http://www.picpaste.com/extpics/chillgi ... 2va5qP.jpg[/spoiler]

#304

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... start=1525

Meanwhile, in the Land of Make Believe Social Justice..... Sun Countess is explaining to Wind why Wind is a non-person (because Wind has praised mod policies at JREF). Her refusal to give up her supposed "source" represents (per Cipher) "an immediate risk to the personal safety" of Cipher and the other supersecret A+ fright club munchkins ...

Sun Countess wrote:The JREF has a thread in the Religion & Philosophy forum that is dedicated to bashing Atheism+. It's 66 pages long, and the latest posts there are about you and this thread.

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=242361&page=66

#305

Eucliwood wrote:
cunt wrote:
Neither does yours. She's not breaking the law by asking for dick pics, somebody stupid enough to send them knowing she's 17 and joking might be.
Oh look, it's welch-cunt, standing on the homefront for the law. Lost all respect for the guy. "It's wrong cos the lawwww omg. People on this forum would TOTALLY post dick pictures here where MINORS CAN SEE THEM BECAUSE EUCLISQUICK, WHO IS DISLIKED BY MOST OF THE MALE POPULATION HERE JOKINGLY ASKED AND THAT ALSO USUALLY RESULTS IN PEOPLE GIVING A FUCK AND ARRESTING EVERYONE FOR ALLOWING PICTURES WHERE MINORS GOO... USUALLY PEOPLE TREAT THE FORUM LIKE SOME KIND OF PORN SITE AND INSTILL 18+ LAWS JUST SO PEOPLE CAN POST NSFW PICTURES!" Government boot kissers and patriotards annoy me. They're not the same thing, exacctly, but they have the same flavor.

I expect you guys to see this post like a month from now, where it will be irrelevant. Then, a shitstorm of complaints about "necro posts" will come up, saying it's my fault because I *made* Lsuoma do it.

Someone needs a midol

#306

lol, i'm on your side Eucliwood.

#307

Tony Parsehole wrote:Lsuoma. Maybe the Pit needs an adult content disclaimer?* Just to cover your back.

That's actually a really good idea. And if we already have one, I'll gladly fuck off, as well...

#308

Al Stefanelli wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:Lsuoma. Maybe the Pit needs an adult content disclaimer?* Just to cover your back.
That's actually a really good idea. And if we already have one, I'll gladly fuck off, as well...

I'm not legal expert, but I am an expert in covering my arse. If in doubt, stick a warning or disclaimer on it -- large print where everybody can see it.

#309

For what it's worth, I like Eucliwood. She's cool in my book. A bit too exasperated at times, but she's not a baboon. The moderation is bull.

Somedumbguy, don't be daft. No one gets banned.

#310

I love oolon being all worried we want to get into the SEEKRET forum on a+.

How could it be more entertaining than what's already there.

#311

Pitchguest wrote:For what it's worth, I like Eucliwood. She's cool in my book. A bit too exasperated at times, but she's not a baboon. The moderation is bull.

Somedumbguy, don't be daft. No one gets banned.

I have Eucliwood on ignore and that works for me. I'm a bit worried that she might do some stuff that blows back on the 'pit but I will let more established members worry about that.

#312

welch wrote:I love oolon being all worried we want to get into the SEEKRET forum on a+.

How could it be more entertaining than what's already there.

I also love the fact that somebody hostile to A+ is already in there and they are shitting themselves over who it is.

"WIND! TELL ME YOUR SOURCE!!!!"

HAHA!

#313

Tony Parsehole wrote:
welch wrote:I love oolon being all worried we want to get into the SEEKRET forum on a+.

How could it be more entertaining than what's already there.
I also love the fact that somebody hostile to A+ is already in there and they are shitting themselves over who it is.

"WIND! TELL ME YOUR SOURCE!!!!"
HAHA!

If Wind had any troll-sense at all, she'd reply with: 'It was somebody I was speaking to on a secret forum.'

#314

Pitchguest wrote:For what it's worth, I like Eucliwood. She's cool in my book. A bit too exasperated at times, but she's not a baboon. The moderation is bull.

Somedumbguy, don't be daft. No one gets banned.

Really? I bet that's not true.

I bet if someone here posted CP they would be banned. I bet if someone here posted credit card numbers, they would be banned. I bet if someone here posted graphic images, or spammed others, or harassed or threatened others, they would be banned.

