Periodic Table of Swearing

Old subthreads
Dick Strawkins
.
.
Posts: 5859
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11961

Post by Dick Strawkins »

Heintje wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:I know that Greta Christina has defended pedophelia in the past (at least forms of pedophelic pornography that don't involve actual child abuse - for example photoshopping pictures of children or animated child characters that are shown having sex with adults.
Perhaps this is their new policy:
Atheismplus - a safe place for child molesters! :shock:
I, too, am inclined to believe that the paedophile is real. First, a paedophile is not a child-molestor until he/she has molested a child. Please don't conflate the two.
Perhaps molester is too strong a word without evidence of something further.
At the same time you don't need to physically touch a child to have contributed to abuse - just look at all the people who have been found to have downloaded child porn.

Heintje
.
.
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 6:54 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11962

Post by Heintje »

Dick Strawkins wrote:Perhaps molester is too strong a word without evidence of something further.
At the same time you don't need to physically touch a child to have contributed to abuse - just look at all the people who have been found to have downloaded child porn.
I agree, but in this case we don't have any evidence that he indulges in child porn either. If it is not too presumptuous for me to ask, let's not speak ill of this person any further. I think he already suffers enough - I imagine it would be kind of like being gay in a society where homosexuality is punishable by death.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11963

Post by cunt »

They have a back-slapping thread to accompany that one.

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=801

It must suck being Jadehawk, too depressed to work but still able to afford a college education, internet connection, food, water, gas, electricity, rent. What a terrible society that allows for that to happen.

Also, the "pedophile" was an obvious troll.

Dilurk
.
.
Posts: 1215
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11964

Post by Dilurk »

franc wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:
franc wrote:Effects of not having privilege(Trigger Warning: Oppression)

Post by Catherine » Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:45 am
So gender traitor chill girls and 'misogynists', like Dawkins and Russell Blackford, are not welcome in Atheism plus, but pedophiles are fine :shock:
Fucking really. If any of them were animals, and you didn't put them to sleep and out of their misery, it would be animal cruelty.
Thought I would make a thread where people can share their experiences of not having privilege:

Because I am transgendered I have never had a relationship
Because I am transgendered I had to give up my teaching Job
Because I am transgendered I face transphobic abuse from strangers

...
Bunch of lunatics all of them.

Git
.
.
Posts: 1271
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:31 pm
Location: Engerland

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11965

Post by Git »

Two new pearls of wisdom on A+.

First a thread where they spend their time shilling for Islam, and defending one of the most misogynist concepts in existence (veiling):

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=225

And then a thread where they, wait for it, debate how to "overthrow Capitalism":

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=437

Wonder if anyone has told Surlyamy yet that she's a kulak?

Git
.
.
Posts: 1271
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:31 pm
Location: Engerland

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11966

Post by Git »

A link I posted on the facebook group, will also post it here (P.S. Phil, ffs, accept my friend request will you? I need to spam you with cat pictures!)

http://www.theawl.com/2012/05/when-trig ... ts-meaning
This is a sign of how far afield "trigger warnings" have gone: it's insulting, infantilizing and comes from some part of the Internet that only exists in parts of California, I'm pretty sure.
Triggers are a pretty specific psychological phenomenon. They are not the same as being reminded of things one does not like. When the term becomes too general it stifles regular conversation because the phrase carries with it, in common usage, the idea that we should respect the severe psychological responses to otherwise ordinary exchanges, and should modify our behavior accordingly. In the case of a severe response, this seems justified. In lesser cases it seems like a word used to make people stop talking about something you don't want them to talk about.
I'm kinda concerned that the phrasing of "triggered," a relatively newly-recognized phenomenon, is jumping past its intended usage. "Triggered" is becoming the new "codependent," in that it's a word that's getting overused and used to mean something other than the original meaning, and therefore starts to mean nothing.

Git
.
.
Posts: 1271
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:31 pm
Location: Engerland

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11967

Post by Git »

Why am I still reading A+. The ludicrous Alyss is now defending Chairman fucking Mao and insisting that claims that tens of millions killed by him are "US Propaganda". All from the safety of Massachusetts.

Fuck me, do any of these toilet revolutionaries realise that in any sort of totalitarian regime they'd be the first to be dragged to an execution post, screaming in terror?

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11968

Post by cunt »

Git wrote:Why am I still reading A+. The ludicrous Alyss is now defending Chairman fucking Mao and insisting that claims that tens of millions killed by him are "US Propaganda". All from the safety of Massachusetts.

Fuck me, do any of these toilet revolutionaries realise that in any sort of totalitarian regime they'd be the first to be dragged to an execution post, screaming in terror?
Ah, Alyss. The autistic transexual with a history of mental illness.

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11969

Post by Tigzy »

The A+ forum is one sad, strange, disturbing place.

Am I the only one who thinks the whole A+ thing is crashing and burning already?

