Periodic Table of Swearing

Old subthreads
JackRayner
.
.
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:27 am
Location: In the basement of the University of Minnesota Morris
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20606

Post by JackRayner »

bhoytony wrote:
decius wrote:
The risk cyclists pose to cars is a few scratches to the paintwork at worst. With increased velocity, volume, mass and momentum comes increased responsibility.
Further, more bicycles on the road entail significant decongestion to traffic, something you car drivers benefit from at no personal cost.
Just visit the Netherlands or Berlin and take a good look around, if you don't believe me.
So if I hit and kill a cyclist who runs a red light, the only damage to me is to my paintwork? How about if I react instinctively to try and avoid him and hit another road user or pedestrian?
As usual you are a whining gobshite.
Yeah. And, call me a fucking bleeding heart, but for some reason I also dislike the idea of inadvertently helping someone kill themselves, no matter how fucking stupid they might have been.

And before any of my statements are taken as a two wheels bad, four wheels good [or vise versa] sort of thing, let me just add that I'm plenty aware that there are idiots on any amount of wheels. I drove professionally for a while, both for the military and as a civilian, on anything from four to eighteen wheels, and I've seen enough to know that humans are the common element...

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20607

Post by Lsuoma »

BTW, I think the first TV-induced stiffy I got was from watching Pan's People doing their dance to "All Right Now" by Free. in schoolgirl uniforms and hockey sticks...

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Fil ... rs-006.jpg

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20608

Post by Lsuoma »

Lsuoma wrote:BTW, I think the first TV-induced stiffy I got was from watching Pan's People Legs and Co doing their dance to "All Right Now" by Free. in schoolgirl uniforms and hockey sticks...
http://www.panspeople.org.uk/wp-content ... ow_th4.jpg

Fixed.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20609

Post by Lsuoma »

And let's not forget that one in Kate's bush was worth two in the hand:

http://www.technodisco.net/img/tracks/k ... inside.jpg

debaser71

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20610

Post by debaser71 »

Dilurk wrote:
cunt wrote:
Mykeru wrote: [youtube]9YUvmvcC-nk[/youtube]
Pure fucking ownage.
It's not just cell phones anymore. I have been rear ended by some clown who chose that moment to start talking to his passenger instead of watching the lights. Any distracted driving in the car is wrong mmm'kay?
Just of note. I teach my kids that distracting the driver is a bad thing. They even teach it in school about the bus and the bus driver. I say this to illustrate that there's a sort of meme out there about "distracted driving" and at least some people take it seriously. I really hope it sticks.

Great video btw. Me, I'm honestly too scared to ride my bike on roads anymore. I wouldn't even feel safe jogging or walking on some roads. Around where I live, even though it's very crowded and the roads are already too narrow, most streets do not even have sidewalks.

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20611

Post by Tigzy »

Kate Bush just used to scare the shit out of me.

In a similar vein, I was too young to appreciate Sally James from Tiswas. I can appreciate her now, though. And fully understand why she so frequently had buckets of water thrown over her:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_lKL9DLKmCpI/S ... _james.jpg

CommanderTuvok
.
.
Posts: 3744
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20612

Post by CommanderTuvok »

Over on Pz Barnum's thread about the Texas event, someone in the comments makes reference about giving PZ a cowboy hat. Now, obviously, cowboys are linked to racism against Native Americans, so obviously that would make PZ racist and imperialist if he wore it!

StyxMaker
.
.
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 8:10 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20613

Post by StyxMaker »

Tigzy wrote:Kate Bush just used to scare the shit out of me.

In a similar vein, I was too young to appreciate Sally James from Tiswas. I can appreciate her now, though. And fully understand why she so frequently had buckets of water thrown over her:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_lKL9DLKmCpI/S ... _james.jpg
It was Anette on the original Mickey Mouse Club show for me. Yeah, I'm old.

