The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

Old subthreads
Locked
comslave
.
.
Posts: 389
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:30 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3721

Post by comslave »

16bitheretic wrote:
decius wrote: If Peezus and some gamers don't like the genre, they can as well stay the fuck out and stop attributing magic properties to a subject, once it breaks out the screen and it is turned into a three-dimensional object, which is substantial identical to its virtual counterparts.
I'm not necessarily keen on taking PZ's side on that statue, but I will say that I can't imagine anyone with any taste whatsoever having that. The thing has been nearly universally ridiculed or responded to with a "WTF is this shit?" style response on every gaming site/blog I've seen mention and show it. Just to draw a comparison, I myself loved the movie Devil's Rejects, and laughed quite hard when the woman wearing the mask made of her husband's face got pancaked across the road by the semi, but I don't think I'd want a replica of the scene sitting as a decoration in my house. That'd be a total "WTF?"

The general response I've seen to this Dead Island thing leads me to believe they'll rethink selling that statue with the game rather soon.

Games are slight variations on the theme of pornography. They are indulgence in fantasy. Just be thankful they don't sell any of the japanese Battle Raper series over here (although you could probably get it at jlist.com).

ReneeHendricks
.
.
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:48 am
Location: Kent, WA
Contact:

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3722

Post by ReneeHendricks »

OH man! I'm sitting here squirming in my seat wishing I could say something on Reap's podcast right now!!!!

BarnOwl
.
.
Posts: 3311
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:18 pm
Location: The wrong trouser of Time

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3723

Post by BarnOwl »

Zenspace wrote:
d4m10n wrote:I'll also buy you one of these nifty shirts to wear around, if you like.
Holy crap!!! There is actually real Mykeru swag!?!?!

Oh, baby, my heart be still! I need one of those t-shirts. I know a place where it would cause, um, serious discomfort. :whistle:
Did you see the starburst stickers? I'm going to order a couple later tonight. I'll take a photo after I put one on my car.

They look great, Mykeru!

mutleyeng
.
.
Posts: 333
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:32 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3724

Post by mutleyeng »

Pitchguest wrote:You need to enable the chat, Reap!
its all too highbrow for me

comslave
.
.
Posts: 389
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:30 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3725

Post by comslave »

Mykeru wrote:
Jan Steen wrote:Is Ophelia Benson memory-holing comments again? I see responses to comments that are no longer there.

She really loves banning and purging, doesn't she? Pressing that delete button must give her an adrenaline kick.

What a sad, small-minded person.
Ophelia Benson is a (pick one)

A. [spoiler]Cunt[/spoiler]

B. [spoiler]Cunt[/spoiler]

C. [spoiler]Cunt[/spoiler]

Answer
[spoiler]All of the above.[/spoiler]

Seriously, I barely pay attention to the comments on my Youtube channel, I certainly to censor them. I haven't seen such fear of the written word outside the creationists.

comslave
.
.
Posts: 389
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:30 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3726

Post by comslave »

fuck me and my inability to proofread my own comments before I post them.

Cunning Punt
.
.
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:50 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3727

Post by Cunning Punt »

Mzone wrote:Hi all,

New to the slymepit and thought I would take your votes on an avatar. I took both of these at the zoo.
[spoiler]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t12/ ... d95225.jpg

or

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t12/ ... 447ff9.jpg[/spoiler]
I am kinda partial to the second one, but the eyes of the first just draw me in. Let me know what you think.

Mzone
Welcome.

I pick number 2 because it reminds me of an old Italian guy playing checkers at the park.

"Eh! Stop-a lookin atta pretty girls and makea ya move!"

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5543
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3728

Post by Gumby »

Jan Steen wrote:
I’m glad to hear that Shermer is a climate-change denier. It helps me to know that his inability to deal with reality is general.
You must be hearing voices and you know nothing. But it is nice to see how prejudice works in feeble brains.

Another commenter talks about the 'pits "obsessive photoshopping of obscene images of Ophelia, P.Z. et al (well, not Al anymore; he’s over there now)" and the "creation of fake accounts in the name of Ophelia and Rebecca". There is no evidence that the latter was done by 'pitters, and as far as I can remember, I have never seen 'obscene images' of Ophelia or PZ here.

OB's blog is a cesspool of lies.
Yet another example of these fuckers shamelessly twisting absolutely everything in order to smear their critics. "Shermer was skeptical of anthropogenic climate change years ago" becomes "Shermer is a climate-change denier". Pah.