Git
.
.
Posts: 1271
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:31 pm
Location: Engerland

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11970

Post by Git »

cunt wrote:
Git wrote:Why am I still reading A+. The ludicrous Alyss is now defending Chairman fucking Mao and insisting that claims that tens of millions killed by him are "US Propaganda". All from the safety of Massachusetts.

Fuck me, do any of these toilet revolutionaries realise that in any sort of totalitarian regime they'd be the first to be dragged to an execution post, screaming in terror?
Ah, Alyss. The autistic transexual with a history of mental illness.
I think the whole autistic transexual thing is utterly irrelevant to this though.

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11971

Post by cunt »

Git wrote:
cunt wrote:
Git wrote:Why am I still reading A+. The ludicrous Alyss is now defending Chairman fucking Mao and insisting that claims that tens of millions killed by him are "US Propaganda". All from the safety of Massachusetts.

Fuck me, do any of these toilet revolutionaries realise that in any sort of totalitarian regime they'd be the first to be dragged to an execution post, screaming in terror?
Ah, Alyss. The autistic transexual with a history of mental illness.
I think the whole autistic transexual thing is utterly irrelevant to this though.
Maybe the trans part is.

Git
.
.
Posts: 1271
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:31 pm
Location: Engerland

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11972

Post by Git »

Tigzy wrote:The A+ forum is one sad, strange, disturbing place.

Am I the only one who thinks the whole A+ thing is crashing and burning already?
I'm opening a book on how long it will be before you see 9/11 Truthery and Holocaust Denial on there.

Git
.
.
Posts: 1271
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:31 pm
Location: Engerland

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11973

Post by Git »

cunt wrote:
Git wrote:
cunt wrote:
Git wrote:Why am I still reading A+. The ludicrous Alyss is now defending Chairman fucking Mao and insisting that claims that tens of millions killed by him are "US Propaganda". All from the safety of Massachusetts.

Fuck me, do any of these toilet revolutionaries realise that in any sort of totalitarian regime they'd be the first to be dragged to an execution post, screaming in terror?
Ah, Alyss. The autistic transexual with a history of mental illness.
I think the whole autistic transexual thing is utterly irrelevant to this though.
Maybe the trans part is.
It is. Someone's sexual identity is irrelevant to the matter, at, err, hand.

Tigzy
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 6789
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11974

Post by Tigzy »

Git wrote:
Tigzy wrote:The A+ forum is one sad, strange, disturbing place.

Am I the only one who thinks the whole A+ thing is crashing and burning already?
I'm opening a book on how long it will be before you see 9/11 Truthery and Holocaust Denial on there.
The interesting thing is that if one were really that opposed to A+, you'd have to do pretty much shit all to counter them. It's the Aplussers' own who have done the most damage so far: Carrier, 'widdle pwincess' Jen and her overbearing father, and that utterly, utterly bizarre forum. One really only has to sit back and gawk, aghast, as the whole grisly thing destroys itself.

KarlVonMox
.
.
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:44 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11975

Post by KarlVonMox »

Git wrote:Why am I still reading A+. The ludicrous Alyss is now defending Chairman fucking Mao and insisting that claims that tens of millions killed by him are "US Propaganda". All from the safety of Massachusetts.

Fuck me, do any of these toilet revolutionaries realise that in any sort of totalitarian regime they'd be the first to be dragged to an execution post, screaming in terror?
I gave up on reading anything associated with their bizarre cult-like movement a long time ago. I cant handle anymore of their mind-numbing nonsense...just reading that thread gave me a headache.

Thankfully, I think we can be quite sure that the vast majority of secularists that don't spend every waking moment on their computers whining on forums and comment threads about how oppressed they are wont buy into their nonsense. Its just drama of the worst kind. :violin:

JackRayner
.
.
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:27 am
Location: In the basement of the University of Minnesota Morris
Contact:

Re: the views of MRAs

#11976

Post by JackRayner »

sacha wrote:
I was with a very close friend of mine last night (Englishman). I attempted to get him up to date with PZ, Watson, and the baboons (He's been in Europe for over a month and a half, and too busy to do more than what was necessary online). I told him that at this point it has become bizarre that Steven Novella is continuing to defend her and keep her on the SGU when it seems that the only others defending her are baboons and their sycophants, and those in the sceptic community who are opposed to her have become quite numerous and vocal, especially since A+theism.

I mentioned the A Voice For Men podcast in which they discuss Watson, told him a bit about Girl Writes What and in passing, I said something to the effect of "of course, I'm a MRA" and he replied "A MRA? I thought you were simply for equality"
I assumed that considering myself a MRA was common knowledge to him, as we have spoken about my support for men, and anger at their treatment in many different facets of US* society, at length, he has seen my reaction whenever there is blatant misandry in adverts and the media, and he has been with me numerous times when I have made it extremely clear that I refuse to keep quiet when someone perpetuates the belief that it is perfectly fine to refer to men in ways that would never be tolerated if it were men referring to women the exact same way. He has seen me speak up when women find humour at the expense of men, but would be outraged at the “misogynistic” men who would dare to laugh at a woman's expense, He has heard me ask men why they tolerate this behaviour, and he has heard the stories of why I will not go out with a group of women under any circumstances, as I've never been with a group of women when the topic of discussion did not very quickly turn into a man-bashing party.