Rystefn
.
.
Posts: 635
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:03 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20614

Post by Rystefn »

Steersman wrote:Thanks, although I only see one case of “they” referring to, supposedly, a “one”, but it’s late ….
Shakespeare wrote:FRIAR LAURENCE
Arise; one knocks; good Romeo, hide thyself.

ROMEO
Not I; unless the breath of heartsick groans,
Mist-like, infold me from the search of eyes.

Knocking

FRIAR LAURENCE
Hark, how they knock! Who's there?
Shakespeare wrote:There's not a man I meet but doth salute me
As if I were their well-acquainted friend
Shakespeare]Now leaden slumber with life's strength doth fight; And [b]every one[/b] to rest [b]themselves[/b] betake, Save thieves, and cares, and troubled minds, that wake.[/quote] [quote= wrote:'Tis meet that some more audience than a mother, since nature makes them partial, should o'erhear the speech
[/quote]

Does that help?

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20615

Post by bhoytony »

With all this masturbating over Sally James and Pan's People, I'm pretty sure that the Slymepit is surrounded by an angry mob of baboons preparing to burn it to the ground.
Personally I was more of a Janet Ellis wanker.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20616

Post by cunt »

Hardcore pornography over a 28.8kbps modem. Frankly I didn't notice popular culture at all until 2002.

CommanderTuvok
.
.
Posts: 3744
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20617

Post by CommanderTuvok »

I missed this first time round...

[youtube]I1vWkA7DuvA[/youtube]

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20618

Post by Mykeru »

bhoytony wrote:
decius wrote:
The risk cyclists pose to cars is a few scratches to the paintwork at worst. With increased velocity, volume, mass and momentum comes increased responsibility.
Further, more bicycles on the road entail significant decongestion to traffic, something you car drivers benefit from at no personal cost.
Just visit the Netherlands or Berlin and take a good look around, if you don't believe me.
So if I hit and kill a cyclist who runs a red light, the only damage to me is to my paintwork? How about if I react instinctively to try and avoid him and hit another road user or pedestrian?
As usual you are a whining gobshite.
The "yeah but I once saw a cyclist do this..." anecdote. It never gets old.

CommanderTuvok
.
.
Posts: 3744
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20619

Post by CommanderTuvok »

bhoytony wrote:Personally I was more of a Janet Ellis wanker.
She certainly put the "blue" into Blue Peter.

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20620

Post by Tigzy »

CommanderTuvok wrote:I missed this first time round...

[youtube]I1vWkA7DuvA[/youtube]
The amazing thing about this video is if you close your eyes, you find that Watson's voice - in being such an affected, unwavering drone devoid of any dynamic of humanity - doesn't sound as it it's been spliced at all.

Until it gets the the speak-and-spell 8-bit music coffee part. Then it gets more lifelike.

Rystefn
.
.
Posts: 635
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:03 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20621

Post by Rystefn »

Drivers are mostly shitheads who shouldn't be allowed behind the wheel. Cyclists are mostly shitheads who shouldn't be allowed on a bike. Pedestrians are mostly shitheads who shouldn't be allowed the use of their legs. People are generally shitheads who don't pay attention to the world around them and think it's everyone else's job to get the fuck out of their way. No amount of bitching about it is going to change this, so all you can do is watch where you're going and try not to die.

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20622

Post by Mykeru »

Rystefn wrote:Drivers are mostly shitheads who shouldn't be allowed behind the wheel. Cyclists are mostly shitheads who shouldn't be allowed on a bike. Pedestrians are mostly shitheads who shouldn't be allowed the use of their legs. People are generally shitheads who don't pay attention to the world around them and think it's everyone else's job to get the fuck out of their way. No amount of bitching about it is going to change this, so all you can do is watch where you're going and try not to die.
Who let this shithead post?

