Periodic Table of Swearing

Old subthreads
welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17226

Post by welch »

Skep tickle wrote:
rayshul wrote:
Saint N. wrote:
Skep tickle wrote:
Stephanie Zvan wrote:Now run back to the pit and be happy I was awake enough not to take “face to face” literally and tell LSP where you live.
So Steffelant feels justified to brag about possibly doc-dropping someone's address if she's tired enough to mistake a simple comment for a threat, as long as it's made by someone who stands up to her bullshit. Yet she'll defend Laden (an ally of hers), who sent actual threats of violence to someone, any hour of the day, no questions asked. I said it before, I'll say it again, this person has no fuckin integrity or principles. It's a pure act for her. She's found a tiny, negligible, insignificant, source of authority and is milking it for all it's worth. Fuck you, Steffelantosaurus, and your irrational hangup about people misspelling your stupid name.
That's quite a threat, there. If you don't be quiet, I'll send someone to find you.

I never know the point at which you should probably contact the police, but given what happened to ERV it miiiight be something you'd want to think about.
Mmm, well since I did say she could tell Left-whatever-whatever where to find me (meaning the Slyme Pit), I left a bit of an opening for that. But still, it's quite inappropriate yadda yadda. Of course, since I live in the middle of West Hollywood, in Amy Davis Roth's apartment building*, Stephanie would be short-sighted to reveal my address.

Could someone post the Cliff Notes version of what happened to ERV, & maybe a linkie or pointer to some more info somewhere?

*Of course, I'm kidding. That's not where I live. But I don't live that far from a prominent pro-A+ blogger-or-former-blogger. I won't name drop, however, as that might be assumed to suggest that I might retaliate if my address were given out.
You live near Laden?

I bet he has the prettiest trailer in the park.

AnonymousCowherd
.
.
Posts: 1708
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:49 am
Location: The Penumbra of Doubt

Re: Kikes and Ale

#17227

Post by AnonymousCowherd »

Michael K Gray wrote:
AnonymousCowherd wrote:... We tropical dwellers tend to like the place where the river actually flows, even if it's over us, occasionally.
Yeah, yeah. Rub it in all you like.
No. Seriously. Especially if it is a Mango based ointment.

Then I shan't care if the river flows, or not.
(Mmm... good idea for a Blues song)
Or not
We eat the mangoes. Ointment? What? What the hell do you do with them, Clancy?

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17228

Post by welch »

rayshul wrote:
Saint N. wrote:
Skep tickle wrote:Could someone post the Cliff Notes version of what happened to ERV, & maybe a linkie or pointer to some more info somewhere?
I'm not sure whether you're referring specifically to ERV's (Abbie's) problems with Laden, or just a chronology of the things that have happened on the old ERV that the slyme pit is an extension of.

If it's the latter than you might want to browse through the wiki that has been set up to chronicle all the FtB/Skepchick nonsense, link (you can also edit, and add to it if you want to, as long as you have citations).

I won't bore you with the details of the laden thing, unless that's what your looking for.
It's the Laden campaigning to shut down her site to NatGeo and then turning up at her fucking work is what I'm thinking of, but I notice Pharwongula hasn't documented it.
I don't believe he "showed up" there. Last I heard, he'd just sent emails to her boss in an attempt to silence her.

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17229

Post by Michael K Gray »

AnonymousCowherd wrote:
Michael K Gray wrote:
Git wrote:Bloody colonials!
I'm only an Acting 2nd Lieutenant!
That's "lef-tenant" to you, oik. Loo-tenants we won't mention on a family forum. Shudder.
Yes, Gomer Pyles!
As for Loo-tenants: Luxury.
We used to have to...

[Readers' Indigest "Complete the Phrase" quiz.
You have most assuredly won $1,000,000,000.00 No questions asked.
Pick up your prize at our Alpha Centauri office, 3rd floor.]

Just complete the phrase after the ellipsis, and send it on the back of a stamped self-addressed Humboldt Squid to anyone but us.

Philip of Tealand
.
.
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:11 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17230

Post by Philip of Tealand »

Michael K Gray wrote:
Git wrote:Bloody colonials!
I'm only an Acting 2nd Lieutenant!
I'm not bothered about that, I'm more frightened of an outbreak of Skradje or if this batter pudding is going to cook on time!

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17231

Post by welch »

Michael K Gray wrote:
mikelf wrote:
mikelf wrote: If you will allow me to be pedantic, that is actually Purgatory in the background, not Hell.
Okay, I am an idiot. That is Hell in the left foreground.
And here I was assuming that Hell is being stuck in an elevator with the A+Theism moderators.

(And that is not an Allegory, Don'te forget)
Oh crap, physioproffe disease strikes.

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Kikes and Ale

#17232

Post by Michael K Gray »

AnonymousCowherd wrote:
Michael K Gray wrote:
AnonymousCowherd wrote:... We tropical dwellers tend to like the place where the river actually flows, even if it's over us, occasionally.
Yeah, yeah. Rub it in all you like.
No. Seriously. Especially if it is a Mango based ointment.

Then I shan't care if the river flows, or not.
(Mmm... good idea for a Blues song)
Or not
We eat the mangoes. Ointment? What? What the hell do you do with them, Clancy?
Drill wide fucken' holes in 'em, and Shag 'em ragged.
You got a problem with that?
Can you squeal like a papaya, boy?