Over the years, he has also heard me tell the tales** of either overhearing, being directly told, or having first-hand knowledge of what many women are willing to do to men who simply did not want to continue a relationship with them, or never wanted to start one after having sex with them. A level of vindictiveness only the truly psychotic men even come close to.

So I was surprised that he did not consider me an MRA, and *I realised that the majority of my experiences with misandry were all in the US, and that the vast majority of women baboons are from the US, and although I have always felt more comfortable with men, and have always had a distrust of most women (with very good reason, even if one only looks at how they treat other women) and often found I had very little in common with them, I don’t remember the behaviour by the majority being anywhere close to what it is in the US, and there is a very distinct difference in the women who have moved to the US from other countries.

My response to him was that in Merkinland, I feel the need to counteract what society deems appropriate when it comes to men, by being vocal in my support that men (and boys) have become the oppressed, and that they are the ones in need of vocal advocates, especially those who are women, and although my world view is one of advocating gender equality, in the US, the men need me more.

It’s possible that the disconnect in the perception of why one would consider themselves an MRA on this thread, has everything to do with what part of the world is most familiar to them.

**I've heard everything from cutting up or burning all of his clothing, to extreme stalking and harassment, to reporting false accusations of rape, and not just once or twice. The amount of times I have heard women advise their friends who are hurt by the fact that their boyfriend chose to end the relationship with them to "ruin his life" is far more than I can count. These examples are not even including the women who go to court to take every last cent of their husband's money in a divorce, even when he was very good to her the entire marriage, and was as kind as possible when explaining he wanted to live without her, or those women who go to court and tell lies in order to stop him from seeing his children, when they know, almost always, courts in the US rule in their favour.

In the US, women who become vindictive towards men who want out of a relationship are not the minority, and I could write a tome about most women and their reaction after casual sex, even when they knew ahead of time, that is all it will ever be.
"hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" is not an exaggeration.

Just to be clear, of course I have known women who would never even consider behaving that way. I recently spent the evening with a casual friend, and her friend, and had a great time, the times men were mentioned, it was always in a positive light, (of course one of them was raised by parents who are not Merkin, and the other is Brazilian.)

Hm. I wonder if it really is the culture here. If it is, it still seem like the ultimate deciding factor is individual personalities. Some will embrace it, and others will reject it.

I dated a woman from Barbados once, and she had an awesome attitude. She wasn't the epitome of femininity either, though. (Had her hair cut shorter than mine, and her idea of fun was climbing trees and wrestling. Seeing bruises on her was common.) On the other end, one of the students at my school, a girl from Morocco majoring in fashion design, who models on the side, (maybe that says something) said that once she dates a man that makes a certain amount of money, she is incapable of dating anyone that makes less. Repulsive, is the only word I can think of for that. She's pretty attractive, but her air smells. I'd never even consider dating someone like that, and not just because I'm a broke art student. :lol:

That post on how misogynists are made is interesting. I stopped and wondered, but I still resist the label. By default, I mistrust everyone equally initially. (Okay, maybe not. Authority figures earn more distrust from me.) Any greater level of distrust, from a first impression, will be related to my brief assessment of whatever they're wearing on their sleeve that day. Sure, there are certain types of women that I automatically decide are not worthy of my trust, but there are also certain types of men...

Anyhow, thanks for sharing.

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11977

Post by bhoytony »

Oh, that privilege thread is just begging for a Poe. Who's up for it? Mind you after reading the one that went:
"Because I am gifted....." for about half a page and then whined on about having asthma as if it were the Black Death I'm not sure we could come up with a Poe that was as ridiculous as the real thing.
Still, I am tempted. Surely we have someone who could post there.

"Because I am ginger I have to wear a tea cosy...."

Git
.
.
Posts: 1271
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:31 pm
Location: Engerland

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11978

Post by Git »

bhoytony wrote:Oh, that privilege thread is just begging for a Poe. Who's up for it? Mind you after reading the one that went:
"Because I am gifted....." for about half a page and then whined on about having asthma as if it were the Black Death I'm not sure we could come up with a Poe that was as ridiculous as the real thing.
Still, I am tempted. Surely we have someone who could post there.

"Because I am ginger I have to wear a tea cosy...."
I have asthma. I have been hospitalised in the past because of it. I take montelukast daily, and Ventolin as appopriate, and stay out of smoky atmospheres.

Help, help, I'm being oppressed.

Mr Danksworth
.
.
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:30 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11979

Post by Mr Danksworth »

Git wrote:Two new pearls of wisdom on A+.

