Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 9:12 am
A lesson in policing for those violent US thugs in blue, courtesy of France.
Exposing the stupidity, lies, and hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors since July 2012
http://slymepit.com/phpbb/
He's a comedian who abhors political correctness, a combination which "true" liberals seems to hate with the fury of a thousand suns.Driftless wrote: ↑ Remember when Bill Maher was considered liberal? Didn't he donate to Hillary's campaign? Anyway, he is no longer a real liberal:
https://fair.org/home/the-phony-liberal ... ill-maher/
He's like Rush Limbaugh:
The point is that Maher’s beliefs, actions and outbursts, if they are coherent at all, are not consistent with liberalism and are, if anything, more in keeping with a right-wing shock jock like Rush Limbaugh.
That link was murdered by the Clintons, just like Vince Foster!mordacious1 wrote: ↑Dead link?mordacious1 wrote: ↑ Apparently, this guy also knew where Hillary’s Emails were hidden:
https://www.complex.com/life/2019/10/ke ... dly-killed
https://wtvr.com/2019/10/05/joshua-brow ... -to-death/
FAIR is a biased, far-left org that describes itself as "progressive". True liberals are not 'progressives' (read: regressive leftist, po-mo, socialist SJWs.) So FAIR can go fuck itself.Pitchguest wrote: ↑He's a comedian who abhors political correctness, a combination which "true" liberals seems to hate with the fury of a thousand suns.Driftless wrote: ↑ Remember when Bill Maher was considered liberal? Didn't he donate to Hillary's campaign? Anyway, he is no longer a real liberal:
https://fair.org/home/the-phony-liberal ... ill-maher/
He's like Rush Limbaugh:
The point is that Maher’s beliefs, actions and outbursts, if they are coherent at all, are not consistent with liberalism and are, if anything, more in keeping with a right-wing shock jock like Rush Limbaugh.
The author of this hit piece really shouldn't be criticizing the coherency of other people. He also says:Driftless wrote: ↑ Remember when Bill Maher was considered liberal? Didn't he donate to Hillary's campaign? Anyway, he is no longer a real liberal:
https://fair.org/home/the-phony-liberal ... ill-maher/
He's like Rush Limbaugh:
The point is that Maher’s beliefs, actions and outbursts, if they are coherent at all, are not consistent with liberalism and are, if anything, more in keeping with a right-wing shock jock like Rush Limbaugh.
That's actually from the September 14th, 2018 show. This matters just a little because the allegations were from an anonymous source at that point. Ford came forward on September 16th, Ramirez on September 23rd.On the September 20 edition of Real Time, he condemned the Democrats for reviving their opposition to Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, claiming that continuing to “go after a guy for what he did in high school” “looks bad.”
Here's the actual exchange:In 2013, ... and recanted his anti-Iraq War position, claiming, “Iraq is doing better than I thought it would be.”
Seattle is on the same track. Check out "Seattle is Dying" on YooToob.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ San Francisco, Hostage to the Homeless
Failure to enforce basic standards of public behavior has made one of America’s great cities increasingly unlivable.
The solution is "affordable housing" (so they say). Most of these people have no money, so I don't know how to make housing they can afford. And if they are mentally ill and/or addicted to drugs they may not want to stay in housing voluntarily.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ San Francisco, Hostage to the Homeless
Failure to enforce basic standards of public behavior has made one of America’s great cities increasingly unlivable.
It's called "service resistance", though the wokerati say that's shaming.Driftless wrote: ↑The solution is "affordable housing" (so they say). Most of these people have no money, so I don't know how to make housing they can afford. And if they are mentally ill and/or addicted to drugs they may not want to stay in housing voluntarily.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ San Francisco, Hostage to the Homeless
Failure to enforce basic standards of public behavior has made one of America’s great cities increasingly unlivable.
And Portland. If your city happens to be prosperous and has a temperate climate, look out. It's less of a problem in the NE, because of the hard winter.Lsuoma wrote: ↑Seattle is on the same track. Check out "Seattle is Dying" on YooToob.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ San Francisco, Hostage to the Homeless
Failure to enforce basic standards of public behavior has made one of America’s great cities increasingly unlivable.