I actually don't know if it's legal or illegal for a minor to ask someone to buy alcohol, or send them porn, but I know it is illegal for adults to do so. And I don't think everyone here understands Eucliwood is a minor.

And I do think Eucliwood has repeatedly demonstrated poor judgment along these lines as well as entering a post that is a pretty coherent, easy to believe, credible threat. (Consider too all the phony DMCA attacks that go on at YouTube and think about the potential threat to the Slymepit should either Eucliwood or someone reading FTB get the notion to accuse the Slymepit of encouraging sending of porn to minors.)

Somedumbguy, don't be daft. No one gets banned.

No one is suggesting banning her for her ideas or her criticism or even her position on the age of majority.

But her behavior needs moderation or banning.

#315

AbsurdWalls wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:For what it's worth, I like Eucliwood. She's cool in my book. A bit too exasperated at times, but she's not a baboon. The moderation is bull.

Somedumbguy, don't be daft. No one gets banned.
I have Eucliwood on ignore and that works for me. I'm a bit worried that she might do some stuff that blows back on the 'pit but I will let more established members worry about that.

I was reading here during the initial uproar, and I thought she was pretty cool too. I like her.

Gotta say, with all the stuff that is posted here, I kinda assumed this website was adult. There sure is adult content here, allowing minors might make it difficult to attract more sponsors. ;)

#316

VickyCaramel wrote:
AbsurdWalls wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:For what it's worth, I like Eucliwood. She's cool in my book. A bit too exasperated at times, but she's not a baboon. The moderation is bull.

Somedumbguy, don't be daft. No one gets banned.
I have Eucliwood on ignore and that works for me. I'm a bit worried that she might do some stuff that blows back on the 'pit but I will let more established members worry about that.
I was reading here during the initial uproar, and I thought she was pretty cool too. I like her.

Gotta say, with all the stuff that is posted here, I kinda assumed this website was adult. There sure is adult content here, allowing minors might make it difficult to attract more sponsors. ;)

Lol. It's adult in the "be one" sense more than the pr0n sense

#317

Trophy wrote:Great. Because of this discussion I spent the last 15 minutes checking out peenus pictures on tumblr.

So, basically just another day at the office, is what you're saying. ;)

#318

Skep tickle wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:
Metalogic42 wrote:@justinvacula:

What is the SIN crowd? A new name for us or something?
ScepticINk

SIN.
DING DING DING DING - I think ^this^ was the 50,000th post

Reap wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:Calling it for the night. (It's actually in the early hours of the morning and I should have gone to bed hours ago.) Catch you all later (looking forward to see who got the 50,000th post - not going to be me, obviously)!
okay we were at 5666 at the beginning of the second thread and it ended at 5619. 5666-5619= 47 if someone wants to correct me..
I get the same thing:
44333 replies in PToS = 44334 posts
5618 replies in PToS-YSS = 5619 posts
44334 + 5619 = 49,953
50,000 - 49.953 = 47

Ok cool! TY I was just waiting for a second. Now even if our math sucks too bad. Pitchguest gets prizes.....

#319

Tigzy wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:
welch wrote:I love oolon being all worried we want to get into the SEEKRET forum on a+.

How could it be more entertaining than what's already there.
I also love the fact that somebody hostile to A+ is already in there and they are shitting themselves over who it is.

"WIND! TELL ME YOUR SOURCE!!!!"
HAHA!
If Wind had any troll-sense at all, she'd reply with: 'It was somebody I was speaking to on a secret forum.'

My troll sense would tell me to say it was Flewellyn.

#320

Tony Parsehole wrote:Lsuoma. Maybe the Pit needs an adult content disclaimer?* Just to cover your back.

*If it has just tell me to fuck off.

It already has an agreement when you sign up not to post illegal material.

I'm not sure how watertight these things are, but one of my sisters-in-law is a criminal trial attorney (and works with Child Protection Services in Pierce County, WA). She looks over this place from time to time, and hasn't seen anything worrying. She'll be taking a look at Teenage Turdbox's posts this PM, but from my brief description on the 'phone she said I'm likely doing the right thing.