Since Ophie dislikes "obscene" photoshopping, maybe she should cut out the obscene mental photoshopping of what she reads. Absolutely nothing that anyone who disagrees with her writes about comes out looking like it was originally penned after Benson gets her lying claws on it.

comslave
.
.
Posts: 389
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:30 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3729

Post by comslave »

Opinion:
I strongly suspect if the Slymepitters held a convention, we may not get greater numbers, but we'd probably get a greater percentage of women simply because the women here don't seem to be scared shitless of men.

Select:
1. Agree
2. Disagree

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5543
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3730

Post by Gumby »

KiwiInOz wrote: tl;dr

"Fuck you, welch" is an acceptable response.

"... and the camel you came in on" is also an acceptable appellation.
As is "...and the camel you came in".

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5543
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3731

Post by Gumby »

acathode wrote:
16bitheretic wrote:They are really stretching now to try and find some nail to hit him with.
They know that they don't need to really "nail" him with anything that's actually true, all they need to do is to invent, lie and misrepresent him over and over and over again, until some of the shit they are throwing sticks. Just keep at it, and it will go the same way as the mono-pod man, which is still being used as a example of harassment at cons, even though it's conclusively been proven a false accusation.

It's a pure smear campaign.
Yep. This is the most torn and worn page in the FTB playbook. All we have to do is keep pointing it out - here, on Twitter, etc.

d4m10n
.
.
Posts: 1526
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:17 am
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3732

Post by d4m10n »

"Feminisim is like Baskin Robbins, man, there's so many flavours." - Al Stefanelli

Zenspace
.
.
Posts: 923
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:13 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3733

Post by Zenspace »

nippletwister wrote:
Zenspace wrote:
d4m10n wrote:I'll also buy you one of these nifty shirts to wear around, if you like.
Holy crap!!! There is actually real Mykeru swag!?!?!

Oh, baby, my heart be still! I need one of those t-shirts. I know a place where it would cause, um, serious discomfort. :whistle:

The back seat of a Volkswagon?
Ha! Actually, now that I think of it, that would have been true about 40 years ago. :D

Lurkion
.
.
Posts: 707
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 8:56 pm

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3734

Post by Lurkion »

clownshoe wrote:
rocko2466 wrote:I'll just leave this here:

http://www.news.com.au/money/money-matt ... 6553922045

I told you patriarchy hurts everyone.
:lol:
The word 'sexist' is in quotes because you totes can't be sexist against men.
OI! When's your podcast coming out? I've been waiting!

And you totes can't be sexist against men because ALL men are richer and more powerful than ALL women and you can't be sexist against an oppressor. It's science! (Also, math!)

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3735

Post by Mykeru »

Zenspace wrote:
d4m10n wrote:I'll also buy you one of these nifty shirts to wear around, if you like.
Holy crap!!! There is actually real Mykeru swag!?!?!

Oh, baby, my heart be still! I need one of those t-shirts. I know a place where it would cause, um, serious discomfort. :whistle:

DOXX!

Karmakin
.
.
Posts: 1437
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 6:49 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3736

Post by Karmakin »

I just tuned in to the ReapSow Radio thing with Oolon.

Holy crap he reminds me of Karl Pilkington.

Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3737

Post by Pitchguest »

The Prune has a new post up called "Paging Orac" where she intends to mock Shermer. The funny thing is it's missing the mark, and it's telling us that Ophelia still doesn't think she compared TAM to Nazi Germany. Just for reference, let's see that quote one more time.
As Jews in Germany circa 1936 might have created “a climate where Jews — who otherwise wouldn’t — end up feeling unwelcome and unsafe.” As the Southern Poverty Law Center creates a climate where people who are the object of systematic vocal hatred end up feeling unwelcome and unsafe. That’s not to compare TAM with Nazi Germany or racist pockets of the US, of course, but then Rebecca didn’t name TAM in the item DJ quoted, either; she (or rather USA Today, indirectly quoting her) said “the freethought community.”
Wow. Not comparing TAM to Nazi Germany sure does look a lot like comparing TAM to Nazi Germany. Then, what's even more amusing is the way Ophelia attempted to hide this piece of libel by claiming it was said by people on "the other side."

http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... i-germany/

[spoiler]
I sent Travis Roy a message on Facebook. (He’s not a friend, but you can send messages to people who aren’t friends. That’s convenient sometimes.) He’s the guy who announced on that “Great Penis Debate” that I compared TAM to Nazi Germany, which is not true. I asked him where he got that piece of misinformation.
The only place I’ve seen it via Google is on a stupid wiki set up by ERV people (and places they’ve dropped it lately, such as Ask an Atheist). I’m curious about how much success they’re having in spreading malicious falsehoods.
Maybe for my TAM talk I’ll just say “I did not compare TAM to Nazi Germany” as many times as I can in the time allotted.
[/spoiler]

But was it?

