That's the entire point. Children aren't supposed to tell adults they're abject failures. Exactly why Thunberg has gotten attention and a thousand cerebral lectures have garnered a collective yawn. Adults talk down to children; children don't talk down to adults; it's an alarming table turn.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑ I don't have much time for children bitching about previous generations either.
You is all a bunch of poofs!
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
-
- .
- Posts: 8652
- Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:52 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
:happy-smileyinthebox: Confirmed: at 18m20s, David Silverman uses Richard Carrier's full name, Carrier "not man enough" to call Beth Pressman "a slut".
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
He probably just had brownies:Clarence wrote: ↑ https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/09/v ... ont-shoot/
Another one for the "Cops Don't have Dangerous Jobs" crowd to armchair quarterback.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Half-pology to Vacula around 62 minutes in.Service Dog wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:21 am:happy-smileyinthebox: Confirmed: at 18m20s, David Silverman uses Richard Carrier's full name, Carrier "not man enough" to call Beth Pressman "a slut".
Interesting video.
-
- .
- Posts: 2181
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
I wouldn't call it a table turn. It is exactly the kind of thing that anti-AGW campaigners can use to bolster their point, that climate change is a purely political issue dreamed up by the left and spread by moral scolding and emotional appeal. A child telling adults they're "abject failures" carries no authority whatsoever.Hunt wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:01 amThat's the entire point. Children aren't supposed to tell adults they're abject failures. Exactly why Thunberg has gotten attention and a thousand cerebral lectures have garnered a collective yawn. Adults talk down to children; children don't talk down to adults; it's an alarming table turn.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑ I don't have much time for children bitching about previous generations either.
-
- .
- Posts: 3744
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:18 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Any other Pitters following the increasingly insane goings-on in Blighty?
Bo Jo used is accused of using 'threatening language' which has led to death threats, apparently. [remind you of GamerGate, anyone?] The word he is guilty of using? "Surrender" or "Betrayal"!!!
Now, naturally, MPs from all sides are saying: "hold on, you said [x] a few hours ago, which is equally bad if not worse". They're right. This is what happens when you lower the offence bar to words like "surrender" and "betrayal". Even "gobby" Jess Phillips has had to clarify why she has used bad language in the past, but half-defended it by mumbling something about power and privilege.
PS - Very little from the Guardianista types about their use of "Nazi", "fascist", or "racist" towards half the population. Even "gammon" would qualify as a offensive under these new "rules". The fucking whole lot of them are fucking useless.
Bo Jo used is accused of using 'threatening language' which has led to death threats, apparently. [remind you of GamerGate, anyone?] The word he is guilty of using? "Surrender" or "Betrayal"!!!
Now, naturally, MPs from all sides are saying: "hold on, you said [x] a few hours ago, which is equally bad if not worse". They're right. This is what happens when you lower the offence bar to words like "surrender" and "betrayal". Even "gobby" Jess Phillips has had to clarify why she has used bad language in the past, but half-defended it by mumbling something about power and privilege.
PS - Very little from the Guardianista types about their use of "Nazi", "fascist", or "racist" towards half the population. Even "gammon" would qualify as a offensive under these new "rules". The fucking whole lot of them are fucking useless.
-
- .
- Posts: 8652
- Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:52 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Impeach Impeach Impeach!
Man-- they sure want Pence to be president.
.
.
.
Can Trump replace Pence with Kid Rock, then resign from office? Is that within the rules?
Man-- they sure want Pence to be president.
.
.
.
Can Trump replace Pence with Kid Rock, then resign from office? Is that within the rules?
-
- .
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:17 am
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Not an argument completely without merit: "Jo Cox murder suspect tells court his name is 'death to traitors, freedom for Britain'"CommanderTuvok wrote: ↑ Any other Pitters following the increasingly insane goings-on in Blighty?
Bo Jo used is accused of using 'threatening language' which has led to death threats, apparently. [remind you of GamerGate, anyone?] The word he is guilty of using? "Surrender" or "Betrayal"!!!
Now, naturally, MPs from all sides are saying: "hold on, you said [x] a few hours ago, which is equally bad if not worse". They're right. This is what happens when you lower the offence bar to words like "surrender" and "betrayal". Even "gobby" Jess Phillips has had to clarify why she has used bad language in the past, but half-defended it by mumbling something about power and privilege.
PS - Very little from the Guardianista types about their use of "Nazi", "fascist", or "racist" towards half the population. Even "gammon" would qualify as a offensive under these new "rules". The fucking whole lot of them are fucking useless.
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
You began your puerile name-calling & insults immediately after I noted you had zero evidence to support your claims and apparently zero experience with firearms. You also continue to strawman your interlocutors' positions by repeatedly posting videos of unjustified police shootings that nobody defends. I don't know whether that classifies you as an SJW, but it does make you a Damien-level disingenuous cunt.