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17233

Post by Michael K Gray »

welch wrote:Oh crap, physioproffe disease strikes.
Argggh no!!
Will someone Shoot me, please?

real horrorshow
.
.
Posts: 1505
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:59 am
Location: In a band of brigands.

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17234

Post by real horrorshow »

TheMan wrote:Yeah they are capable and I dare say not shy in expressing any desires....
Disabled people are people, first and last. Individuals. That's one of the gaping flaws in all this 'privilege' bullshit. Have too many 'privilege points': you must be bad. Have enough 'victim points': you must be good. It's just the flip side of bigotry. It's for stupid buggers who are too lazy to think.

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17235

Post by Michael K Gray »

Philip of Tealand wrote:
Michael K Gray wrote:
Git wrote:Bloody colonials!
I'm only an Acting 2nd Lieutenant!
I'm not bothered about that, I'm more frightened of an outbreak of Skradje or if this batter pudding is going to cook on time!
Where is your ticket for the Albert Memorial flight to the Moon, young man?
What's that Minnie? I can't hear you over you yelling at me!
His ticket is in his trousers?
Which trouser, Min?

LMU
.
.
Posts: 617
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 7:40 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17236

Post by LMU »

I am amused by the idea that the A+ forum is just a den of Poes arguing with each other and banning reasonable people. An ethical question: if that isn't already the case (no one can tell!) are we allowed to help it along?

Also: if Matt maintains his stance, how long before he gets a label like "misogynist MRA" or "vacuous shitbag troll" and someone starts a petition to remove him from the Atheist Experience?

Philip of Tealand
.
.
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:11 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17237

Post by Philip of Tealand »

Michael K Gray wrote:
Philip of Tealand wrote:
Michael K Gray wrote:
Git wrote:Bloody colonials!
I'm only an Acting 2nd Lieutenant!
I'm not bothered about that, I'm more frightened of an outbreak of Skradje or if this batter pudding is going to cook on time!
Where is your ticket for the Albert Memorial flight to the Moon, young man?
What's that Minnie? I can't hear you over you yelling at me!
His ticket is in his trousers?
Which trouser, Min?
I was busy watching a football match between the early Britons (Gad, they were up early!) and 693 Romans, interesting match, the Roman's goalie was on the cliff edge, had a bit of a rough time I tell you!

Oh yes, I've left the American 5th Fleet on the mantle piece

Ying Tong Iddle I po!

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17238

Post by Michael K Gray »

LMU wrote:I am amused by the idea that the A+ forum is just a den of Poes arguing with each other and banning reasonable people. An ethical question: if that isn't already the case (no one can tell!) are we allowed to help it along?

Also: if Matt maintains his stance, how long before he gets a label like "misogynist MRA" or "vacuous shitbag troll" and someone starts a petition to remove him from the Atheist Experience?
[youtube]zKFJupMjMmY[/youtube]

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17239

Post by Dick Strawkins »

A blast from the past

http://i.imgur.com/dgRml.jpg?1

AnonymousCowherd
.
.
Posts: 1708
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:49 am
Location: The Penumbra of Doubt

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17240

Post by AnonymousCowherd »

Dick Strawkins wrote:A blast from the past
O. Yes!

TedDahlberg
.
.
Posts: 1111
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:08 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17241

Post by TedDahlberg »

Tigzy wrote:
One thing I could never understand is why 'cheese-eating' is used in such a derogatory sense here. Cheese is just awesome. And the French do make some very nice ones, it has to be said.
I can only assume ERV hasn't seen your pondering. Origin of the phrase:

[youtube]4rJAw-fuYHk[/youtube]

So as you can see it is perfectly cromulent.

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17242

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

TedDahlberg wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: Oooohhh, Deadpool!

/comics geek
:D

Relevant commentary on the sceptical community from the man himself:
http://dyingunderalienstars.files.wordp ... -sense.jpg
I...I...I love you Ted!

AnonymousCowherd
.
.
Posts: 1708
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 2:49 am
Location: The Penumbra of Doubt

Re: Kikes and Ale

#17243

Post by AnonymousCowherd »

[quote="Michael K Gray"
Drill wide fucken' holes in 'em, and Shag 'em ragged.
You got a problem with that?
Can you squeal like a papaya, boy?[/quote]

Bring me a boy!!!!.........Blast!
Bring me another boy!!!!..........Blast!
Bring me my Brass Bound Buggery Box, these boys split too easily!

On the other hand, if you're only shagging mangoes ragged, maybe you should meet... oops nearly said something tasteless, juvenile, completely without class, etc.

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17244

Post by Michael K Gray »

Philip of Tealand wrote:I was busy watching a football match between the early Britons (Gad, they were up early!) and 693 Romans, interesting match, the Roman's goalie was on the cliff edge, had a bit of a rough time I tell you!
Caractacus Seagoon!
Get back to your galley oars.
The Captain wishes to ski this afternoon!

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Kikes and Ale

#17245

Post by Michael K Gray »

AnonymousCowherd wrote:... oops nearly said something tasteless, juvenile, completely without class, etc.
There is a "first" for everything.

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17246

Post by Dick Strawkins »

From an Aplus supporter defending the 'Schrödingers Rapist' argument

http://i.imgur.com/xQICF.jpg?1

The first thing?

Wild guess here.
This guy has no kids.