BC's southern coast has Canada's mildest temperatures in the winter and nice summers. As a result, here on Vancouver Island we are getting homeless from all over Canada, not just in the bigger cities but now in the smaller cities. There is even a camp of hundreds of people outside a local tourism based village and a National Park.Sulman wrote: ↑And Portland. If your city happens to be prosperous and has a temperate climate, look out. It's less of a problem in the NE, because of the hard winter.Lsuoma wrote: ↑Seattle is on the same track. Check out "Seattle is Dying" on YooToob.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ San Francisco, Hostage to the Homeless
Failure to enforce basic standards of public behavior has made one of America’s great cities increasingly unlivable.
I know, I read about the whistleblowers and I read they were represented by a Mark Zaid and I thought, 'Not the same Mark Zaid, is it?' It is! It is the same Mark Zaid! Is he going to screw the pooch the same way he did with Richard Meyer? The first whistleblower didn't amount to anything, despite their revelation of a 'transcript' (which turned out to be a summation of a conversation they'd heard was said, and not a transcript of an actual recording), but the second whistleblower allegedly has 'first-hand accounts' - I guess we'll see what that entails.Service Dog wrote: ↑ Today, I read a CNN daily news summary
and learn:
the 'ukraine whistleblower' and 'second whistleblower' are represented by attorney Mark Zaid.
Zaid! I know that name. Mark Zaid is also defending comic book writer Mark Waid-- in the ComicsGate lawsuit filed by Richard C. Meyer!
The comicbook case involves nerd-celebrity Wait successfully-pressuring the publisher of Meyer's comicbook-- to cancel publication, due to Meyer's videos on youtube, which comment on the comicbook industry, from a non-SJW 'Make Comics Great Again' perspective.
For the thoughtcrime of dissenting from SJW propaganda in comicbook stories... Meyer is (of course) considered a RacistSexistHomophobicAltRightNazi.
=
Friday thru Sunday, I worked at New York ComicCon, at the promotional booth for a cable tv channel. On the last day, I got into the spirit of the event & did a little cosplay. I wore an old US Army shirt, with the name YA BOI ZACK above the chest pocket. Richard Meyer is a veteran (both Army and Marines) and the name of his channel is Comics MATTER (with Ya Boi Zack).
Within the small pond of woke-comicbook-social-media, my shirt was the nerd-equivalent of wearing a MAGA hat. I received zero positive or negative comments on the shirt. The vast mass of comicon nerds don't know or care. When I walked the aisles of Artists' Alley, I'm sure some of the pros noticed my nametag... but they kept pokerfaces.
The Democrats are using the Alistair Campbell/Tony Blair playbook. They've been setting up a moral dichotomy with a blizzard of accusations and following up with "for the love of God, I emplore you, have some decency" rhetoric. They followed this model with the Kavanaugh hearings and they've consistently followed it with Trump from day 1. It doesn't matter if any of the allegations are true or not as long as you can create enough of a stink around the target, only the Democrats have overplayed it. Alistair Campbell managed to create such an impression of corruption and decay around the Tory government that Labour and President Blair swept into power with disastrous long-term consequences for the country. Alistair Campbell is the template for a modern ruthlessly zealous ideological spin doctor.Service Dog wrote: ↑ Schiff & the Democrats ~could~ vote to conduct an impeachment investigation, which would give them subpoena power, to compel witnesses to testify.
But Schiff & the Democrats refuse to do that. Instead, they're calling witnesses-- minus any authority compel testimony-- then pretending the witnesses have defied & obstructed a lawful demand to appear.
If you know that ^. Then Schiff's press conference today is pure pro-wrestling fakery.
I'm glad the Repubs called-out Schiff for running-away without answering any reporters' questions. The Repubs stuck-around and answered questions... they don't look like they're fearful, hiding, scurrying.
John Kiriakou wasn't prosecuted for being a whistleblower. A whistleblower reports activity through official channels and at least theoretically is protected from retaliation.Keating wrote: ↑ What bugs me about the current story is that the whistleblower who revealed that the CIA was engaged in waterboarding, while the Bush DOJ cleared him of wrongdoing, the Obama DOJ reopened the case against him and bankrupted him. Seems to me you yanks need to clean house at the CIA and their media water carriers. Truman fucked up.
Plane was safely extricated, but all her informants got burned. And by 'burned', I mean 'tortured to death'.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ Leaking covert agent Valerie Plame's identity is what got Scooter Libby into trouble.