Of course not.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/butterflies ... -explains/

Following the Ophelia model of writing blog posts (thank you, Richard Reed), a few paragraphs down the line and ... again ...
As Jews in Germany circa 1936 might have created “a climate where Jews — who otherwise wouldn’t — end up feeling unwelcome and unsafe.” As the Southern Poverty Law Center creates a climate where people who are the object of systematic vocal hatred end up feeling unwelcome and unsafe. That’s not to compare TAM with Nazi Germany or racist pockets of the US, of course, but then Rebecca didn’t name TAM in the item DJ quoted, either; she (or rather USA Today, indirectly quoting her) said “the freethought community.”
In summary: I'm sick of your disingenuous, bullshit tactics, Ophelia, and I wish you'd stop being such a humongous (and I don't normally use this word) cunt.

Zenspace
.
.
Posts: 923
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:13 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3738

Post by Zenspace »

BarnOwl wrote:
Zenspace wrote:
d4m10n wrote:I'll also buy you one of these nifty shirts to wear around, if you like.
Holy crap!!! There is actually real Mykeru swag!?!?!

Oh, baby, my heart be still! I need one of those t-shirts. I know a place where it would cause, um, serious discomfort. :whistle:
Did you see the starburst stickers? I'm going to order a couple later tonight. I'll take a photo after I put one on my car.

They look great, Mykeru!
Yup. They would be great on the vehicle. I'll order some with the shirt! :dance:

The shirts need to be made available in black, though!

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3739

Post by Lsuoma »

Very painful listen.

pandora
.
.
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 4:45 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3740

Post by pandora »

comslave wrote:Opinion:
I strongly suspect if the Slymepitters held a convention, we may not get greater numbers, but we'd probably get a greater percentage of women simply because the women here don't seem to be scared shitless of men.

Select:
1. Agree
2. Disagree
Well, I for one believe in the radical notion that men are people, so yes.

Dilurk
.
.
Posts: 1215
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 pm

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3741

Post by Dilurk »

Lsuoma wrote:Very painful listen.
It is

Zenspace
.
.
Posts: 923
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:13 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3742

Post by Zenspace »

Mykeru wrote:
Zenspace wrote:
d4m10n wrote:I'll also buy you one of these nifty shirts to wear around, if you like.
Holy crap!!! There is actually real Mykeru swag!?!?!

Oh, baby, my heart be still! I need one of those t-shirts. I know a place where it would cause, um, serious discomfort. :whistle:

DOXX!
Uh huh, uh huh! While I am quite serious and WILL do it, unfortunately I won't expound on it - it will have to be a 'you had to be there' experience until I finally get away from the day job. Too risky with those doxxing maroons out there. After that, I won't give two shits as
I'll be self employed and immune.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3743

Post by Lsuoma »

So, Reap: can we get Eucliowoo next?

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3744

Post by Mykeru »

Zenspace wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:
Zenspace wrote:
d4m10n wrote:I'll also buy you one of these nifty shirts to wear around, if you like.
Holy crap!!! There is actually real Mykeru swag!?!?!

Oh, baby, my heart be still! I need one of those t-shirts. I know a place where it would cause, um, serious discomfort. :whistle:
Did you see the starburst stickers? I'm going to order a couple later tonight. I'll take a photo after I put one on my car.

They look great, Mykeru!
Yup. They would be great on the vehicle. I'll order some with the shirt! :dance:

The shirts need to be made available in black, though!

The problem there is they reference the .com. It's Cafe Press stuff from 2005.

d4m10n
.
.
Posts: 1526
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:17 am
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3745

Post by d4m10n »

Mykeru wrote:
Zenspace wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:
Zenspace wrote:
d4m10n wrote:I'll also buy you one of these nifty shirts to wear around, if you like.
Holy crap!!! There is actually real Mykeru swag!?!?!