First a thread where they spend their time shilling for Islam, and defending one of the most misogynist concepts in existence (veiling):

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=225

And then a thread where they, wait for it, debate how to "overthrow Capitalism":

http://atheismplus.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=437

Wonder if anyone has told Surlyamy yet that she's a kulak?
So it is really is a place for washed out 'Occupy' protesters and Kony 2012 promo package purchasers.

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11980

Post by bhoytony »

Git wrote:
bhoytony wrote:Oh, that privilege thread is just begging for a Poe. Who's up for it? Mind you after reading the one that went:
"Because I am gifted....." for about half a page and then whined on about having asthma as if it were the Black Death I'm not sure we could come up with a Poe that was as ridiculous as the real thing.
Still, I am tempted. Surely we have someone who could post there.

"Because I am ginger I have to wear a tea cosy...."
I have asthma. I have been hospitalised in the past because of it. I take montelukast daily, and Ventolin as appopriate, and stay out of smoky atmospheres.

Help, help, I'm being oppressed.
Yes, yes, but are you ginger?

Dear Muslima....

John Greg
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 2669
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:05 pm
Location: New Westminster, BC, Canada

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11981

Post by John Greg »

Oh well, I suppose it should not come as a surprise, but Jean Kazez has now publically stated her willingness to wear the Gown of Truthiness so she won't have to deal with those nasty mean and vile people who have the affrontery, the affontery I say, to disgaree with her.

Like a puff of smoke, yet one more supposed intellectual drinks the flavour-aid and flushes themselves down the drain into room 101.

link: http://kazez.blogspot.ca/2012/09/misogy ... -life.html

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11982

Post by bhoytony »

Just had a look at Jen McWrong's dad's blog. I particularly loved this sneaky little comment. Classic. Well played that man.
John D.

You know, Mike, this message would probably cut a little deeper, and reach further, if you made and uploaded a video. A lot of people nowadays are too lazy to bother reading, and I think your message is both poignant and important. People on the internet need to be taught some respect!

Mr Danksworth
.
.
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:30 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11983

Post by Mr Danksworth »

bhoytony wrote:Just had a look at Jen McWrong's dad's blog. I particularly loved this sneaky little comment. Classic. Well played that man.
John D.

You know, Mike, this message would probably cut a little deeper, and reach further, if you made and uploaded a video. A lot of people nowadays are too lazy to bother reading, and I think your message is both poignant and important. People on the internet need to be taught some respect!
Daddy Slaughter Part Deux? One can only hope.

Mr Danksworth
.
.
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:30 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11984

Post by Mr Danksworth »

This one slipped passed moderation. Dear Musima and all of that....

"Criag Urias said...
There is a wide range of variability in Internet addiction or at least Internet obsessiveness. Out of millions, we expect some number to exhibit strong obsessiveness and strong opinions. In the extreme case we find nutjobs. Since these people make a disproportionate amount of noise, the tail end of the distribution curve becomes exaggerated in our minds, leading to misperceptions.

Just as we are evolved to perceive human-length time intervals (and not deep time) and human-magnitude velocities (and not near-lightspeed velocities), we misperceive the attitude of a group of millions of people when we use our online experience as evidence. Also see the 1% rule.

In addition, being personally attacked also skews our perception, causing us to give undue weight to a handful of individuals. Moreover, personal attacks create a vicious cycle leading to an even greater exaggeration of the distribution tail segment. We don't see tit-for-tat exchanges of kindness that drag out for months or years, or whole websites devoted solely to raining compliments upon a group of bloggers.

We should therefore be skeptical of an individual's assessment of a particular group's social problems formed from the individual's perceptions gathered online.

Jean, if you think about the factors which culminated in your current belief that there is a "misogyny war", doesn't it boil down to a small number of individuals? Your attitude seems to have shifted after you were unjustly attacked. While the sense of injustice is a very real and palpable thing, it is helpful to find some perspective. Think about the millions of people in the secular population worldwide. In Europe there are whole countries of atheists. So you ran into a few nutjobs. In the long view, so what?

Before elevatorgate we did not hear about atheism particularly having a misogyny problem. Shouldn't we have noticed it before? Isn't it more likely that we are looking at an online phenomenon? Internet discussions tend toward conflict due to missing cues from body language, pressure to defend oneself in front of thousands or (potentially) millions, social stroking from commenters that give license to otherwise antisocial behavior, the (sometimes monetary) incentive to increase traffic by discussing contentious issues, and of course the perils that accompany anonymity. Personal drama does not generally require deep contemplation or research, making it perfectly suited for high-volume blogging.

And remember the Internet includes literal and figurative children who love the attention that Internet flaming gives them. For them, nothing is more exciting than seeing their words quoted and accompanied by outrage. They "win" every time that happens, and lately they have found a wellspring of seemingly unlimited wins."