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Making that unhinged assburger the face of climate change activism is an epic PR disaster. Plus, her seething rage against 'Capitalism' exposes the true agenda of many of these activists: climate change is just an handy excuse to promote their socialist economic revolution.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑I wouldn't call it a table turn. It is exactly the kind of thing that anti-AGW campaigners can use to bolster their point, that climate change is a purely political issue dreamed up by the left and spread by moral scolding and emotional appeal. A child telling adults they're "abject failures" carries no authority whatsoever.Hunt wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:01 amThat's the entire point. Children aren't supposed to tell adults they're abject failures. Exactly why Thunberg has gotten attention and a thousand cerebral lectures have garnered a collective yawn. Adults talk down to children; children don't talk down to adults; it's an alarming table turn.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑ I don't have much time for children bitching about previous generations either.
Oh, but anyone who says so is a 'wingtard' per comrade hunt.
-
- .
- Posts: 8652
- Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:52 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
I enjoy the Oxford-style debates hosted by the Soho Forum.
The most recent one was comedian Dave Smith vs. chairman of the Libertarian Party-- and attorney-- Nick Sarwark...
on the topic of whether the Libertarian Party's presidential candidates should be be Hardline libertarians or Mainstream politicians who overlap to a lesser degree with doctrinaire libertarianism.
I don't find that topic very interesting. The thing I find interesting is the rhetorical MMA of a comedian debating a campaign-staffer/lawyer.
What does it mean when the lawyers jokes fall-flat? Should that count against him (perhaps evidence that he's an idiot, so his ideas are probably bad)... or should that evidence be disregarded-- a comedian telling better jokes isn't a good measure of whether his ideas are better.
To his credit, Sarwark agreed to appear on Smith's podcast, the day after the debate.
I'm about an hour & 10 minutes into that... and I think Smith is kicking Sarwark's ass in Round 2. For example, apparently-- after Charlottesville-- the LP circulated a letter, urging Libertarians to sign, saying White Nationalism' and 'Racism' have no place in Libertarianism.
Of course-- one neednt be a white nationalist to be damned by this Pledge Of Allegiance... refusing to sign it was ~also~ proof of one's impurity.
Smith points-out that it might be better to welcome white nationalists to join in an anti-war anti-initiation-of-violence movement, than banish them.
The most recent one was comedian Dave Smith vs. chairman of the Libertarian Party-- and attorney-- Nick Sarwark...
on the topic of whether the Libertarian Party's presidential candidates should be be Hardline libertarians or Mainstream politicians who overlap to a lesser degree with doctrinaire libertarianism.
I don't find that topic very interesting. The thing I find interesting is the rhetorical MMA of a comedian debating a campaign-staffer/lawyer.
What does it mean when the lawyers jokes fall-flat? Should that count against him (perhaps evidence that he's an idiot, so his ideas are probably bad)... or should that evidence be disregarded-- a comedian telling better jokes isn't a good measure of whether his ideas are better.
To his credit, Sarwark agreed to appear on Smith's podcast, the day after the debate.
I'm about an hour & 10 minutes into that... and I think Smith is kicking Sarwark's ass in Round 2. For example, apparently-- after Charlottesville-- the LP circulated a letter, urging Libertarians to sign, saying White Nationalism' and 'Racism' have no place in Libertarianism.
Of course-- one neednt be a white nationalist to be damned by this Pledge Of Allegiance... refusing to sign it was ~also~ proof of one's impurity.
Smith points-out that it might be better to welcome white nationalists to join in an anti-war anti-initiation-of-violence movement, than banish them.
-
- .
- Posts: 4024
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Haha, Carrier, you hound! He just can't catch a break, can he? Still, I'm not sure how conducive to Atheism+ it is to call someone a slut, especially a woman! Heavens!Service Dog wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:21 am:happy-smileyinthebox: Confirmed: at 18m20s, David Silverman uses Richard Carrier's full name, Carrier "not man enough" to call Beth Pressman "a slut".
-
- .
- Posts: 6555
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
https://i.imgur.com/Nw4aLjg.png
Oh man, what wouldn't I give to have Ape still around to make us a Shop of this.
I'd let Ophelia grind her dusty gums on my dick all day to see what he'd make of this.
Oh man, what wouldn't I give to have Ape still around to make us a Shop of this.
I'd let Ophelia grind her dusty gums on my dick all day to see what he'd make of this.
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
hunt wrote:What reality? The one were lots of times cops empty their clips and never hit anything?
Lots of times they're not even aiming!
Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑
Is it safe to assume that you'd find the number of rounds discharged in these instances "egregious"?
xhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SCiA1hlaXY
hunt wrote:First, maybe, second a definite yes. Dirty Harry wannabe shooting through windshield and then spraying bullets all around the neighborhood. You consider this good policing. Have you gone completely off your rocker?