Oh, baby, my heart be still! I need one of those t-shirts. I know a place where it would cause, um, serious discomfort. :whistle:
Did you see the starburst stickers? I'm going to order a couple later tonight. I'll take a photo after I put one on my car.

They look great, Mykeru!
Yup. They would be great on the vehicle. I'll order some with the shirt! :dance:

The shirts need to be made available in black, though!

The problem there is they reference the .com. It's Cafe Press stuff from 2005.
Oh, um... sorry?

Just needed something to put on Justin V. so that everyone can more easily recognize him at the Women in Secularism conference.

Hey, Lsuoma, will there ever be SlymePit swag?

Zenspace
.
.
Posts: 923
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:13 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3746

Post by Zenspace »

Mykeru wrote:
Zenspace wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:
Zenspace wrote:
d4m10n wrote:I'll also buy you one of these nifty shirts to wear around, if you like.
Holy crap!!! There is actually real Mykeru swag!?!?!

Oh, baby, my heart be still! I need one of those t-shirts. I know a place where it would cause, um, serious discomfort. :whistle:
Did you see the starburst stickers? I'm going to order a couple later tonight. I'll take a photo after I put one on my car.

They look great, Mykeru!
Yup. They would be great on the vehicle. I'll order some with the shirt! :dance:

The shirts need to be made available in black, though!
Ah. Not an issue really. I would get them for myself. It is just cool artwork. I don't see the people who would recognize it that often, so it really is just for my own satisfaction. Well, that and as a reminder of my new favorite watering hole - the Pyt!


The problem there is they reference the .com. It's Cafe Press stuff from 2005.

Reap
.
.
Posts: 630
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:27 pm
Location: Reno Nevada
Contact:

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3747

Post by Reap »

Lsuoma wrote:So, Reap: can we get Eucliowoo next?
Sure why not? Can we wait for my IQ to recover from this last conversation?

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3748

Post by Lsuoma »

d4m10n wrote: Oh, um... sorry?

Just needed something to put on Justin V. so that everyone can more easily recognize him at the Women in Secularism conference.

Hey, Lsuoma, will there ever be SlymePit swag?
Gimme grafix - I don't do grafix.

ReneeHendricks
.
.
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:48 am
Location: Kent, WA
Contact:

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3749

Post by ReneeHendricks »

Reap wrote:
Lsuoma wrote:So, Reap: can we get Eucliowoo next?
Sure why not? Can we wait for my IQ to recover from this last conversation?
LOL This last podcast was...um, illuminating I suppose is the word I'm thinking of.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3750

Post by Lsuoma »

Reap wrote:
Lsuoma wrote:So, Reap: can we get Eucliowoo next?
Sure why not? Can we wait for my IQ to recover from this last conversation?
Sounds good to me, but don't let s/h/it go all porny on you.

I loved the way colon used his Brit posture as an excuse to repeatedly deliberately misunderstand you, such as close to the end where, when you asked him if he got wet in his pants, he interpreted it to mean having wet himself (pissed his pants, if that phraseology isn't used over hear).

Very disingenuous, very typical, and not at all surprising.

decius
.
.
Posts: 1365
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:08 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3751

Post by decius »

Lsuoma wrote:
d4m10n wrote: Oh, um... sorry?

Just needed something to put on Justin V. so that everyone can more easily recognize him at the Women in Secularism conference.

Hey, Lsuoma, will there ever be SlymePit swag?
Gimme grafix - I don't do grafix.

If you want profi output, then you need to wait a couple of weeks.

masakari2012
.
.
Posts: 334
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:14 pm

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3752

Post by masakari2012 »

Don't know if this was already shared, but here it is anyway...

Michael Shermer
http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.ph ... ermer_33_2

I especially love the part about PZ Myers, lol.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3753

Post by Lsuoma »

decius wrote:
Lsuoma wrote:
d4m10n wrote: Oh, um... sorry?

Just needed something to put on Justin V. so that everyone can more easily recognize him at the Women in Secularism conference.

Hey, Lsuoma, will there ever be SlymePit swag?
Gimme grafix - I don't do grafix.