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20623

Post by bhoytony »

Mykeru wrote:
The "yeah but I once saw a cyclist do this..." anecdote. It never gets old.
Not my point. I merely stated that there are cyclists as well as motorists that are a hazard on the roads. I've come across plenty of both and I thought that we should acknowledge that in this thread. Don't forget that any driver has had to show that they are supposedly competent before they get a licence. Any idiot can jump on a bike and take to the road without knowing any of the laws or rules. I'm no great champion of motoring, if I didn't need my car I'd be more than happy to do without the hassle and expense.

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20624

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Tigzy wrote:I dunno. Jet was awesome, but when it comes to totty-you-forgotty, Nicola Bryant - Peri from Dr Who - wins hands down for me.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PLQi85xyAac/S ... bryant.jpg

Damn. She didn't half used to make me 'feel funny'. Funny how my dad suddenly got interested in Dr Who when she was on...
MMMmmmmm....Nice. I used to fancy Ace from the 7th Doctor series (I was 6 when it came out). Looking back I don't know what the fuck I was thinking. She looks like Alison Moyet.

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20625

Post by Mykeru »

bhoytony wrote:
Mykeru wrote:
The "yeah but I once saw a cyclist do this..." anecdote. It never gets old.
Not my point. I merely stated that there are cyclists as well as motorists that are a hazard on the roads.
What makes me think that this is going to be the sort of "agnostic" argument where the point that the agnostic is better than everyone else?
I've come across plenty of both and I thought that we should acknowledge that in this thread.
All righty then
Don't forget that any driver has had to show that they are supposedly competent before they get a licence.
Bitch, please.
Any idiot can jump on a bike and take to the road without knowing any of the laws or rules.
Do you know any cyclists we aren't 8 years old?

Most of use are familiar with the concept of roads and actually own motor vehicles.
I'm no great champion of motoring,
Or anything, it seems.
if I didn't need my car I'd be more than happy to do without the hassle and expense.
I empathize with your being a victim of circumstance, the Trolley-destroying Judge Doom and The Man in general.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20626

Post by cunt »

Because you're a shallow unkempt fat fuck cunt desperately trying to prolong the pathetically unfortunate and entirely accidental amount of celebrity you've somehow managed to acquire.

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20627

Post by bhoytony »

Mykeru wrote:
bhoytony wrote:
Mykeru wrote:
The "yeah but I once saw a cyclist do this..." anecdote. It never gets old.
Not my point. I merely stated that there are cyclists as well as motorists that are a hazard on the roads.
What makes me think that this is going to be the sort of "agnostic" argument where the point that the agnostic is better than everyone else?
I've come across plenty of both and I thought that we should acknowledge that in this thread.
All righty then
Don't forget that any driver has had to show that they are supposedly competent before they get a licence.
Bitch, please.
Any idiot can jump on a bike and take to the road without knowing any of the laws or rules.
Do you know any cyclists we aren't 8 years old?

Most of use are familiar with the concept of roads and actually own motor vehicles.
I'm no great champion of motoring,
Or anything, it seems.
if I didn't need my car I'd be more than happy to do without the hassle and expense.
I empathize with your being a victim of circumstance, the Trolley-destroying Judge Doom and The Man in general.
Are you sure about not being 8 years old?

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20628

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »


Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20629

Post by Lsuoma »

bhoytony wrote:With all this masturbating over Sally James and Pan's People, I'm pretty sure that the Slymepit is surrounded by an angry mob of baboons preparing to burn it to the ground.
Personally I was more of a Janet Ellis wanker.
If it raises Baboollie Blood Pressure, I'm all for it. Fuck 'em.

And though I was too young for The Avengers with Diana Rigg, I found her Emma Peel (M Appeal, geddit?) to be the epitome of teh sexy when I got older. From "A Touch of Brimstone":

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4tby ... o1_500.jpg
Snake picture chosen for Phil's benefit...

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20630

Post by AndrewV69 »

Tigzy wrote:I'd also really fuckin like to be a mason, on the basis that I'm pretty sure it does grant a lot of local influence (damn fine privilege, that one) and you get to go out and have nice dinners, too. Usually in more expensive restaurants tailored to those who are more privileged.