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11985

Post by bhoytony »

Mr Danksworth wrote:
bhoytony wrote:Just had a look at Jen McWrong's dad's blog. I particularly loved this sneaky little comment. Classic. Well played that man.
John D.

You know, Mike, this message would probably cut a little deeper, and reach further, if you made and uploaded a video. A lot of people nowadays are too lazy to bother reading, and I think your message is both poignant and important. People on the internet need to be taught some respect!
Daddy Slaughter Part Deux? One can only hope.
And look what happened to him.

Reap
.
.
Posts: 630
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:27 pm
Location: Reno Nevada
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11986

Post by Reap »

I would like to make a point to people reading who voice a less than A+ opinion of The Slyme Pit+. Do you notice gangs of people piling on others with a differing point of view? Have you seen people being banned for simply disagreeing? Has anyone resorted to screaming out "TROLL!" just because they can not support a point? At any time has anyone demanded that certain beliefs must be held in order to interact with the others in the forum? Does there seem to be a habit of calling people stupid because they simply have a different opinion?
Is it a "safe" place to say whatever you wish surrounded by nodding heads? No, it is not and it shouldn't be. A place that does not allow a free exchange of ideas AND peer review does not encourage positive/fair change. A forum of only like-minded people is good for growing egos but little else.
And for the record there has been no attempt by any of the slyme pit members to control my mind or actions as of yet ....even if this did/does occur it will still be none of your business so F off. I hope this clears up any misunderstandings you may have had, have a nice day.


Shameless opinion plug http://reapstruth.blogspot.com/2012/09/ ... -isnt.html
Also Maria Maltseva was a guest on the A-news podcast last night in case you want to keep an eye out, it should be up today

sacha
.
.
Posts: 2450
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:31 am
Location: Gender Traitors International

Re: My Little Princess & her Happy Army

#11987

Post by sacha »

Michael K Gray wrote:
DownThunder wrote:That generous over inflation of ones abilities and accomplishments seems to have carried over into adult life.
Again, mea culpa in the early years with her (0~2).
0-2 is when it SHOULD be done. That is when they build confidence. When they get a few years older and they are still being infantilised is the problem.

haha! when looking to see if I spelled infantilised correctly, Google US gave me this:
definition.jpg
(21.5 KiB) Downloaded 195 times

lost control
.
.
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 3:21 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11988

Post by lost control »

Darren wrote:
jennyfuckoff.png
source
Harumph. So I guess recurrent minor depressive disorder then? Bad enough - and can fuck up your life as well, but a major depressive episode would kinda keep one from twittering, usually.
And nope, to the best of my knowledge, there's no such fucking thing as chronic depression. At least not as a medical term. (Or is the DSM that shite in cotrast to the ICD?) Fuck, any depressive I've met knows that, cause you learn that shit in psychiatric care. And at least in my area, the psychiatrists and clinical psychologists make sure to only use the proper medical terms, in order to help one deal with the bullshit one usually gets with lay-idiots, who range from co-workers to bosses, to...

Oh well, reminds me, I finally gotta give a call to the inmate who helped me back then, without her, I wouldn't have gotten back on my feet.

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11989

Post by bhoytony »

OK, who was it? Come on own up.

http://img542.imageshack.us/img542/6963 ... 37fcdd.png

This post has now been removed. Luckily I got a screencap first.

sacha
.
.
Posts: 2450
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:31 am
Location: Gender Traitors International

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11990

Post by sacha »

Heintje wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:I know that Greta Christina has defended pedophelia in the past (at least forms of pedophelic pornography that don't involve actual child abuse - for example photoshopping pictures of children or animated child characters that are shown having sex with adults.
Perhaps this is their new policy:
Atheismplus - a safe place for child molesters! :shock:
I, too, am inclined to believe that the paedophile is real. First, a paedophile is not a child-molestor until he/she has molested a child. Please don't conflate the two.

Having read some popular books, articles, etc. on neuroscience, I am not surprised if there really are people who, not by their own choice, are sexually attracted to children - they are just 'cursed' with such neurobiology. Most of the time, they know sex with children is wrong and their frontal lobes are doing a wondrous job of inhibiting them from acting on their impulse.
Cited in this brilliant essay* is a case of a brain tumour patient developing uncontrolled paedophilia. Unfortunately, the link to the original article on Newscientist no longer works.

Regardless of whether the paedophilia is in-born or not, let's not demonize the person so hastily before we are even sure that he/she has committed a crime. After all, we agree that people shouldn't be convicted for thought crime.
The "paedophile" at A+theism is a troll, (there is no way anyone would think that forum is a "safe space" for someone who suffers from paedophilia) however, I completely agree with Heintje. As long as they do not act on the impulses, I sympathise with them.

Even Steven Novella has stated that he has sympathy for those afflicted with the disorder.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7116506.stm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11991

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

Mr Danksworth wrote:
This one slipped passed moderation. Dear Musima and all of that....