If you want profi output, then you need to wait a couple of weeks.
No problem. Anything you can do would be gratefully received...

decius
.
.
Posts: 1365
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:08 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3754

Post by decius »

Lsuoma wrote: No problem. Anything you can do would be gratefully received...
I'll fire the booster and finish what I'm doing, then we talk. If you already have a vision or an idea of sort, just let me know.

d4m10n
.
.
Posts: 1526
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:17 am
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3755

Post by d4m10n »

Lsuoma wrote:
decius wrote:
Lsuoma wrote:
d4m10n wrote: Oh, um... sorry?

Just needed something to put on Justin V. so that everyone can more easily recognize him at the Women in Secularism conference.

Hey, Lsuoma, will there ever be SlymePit swag?
Gimme grafix - I don't do grafix.

If you want profi output, then you need to wait a couple of weeks.
No problem. Anything you can do would be gratefully received...

w00t!

I want a "Stand Down Gentlemen" hoodie.

Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3756

Post by Pitchguest »

I expected the turd to be dishonest, dodge questions, obfuscate, redefine words, etc, but I at least thought he'd be able to keep a cool head under fire. But he couldn't even manage that. Instead of he came off as agitated, extremely snappy and just eager to swipe at whatever Reap, Al or Brian said.

It became painful to listen to when you realise he's not even going to be that decent. Even when the subject of misogyny came up, when you realise that none of the people here at the 'pit have said anything misogynistic or anything that could be considered misogynistic, even in the new redefined version courtesy of Julia Gillard, does he recant and simply attempts to slimily implicate the behaviour of the 'pit as misogynistic. It was just ... meh.

There comes a point when you just quit dealing with turds of that sort. Unless oolon changes the way he operates, it's going to stay that way.

masakari2012
.
.
Posts: 334
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:14 pm

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3757

Post by masakari2012 »

And now I wish I would have followed through with adding the Sam Harris nonsense to the Witch of the Week several months ago. I had it typed out, and then at the last second, I decided not to. I can't remember why. But it's not as if we can't add it anytime we chose.

comslave
.
.
Posts: 389
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:30 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3758

Post by comslave »

masakari2012 wrote:Don't know if this was already shared, but here it is anyway...

Michael Shermer
http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.ph ... ermer_33_2

I especially love the part about PZ Myers, lol.

FTB head explosion in 5...4...3...2...
:popcorn:

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3759

Post by welch »

Mark Neil wrote:
welch wrote:
Mark Neil wrote:
welch wrote:
Mark Neil wrote:Attack the person, not the argument. Check.
I give the arguments exactly the consideration I feel they deserve. Want a better response, be less of a douchecrumpet.
I've read the baboons use that same excuse to avoid discussion as well after being called on their shit flinging. I suppose this is a case of monkey see, monkey do.

Oh bless your heart. Did I hurt your sense of "everything I say requires a serious response, no matter how much of a peckersnot I'm being?". Welcome to the real world, fuckolio. Should you wish to reply to me in a manner less reminiscent of a teenager about to cry because they aren't getting what they want out of life, I'll feel more obliged to stop treating you like one.

But I doubt that will happen, so run along and play. Maybe one of the milkman's smarter children can sign on and the grownups can have a talk whilst you have your paste snack.
Coming from a baby claiming s/he's too good to have a reasonable discussion so s/he'll insult me instead, that's actually pretty funny. But you are playing right out of the baboon playbook. 1. Attack the person rather than the argument. 2. Claim superiority in order to dismiss the argument when called on the ad homs in 1. 3. make accusations of my emotional state when 1 and 2 fail to work. Next we'll see you playing the victim, and flouncing because I'm supposedly not being reasonable. I responded to you. If you didn't like that response, you should have ignored it. But the ad hom and "I'm too good to bother with your response" bullshit is just that, shit. So when you want to stop flinging it like a baboon and respond to what I wrote with something other than attacks, I'll be here. But I suspect you're to full of yourself not to double down at this point.
Pro tip sonny, if you're going to try to shame someone who a) doesn't know you and b) doesn't give a fuck what you think via comparisons to the baboons, using their favorite phrase as part of your attack, aka "double down", kinda ruins the fucking moment.

Fuck, was there anything out of that "best of every cock in the 'hood" collective that describes your momma's uterus that had ANY fucking brains AND made it to adulthood? If so, can that one explain it to you? I don't know you. I don't have to treat you a goddamned iota better than you've earned. Get over it. And if you think you have what it takes to make ME flounce? You are in fact the most preciously stupid excuse for a talking turd I've seen since Mr. Hanky's "special" son, Simon. But if you think you can make me go?