In the spirit of being antithetical to the prevailing attitudes of A+, I'd be interested to hear what privileges the rest of you enjoy, and what privileges you also hanker for.
Speaking as someone who has/had more than a few relatives who are/were Masons I suggest that a lack of belief in God may hamper your admisssion to that order.

Plus admission to the ranks is strictly by invitation. If you try to apply, like the case of my ex-Father-in-Law, you probably are not going to get in, even if you already have relatives within that order.

I am quite frankly, completely satisfied with the remaining privileges I do enjoy. In fact I also gave up a substantial number of them because I could not stand many of the activities associated with them.

YMMV

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20631

Post by Lsuoma »

CommanderTuvok wrote:I missed this first time round...

[youtube]I1vWkA7DuvA[/youtube]
Thanks, Tuvok: love it!

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20632

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Who is that vision in the first picture?????

Reap
.
.
Posts: 630
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:27 pm
Location: Reno Nevada
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20633

Post by Reap »

I have been listening to the shitty worthless pile of crap I call a podcast back when PZ Meyers was the guest. I don't want to alarm anyone but......I think we have a case of alien abduction on our hands.....PLEASE- DO NOT PANIC. I have been through this many times on various TV programs. I know exactly what to do to get the old PZ back. We want him back right? right? ......we don't care do we? Well there will be a new/old podcast up soon it's kinda creepy how easily weak-minded people like PZ can get pulled into unhealthy thinking habits. I say weak-minded mainly because of the speed of his change in thinking.
In case you want to hear something interesting and you don't want to listen to the entire podcast cause it such a fucking epic waste of time due to the fact it sucks cock go to about 1:22:00 and listen. Seems he should have pretty solid thinking behind what he says at his age doesn't it? I mean I can't imagine making any quick major changes in my core thinking at this point in my life. Unless jesus shows up with whores, pizza, and cold beer at my house later...
http://www.reapsowradio.com/?p=6395

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20634

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

Tony Parsehole wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Mines would be :

Snip pics


Who is that vision in the first picture?????
Sabrina. Look on YT for "boys boys boys"

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20635

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Lsuoma wrote:
CommanderTuvok wrote:I missed this first time round...

[youtube]I1vWkA7DuvA[/youtube]
Thanks, Tuvok: love it!
There is no hope for some people. No hope at all. This comment is from that video:
I am impressed if you really think no one will notice the editing here. Your either stupid or a bad troll. Keep on working!
funnyespen 1 year ago
Dafuq?

papillon
.
.
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:26 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20636

Post by papillon »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Mines would be :

Snip pics


Who is that vision in the first picture?????
Sabrina. Look on YT for "boys boys boys"
That's Youtube, DO NOT Google it.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20637

Post by cunt »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Mines would be :

Snip pics
Who is that vision in the first picture?????
Sabrina. Look on YT for "boys boys boys"
[youtube]ZfkwW4GgAiU[/youtube]

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20638

Post by Mykeru »

bhoytony wrote:
Mykeru wrote:
bhoytony wrote:
Mykeru wrote:
The "yeah but I once saw a cyclist do this..." anecdote. It never gets old.
Not my point. I merely stated that there are cyclists as well as motorists that are a hazard on the roads.
What makes me think that this is going to be the sort of "agnostic" argument where the point that the agnostic is better than everyone else?
I've come across plenty of both and I thought that we should acknowledge that in this thread.
All righty then
Don't forget that any driver has had to show that they are supposedly competent before they get a licence.
Bitch, please.
Any idiot can jump on a bike and take to the road without knowing any of the laws or rules.
Do you know any cyclists we aren't 8 years old?