"Criag Urias said...
There is a wide range of variability in Internet addiction or at least Internet obsessiveness. Out of millions, we expect some number to exhibit strong obsessiveness and strong opinions. In the extreme case we find nutjobs. Since these people make a disproportionate amount of noise, the tail end of the distribution curve becomes exaggerated in our minds, leading to misperceptions.

Just as we are evolved to perceive human-length time intervals (and not deep time) and human-magnitude velocities (and not near-lightspeed velocities), we misperceive the attitude of a group of millions of people when we use our online experience as evidence. Also see the 1% rule.

In addition, being personally attacked also skews our perception, causing us to give undue weight to a handful of individuals. Moreover, personal attacks create a vicious cycle leading to an even greater exaggeration of the distribution tail segment. We don't see tit-for-tat exchanges of kindness that drag out for months or years, or whole websites devoted solely to raining compliments upon a group of bloggers.

We should therefore be skeptical of an individual's assessment of a particular group's social problems formed from the individual's perceptions gathered online.

Jean, if you think about the factors which culminated in your current belief that there is a "misogyny war", doesn't it boil down to a small number of individuals? Your attitude seems to have shifted after you were unjustly attacked. While the sense of injustice is a very real and palpable thing, it is helpful to find some perspective. Think about the millions of people in the secular population worldwide. In Europe there are whole countries of atheists. So you ran into a few nutjobs. In the long view, so what?

Before elevatorgate we did not hear about atheism particularly having a misogyny problem. Shouldn't we have noticed it before? Isn't it more likely that we are looking at an online phenomenon? Internet discussions tend toward conflict due to missing cues from body language, pressure to defend oneself in front of thousands or (potentially) millions, social stroking from commenters that give license to otherwise antisocial behavior, the (sometimes monetary) incentive to increase traffic by discussing contentious issues, and of course the perils that accompany anonymity. Personal drama does not generally require deep contemplation or research, making it perfectly suited for high-volume blogging.

And remember the Internet includes literal and figurative children who love the attention that Internet flaming gives them. For them, nothing is more exciting than seeing their words quoted and accompanied by outrage. They "win" every time that happens, and lately they have found a wellspring of seemingly unlimited wins."
This is very good. I wish I had written it.

Reap: I'm not really into podcast, but if Blu was a guest, I'll give it a try. Thanks!

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11992

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

lost control wrote:
Darren wrote:
jennyfuckoff.png
source
Harumph. So I guess recurrent minor depressive disorder then? Bad enough - and can fuck up your life as well, but a major depressive episode would kinda keep one from twittering, usually.
And nope, to the best of my knowledge, there's no such fucking thing as chronic depression. At least not as a medical term. (Or is the DSM that shite in cotrast to the ICD?) Fuck, any depressive I've met knows that, cause you learn that shit in psychiatric care. And at least in my area, the psychiatrists and clinical psychologists make sure to only use the proper medical terms, in order to help one deal with the bullshit one usually gets with lay-idiots, who range from co-workers to bosses, to...

Oh well, reminds me, I finally gotta give a call to the inmate who helped me back then, without her, I wouldn't have gotten back on my feet.
Bipolar disorder, maybe?

sacha
.
.
Posts: 2450
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:31 am
Location: Gender Traitors International

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11993

Post by sacha »

bhoytony wrote:Just had a look at Jen McWrong's dad's blog. I particularly loved this sneaky little comment. Classic. Well played that man.
John D.

You know, Mike, this message would probably cut a little deeper, and reach further, if you made and uploaded a video. A lot of people nowadays are too lazy to bother reading, and I think your message is both poignant and important. People on the internet need to be taught some respect!
Where the fuck IS John D? He's an old friend. Franc and I know him well. He registered here, but has not posted. I suspect this thread may be too much of a commitment for many, as it can take hours to catch up and respond, even if one is here daily.

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11994

Post by bhoytony »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
Bipolar disorder, maybe?
Couldn't find a Bipolar, Will this do?

http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6207/6047 ... 3a92_z.jpg

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11995

Post by AndrewV69 »

pandas.jpeg
(42.08 KiB) Downloaded 164 times

Evan
.
.
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:39 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11996

Post by Evan »

bhoytony wrote:
Mr Danksworth wrote:
bhoytony wrote:Just had a look at Jen McWrong's dad's blog. I particularly loved this sneaky little comment. Classic. Well played that man.
John D.

You know, Mike, this message would probably cut a little deeper, and reach further, if you made and uploaded a video. A lot of people nowadays are too lazy to bother reading, and I think your message is both poignant and important. People on the internet need to be taught some respect!
Daddy Slaughter Part Deux? One can only hope.
And look what happened to him.
https://twitter.com/AmetSpeaks/status/2 ... 7847356417
JenConsequencesWillNeverBeTheSame.jpg
(67.94 KiB) Downloaded 162 times

Mr Danksworth
.
.
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:30 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11997

Post by Mr Danksworth »

^
This shit is getting meta.