Bring

It

The Fuck

On

Your momma really shoulda stuck to rimjobs. This is what happens when your ego writes checks your skills can't cover.

decius
.
.
Posts: 1365
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:08 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3760

Post by decius »

d4m10n wrote:
w00t!

I want a "Stand Down Gentlemen" hoodie.
Well, that's easy, if it's just text.

aweraw
.
.
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:15 am
Contact:

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3761

Post by aweraw »

In her latest Shermer effigy article, DudeBrophelia says:
It seems to imply that while membership is 50/50, it’s a “guy thing” to speak and argue and get involved and think about these issues. There’s a mass of female members content to just sit in the stands and watch.
Exactly!! Excuse me for shouting, but that’s exactly it. I am SO not content to just sit in the stands and watch, and I know so many other women who are also not.
Puh-LEEZ. You backed out of an opportunity to get up in the mix at TAM, because you percieved peoples shadows to be axe-weilding maniacs.

Why do I tourture myself by reading their comment threads anymore? So full of fail.

d4m10n
.
.
Posts: 1526
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:17 am
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3762

Post by d4m10n »

decius wrote:
d4m10n wrote:
w00t!

I want a "Stand Down Gentlemen" hoodie.
Well, that's easy, if it's just text.
Well, it's a picture on here somewhere.

Dan Dennett says, “There it is again.”
Dawkins replies, “I didn't hear anything.”

Zenspace
.
.
Posts: 923
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:13 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3763

Post by Zenspace »

comslave wrote:
masakari2012 wrote:Don't know if this was already shared, but here it is anyway...

Michael Shermer
http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.ph ... ermer_33_2

I especially love the part about PZ Myers, lol.

FTB head explosion in 5...4...3...2...
:popcorn:
Indeed. That may be the single clearest message I've seen directed towards Myers about where he fits in the greater skeptical scheme of things. Talk about digging a ever deeper fucking whole for yourself. Eeeouwch! :violin:

CommanderTuvok
.
.
Posts: 3744
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3764

Post by CommanderTuvok »

masakari2012 wrote:Don't know if this was already shared, but here it is anyway...

Michael Shermer
http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.ph ... ermer_33_2

I especially love the part about PZ Myers, lol.
Yeah, it's superb. It really rubs Myers' face in faeces. People should go to TAM wearing T-shirts with that message on it. We really do need to get the message through to these fuckers that we are going to defeat them.

BTW, Opheliar is again moaning about how she didn't invoke a Nazi comparison against TAM - instead complaining it was against DJ Grothe!!! Well, that makes everything alright, doesn't it. Ophelia Benson is the biggest cunt at FTB, and there are some might big cunts to beat to that honour.

Also, she has a comment saying that people are allowed to post if they are "adult" about it. That is a lie. Any post that correctly points out Ophelia's mistakes and lies is memory holed. They think we don't notice.

The fucking cunt.

d4m10n
.
.
Posts: 1526
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 5:17 am
Location: OKC
Contact:

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3765

Post by d4m10n »

Found it!
Damn that would be a fine t-shirt. Even better as a lunch-box.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3766

Post by welch »

Shermer's piece is spot-on, and he's remarkably balanced and fair, refusing to take the cheap shots he could have easily used.

No wonder Ophelia et al are so angry.

decius
.
.
Posts: 1365
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:08 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3767

Post by decius »

d4m10n wrote:
decius wrote:
d4m10n wrote:
w00t!

I want a "Stand Down Gentlemen" hoodie.
Well, that's easy, if it's just text.
Well, it's a picture on here somewhere.

Dan Dennett says, “There it is again.”
Dawkins replies, “I didn't hear anything.”
OK, I remember that. It's extremely funny. However raster graphics (photos) don't print well on fabric and you would need high-resolution for anything rising above smudge quality. I doubt that a high-resolution master exists, but you can always ask the guy who did it.

There are some photos that can be traced and, by further drastically reducing the number of colours, you can obtain some to work with on silk-screen prints.

However, the best results are from "simple" vector graphics (illustrations), especially on thick fabric. From there you don't need complex and costly techniques.

Bottom line, what looks good on monitor is generally not fit for print and vice versa.

masakari2012
.
.
Posts: 334
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:14 pm

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3768

Post by masakari2012 »

A video to make Ophelia's head explode...
[youtube]YnPAxnwFZc4[/youtube]

comslave
.
.
Posts: 389
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:30 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3769

Post by comslave »

Zenspace wrote:
comslave wrote:
masakari2012 wrote:Don't know if this was already shared, but here it is anyway...