#321

Zenspace in post 287 wrote:I'll close my observation with this quote. It is doubly interesting, because in spite of Louis' disclaimer about picking sides, he clearly has picked one and will willfully ignore anything that might penetrate that position. The irony lies within the last three word sentence. No, it's not hard. In fact, the pyt gives you a place for one-stop-shopping to find the truth, with screencaps and shared reports and links to various other sources and references, all of which have been created to point out the deep hypocrisy that lies at the center of FtB.

Thanks for this post. Yeah, I definitely got the sense that he saw himself as the posh 'grownup' who was going to come in here and .... ? I don't know what. Enlighten everyone by explaining that PZ is "only human?" For fuck's sake. Talk about preaching to the converted (with the understatement of the millennium) ...

#322

VickyCaramel wrote: I was reading here during the initial uproar, and I thought she was pretty cool too. I like her.

Gotta say, with all the stuff that is posted here, I kinda assumed this website was adult. There sure is adult content here, allowing minors might make it difficult to attract more sponsors. ;)

I think that she's just an attention whore, and has been wanting to get banned/modded ever since she registered. She constantly makes posts that appear to me to be attempting reactively to push buttons. Well, now she can get a little bit wet about going into (very light) moderation.

She almost provoked me into making a baboon move a couple of weeks back, but thanks to some other posters here I didn't do that.

I submitted this site for consideration by Project Wonderful yesterday, and stated that it's adult but not porn. They may or may not decide to run with it, but it'll stay up as long as I have the shekels and people want it.

#323

Apples wrote:
Zenspace in post 287 wrote:I'll close my observation with this quote. It is doubly interesting, because in spite of Louis' disclaimer about picking sides, he clearly has picked one and will willfully ignore anything that might penetrate that position. The irony lies within the last three word sentence. No, it's not hard. In fact, the pyt gives you a place for one-stop-shopping to find the truth, with screencaps and shared reports and links to various other sources and references, all of which have been created to point out the deep hypocrisy that lies at the center of FtB.
Thanks for this post. Yeah, I definitely got the sense that he saw himself as the posh 'grownup' who was going to come in here and .... ? I don't know what. Enlighten everyone by explaining that PZ is "only human?" For fuck's sake. Talk about preaching to the converted (with the understatement of the millennium) ...

In partial defense of Louis, he is not unique, but part of some Internet phenomena.

If you hangout at /r/mensrights for instance, not a week goes by that 2 or 3 women don't swing by with very similar posts explaining how in the interest of making peace between feminism and mensrights folks they honestly want to understand how men could be so deluded as to not realize feminists are correct.

#324

Lsuoma wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote: I was reading here during the initial uproar, and I thought she was pretty cool too. I like her.

Gotta say, with all the stuff that is posted here, I kinda assumed this website was adult. There sure is adult content here, allowing minors might make it difficult to attract more sponsors. ;)
I think that she's just an attention whore, and has been wanting to get banned/modded ever since she registered. She constantly makes posts that appear to me to be attempting reactively to push buttons. Well, now she can get a little bit wet about going into (very light) moderation.

She almost provoked me into making a baboon move a couple of weeks back, but thanks to some other posters here I didn't do that.

I submitted this site for consideration by Project Wonderful yesterday, and stated that it's adult but not porn. They may or may not decide to run with it, but it'll stay up as long as I have the shekels and people want it.

You are wonderful, you know that right?

#325

Rebecca Watson should look up the meaning of the word â€˜literallyâ€™ in a dictionary. She writes:

And Paula Kirby of RDFUK has spent months defending her point that those of us asking for atheist conferences to be safer spaces for women are literally like Nazis and the Stasi.

http://skepchick.org/2013/01/on-optimism/

This is what Paula Kirby wrote:

For the record, I am categorically NOT suggesting that the people I have applied these terms to are, in fact, Nazis or Stasi members, or would ever have sympathized with either of them.

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B02RDDb ... edit?pli=1

Seems to me that Paula Kirby was defending the exact opposite of what Rebecca Watson claimed. Who should we believe? "Hard to say," to quote the great thinker Greg Laden.

By the way, Rebecca, could you please introduce some space on the left side of your web pages? As it is, the text is crammed to the edge of the browser window, which makes it unpleasant to read (apart from any unpleasantness caused by the contents).