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17247

Post by Michael K Gray »

Dick Strawkins wrote:From an Aplus supporter defending the 'Schrödingers Rapist' argument

http://i.imgur.com/xQICF.jpg?1

The first thing?

Wild guess here.
This guy has no kids.
Nate has no dick. No balls.
Nothing but pathetic whiney suck-hole "hope, no DREAM like hell to get sympathy-laid by a decrepit aging crayon-tattooed podgy cellulite-dough lard-arsed-feminazi, oh yes!" because I perform like a trained puppy when my cruel mistresses tease me with measly taunting treats that I shall never actually get.

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17248

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Dick Strawkins wrote:From an Aplus supporter defending the 'Schrödingers Rapist' argument

http://i.imgur.com/xQICF.jpg?1

The first thing?

Wild guess here.
This guy has no kids.
And if he does have kids Social Services have probably rehoused them for their own safety.

What a fucking idiot. Imagine telling a toddler not to forcefully stick his bald, flaccid, pre pubescent cock into a girls bits without her consent. These people are without hope.

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17249

Post by Dick Strawkins »

Another big-name FTBer decides to place Atheismplus on the ground and back away slowly.

http://freethoughtblogs.com/dispatches/ ... issension/
I’m very happy about the whole Atheism+ idea because I think anything that focuses our attention on issues of social justice is a good thing. But I’m not going to go around calling myself an atheist+, I’m just going to call myself an atheist. And no one is going to try to drum me out of the movement for choosing not to take such a label.
Oh dear...

Where's Dickie Carrier when you really need him?

http://i.imgur.com/ORH0N.jpg

Dilurk
.
.
Posts: 1215
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17250

Post by Dilurk »

http://www.atheistrev.com/2012/10/lesso ... bacle.html *ugh*

I personally never felt there was anything wrong with Justin posting Surly's address. If I had, I would not have posted the lmgtfy.com string that Lsuoma so graciously replaced. It was always a question of *image* of *politics*.

It was always my understanding Voice for men ran JVs piece with his permission. A number of us did also warn him at the time that this was a *political* mistake.

Sad. Considering the propensity of some atheists to dox, I don't even trust atheistrev.

TedDahlberg
.
.
Posts: 1111
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:08 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17251

Post by TedDahlberg »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
TedDahlberg wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: Oooohhh, Deadpool!

/comics geek
:D

Relevant commentary on the sceptical community from the man himself:
http://dyingunderalienstars.files.wordp ... -sense.jpg
I...I...I love you Ted!
I love you too Phil. In fact, just to show you how much:

http://dyingunderalienstars.files.wordp ... poster.jpg

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17252

Post by Michael K Gray »

Dick Strawkins wrote:Where's Dickie Carrier when you really need him?
Wilfred Bramble?
Steptoe vs The Awesome DICK Carrier?

'ere 'arold! Gimme a hand with this Victorian draft excluder, will ya son?
No, I ain't pretendin' this time. Honest.

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17253

Post by Dick Strawkins »

Dilurk wrote:http://www.atheistrev.com/2012/10/lesso ... bacle.html *ugh*

I personally never felt there was anything wrong with Justin posting Surly's address. If I had, I would not have posted the lmgtfy.com string that Lsuoma so graciously replaced. It was always a question of *image* of *politics*.

It was always my understanding Voice for men ran JVs piece with his permission. A number of us did also warn him at the time that this was a *political* mistake.

Sad. Considering the propensity of some atheists to dox, I don't even trust atheistrev.
The idea that this place is a hate site is ridiculous.
We are a LOL site.

Justin posting Surly Amys address here was opposed by most of the people who commented - as was the posting of oolons details.
If we were really a hate site then we must be the most inept bunch of haters ever. :(

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17254

Post by Tigzy »

TedDahlberg wrote:
Tigzy wrote:
One thing I could never understand is why 'cheese-eating' is used in such a derogatory sense here. Cheese is just awesome. And the French do make some very nice ones, it has to be said.
I can only assume ERV hasn't seen your pondering. Origin of the phrase:

--youtube snip--

So as you can see it is perfectly cromulent.
But don't tons of people people, be they French or not, eat cheese anyway? Isn't it a lot like saying, 'You shoe-wearing surrender monkey!'?

Michael K Gray
.
.
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:04 am
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17255

Post by Michael K Gray »

Dilurk wrote:Sad. Considering the propensity of some atheists to dox, I don't even trust atheistrev.
If you are worried about "doxxing", then why not ask those of us who maintain a straightforward public identity to make enquiries in your behalf?

Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17256

Post by Dick Strawkins »

Here's one for Phil!
[youtube]B0lqXNlI1rk[/youtube]

Philip of Tealand
.
.
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:11 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17257

Post by Philip of Tealand »

Tony Parsehole wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:From an Aplus supporter defending the 'Schrödingers Rapist' argument

http://i.imgur.com/xQICF.jpg?1

The first thing?

Wild guess here.
This guy has no kids.
And if he does have kids Social Services have probably rehoused them for their own safety.

What a fucking idiot. Imagine telling a toddler not to forcefully stick his bald, flaccid, pre pubescent cock into a girls bits without her consent. These people are without hope.
What the hell do these people do when out and about - are they constantly yelling at women "LOOK OUT,THE LIKELIHOOD THAT I'M ABOUT TO RAPE YOU IS SIGNIFICANTLY HIGH, YOU DON'T KNOW THAT I WON'T, I DON'T EVEN KNOW IF I WILL BUT TAKE IT AS READ THAT I MIGHT, RUN, RUN AWAY FROM ME!