Michael Shermer
http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.ph ... ermer_33_2

I especially love the part about PZ Myers, lol.

FTB head explosion in 5...4...3...2...
:popcorn:
Indeed. That may be the single clearest message I've seen directed towards Myers about where he fits in the greater skeptical scheme of things. Talk about digging a ever deeper fucking whole for yourself. Eeeouwch! :violin:

Here's the deal though: He's saying they're between 40% to 50% female attendees at these conferences. Given that the american atheist community is only 20-30% female, and less worldwide, WE'RE GETTING TOO MANY WOMEN at these conferences. Who is scaring away all the menz?!

KarlVonMox
.
.
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:44 pm

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3770

Post by KarlVonMox »

Mark Neil wrote:
comslave wrote:
CommanderTuvok wrote: Just for Caine's information, here are the horribly misogynist FTB stats:

http://i.imgur.com/zUaTi.jpg

Oh dear. Isn't evidence a real bummer!

Pretty much ever stat I've seen, including that atheist census that was up recently, show men outnumber women in atheism by a substancial percentage. we're pretty much doomed to accusations of sexism. The only way to win is not to care.

Now excuse me while I try to find an even more sexist Star Trek avatar.
Sometimes I'd love to see the reaction if the tables were turned. Imagine the anger from women (not necessarily feminists) if men started complaining about wedding conventions targeting and largely being populated by women, and claiming men are being discriminated against... then using that anger as "proof" the accusation was true. But I just can't use that kind of logic with a good conscience.
Majority 18-24? Some college? I always knew the FTB commentariat consists mainly of kids.

somedumbguy
.
.
Posts: 379
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:53 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3771

Post by somedumbguy »

I don't know if women can't do "thinky", as Ophelia Benson puts it, but I am pretty sure she can't do thinky.

I read Shermer's new piece, and I read Benson's response, and Shermer compares Benson/A+/PZ/RW/... to

Salem Witch Trials
McCarthyism
Spanish Inquisition
Previous social movement purges, including Objectists

There is no phraseology I can find that compares Benson et. al., to NAZIs.

He does state a lesson he has learned from Pastor Niemoller about the importance of speaking out against oppression targeting others, not yourself. But in the context of the explicit comparisons to Salem/McCarthyism/Spanish Inquisition/Other Social Purges I found above, it is a huge stretch to go from there to claiming he compared them to NAZIs, especially if in doing so they ignore the explicit comparisons.

If Benson had any ability to do thinky and be intellectually honest, she would take on directly the claims of being purged and notice what happens at FTB, the split of A+, the speech of PZ of asshole atheists, the carrier creepiness, the twitter abuse, and so on.

Oh well, another dishonest asshole. Not much new.

Zenspace
.
.
Posts: 923
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:13 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3772

Post by Zenspace »

comslave wrote:
Zenspace wrote:
comslave wrote:
masakari2012 wrote:Don't know if this was already shared, but here it is anyway...

Michael Shermer
http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.ph ... ermer_33_2

I especially love the part about PZ Myers, lol.

FTB head explosion in 5...4...3...2...
:popcorn:
Indeed. That may be the single clearest message I've seen directed towards Myers about where he fits in the greater skeptical scheme of things. Talk about digging a ever deeper fucking whole for yourself. Eeeouwch! :violin:
Here's the deal though: He's saying they're between 40% to 50% female attendees at these conferences. Given that the american atheist community is only 20-30% female, and less worldwide, WE'RE GETTING TOO MANY WOMEN at these conferences. Who is scaring away all the menz?!

I actually had a similar thought when I saw the figures presented, women are over represented at the conferences if we are supposed to be comparing attendance ratios to the atheist/skeptic population as a whole.

franc
.
.
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:03 pm
Location: Kosmopolites
Contact:

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3773

Post by franc »

EdgePenguin wrote:There is nothing that gets a Rad Fem riled quite like pubic hair removal

http://skepchick.org/2013/01/pubic-lice ... g-extinct/
"Like the last time I wrote about it, this story is getting a lot of popular press. However, what is presented is a lot of anecdotal evidence—stories without actual data"

So cute when a Skepchick says something like that. Needs a giggle soundtrack.

aweraw
.
.
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:15 am
Contact:

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3774

Post by aweraw »

Addressing Caine's unwillingness to consider Alexa stats as evidence that more men than women visit FTB:

http://i.imgur.com/5Z7f1.png

Mark Neil
.
.
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 1:39 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3775

Post by Mark Neil »

welch wrote:Blah Blah Blah, Yap Yap Yap, PooPoo PooPoo etc.
If you want to converse like a grown up, you know where my post is, reply to that. Otherwise, I'm not your mother, and I don't have to coddle you while your having a temper tantrum. "Fuck you and the camel you came in".