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11998

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

Mr Danksworth wrote:^
This shit is getting meta.
Forgot the "L" at the end of "meta", didn't ya?

Mr Danksworth
.
.
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:30 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#11999

Post by Mr Danksworth »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
Mr Danksworth wrote:^
This shit is getting meta.
Forgot the "L" at the end of "meta", didn't ya?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=meta
"Meta- A term, especially in art, used to characterize something that is characteristically self-referential. "

Metal works also ;)

AKAHorace
.
.
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:34 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12000

Post by AKAHorace »

Heintje wrote:
Dick Strawkins wrote:I know that Greta Christina has defended pedophelia in the past (at least forms of pedophelic pornography that don't involve actual child abuse - for example photoshopping pictures of children or animated child characters that are shown having sex with adults.
Perhaps this is their new policy:
Atheismplus - a safe place for child molesters! :shock:
I, too, am inclined to believe that the paedophile is real. First, a paedophile is not a child-molestor until he/she has molested a child. Please don't conflate the two.

Having read some popular books, articles, etc. on neuroscience, I am not surprised if there really are people who, not by their own choice, are sexually attracted to children - they are just 'cursed' with such neurobiology. Most of the time, they know sex with children is wrong and their frontal lobes are doing a wondrous job of inhibiting them from acting on their impulse.
Cited in this brilliant essay* is a case of a brain tumour patient developing uncontrolled paedophilia. Unfortunately, the link to the original article on Newscientist no longer works.

Regardless of whether the paedophilia is in-born or not, let's not demonize the person so hastily before we are even sure that he/she has committed a crime. After all, we agree that people shouldn't be convicted for thought crime.

*Those who follow the link might notice the author of the article is Adam Lee of Daylight Atheism, one of the vocal supporters of FTBaboons and skepchicks. I found him a clear thinker and a superb writer whose writing was instrumental in my deconversion, so I was extremely disappointed and disillusioned when I found out that he has a massive blind spot when it comes to feminist doctrine.


I agree with you, you kaas kop. See http://gawker.com/5941037/born-this-way ... h-children

Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12001

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

Mr Danksworth wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
Mr Danksworth wrote:^
This shit is getting meta.
Forgot the "L" at the end of "meta", didn't ya?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=meta
"Meta- A term, especially in art, used to characterize something that is characteristically self-referential. "

Metal works also ;)
I do have a way to fuck up my jokes, it seems...

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12002

Post by AndrewV69 »

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
Mr Danksworth wrote:
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:
Mr Danksworth wrote:^
This shit is getting meta.
Forgot the "L" at the end of "meta", didn't ya?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=meta
"Meta- A term, especially in art, used to characterize something that is characteristically self-referential. "

Metal works also ;)
I do have a way to fuck up my jokes, it seems...
Aww Plil, thas just mental!

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12003

Post by AndrewV69 »

Sorry, I forgot you were a cunt!
[youtube]5ykK0ifsMcA[/youtube]

The Pelagic Argosy
.
.
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:16 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12004

Post by The Pelagic Argosy »

AndrewV69 wrote:Sorry, I forgot you were a cunt!
[youtube]
Is she a chill girl?

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5543
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12005

Post by Gumby »

Dilurk wrote:
Steersman wrote:
JAB wrote:
Steersman wrote: Seems to me that the most Mayhew could justifiably argue was that the accusation was unfounded if not libelous, not that the accusation in itself constitues sexual harassment.
It wouldn't surprise me if they had a reg in place that the accusation of sleeping your way to the top was harrassment. Making up and spreading rumours of that sort add to a hostile work environment. You may argue that it isn't technically harrassment if done once, but it's better to stomp that sort of talk quickly and it wouldn't be odd to have it written into the guidelines at a workplace here, I don't think.
Maybe the limitations of Twitter “conversations” with their 140 character constraint.
A good reason not to argue on Twitter.
Twitter is good for some things, but trying to have a meaningful debate with a 140-character limit is like trying to play hopscotch on a Scrabble board.

Darren
.
.
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:40 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12006

Post by Darren »

franc wrote:Effects of not having privilege(Trigger Warning: Oppression)

Post by Catherine » Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:45 am
Hey, I can play this game!

Because I am male, people assume an invitation for coffee is a proposition for sex.
Because I am male, people assume I am trying to use my x-shot to take photos up womens skirts.

bhoytony
.
.
Posts: 3017
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:56 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12007

Post by bhoytony »

Darren wrote:
franc wrote:Effects of not having privilege(Trigger Warning: Oppression)

Post by Catherine » Sat Sep 08, 2012 7:45 am
Hey, I can play this game!