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17258

Post by Lsuoma »

Michael K Gray wrote:,... or I will get Amy's crack lawyers to sue you for £100,000!!!!!
Ah, fuck, I did my deliberate misinterpretation on that, and now I can't stop thinking about the idea that Smelly Amy may have hired an attorney to defend her axe wound....

CommanderTuvok
.
.
Posts: 3744
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17259

Post by CommanderTuvok »

Anybody who owns a laptop, computer, mobile phone, or has access to a library or internet cafe is a "POTENTIAL PAEDOPHILE"!!!!!!!!!

Now modify your behaviour!!!

:whistle:

codelette
.
.
Posts: 788
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:01 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17260

Post by codelette »

I wonder how Jenn McBoobquake is taking the news of fellow FTB social jurists abandoning Church+? Hopefully, her boyfriend will establish his patriarchal privileges by logging her of the Internet. Forever.

Scented Nectar
.
.
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17261

Post by Scented Nectar »

Kudos to Matt D for not caving in to the pity party's spoiled-brat tantrum demands.

ERV
Arnie Loves Me!
Arnie Loves Me!
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17262

Post by ERV »

Scented Nectar wrote:Kudos to Matt D for not caving in to the pity party's spoiled-brat tantrum demands.
How pathetic is it that we have to give these people 'kudos' for having some principles.

And Im still not convinced Matt 'gets it' (what happened/is happening to him happened/is happening to everyone else, and Matt participated in this behavior himself), and him 'not caving' is really just more hypocrisy ('It was fine when I was a douche to Thunderf00t... but when people are a douche to ME its DIFFERENT! IM SPECIAL!').

ERV
Arnie Loves Me!
Arnie Loves Me!
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17263

Post by ERV »

Also, no seriously, wheres James?

Im gonna shoot him an email...

Scented Nectar
.
.
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17264

Post by Scented Nectar »

Skep tickle wrote:Could someone post the Cliff Notes version of what happened to ERV, & maybe a linkie or pointer to some more info somewhere?
Here are two links to Laden and Stuffy admitting to some of the nuisance complaints they made to Abbie's bloghost, and to the chair of her academic department, as revenge because 1) she lets people say bads words in her comment areas and 2) people can express negative opinions about FfTBers without being stopped.

Laden:
(copy and past this link, since the anonymizer will strip the comment number data, OR click it and then page down to find comment #4)
http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... ment-94072
The National Geographic situation perplexes me. A while back Abbie Smith and some of her commenters made some very specific and terribly offensive remarks related directly to me (as usual) but that also brought in a completely innocent bystander, someone potentially vulnerable to this sort of cyberstalking, and the only reason that person was brought into their comments was because of a vague and ephemeral on-line association with me (we wrote similar posts and linked to each other). Previously I never thought complaining to management about the “slimepit” was worthwhile or appropriate, but this time I did make a complaint because of the potential damage to a third party. They got back to me with a request for information on which “threads” on ERV seemed to be offensive in general (not just in relation to me and colleagues) so I gave them a list of four threads that I thought fit the bill and then didn’t really hear back from them. More recently, someone up in the administration of SB.com/NGS asked me for that information again, as they had misplaced it. I suppose if it took 30 years to discover the source off the Nile something like dealing with this might take months.

By the way, I also made a complaint about that specific issue, at the same time (along with a couple of other points of interest) to the chair of Abbie Smith’s academic department. Like it or not, this is how blatant professional misconduct is often managed in academia. The expected outcome of such an email might be a follow up phone conversation and a sit down talk between the student and adviser or chair. Oddly, within about 24 hours of sending an informative email to that Professor, I heard on the internet that I had done this! There are no ways to explain that without reference to some sort of unethical behavior, or worse.

The reason I mention these two things is this: One of the problems we have in dealing with offensive behavior like this is that not everyone else who is structurally connected to it, and thus passively supportive of it, is on board with dealing with it or even recognizing it. Abbie Smith is running the “slimepit” from her academic department in Oklahoma, and her department chair is either in on it (is he one off her commenters?) or unaware of it, or knows about it but thinks it’s cute, or something. NGS/SB.com is running a “family friendly” operation in which the word “c*nt” is used something like a thousand times, physical threats have been made, and direct and repeated attacks on numerous people, many slanderous, have been made.

“What does this word mean, mommy” …. (Just when the parents thought they had the Internet Filter settings to Safe)
Stuffy:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... beginning/
I sent Seed Media a letter on June 28.
I know that Seed Media has previously been made aware of the four comment threads at ERV that are in gross violation of the ScienceBlogs code of conduct. I know that they were made aware of the problems in these threads quite some time ago. I have been patient in waiting for Seed to live up to the commitments it has made to the public and to other individuals. I’m not patient anymore.

Your platform is being used as a base of operations to cyberstalk and defame me and several other people. I have no intention of being remotely diplomatic about that fact any longer. You may wish to read this: http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... ing-abuse/

I sincerely hope that talking about this publicly will be enough to finally get someone at your network to take some responsibility for it. I don’t want to have to take this further, but I will do what I have to do.
It was exactly my intent, and the intent of people pressuring Russell Blackford and others, to cut off all social support for that inexcusable behavior. Credit for that working, to whatever extent it does, goes to the people setting these limits (yes, me included), not to anyone in the slime pit. That thing has been festering for a year unchecked.