Except he didn't. The leaker was Richard Armitage. Libby was convicted of crimes related to lying to investigators about how he learned of Plame's CIA work, which had no known connection to the leak itself. But there were coteries in the Dept. of Justice and CIA that wanted a Bushie neo-con scalp in retaliation to Plame's unmasking. Armitage was widely respected as a moderate and seen as a force within the administration opposing the neo-cons, so he wouldn't do. Karl Rove was the real target, but when no evidence turned up against him, they had to settle for Libby as the scapegoat. The raw partisanship in how this prosecution was conducted seems to have reared its head again in the Dept. of Justice over the last few years.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ Leaking covert agent Valerie Plame's identity is what got Scooter Libby into trouble.
You are right about the leaker to Novak not being Libby, however I disagree that his charges had nothing to do with the outing of Plame. The investigation that saw him charged was all about the outing of Plame.Except he didn't. The leaker was Richard Armitage. Libby was convicted of crimes related to lying to investigators about how he learned of Plame's CIA work, which had no known connection to the leak itself.
No one, including Libby was convicted for leaking:According to testimony given in the CIA leak grand jury investigation and United States v. Libby, Bush administration officials Richard Armitage, Karl Rove, and Lewis Libby discussed the employment of a then-classified, covert CIA officer, Valerie E. Wilson (also known as Valerie Plame), with members of the press.[3][26]
I don't understand how you chalk up the outcome of the investigation to partisanship. The investigation was done by Patrick Fitzgerald who was appointed by registered Republican James Comey. (Oh how history repeats itself) I see no liberal fingerprints on this turkey.In October 2005, Libby resigned from all three government positions after he was indicted on five counts by a federal grand jury concerning the investigation of the leak of the covert identity of Central Intelligence Agency officer Valerie Plame Wilson.[5] He was subsequently convicted of four counts (one count of obstruction of justice, two counts of perjury, and one count of making false statements),[6]
Robert Novak's testimony in Libby's perjury trial made it known that the two senior administration sources he cited in his article were Richard Armitage and Karl Rove
The partisanship I was speaking of wasn't Democrat vs Republican partisanship, but State Dept/CIA bureaucracy (now frequently referred to as the Deep State) vs. Bush-era Neocons, with Fitzgerald taking the side of the Deep State. While it never leaked at the time, Armitage revealed in his book that he knew he was the leaker referenced in Novak's column right away and immediately told Colin Powell. It made its way to the Dept. of Justice, and Fitzgerald did investigate Armitage, but declined to press charges. As I mentioned in my original post, they wanted a neo-con scalp and Armitage wasn't that. The real big fish targets were Cheney or Rove, but in the absence of justiciable evidence against them, they went hard after Libby as a consolation.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ I don't understand how you chalk up the outcome of the investigation to partisanship. The investigation was done by Patrick Fitzgerald who was appointed by registered Republican James Comey. (Oh how history repeats itself) I see no liberal fingerprints on this turkey.
Apparently Rove's role in Novak's interviews was saying something like "Yeah, I heard that too" when Novak mentioned Plame and Wilson, which most certainly is not leaking.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ Also, when you say there was no evidence of wrongdoing on Rove's part, remember the testimony of the journalist that outed Plame.Robert Novak's testimony in Libby's perjury trial made it known that the two senior administration sources he cited in his article were Richard Armitage and Karl Rove
He confirmed the "leak". It gave the second source that allowed Novak to publish her name and give it credibility by your own assessment.Apparently Rove's role in Novak's interviews was saying something like "Yeah, I heard that too" when Novak mentioned Plame and Wilson, which most certainly is not leaking.
I smell hippy...release the hounds!free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ I'm going mushroom picking tomorrow. I will be shifting my shakras toward tasty food that is generously provided by Mother Nature in spite of how the anarchic/ libertarian Patriarchy is poisoning Gaia.
:P :P
What do you think of Giuliani? I've always considered him vermin, but understood why many regular new yorkers considered him their guy.
You can certainly question the propriety of his response. A 'no comment' would have been better. But it was definitely not in the legal definition of leaking, which is why he wasn't charged even though Fitzgerald had a hard-on for him. This is all ancient history now and I'm not going to wade into the details, but the Bush administration in general during that time was having trouble finding the balance between legitimately defending themselves and avoiding disclosing classified information about how the situation arose.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ He confirmed the "leak". It gave the second source that allowed Novak to publish her name and give it credibility by your own assessment.