#326

VickyCaramel wrote:
The question is, what if somebody had posted a photo of their dick for the lulz and nobody had asked for the photo?

chris-hansen-j.jpg: (50.95 KiB) Downloaded 167 times

#327

louis wrote:...I'll go and post it over there with full credit, all the disclaimers anything you want. Fair? If PZ bans me, he bans me. He won't, and if it's a good argument, I bet it'll get a good treatment.."

Matt?... Matt Dillahunty? is that you?

louis wrote:..it would have been so much easier than actually being curious.

I knew it! Hi Matt!

#328

VickyCaramel wrote:
Lsuoma wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote: I was reading here during the initial uproar, and I thought she was pretty cool too. I like her.

Gotta say, with all the stuff that is posted here, I kinda assumed this website was adult. There sure is adult content here, allowing minors might make it difficult to attract more sponsors. ;)
I think that she's just an attention whore, and has been wanting to get banned/modded ever since she registered. She constantly makes posts that appear to me to be attempting reactively to push buttons. Well, now she can get a little bit wet about going into (very light) moderation.

She almost provoked me into making a baboon move a couple of weeks back, but thanks to some other posters here I didn't do that.

I submitted this site for consideration by Project Wonderful yesterday, and stated that it's adult but not porn. They may or may not decide to run with it, but it'll stay up as long as I have the shekels and people want it.
You are wonderful, you know that right?

/hug

#329

Trophy wrote:
Apples wrote:Oops - he mentioned Richard Dawkins in a list of allies. Rebecca jumps in to correct him in the first comment:
Rebecca Watson wrote:I guess if youâ€™ve never been called a â€œfeminaziâ€ by Paula Kirby or had your inbox explode with rape threats thanks to Richard Dawkins, RDF wouldnâ€™t look out of place on that list.
Hahaha, that's priceless. The rest of the comments are a winner too.

Some idiot on PZ's blog wrote:
The big viper in the overhead locker is JREF. Technically, theyâ€™re skeptic rather than atheist, but thereâ€™s a huge amount of overlap.

On their website, they list their staff as James Randi, D.J. Grothe, Carrie Poppy, Brian Thompson and Barbara Drescher. Out of those five, Drescher has appeared on Reap Padenâ€™s podcast, where she denounced us as delusional narcissists, and accused us of being the real bullies. Grothe blames the decline of female attendance at TAM as our fault, and is pally on Twitter with many of the haters (as is Drescher). Poppy has resigned in protest. Iâ€™m not sure about Thompson and Randi himself.

The overall picture is fairly good, but JREF is a big stain.
I'm waiting for someone to mention Shermer. It shouldn't take long though.

Yea well I have news for that idiot PZ and the rest of his bobble-heads. David Silverman, DJ Grothe, DPR Jones and all the original founding members of Secular Woman have been on my show too. The show with the founders of Secular Woman was a special podcast I did to launch the organization. They asked me to do it and I gladly did so. I also was part of an event in support of Ellenbeth Wachs after she had all the trouble with the cops in Florida. Ellenbeth has since removed me from her facebook without a word, real classy. Your welcome Ellenbeth glad other people's made-up words speak louder than my real actions. Next time you need support just ask so I can say "Not just no, no fucking way"

#330

Is the Slymepit interested in a logo of some kind?

#331

papillon wrote:
louis wrote:...I'll go and post it over there with full credit, all the disclaimers anything you want. Fair? If PZ bans me, he bans me. He won't, and if it's a good argument, I bet it'll get a good treatment.."

50 Shades Of Oolon.

#332

It's certainly been suggested - somebody offered (I can't remember who), but said they wouldn't be able to get around to it for a couple of weeks.

All offerings are welcome - we could do a poll to choose the winner.

#333

Tony Parsehole wrote:
papillon wrote:
louis wrote:...I'll go and post it over there with full credit, all the disclaimers anything you want. Fair? If PZ bans me, he bans me. He won't, and if it's a good argument, I bet it'll get a good treatment.."

50 Shades Of Oolon.

Now there's a thought to fuck up your day - oolon porn!

#334

teenage whiny is now off moderation.

#335

agarybuseychristmas wrote:Is the Slymepit interested in a logo of some kind?

:hankey: ... tastefully combined with the WCoA, Vicky's Bewbs & chill girl pearl necklace, and ERV's dog.