In case you have any doubts about that, well, someone sent me a link to the new slime pit today.
Anyways, that's just part of it, I think. They were not successful in taking down the Slimepit while it was at ERV, but we moved to stop them from continuing to bully and stalk Abbie with their nefarious claims that we were cyberstalking them, as well as their tattling that we use bad words. Oh won't someone think of the children!

Scented Nectar
.
.
Posts: 4969
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:45 am
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17265

Post by Scented Nectar »

ERV wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:Kudos to Matt D for not caving in to the pity party's spoiled-brat tantrum demands.
How pathetic is it that we have to give these people 'kudos' for having some principles.

And Im still not convinced Matt 'gets it' (what happened/is happening to him happened/is happening to everyone else, and Matt participated in this behavior himself), and him 'not caving' is really just more hypocrisy ('It was fine when I was a douche to Thunderf00t... but when people are a douche to ME its DIFFERENT! IM SPECIAL!').
It is pretty pathetic. But it's so rare that any of them wake up and smell reality.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17266

Post by welch »

ERV wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:Kudos to Matt D for not caving in to the pity party's spoiled-brat tantrum demands.
How pathetic is it that we have to give these people 'kudos' for having some principles.

And Im still not convinced Matt 'gets it' (what happened/is happening to him happened/is happening to everyone else, and Matt participated in this behavior himself), and him 'not caving' is really just more hypocrisy ('It was fine when I was a douche to Thunderf00t... but when people are a douche to ME its DIFFERENT! IM SPECIAL!').
HOW DARE YOU GORE MYYYYY OX!?! MY OX IS SPECIAL!!!! YOU CAN ONLY GORE THEIRRRRR OX!

JackRayner
.
.
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:27 am
Location: In the basement of the University of Minnesota Morris
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17267

Post by JackRayner »

Dick Strawkins wrote:Things are heating up at the Al Stefanellie weenie roast!
LeftSidePositive says:
October 9, 2012 at 6:36 pm

How about frustration that someone who ought to know better is repeating the same tired, illogical bullshit we usually get from the Slymepit, and hasn’t provided any evidence or citations for their assertions.
Reply

Al Stefanelli says:
October 9, 2012 at 7:59 pm

Really? You’re going there?

OK, here’s the thing about the slime pit. I am not familiar with it from a personal level, only what has been written about it and discussed in other places. Perhaps I should investigate it, but if it is anything like how any other forum operates (and I’ve moderated and administered several on the Phpbb and Delphi systems going back ten years), there is a mix of several different personalities there, regardless of the general lean. There are even some liberals that hang out at conservative forums, and it is not uncommon at all to have atheists on Christian boards or vice verse. So, you would do good to specify that the information you are referring to is coming from *some* of the people there, regardless of whether or not you perceive it to be bullshit or otherwise. That is, unless you’ve been in communication with the entirety of the membership, in which case, I would be wrong.

Second, your request for citations or evidence is unfounded. I offered my points of view, observations and personal thoughts. Are you trying to do a ‘no pics, didn’t happen’ thing? If so, you’re way off mark. If I were offering a dissertation, or a wiki type article, or perhaps covering these things for a news outlet, perhaps citations would be apropos. This isn’t one of those times, though.
This Al fellow seems like an alright cunt to me. I should probably go and read that whole blog post. If baboons are having bitch-fits over it, then it's probably worth reading. :)

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17268

Post by Mykeru »

Dick Strawkins wrote:
Dilurk wrote:http://www.atheistrev.com/2012/10/lesso ... bacle.html *ugh*

I personally never felt there was anything wrong with Justin posting Surly's address. If I had, I would not have posted the lmgtfy.com string that Lsuoma so graciously replaced. It was always a question of *image* of *politics*.

It was always my understanding Voice for men ran JVs piece with his permission. A number of us did also warn him at the time that this was a *political* mistake.

Sad. Considering the propensity of some atheists to dox, I don't even trust atheistrev.
The idea that this place is a hate site is ridiculous.
We are a LOL site.

Justin posting Surly Amys address here was opposed by most of the people who commented - as was the posting of oolons details.
If we were really a hate site then we must be the most inept bunch of haters ever. :(
The same goes for A Voice for Men. Obviously it's a article of faith that AVfM is a ravenous hate site filled with rapey guys, guys who hate, who hate and rape and rapety-rape-rape.

Although, I haven't seen it. Do they get some guys fresh from a burn? Sure. Do they get guys who are venting a mile-a-minute because someone is finally listening to them? That to.

But hate, much less pathological hatred of women? Not a bit. At best, you can say the atmosphere in that regard is of an overwhelming sense of betrayal ("But you said this would benefit us too").

When evidence is given of this, it's invariably either someone with an obvious political fund-raising agenda like The Southern Poverty Law center that asserts that it kinda sort of can be sometimes hateful or you get the usual "the world is run by 12 year old trolls in comments, apparently" evidence. Or you get someone like Pickles Dillahunty who knows "sick MRA bullshit" because...uh...well...someone told him and no, he doesn't have time to figure out who.