Assuming he had some briefing on security don't you think he should have known better than even giving it grudging agreement. That is assuming the he said "yeah I heard that too" is an accurate and complete quote.
To be clear, I had no dog in that particular fight. I would have thought my use of the phrase "Bush-y Neocons" strongly hinted I have no love for that group. But I'm also repelled by the Foggy Bottom culture of diplomacy above all even when dealing with rogue states, and the CIA's muddled intelligence gathering during this era was disgraceful. My main beef was that a mistake by one of the Foggy Bottom crew was shamefully used as a catalyst to punish a perceived enemy of the crew instead.free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ Just to let you know: I live right beside a military installation that specializes in "communications". I'm not saying that Canada has a deep state unit, but if they do they likely have been monitoring my internet use and know that you are on to their sneaky plans.
Just joking :P I don't think they are that thorough ... yet.
I just hope he picks a clever handle.
let's scroll-down to page 2...
Elizabeth Warren's critics forgot: Pregnancy lasts for nine months
Those seeking to bring down Sen. Elizabeth Warren — most but not all of whom are on the right — have only their own sexism to blame for the latest ...
yesterday
CBS This Morning
Elizabeth Warren defends claim that she was fired over pregnancy
video_youtube
13 hours ago
Elizabeth Warren says she was let go while pregnant. It’s common today.
Pregnancy discrimination is illegal in 2019. It still happens all the time.
9 hours ago
Elizabeth Warren Vows to Remake Capitalism. Businesses Are Bracing.
The Democratic Party's favored presidential candidate has proposed sweeping changes to how business operates, beyond what previous front-runners sought.
7 hours ago
page 3... finally some variation...
The Elizabeth Warren pregnancy smear shows how poisoned the media world is
Elizabeth Warren's pregnancy story is one too many women already know
Elizabeth Warren stands by account of being pushed out of first teaching job
Elizabeth Warren defends story that she was fired for being pregnant after more details surface
page 5Warren faces mounting questions on another part of her personal story: Was she fired for being pregnant?
Fox News
Warren Leads in New Iowa Poll With Biden Second
New York Times
How Elizabeth Warren Raised Big Money Before She Denounced Big Money
New York TImes
Climate Town Hall: Several Democratic Candidates Embrace a Carbon Tax
New York Times
Last Month
page 6Opinion
Elizabeth Warren's pregnancy discrimination story isn't exactly hard to believe
3 hours ago
Washington Examiner
How you know Elizabeth Warren is the press' favorite 2020 Democratic candidate
Anatomy of a fake GOP scandal about Elizabeth Warren
Yesterday
page 7, under the heading "from twitter"Analysis
Warren pregnancy debate another example of sexism in the guise of scrutiny
CNN
Years after Warren left teaching, scrutiny of her story is bringing pregnancy discrimination to the fore
Washington Post
page 8... under heading "All Coverage". Maybe it should be called "Are You Still Here? Ok, fine then"
Elizabeth Warrenverified_user
ewarren
This was 1971, years before Congress outlawed pregnancy discrimination—but we know it still happens in subtle and not-so-subtle ways. We can fight back by telling our stories. I tell mine on the campaign trail, and I hope to hear yours.
10/8/19 9:08 AM
Elizabeth Warrenverified_user
ewarren
When I was 22 and finishing my first year of teaching, I had an experience millions of women will recognize. By June I was visibly pregnant—and the principal told me the job I'd already been promised for the next year would go to someone else.
10/8/19 9:08 AM
Jennifer Binis
JennBinis
The (NJ) Herald News, Wednesday June 21, 1972. Two years after Warren left. Automatically is the key word here, friends. Unless Warren's principal was willing to buck norms, she would have been forced out. https://t.co/NtvlyIXq0X
10/7/19 7:08 PM
Alyssa Leader
alittleleader
If you have trouble believing that Elizabeth Warren experienced pregnancy discrimination because no one wrote down "Fired because pregnant," you are going to be floored when you learn about the experiences of.... any other human woman you know.
10/8/19 2:49 AM
etc. etc. etc.Fired! Pregnant! American Indian! Liberals like Elizabeth Warren are gaming PC victim culture
Liberal media ignore Elizabeth Warren’s lie about pregnancy-related firing
Warren: Hell Yes, I 'Stand By' My Story About Getting Fired for Being Pregnant, Despite All the Contradictory Evidence
Elizabeth Warren Is Right. In The 1970s, Pregnant Teachers Didn’t Keep Their Jobs.