#336

Lsuoma wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:
papillon wrote:
louis wrote:...I'll go and post it over there with full credit, all the disclaimers anything you want. Fair? If PZ bans me, he bans me. He won't, and if it's a good argument, I bet it'll get a good treatment.."

50 Shades Of Oolon.
Now there's a thought to fuck up your day - oolon porn!

Mental image: Nine stone man in saggy Y-fronts, grey ankle socks and Jesus-sandals frotting himself on The Guardian.

#337

Eucliwood wrote:I'm confused... is this seriously an orgy sponsored by some chick's bewbs? Can someone post dick pictures then?

Did you really just say that? Okay, here.
http://reapsowradio.com/graphics/dunce.jpg

#338

I'm so busy otherwise, that I'm happy to leave the logo project to someone else, provided they are not amateurs. It's like every second incompetent cunt thinks they are a designer.

#339

I get the feeling that even when a certain somebody does turn 18 they will still have the intellectual power of a toddler on a blue pop sugar-rush.
I have to say that judging by the toddler's posts to date I reckon that 18th birthday is about ten years away.

#340

Slympit logo suggestion:
Could you knock up a cross with the arms of the cross of equal length with a section of each arm projecting at right angles from the end of each arm, all in the same direction and clockwise? Just a thought.

#341

Cunning Punt wrote:
justinvacula wrote:http://i.imgur.com/KuKDvfs.jpg
Oh fuck me, somebody give this a dramatic reading please. Something with a bit of Beethoven in the background.

Done. No music though.

k7qiLVXCYMI

#342

d4m10n wrote:Looks like Justin won't be the only male blogger in attendance at WiS2 â€” http://freethoughtblogs.com/lousycanuck ... ecularism/

Nope, still only one male blogger.

#343

Reap wrote:
Trophy wrote:
Apples wrote:Oops - he mentioned Richard Dawkins in a list of allies. Rebecca jumps in to correct him in the first comment:
Rebecca Watson wrote:I guess if youâ€™ve never been called a â€œfeminaziâ€ by Paula Kirby or had your inbox explode with rape threats thanks to Richard Dawkins, RDF wouldnâ€™t look out of place on that list.
Hahaha, that's priceless. The rest of the comments are a winner too.

Some idiot on PZ's blog wrote:
The big viper in the overhead locker is JREF. Technically, theyâ€™re skeptic rather than atheist, but thereâ€™s a huge amount of overlap.

On their website, they list their staff as James Randi, D.J. Grothe, Carrie Poppy, Brian Thompson and Barbara Drescher. Out of those five, Drescher has appeared on Reap Padenâ€™s podcast, where she denounced us as delusional narcissists, and accused us of being the real bullies. Grothe blames the decline of female attendance at TAM as our fault, and is pally on Twitter with many of the haters (as is Drescher). Poppy has resigned in protest. Iâ€™m not sure about Thompson and Randi himself.

The overall picture is fairly good, but JREF is a big stain.
I'm waiting for someone to mention Shermer. It shouldn't take long though.
Yea well I have news for that idiot PZ and the rest of his bobble-heads. David Silverman, DJ Grothe, DPR Jones and all the original founding members of Secular Woman have been on my show too. The show with the founders of Secular Woman was a special podcast I did to launch the organization. They asked me to do it and I gladly did so. I also was part of an event in support of Ellenbeth Wachs after she had all the trouble with the cops in Florida. Ellenbeth has since removed me from her facebook without a word, real classy. Your welcome Ellenbeth glad other people's made-up words speak louder than my real actions. Next time you need support just ask so I can say "Not just no, no fucking way"

I just listened to your podcast for the first time (the episode with Drescher) and I am amazed at how anyone could think you were some sort of boogeyman monster.

#344

Fixed.

[youtube]k7qiLVXCYMI[/youtube]

#345

Tony Parsehole wrote:Slympit logo suggestion:
Could you knock up a cross with the arms of the cross of equal length with a section of each arm projecting at right angles from the end of each arm, all in the same direction and clockwise? Just a thought.

You could put it on an arm band, and maybe a peek cap, and maybe have some semi-naked girls wear this, and then have them wrestling in a slime pit...

#346

VickyCaramel wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:Slympit logo suggestion:
Could you knock up a cross with the arms of the cross of equal length with a section of each arm projecting at right angles from the end of each arm, all in the same direction and clockwise? Just a thought.
You could put it on an arm band, and maybe a peek cap, and maybe have some semi-naked girls wear this, and then have them wrestling in a slime pit...