The reason that Atheism Plus and the RadFem Etsy drinking club describes AVfM as a hate site is the same reason The Westboro Baptist Church "hates fags": They are so fucking nuts that the only social cohesion they can have is through representative boogeymen. Fred Phelps thinks he's God's ventriloquist dummy and Atheism Plus is all about a narrow and self-serving definition of "social justice" and so to hide that they are just all about hate, they have to hate the hate, even if they have to project like motherfuckers and generally make shit up.

One day they will refer to AVfM as a hate site and 1. Actually pull up a quote that isn't quote mined 2. Pull up something that is actually central to Men's Rights rather than a comment by some retarded troll at the bottom of a thread 3. Not ascribing to AVfm something they've pulled from the man-o-sphere in general, like Pick Up Artists or simply out their asses and 4. Not something that they think is unconscionable that they claim AVfM does which is, not incidentally, something Plussers do more and better such as harassment, lying, doxing and generally being a bunch of "end justifies the means" psychopaths in training.

Odd that Atheism Plus isn't all about radical feminism, yet they've selected as their central target of contempt one of the more cohesive and egalitarian Men's Rights groups. If they didn't have their carefully crafted and almost entirely fictitious enemies, they would have nothing better to do than eat each other.

real horrorshow
.
.
Posts: 1505
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:59 am
Location: In a band of brigands.

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17269

Post by real horrorshow »

ERV wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:Kudos to Matt D for not caving in to the pity party's spoiled-brat tantrum demands.
How pathetic is it that we have to give these people 'kudos' for having some principles.

And Im still not convinced Matt 'gets it' (what happened/is happening to him happened/is happening to everyone else, and Matt participated in this behavior himself), and him 'not caving' is really just more hypocrisy ('It was fine when I was a douche to Thunderf00t... but when people are a douche to ME its DIFFERENT! IM SPECIAL!').
Absolutely. The core of being a sceptic is having the will to change your mind when presented with evidence that conflicts with your previous opinion. It's hard. No one likes to be wrong, and admitting it in public is even tougher. Dillahunty, however, has been an out and proud believer from day one of A+. I don't think he has the balls to reverse his position. In a week or so, this will all have vanished behind a cloud of bullshit-scented pixie-dust.

jeh704

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17270

Post by jeh704 »

Guest wrote:
Gumby wrote:http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Now, I freely admit that not many people want to notice something like that. But masturbating or not, it does seem that Jen McCreight shares the same disdain for homeless men that Ophelia "I can't believe I had to sit near a smelly homeless guy on the bus" Benson does. The guy could be mentally ill, be hungry or cold, need lots of help... but to Jen he's just some disgusting worthless homeless wanker worthy of nothing but a shudder of revulsion. Aren't these people supposed to be social justice warriors? Shouldn't they care about this person, despite his public worm-wrestling? Oh, right, the homeless man wasn't a woman. They don't give a flying fuck. How dare that homeless man violate that poor victimized Jen's right to never feel offended!
LMAO! Are these people for real?

They believe they are!

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17271

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

real horrorshow wrote:
ERV wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:Kudos to Matt D for not caving in to the pity party's spoiled-brat tantrum demands.
How pathetic is it that we have to give these people 'kudos' for having some principles.

And Im still not convinced Matt 'gets it' (what happened/is happening to him happened/is happening to everyone else, and Matt participated in this behavior himself), and him 'not caving' is really just more hypocrisy ('It was fine when I was a douche to Thunderf00t... but when people are a douche to ME its DIFFERENT! IM SPECIAL!').
Absolutely. The core of being a sceptic is having the will to change your mind when presented with evidence that conflicts with your previous opinion. It's hard. No one likes to be wrong, and admitting it in public is even tougher. Dillahunty, however, has been an out and proud believer from day one of A+. I don't think he has the balls to reverse his position. In a week or so, this will all have vanished behind a cloud of bullshit-scented pixie-dust.
(To continue the lulzy flamewars):

Bullshit! Being wrong and admitting it is not hard. It's not tough. It does, however, takes an amount of introspection, humility and rationalism.

Ok, you may have a point WRT A+ and Cie...

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17272

Post by Mykeru »

jeh704 wrote:
Guest wrote:
Gumby wrote:http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Now, I freely admit that not many people want to notice something like that. But masturbating or not, it does seem that Jen McCreight shares the same disdain for homeless men that Ophelia "I can't believe I had to sit near a smelly homeless guy on the bus" Benson does. The guy could be mentally ill, be hungry or cold, need lots of help... but to Jen he's just some disgusting worthless homeless wanker worthy of nothing but a shudder of revulsion. Aren't these people supposed to be social justice warriors? Shouldn't they care about this person, despite his public worm-wrestling? Oh, right, the homeless man wasn't a woman. They don't give a flying fuck. How dare that homeless man violate that poor victimized Jen's right to never feel offended!
LMAO! Are these people for real?

They believe they are!
Meanwhile on the Awesome Social Justice Forumforum.

Search for Malala Yousufzai Results: 3
Search for Masturbation: Results 82

Well, at least Jen McCreight's masturbation horror didn't get its own thread.