Most of use are familiar with the concept of roads and actually own motor vehicles.
I'm no great champion of motoring,
Or anything, it seems.
if I didn't need my car I'd be more than happy to do without the hassle and expense.
I empathize with your being a victim of circumstance, the Trolley-destroying Judge Doom and The Man in general.
Are you sure about not being 8 years old?
If I pinkie swear that you are the bestest person evah, will you pound gravel up your asshole?

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20639

Post by Mykeru »

Cyd Charisse

[youtube]CZQ-6cum9Ig[/youtube]

/that is all.

mutleyeng
.
.
Posts: 333
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:32 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20640

Post by mutleyeng »

Reap wrote:I have been listening to the shitty worthless pile of crap I call a podcast back when PZ Meyers was the guest. I don't want to alarm anyone but......I think we have a case of alien abduction on our hands.....PLEASE- DO NOT PANIC. I have been through this many times on various TV programs. I know exactly what to do to get the old PZ back. We want him back right? right? ......we don't care do we? Well there will be a new/old podcast up soon it's kinda creepy how easily weak-minded people like PZ can get pulled into unhealthy thinking habits. I say weak-minded mainly because of the speed of his change in thinking.
In case you want to hear something interesting and you don't want to listen to the entire podcast cause it such a fucking epic waste of time due to the fact it sucks cock go to about 1:22:00 and listen. Seems he should have pretty solid thinking behind what he says at his age doesn't it? I mean I can't imagine making any quick major changes in my core thinking at this point in my life. Unless jesus shows up with whores, pizza, and cold beer at my house later...
http://www.reapsowradio.com/?p=6395
jeeze - all he said was you are a loathsome woman hating racist and you go taking it all personal

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20641

Post by bhoytony »

Mykeru wrote:
bhoytony wrote:

Are you sure about not being 8 years old?
If I pinkie swear that you are the bestest person evah, will you pound gravel up your asshole?
Yes 8 seems about right

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20642

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Mykeru wrote:Cyd Charisse

[youtube]CZQ-6cum9Ig[/youtube]

/that is all.
Nah. This is the real sexy shit:
[youtube]yWqOYeWdzg4[/youtube]

Just look at that mouth! made for lovin'

rayshul
.
.
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:00 am

Re: Where is your god now?

#20643

Post by rayshul »

real horrorshow wrote:
Lsuoma wrote:Pilgrims evacuated as French floods hit Lourdes shrine.

I like the way they say "French" flood, not "God's" flood...
I've always wanted to visit Lourdes and maybe pick up some souvenirs. No-one does kitch like the catlicks. I've been told that once upon a time (and maybe still) you could pick up a virgin mary cigarette lighter. I love that. Got a bit of lung cancer have we? Go to Lourdes and pray for a miracle, and while you're waiting, spark one spoke one up with the mother of god!
My uncle was massively disabled (ultimately disabled I guess you'd say) and was brought to Lourdes in the 50s/60s. Did not cure him.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20644

Post by Lsuoma »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Mines would be :

Snip pics


Who is that vision in the first picture?????
Sabrina. Look on YT for "boys boys boys"
From The Goon Show:

Seagoon: Unexploded German skulls? I hadn't thought of that.
Bloodnok: Elephant soup with squodge spuds.
Seagoon: I hadn't thought of that either.
Bloodnok: Sabrina in the bath.
Seagoon: Ha, ha, ha, ha! I do have some spare time.
Minnie: I don't think she has!

rayshul
.
.
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:00 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20645

Post by rayshul »

I'm whoring about William Shetterly's blog at the moment because fuck, he's brilliant.

And incredibly right.

The only "privilege" that I think anyone should give a flying fuck about is class.