Because I am male, people assume an invitation for coffee is a proposition for sex.
Because I am male, people assume I am trying to use my x-shot to take photos up womens skirts.
Here's a genuine one from that thread. Fair game if it's a man, but worthy of a self-pitying whine when applied to a member of A+theism.
Because I am lesbian all my long term female friends hate and think of me as a potential rapist

cunt
.
.
Posts: 2768
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:06 am

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12008

Post by cunt »

Because my company is excruciating, nobody in the real world will listen to my stupid long winded bullshit.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12009

Post by Steersman »

Gumby wrote:
Dilurk wrote: ....
A good reason not to argue on Twitter.
Twitter is good for some things, but trying to have a meaningful debate with a 140-character limit is like trying to play hopscotch on a Scrabble board.
Nice image …. :-)

But – twitter? Isn’t that what bird-brains do? ….


Phil_Giordana_FCD
That's All Folks
That's All Folks
Posts: 11875
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
Location: Nice, France
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12011

Post by Phil_Giordana_FCD »

Because I'm so awesome. Fuck you, that's why!

Done for tonight, I think.

Darren
.
.
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:40 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12012

Post by Darren »

OK... "Manwaves" made me laugh! :)

The Pelagic Argosy
.
.
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:16 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12013

Post by The Pelagic Argosy »

Steersman wrote:
But – twitter? Isn’t that what bird-brains do? ….
Steersman, please don't use speciesist and misavianist terms such as "bird-brain" in this forum. (Where are the hidey tags!)

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10933
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12014

Post by Steersman »

The Pelagic Argosy wrote:
Steersman wrote:
But – twitter? Isn’t that what bird-brains do? ….
Steersman, please don't use speciesist and misavianist terms such as "bird-brain" in this forum. (Where are the hidey tags!)
Oops! Sorry about that – I should be careful or I’ll have JAB and Sacha on my case …. :-)

Meant to respond to your earlier post on the related topic of “bad werdz” and the necessity for “hidey tags in the Wendy House”, but really a surprising aspect of Atheism-Plus. Relative to which I see Git had some interesting links to what I think is virtually the only sane context in which to talk about triggers, i.e. the Lone Ranger ….

Although at times I still wonder. Seems several here have indicated they suffer from debilitating depression or PTSD and I’m sure people, mostly women, who have been raped are likely to be prone to strong emotions that are somewhat related to that. But hidey tags and the like have to be a rather ridiculous way of dealing with that – would they expect MSN and Huffington Post and similar sources to be obliged to cater to their sensitivities? Hell of a way to run a railroad if you ask me ….

masakari2012
.
.
Posts: 334
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:14 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12015

Post by masakari2012 »

[youtube]_WvzKZv3GKc[/youtube]

[youtube]-Caj1MeLRlk[/youtube]

dustbubble
.
.
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 1:23 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12016

Post by dustbubble »

Steersman wrote:Git had some interesting links to what I think is virtually the only sane context in which to talk about triggers, i.e. the Lone Ranger …
Maybe, kimosabe. I talk about triggers a lot ATM.
Exclusively in the context of eDrums, and to a particular young person. No I R not teh speedo!
Just the facts of life.
Viz. :- (I love how proper inky-fingered printers call that last sign <tr> <tr> "the dog's bollocks")

So, kid, live in inner-city apartment? Wanna play drums? And need to get the feel and just-so placement & response of those ole Ludwigs ya saved for? Without getting wacked, rolled up in a carpet, and dumped in a skip by yer psycho drifter neighbours? Even with the double kick? Unca Dust kin fix it fer ya.
With triggers. And stuff.

Wish Phil hadn't gone to his pit, I need backup here, man.

Git
.
.
Posts: 1271
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:31 pm
Location: Engerland

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12017

Post by Git »

[youtube]nRB8Jor8tPs[/youtube]

A+ Unicorns!

Mr Danksworth
.
.
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:30 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12018

Post by Mr Danksworth »

SSSSHHHHUUUUUUUUNNNNNN!

I have been waiting for the right time to drop that vid, you beat me to it. A pox on you and your house.

Git
.
.
Posts: 1271
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:31 pm
Location: Engerland

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12019

Post by Git »

Mr Danksworth wrote:SSSSHHHHUUUUUUUUNNNNNN!

I have been waiting for the right time to drop that vid, you beat me to it. A pox on you and your house.
Mwahahahahaha! :dance:

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Periodic Table of Swearing

#12020

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

A beauty from the Thread of Privilege Olympics (proprietor: a cis white hetero middle class North American with a college degree and at least one supportive family member):
Because I am an abuse survivor, others feel the need to pity me
I feel no "need" to pity you. Pity is not a "needed" emotion. But I do pity you. I pity all survivors of abuse. I cannot help but feel "sympathetic or kindly sorrow evoked by the suffering, distress, or misfortune of another" (Dictionary dotcom).

You were abused, you survived, and now I pity you and that part of your life's history. And if you desire not my pity, why have you just blubbed your woes into the internet's biggest pity party palace?

Now, if you don't mind, please stop telling me what (not) to feel, you Thoughtoritarian assbag, and fuck right off.

Locked