Oh, wait...http://goo.gl/xvH1C

Outwest
.
.
Posts: 448
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:01 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17273

Post by Outwest »

Mykeru wrote:
jeh704 wrote:
Guest wrote:
Gumby wrote:http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Now, I freely admit that not many people want to notice something like that. But masturbating or not, it does seem that Jen McCreight shares the same disdain for homeless men that Ophelia "I can't believe I had to sit near a smelly homeless guy on the bus" Benson does. The guy could be mentally ill, be hungry or cold, need lots of help... but to Jen he's just some disgusting worthless homeless wanker worthy of nothing but a shudder of revulsion. Aren't these people supposed to be social justice warriors? Shouldn't they care about this person, despite his public worm-wrestling? Oh, right, the homeless man wasn't a woman. They don't give a flying fuck. How dare that homeless man violate that poor victimized Jen's right to never feel offended!
LMAO! Are these people for real?

They believe they are!
Meanwhile on the Awesome Social Justice Forumforum.

Search for Malala Yousufzai Results: 3
Search for Masturbation: Results 82

Well, at least Jen McCreight's masturbation horror didn't get its own thread.

Oh, wait...http://goo.gl/xvH1C

The real test will be to see how long it takes for the FTB crowd to jump to her defense!

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17274

Post by Tony Parsehole »

Mykeru wrote:
jeh704 wrote:
Guest wrote:
Gumby wrote:http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Now, I freely admit that not many people want to notice something like that. But masturbating or not, it does seem that Jen McCreight shares the same disdain for homeless men that Ophelia "I can't believe I had to sit near a smelly homeless guy on the bus" Benson does. The guy could be mentally ill, be hungry or cold, need lots of help... but to Jen he's just some disgusting worthless homeless wanker worthy of nothing but a shudder of revulsion. Aren't these people supposed to be social justice warriors? Shouldn't they care about this person, despite his public worm-wrestling? Oh, right, the homeless man wasn't a woman. They don't give a flying fuck. How dare that homeless man violate that poor victimized Jen's right to never feel offended!
LMAO! Are these people for real?
Saw this response to jen on twitter by Atheism++ "Atheism++ ‏@AtheismPlusPlus
Homeless ppl: buy a home if u want to jerk off."

LOL!


They believe they are!
Meanwhile on the Awesome Social Justice Forumforum.

Search for Malala Yousufzai Results: 3
Search for Masturbation: Results 82

Well, at least Jen McCreight's masturbation horror didn't get its own thread.

Oh, wait...http://goo.gl/xvH1C

Tony Parsehole
.
.
Posts: 6658
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 8:16 am
Location: Middlesbrough

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17275

Post by Tony Parsehole »

That last message was meant to include this from twitter : Atheism++ ‏@AtheismPlusPlus
Homeless ppl: buy a home if u want to jerk off.

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17276

Post by Mykeru »

Outwest wrote:
Mykeru wrote:
jeh704 wrote:
Guest wrote:
Gumby wrote:http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Now, I freely admit that not many people want to notice something like that. But masturbating or not, it does seem that Jen McCreight shares the same disdain for homeless men that Ophelia "I can't believe I had to sit near a smelly homeless guy on the bus" Benson does. The guy could be mentally ill, be hungry or cold, need lots of help... but to Jen he's just some disgusting worthless homeless wanker worthy of nothing but a shudder of revulsion. Aren't these people supposed to be social justice warriors? Shouldn't they care about this person, despite his public worm-wrestling? Oh, right, the homeless man wasn't a woman. They don't give a flying fuck. How dare that homeless man violate that poor victimized Jen's right to never feel offended!
LMAO! Are these people for real?

They believe they are!
Meanwhile on the Awesome Social Justice Forumforum.

Search for Malala Yousufzai Results: 3
Search for Masturbation: Results 82

Well, at least Jen McCreight's masturbation horror didn't get its own thread.

Oh, wait...http://goo.gl/xvH1C

The real test will be to see how long it takes for the FTB crowd to jump to her defense!
Yes, and I'm betting on less than 250 words before someone gets to "It doesn't matter if homeless wanker guy exists, because this sort of thing happens and women (beings I've read about in manga but never personally interacted with) faced with homeless guys fapping is a problem in our community"

Here they come to save the daaaaay!

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17277

Post by AndrewV69 »

real horrorshow wrote:
ERV wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:Kudos to Matt D for not caving in to the pity party's spoiled-brat tantrum demands.
How pathetic is it that we have to give these people 'kudos' for having some principles.

And Im still not convinced Matt 'gets it' (what happened/is happening to him happened/is happening to everyone else, and Matt participated in this behavior himself), and him 'not caving' is really just more hypocrisy ('It was fine when I was a douche to Thunderf00t... but when people are a douche to ME its DIFFERENT! IM SPECIAL!').
Absolutely. The core of being a sceptic is having the will to change your mind when presented with evidence that conflicts with your previous opinion. It's hard. No one likes to be wrong, and admitting it in public is even tougher. Dillahunty, however, has been an out and proud believer from day one of A+. I don't think he has the balls to reverse his position. In a week or so, this will all have vanished behind a cloud of bullshit-scented pixie-dust.
My take is that it would depend to a large degree as to how much you have invested into being right, and that could take many forms such as how much an authority you consider yourself to be and so on.

I remember once forcing myself to give an apology to a six year old in a room full of adults. Very annoying for me, but I thought it was the right thing to do since I had reprimanded her earlier with the same audience.

(As an aside, I was deliberately teaching myself a lesson and I felt that otherwise I would have been letting her down. This child had once demonstrated her complete faith in me, by putting her hands into the air and stepping off into space at the top of a long flight of stairs, with the absolute certainty I would catch her.)