Anyway here's some links that are from his blog. Some are on racism but the same shit really applies when it comes to feminism.

http://sjwar.blogspot.co.nz/2012/09/wal ... m-and.html

http://shetterly.blogspot.co.nz/2012/09 ... heory.html

http://sjwar.blogspot.co.nz/2012/09/wal ... m-and.html

http://sjwar.blogspot.co.nz/2012/09/pse ... ymity.html (on outing a pseudonym that's not that secret)

Also interesting to read another CALLING OUT incident which has some similarities to what's happened to others:

http://sjwar.blogspot.co.nz/2012/07/soc ... lazip.html

rayshul
.
.
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:00 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20646

Post by rayshul »

Race and Gender with Class differences included

http://shetterly.blogspot.co.nz/2012/05 ... e-now.html

oolon, slimy turd
.
.
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:48 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20647

Post by oolon, slimy turd »

Dilurk wrote:At the risk of annoying folks I present you

http://coffeelovingskeptic.com/?p=1897

Look at comment 10. The poor boy does not know what an argumentum ad populum is.

Here, I'll help you. http://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/popular.html

Just remember, the black death must be right because so many people bought into it.

idiot.

As a further aside.
2. Disengagement – No sanction is to be used against someone for not accepting the principles of this charter, except to disengage from discussion with them, and direct them to this charter as an explanation why.

3. Good Faith – Assume good faith until shown otherwise. Failure to follow the principles of this charter in a debate does not indicate a lack of good faith, so long as a participant at least tries.
Number 3 is precisely why I stopped engaging with Oolon, not for any other reason.

P.S. Fuck you troll.
Excellent! Dilurk tries to say I don't know what an argument from popularity is while demonstrating it has no fucking clue :clap:
So the ‘evidence’ for a general statement of not well received is a bit lacking in terms of raw numbers. Not well received by a small number of people, some of which then engaged in an unpleasant campaign to ridicule her for having an idea, would be a more accurate statement.
I was not saying A+ are in any sense 'correct' about anything because they have more numbers than the slymepit or anywhere else, just that the numbers show that the statement that it 'was not well received' is to be considered pretty dodgy. Especially given this place has been going for years promoting itself as the 'alternative' to the horrible hegemony of FtBs and has managed no where near the number on the A+ forum. So I know which side of the argument has been 'well received'... Please tell me how I should frame that argument to miss your logical fallacy Dilurk! Derp!

Massive failure from Derpity Dilurk, especially given I'm sure I've littered the internet with bad arguments and you choose one which is clearly not what you paint it as... Try harder :doh:

ReneeHendricks
.
.
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:48 am
Location: Kent, WA
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20648

Post by ReneeHendricks »

At the risk of sounding really snarky, I have to admit that I like seeing "Oolon's" posts showing as not viewable unless I want to :D

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20649

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

oolon, slimy turd wrote: Especially given this place has been going for years promoting itself as the 'alternative' to the horrible hegemony of FtBs and has managed no where near the number on the A+ forum.
You will need to correct these false premices before making an argumentation. I suppose you are pretty knew to this debate after all...

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20650

Post by Lsuoma »

ReneeHendricks wrote:At the risk of sounding really snarky, I have to admit that I like seeing "Oolon's" posts showing as not viewable unless I want to :D
Watch out - the little turdbox has claimed that ignoring his whines are tantamount to banning. You'll be accused of censorship next!

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20651

Post by bhoytony »

Here we go again. And the usual suspects will keep giving the attention whore all the attention he so desperately needs

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20652

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

bhoytony wrote:Here we go again. And the usual suspects will keep giving the attention whore all the attention he so desperately needs
This is a free forum. I don't care about bicycles and other peoples' sexual lives. I will damn well engage Oolon if I want to. Just ignore the discussion, like I do for subjects that don't interest me.

Moreover, even if he is trolling, it's always good to have the opposite side engaging on a playing field where there's no censorship or editing, for one side or the other. I just want to see where this goes. "Nowhere", you will say, well, I'd like to see for myself.

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20653

Post by bhoytony »

and yet again Mission Accomplished.

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20654

Post by Tigzy »

AndrewV69 wrote: Speaking as someone who has/had more than a few relatives who are/were Masons I suggest that a lack of belief in God may hamper your admisssion to that order.