Warren: Morris Co. School Fired Her Because Of Pregnancy: Report
People Get Fired From Their Jobs Without Being ‘Fired’ All The Time
HuffPo
Elizabeth Warren’s Fracking Proposal Has Shale Investors Weighing E&P Risk
Yahoo! News
Pregnancy Discrimination Is Insidious by Design
Jezebel
I predict Trump's gonna call her... "Pocahanocchio"This is the dumbest controversy
If You Think Elizabeth Warren Is Lying, You’ve Never Been a Woman in the Workplace
Yahoo Lifestyle
If You Think Elizabeth Warren Is Lying, You’ve Never Been a Woman in the Workplace
Vogue
On the off chance I’m unblocked, I will pose the obvious question.Lsuoma wrote: ↑ For all you Strine fuckers out there: https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2019/1 ... nightmare/
Brive was right?
Betcha this isn’t done per capita.Previous Australian studies have identified the large economic gap between certain regions. SGS Economics and Planning last year found almost two-thirds of GDP growth over the previous 12 months had come from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane.
Oh. What a shock. Yeah. The parts where low quality canon fodder immigrants don’t live.But in those with large gaps, such as Australia, the richest areas - including parts of Sydney and Melbourne - were at least twice as well off than poor areas such as regional Queensland, Western Australia and the Northern Territory.
It’s almost as if the nation state has been replaced by global cities dominated by a global elite.IMF researchers found that economic performance between regions in certain countries could be larger than those between nations, exerting enormous internal political tensions.
If big-Australia was a science experiment the hypothesis would have been proved already. Many times over.Australia has one of the biggest gaps between its richest cities and poorest regions in the developed world with warnings it could worsen without direct assistance from state and federal governments.
She claims that was before teachers' unions. I recall well when my mom's union struck in 1969.Service Dog wrote: ↑ Well... Elizabeth Warren is the new Jussie Smollett.
She seems to have been caught lying-- about being fired-for-being-pregnant, from her special-ed teacher job, in 1971.
Gaia was generous. My lovely neighbor and I scored about 10 pounds of top quality white chantrelles in about an hour and a half of picking. She will be making some delicious cream of white chantrelle soup and I will be having sauteed shrooms all this week. I have pics , but my computer seems to be refusing to shrink the images .Bhurzum wrote: ↑I smell hippy...release the hounds!free thoughtpolice wrote: ↑ I'm going mushroom picking tomorrow. I will be shifting my shakras toward tasty food that is generously provided by Mother Nature in spite of how the anarchic/ libertarian Patriarchy is poisoning Gaia.
:P :P
https://thehappypuppysite.com/wp-conten ... header.jpg
Kill!
Maim!
Savage!
Kinda like this:Service Dog wrote: ↑ That would be heartwarming. More likely, Lois will realize Clark is an incel & 'Superman' is Clark's toxic, violent way of acting-out.
Lois will knock him out with one punch, because women can do anything.
Book is awesome too.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Awesome interview. Just ordered the book:
Douglas Murray talks about his new book The Madness of Crowds
No. Even lefties like Eric Weinstein are clear that this is been the case and the architects of mass migration were happy to say so behind the scenes. Similar stories for free trade agreements.
I'm outraged! Do you think it is easy to look like an unkempt slob when her true identity is a sensei of the woke woman.mordacious1 wrote: ↑ Okay
That’s the funniest thing Watson has ever said, she’s a “normal woman”. If true, god help us.
I'm PZ-aged and my family moved west when I was three, so my folks' impressions are from the thirties through the fifties. We did visit many 60's summers, one grandparent set in rural New Jersey, and the other in Corona Queens rowhouse, with my uncle Fred a retired cop who became famous in my family culture for the "uncle fred" sandwich: cheese and onion, usually on white with mayo.Service Dog wrote: ↑What do you think of Giuliani? I've always considered him vermin, but understood why many regular new yorkers considered him their guy.
And now it's hard for me to reconcile my distaste for him-- with how-much I love his post-Ukraine news interviews. He's running circles around the news dullards.
US$250 = A$368.84. Last time I got a haircut I would have got A$333.84 back in change. That was an expensive haircut as far as I am concerned.