Mykeru
.
.
Posts: 4758
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:52 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17278

Post by Mykeru »

Tony Parsehole wrote:That last message was meant to include this from twitter : Atheism++ ‏@AtheismPlusPlus
Homeless ppl: buy a home if u want to jerk off.
I'm still traumatized by BoobQuake. The sight of so many slack asymmetrical and positively equine knockers being bounced about in making some point or another.

That was a one time thing, right?

Please?

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17279

Post by bhoytony »

TheMan wrote:

I used to do some volunteer work at a house established to home people with developmental/intellectual disorders, some of them in electric wheel chairs. I used to pop in every second wednesday evening and fart arse around with play dough (home made). I was told not to get them too excited but playing with play dough generally descended into a food fight or playing attach the play dough penis to the person sitting next to you... I didn't discourage them in this free art making.
Is your name Amy and do you sell these pieces of art on the internet?

codelette
.
.
Posts: 788
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:01 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17280

Post by codelette »

Mykeru wrote:
Tony Parsehole wrote:That last message was meant to include this from twitter : Atheism++ ‏@AtheismPlusPlus
Homeless ppl: buy a home if u want to jerk off.
I'm still traumatized by BoobQuake. The sight of so many slack asymmetrical and positively equine knockers being bounced about in making some point or another.

That was a one time thing, right?

Please?
The best thing about Boobquake was the earthquake that ocurred that day.

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17281

Post by bhoytony »

Michael K Gray wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:Where's Dickie Carrier when you really need him?
Wilfred Bramble?
Steptoe vs The Awesome DICK Carrier?

'ere 'arold! Gimme a hand with this Victorian draft excluder, will ya son?
No, I ain't pretendin' this time. Honest.
There is only one FTB Albert Steptoe and it's not Richard Carrier.

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/8885 ... 8dd6b4.png

real horrorshow
.
.
Posts: 1505
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:59 am
Location: In a band of brigands.

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17282

Post by real horrorshow »

Mykeru wrote:Here they come to save the daaaaay!
julian (his wings are like a shield of steel) wrote:Needless to say, I kinda wanna snap one of their necks right now.
Needless to say indeed julian, since this is your response to everything.
Sorry but I'm the type of person who responds with an incredible amount of anger

Perceptive, I - like many others - do find your anger incredible. Are you on an all-sugar-and-caffine diet?
towards such blatant dismissals of sexual harassment.
Indeed, screw the homeless guy lets focus on Jen's feelings.
There's no level of harassment so great or so clear that atheists will not excuse it if the person being harassed is someone they feel contempt for.
He's talking about you guys.
I don't want to hear about how wonderful atheism is. How forward thinking atheism is...
"Or any opinion that isn't my own"?
I want to hear from all the people (like Russel Blackford, like Jeremy Stangroom, like Renee Hendricks, like Paula Kirby, like so many others) who feel this behavior is less severe, less worthy condemnation, less worth getting worked up about than even some of the more strongly worded anti-harassment policies for cons.
Damn right julian! I too want to hear how this piece of trivial whiny bullshit is any less important than some other piece of trivial whiny bullshit.

What do we want?

Over-reaction!

When do we want it?

All the time!!!111one one!

papillon
.
.
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:26 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17283

Post by papillon »

Hi guise,
Just de-lurking to say hi.
[I got here from a Google search of 'nasty+atheist+cunts'. I was after the skepchick nudie calender, but ended up here instead. A happy accident.]

Hoping to post a little here and there, always eager to add some more bile to the internet hate machine.
/Formalities over.

Guest

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17284

Post by Guest »

Outwest wrote:
Mykeru wrote:
jeh704 wrote:
Guest wrote:
Gumby wrote:http://i47.tinypic.com/bdwsva.jpg

Now, I freely admit that not many people want to notice something like that. But masturbating or not, it does seem that Jen McCreight shares the same disdain for homeless men that Ophelia "I can't believe I had to sit near a smelly homeless guy on the bus" Benson does. The guy could be mentally ill, be hungry or cold, need lots of help... but to Jen he's just some disgusting worthless homeless wanker worthy of nothing but a shudder of revulsion. Aren't these people supposed to be social justice warriors? Shouldn't they care about this person, despite his public worm-wrestling? Oh, right, the homeless man wasn't a woman. They don't give a flying fuck. How dare that homeless man violate that poor victimized Jen's right to never feel offended!
LMAO! Are these people for real?

They believe they are!
Meanwhile on the Awesome Social Justice Forumforum.

Search for Malala Yousufzai Results: 3
Search for Masturbation: Results 82

Well, at least Jen McCreight's masturbation horror didn't get its own thread.

Oh, wait...http://goo.gl/xvH1C

The real test will be to see how long it takes for the FTB crowd to jump to her defense!
Well, you know she claims to be a pervert in her self description at her blog. She should have at least offered the guy a hand job in that spirit.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#17285

Post by Lsuoma »

bhoytony wrote:
Michael K Gray wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:Where's Dickie Carrier when you really need him?
Wilfred Bramble?
Steptoe vs The Awesome DICK Carrier?

'ere 'arold! Gimme a hand with this Victorian draft excluder, will ya son?
No, I ain't pretendin' this time. Honest.
There is only one FTB Albert Steptoe and it's not Richard Carrier.

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/8885 ... 8dd6b4.png
Youma put this one in the archives, please?

Locked