Plus admission to the ranks is strictly by invitation. If you try to apply, like the case of my ex-Father-in-Law, you probably are not going to get in, even if you already have relatives within that order.

I am quite frankly, completely satisfied with the remaining privileges I do enjoy. In fact I also gave up a substantial number of them because I could not stand many of the activities associated with them.

YMMV
Ah, sod the believing in a god bit - I'd just pretend I did. But yeah, I'm aware it's by invitation only. That said, a good number of years back, and old boss of mine was a mason, and he said there was such a crisis of membership, they were getting pretty relaxed about people who made noises about wanting to join. Dunno if that's changed in the meantime, though.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20655

Post by Steersman »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
bhoytony wrote:Here we go again. And the usual suspects will keep giving the attention whore all the attention he so desperately needs
This is a free forum. I don't care about bicycles and other peoples' sexual lives. I will damn well engage Oolon if I want to. Just ignore the discussion, like I do for subjects that don't interest me.

Moreover, even if he is trolling, it's always good to have the opposite side engaging on a playing field where there's no censorship or editing, for one side or the other. I just want to see where this goes. "Nowhere", you will say, well, I'd like to see for myself.
Quite right.

Seems to be a few here that got out of bed on the wrong side this morning – maybe burrs under their saddles or sand in their Schlitzes …

ReneeHendricks
.
.
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:48 am
Location: Kent, WA
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20656

Post by ReneeHendricks »

Lsuoma wrote:
ReneeHendricks wrote:At the risk of sounding really snarky, I have to admit that I like seeing "Oolon's" posts showing as not viewable unless I want to :D
Watch out - the little turdbox has claimed that ignoring his whines are tantamount to banning. You'll be accused of censorship next!
LOL So, walking away from the asshat is censorship? Love it ;)

ReneeHendricks
.
.
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:48 am
Location: Kent, WA
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20657

Post by ReneeHendricks »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
bhoytony wrote:Here we go again. And the usual suspects will keep giving the attention whore all the attention he so desperately needs
This is a free forum. I don't care about bicycles and other peoples' sexual lives. I will damn well engage Oolon if I want to. Just ignore the discussion, like I do for subjects that don't interest me.

Moreover, even if he is trolling, it's always good to have the opposite side engaging on a playing field where there's no censorship or editing, for one side or the other. I just want to see where this goes. "Nowhere", you will say, well, I'd like to see for myself.
Which is why things like "foe" and not reading pure crap is awesome :)

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20658

Post by Steersman »

Rystefn wrote:
Steersman wrote:Thanks, although I only see one case of “they” referring to, supposedly, a “one”, but it’s late ….
....
Shakespeare wrote:Now leaden slumber with life's strength doth fight;
And every one to rest themselves betake,
Save thieves, and cares, and troubled minds, that wake.
Shakespeare wrote:'Tis meet that some more audience than a mother, since nature makes them partial, should o'erhear the speech
Does that help?
Yes, it does; thanks.

Although, as a quibble I think that in the last example “them” is clearly referring to all mothers and not a single one. Maybe a case of ellipsis? ….

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20659

Post by cunt »

rayshul wrote: Also interesting to read another CALLING OUT incident which has some similarities to what's happened to others:

http://sjwar.blogspot.co.nz/2012/07/soc ... lazip.html
Zathlazip... Actually her boss didn't give two shits about what a bunch of mouth-breathing feminists thought. She just panicked, understandably, and deleted the thread after it was gold-mined. It was a very very funny thread.

Looks like the OP got saved. http://shii.org/knows/WisCon,_the_Femin ... _self-hate

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20660

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

Steersman wrote: Yes, it does; thanks.