Fap, fap, fap.

#347

God, that Atheism Plus thread is a thing of beauty.

After Trinioler posts this:

There isn't really gossiping about people [on the super-secret forum]. There is discussion yes, but generally, its about spotting trolls, or when someone is stepping on toes...

There's an immediate response from Exi5tentialist making a 'freedom of information' request to find out what people have been not-gossiping about him. :lol:

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic ... 525#p65022

I would say that it's remarkable that it wasn't obvious to anyone there that a secret, exclusive forum for more 'trustworthy' members is likely to cause trouble when the bulk of your forum consists of embittered narcissists. But then again, the interests of narcissists rarely extend to other people, so perhaps, in a weird kind of way, it was inevitable...

#348

Tony Parsehole wrote:
VickyCaramel wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:Slympit logo suggestion:
Could you knock up a cross with the arms of the cross of equal length with a section of each arm projecting at right angles from the end of each arm, all in the same direction and clockwise? Just a thought.
You could put it on an arm band, and maybe a peek cap, and maybe have some semi-naked girls wear this, and then have them wrestling in a slime pit...
Fap, fap, fap.

You're thinking of Helga again, aren't you.

#349

My idea would be to utilise 3D and particle systems to generate vast amounts of oozing slime.

Here's something similar I did for another group with smoke and fire instead of slime. This isn't photoshopped, they're actual simulated fluids interacting with the letters.

http://s7.postimage.org/cc2jn7gq3/93bis.png

The downside is that this 3d stuff, unless vectorialised, doesn't work well for t-shirt and such. So, a second dedicated version would be needed. Hence the need for time and careful planning.

#350

http://www.moviepicturedb.com/pictures/ ... c83669.jpg

(Not as nice as Vicky's, though I doubt we'll see those in all their glory :-()

#351

@Tigzy. I got the impression that the only reason "Wind" was pissed off with the secret forum was because she has 800+ posts and was never invited into it.
I'd bet if she was allowed to join she'd be lying her arse off just as much as everybody else.

#352

VickyCaramel wrote:
AbsurdWalls wrote:What happened Vicky?

What did your boobs doooooo~?
[spoiler]They chilled
http://www.picpaste.com/extpics/chillgi ... 2va5qP.jpg[/spoiler]

This link has absolutely nothing to do with anything. Honestly.
http://en.rocketnews24.com/2013/01/20/t ... %e3%80%91/

#353

Tony Parsehole wrote:Slympit logo suggestion:
Could you knock up a cross with the arms of the cross of equal length with a section of each arm projecting at right angles from the end of each arm, all in the same direction and clockwise? Just a thought.

:lol:

#354

I want the dramatic reading in the style of something like this:

http://baumanletters.ytmnd.com/

#355

Lsuoma wrote:http://www.moviepicturedb.com/pictures/ ... c83669.jpg

(Not as nice as Vicky's, though I doubt we'll see those in all their glory :-()

Well, that didn't last long. They seem to have a link detector.

Try this:

http://slymepit.com/staticimgs/ilsa.jpg

#356

Lsuoma wrote:http://www.moviepicturedb.com/pictures/ ... c83669.jpg

(Not as nice as Vicky's, though I doubt we'll see those in all their glory :-()

Are you trying to get me to say "Challenge accepted"?

#357

LSuoma, you would enjoy Iron Sky.

#358

RE: Peezee's post about the ills of Scientology.

I guess he didn't get the memo from Ed about not pissing off the advertisers, then.

#359

Tony Parsehole wrote:Speaking of dramatic readings does anybody have the link or the screenshot of Simpleflower's "Hug Gate" flounce post on A+? I think I could muster up a dramatic Youtube reading of that.

Tony, Slymepit member Candyguitar had the good foresight to preserve that thread for us:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8166544/aplus_hugs.zip

I would love to see a dramatic reading of that episode with two or three actors. :dance:

#360

VickyCaramel wrote:
Lsuoma wrote:http://www.moviepicturedb.com/pictures/ ... c83669.jpg

(Not as nice as Vicky's, though I doubt we'll see those in all their glory :-()
Are you trying to get me to say "Challenge accepted"?

The DOM in me says...
[spoiler]...maybe.[/spoiler]