DownThunder
.
.
Posts: 859
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:10 pm

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3776

Post by DownThunder »

When these same self-described secular feminists went after Sam Harris for a commentary supporting racial profiling in the search for terrorists, again I didn’t speak out. When Harris wrote, “If my daughter one day reads in my obituary that her father ‘was persistently dogged by charges of racism and bigotry,’ unscrupulous people like P.Z. Myers will be to blame,” I thought to myself: “Don’t worry about it, Sam. Your work is for the ages. PZ Myers’s work is for the minutes—the half-life measure of blogs relative to books.”
This phrase is elegant yet hits home the point.What is the bet that we'll be seeing a bunch of random incoherent posts about slymepitter something something MRA something something just so Myers can let off some steam?

rayshul
.
.
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:00 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3777

Post by rayshul »

I quite like the statue, although if we got it (and let's face it, we'll probably get one for free) it might become nightmare fodder for the kid. It looks like a tongue-in-cheek reference to ancient Greek/Roman busts which I've always quite liked. Clever shit. I'd like a bunch of video-game style busts instead of roman ones about the house... although it ISSSSS a bit cheesy.

The more I think about it though the more I like the concept... I love weird fucking art, most of the art I buy are things that make people double-take. I've got some beautiful renaissance inspired pieces of awesome trolling.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3778

Post by Steersman »

aweraw wrote:Addressing Caine's unwillingness to consider Alexa stats as evidence that more men than women visit FTB:

http://i.imgur.com/5Z7f1.png
I don’t know much if anything about Alexa’s methods of collecting stats, but I notice that when I do a mouse-over of the question mark adjacent to the “Gender; Male” line I see “relative to the general internet population, males are overrepresented at FTB”. And similarily with the Female line which says “females are underrepresented”. Whether that is 60-40 or 80-20 or even 30-70 seems to be a moot question. And there's also the question as to how the internet population correlates with the general atheist population.

Although it might yield some interesting results to actually ennumerate all of the commenters at FTB and assign sexes to them based on various statements they’ve made – still doesn’t say much about the lurkers but might still be of some use.

aweraw
.
.
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:15 am
Contact:

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3779

Post by aweraw »

[spoiler]
Steersman wrote:
aweraw wrote:Addressing Caine's unwillingness to consider Alexa stats as evidence that more men than women visit FTB:

http://i.imgur.com/5Z7f1.png
I don’t know much if anything about Alexa’s methods of collecting stats, but I notice that when I do a mouse-over of the question mark adjacent to the “Gender; Male” line I see “relative to the general internet population, males are overrepresented at FTB”. And similarily with the Female line which says “females are underrepresented”. Whether that is 60-40 or 80-20 or even 30-70 seems to be a moot question. And there's also the question as to how the internet population correlates with the general atheist population.

Although it might yield some interesting results to actually ennumerate all of the commenters at FTB and assign sexes to them based on various statements they’ve made – still doesn’t say much about the lurkers but might still be of some use.
[/spoiler]

Not arguing strictly for their accuracy... more that Caine was provided evidence after asking for it, and then dismissed it without any consideration at all, based on flakey reasoning.

comslave
.
.
Posts: 389
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:30 am

Re: The Periodic Table's Younger, Sexier, Sibling Thread...

#3780

Post by comslave »

franc wrote:
EdgePenguin wrote:There is nothing that gets a Rad Fem riled quite like pubic hair removal

http://skepchick.org/2013/01/pubic-lice ... g-extinct/
"Like the last time I wrote about it, this story is getting a lot of popular press. However, what is presented is a lot of anecdotal evidence—stories without actual data"

So cute when a Skepchick says something like that. Needs a giggle soundtrack.
Did somebody try to force a pubic hair removal on her in an elevator? No? Then how is this her business? If a woman wants to get a brazilian, that's her business.

Locked