Although, as a quibble I think that in the last example “them” is clearly referring to all mothers and not a single one. Maybe a case of ellipsis? ….
I think you are right on that one, but I'm not a Shakespeare scholar. I don't see what the problem with "they" would be. In French we have the third singular "on", which is used when no gender is defined and would be quite a correct equivalent.

rayshul
.
.
Posts: 4871
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:00 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20661

Post by rayshul »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:You will need to correct these false premices before making an argumentation. I suppose you are pretty knew to this debate after all...
We're the alternative? How can we be an alternative?

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20662

Post by Steersman »

ReneeHendricks wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
bhoytony wrote:Here we go again. And the usual suspects will keep giving the attention whore all the attention he so desperately needs
This is a free forum. I don't care about bicycles and other peoples' sexual lives. I will damn well engage Oolon if I want to. Just ignore the discussion, like I do for subjects that don't interest me.

Moreover, even if he is trolling, it's always good to have the opposite side engaging on a playing field where there's no censorship or editing, for one side or the other. I just want to see where this goes. "Nowhere", you will say, well, I'd like to see for myself.
Which is why things like "foe" and not reading pure crap is awesome :)
How do you know it’s crap if you don’t read it?

For one thing, his argument that Dilurk’s claim that he was engaging in “argumentum ad populum” seems quite credible to me. He wasn’t saying that the A+ arguments were true because there were more people subscribing to them than to the SylmePit ones, only that the former are more “well received” than the latter.

But you probably wouldn’t know that because you apparently couldn’t be bothered to read his attempt at a rebuttal. However, if you want to keep your head in the sand and have someone else do your thinking for you, who am I to gainsay you? ….

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20663

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

rayshul wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:You will need to correct these false premices before making an argumentation. I suppose you are pretty knew to this debate after all...
We're the alternative? How can we be an alternative?
The bigger question is: since when have we promoted ourselves? At least to the disgusting level of FC5/6/7 and A+? And really, for years? This place was created in July 2012.

ReneeHendricks
.
.
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:48 am
Location: Kent, WA
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20664

Post by ReneeHendricks »

Steersman wrote:
ReneeHendricks wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
bhoytony wrote:Here we go again. And the usual suspects will keep giving the attention whore all the attention he so desperately needs
This is a free forum. I don't care about bicycles and other peoples' sexual lives. I will damn well engage Oolon if I want to. Just ignore the discussion, like I do for subjects that don't interest me.

Moreover, even if he is trolling, it's always good to have the opposite side engaging on a playing field where there's no censorship or editing, for one side or the other. I just want to see where this goes. "Nowhere", you will say, well, I'd like to see for myself.
Which is why things like "foe" and not reading pure crap is awesome :)
How do you know it’s crap if you don’t read it?

For one thing, his argument that Dilurk’s claim that he was engaging in “argumentum ad populum” seems quite credible to me. He wasn’t saying that the A+ arguments were true because there were more people subscribing to them than to the SylmePit ones, only that the former are more “well received” than the latter.

But you probably wouldn’t know that because you apparently couldn’t be bothered to read his attempt at a rebuttal. However, if you want to keep your head in the sand and have someone else do your thinking for you, who am I to gainsay you? ….
That would be due to reading his previous stuff here and in other places. I can then make the determination that, unless something drastically changes to his personality and writing style, I really have no desire to read the pure crap he puts out. Easy peezy :)

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#20665

Post by Steersman »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
Steersman wrote: Yes, it does; thanks.

Although, as a quibble I think that in the last example “them” is clearly referring to all mothers and not a single one. Maybe a case of ellipsis? ….
I think you are right on that one, but I'm not a Shakespeare scholar. I don't see what the problem with "they" would be. In French we have the third singular "on", which is used when no gender is defined and would be quite a correct equivalent.
Not sure what all of the problems with “they” are likely to be, but one of them seems to be a question of the corresponding verb forms. Do we say “they has” where it is known that the “they” is referring to a single individual, gender unknown? Or should it be “they have”, particularly when the individuals in question seem to have multiple personalities or genders?

But, I’m curious about the French “on”: is there a separate verb/ending for that pronoun?

Locked