The only spraying of bullets was done by the perps. That cop was a stud and shot through his windshield — with both hands at one point to improve his aim fuckin A — expressly to hit his target. And with every round of two clips he hit the target. I’m sure you couldn’t notice through your hissy fit, but the cop also waited to approach until he’d followed the perps onto a quieter side street, and had warned another cop to back off while on the main thoroughfare.
May we assume that your policy would be to pursue criminals until they shoot at the cops, then let them go on their way?
In the first video, even after the first few shots, the perp is still standing and brandishing the gun while there are innocent passersby in close proximity.
xhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tePGLcYjcVk
Your approach no doubt would be to issue more verbal warnings like the ones the perp had previously ignored.
Of course, under the Scandinavian System™ you and your buddy Hirschfield want so bad, when a perp drew a gun on a cop at a traffic stop, the cop would be required to call in for a supervisor's approval before drawing his or her own weapon.
It’s a good thing you never became a cop, hunt, cuz you’d have gotten yourself and innocent civilians killed long ago. And we are fucked if uninformed pearl-clutchers like yourself ever get control of policing in the US.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Especially with pictures like this around:ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑I wouldn't call it a table turn. It is exactly the kind of thing that anti-AGW campaigners can use to bolster their point, that climate change is a purely political issue dreamed up by the left and spread by moral scolding and emotional appeal. A child telling adults they're "abject failures" carries no authority whatsoever.Hunt wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:01 amThat's the entire point. Children aren't supposed to tell adults they're abject failures. Exactly why Thunberg has gotten attention and a thousand cerebral lectures have garnered a collective yawn. Adults talk down to children; children don't talk down to adults; it's an alarming table turn.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑ I don't have much time for children bitching about previous generations either.
https://www.document.no/wp-content/uplo ... unberg.jpg
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
To not see that capitalism provides the primary inertia against action against global warming is nit-witted. Why not call a spade a spade. If that loose association makes her a commie in the minds of morons like you, I don't really give a crap. To mock a sixteen year old girl with some mental issues "severely mentally ill" makes you a tactless dolt. Maybe you can get some remedial education from Fox News. Do you even know what severe mental illness looks like? Take a trail ride to hell, asshole.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑Making that unhinged assburger the face of climate change activism is an epic PR disaster. Plus, her seething rage against 'Capitalism' exposes the true agenda of many of these activists: climate change is just an handy excuse to promote their socialist economic revolution.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑I wouldn't call it a table turn. It is exactly the kind of thing that anti-AGW campaigners can use to bolster their point, that climate change is a purely political issue dreamed up by the left and spread by moral scolding and emotional appeal. A child telling adults they're "abject failures" carries no authority whatsoever.Hunt wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:01 amThat's the entire point. Children aren't supposed to tell adults they're abject failures. Exactly why Thunberg has gotten attention and a thousand cerebral lectures have garnered a collective yawn. Adults talk down to children; children don't talk down to adults; it's an alarming table turn.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑ I don't have much time for children bitching about previous generations either.
Oh, but anyone who says so is a 'wingtard' per comrade hunt.
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 11875
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
- Location: Nice, France
- Contact:
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Even though I agree 100% with her message, I find Greta Thunberg to be a very bad choice for a spokesperson. I've seen her "angry" video, and had to turn it off after 1 minute because of the cringe-worthy value.
You want to look genuinely angry and spontaneous and open-hearted? Don't pause every two seconds to read lines from your script. This is theater, not heartfelt activism.
Shame, because she and others could do some actual good if better handled.
You want to look genuinely angry and spontaneous and open-hearted? Don't pause every two seconds to read lines from your script. This is theater, not heartfelt activism.
Shame, because she and others could do some actual good if better handled.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
I agree with only one part of her speech..... where she calls everyone "pigs". She gets this part, and only this part, correct.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: ↑ Even though I agree 100% with her message, I find Greta Thunberg to be a very bad choice for a spokesperson. I've seen her "angry" video, and had to turn it off after 1 minute because of the cringe-worthy value.
You want to look genuinely angry and spontaneous and open-hearted? Don't pause every two seconds to read lines from your script. This is theater, not heartfelt activism.
Shame, because she and others could do some actual good if better handled.
-
- Brassy, uncouth, henpecked meathead
- Posts: 5059
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:08 am
- Location: Lurking in a dumpster
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
A female Gandalf?
What the actual fuck?
What the actual fuck?
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Jesus dude, do you get your news from Fox?Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ like the 1911 pistol replica (top, real below) that Tamir Rice drew and aimed at the cop:
-
- .
- Posts: 4024
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Whatever happened to Ape? Nothing serious, I hope?ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: ↑ https://i.imgur.com/Nw4aLjg.png
Oh man, what wouldn't I give to have Ape still around to make us a Shop of this.
I'd let Ophelia grind her dusty gums on my dick all day to see what he'd make of this.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
I think that he caught a serious case of diarrhea from the Pit.Pitchguest wrote: ↑Whatever happened to Ape? Nothing serious, I hope?ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: ↑ https://i.imgur.com/Nw4aLjg.png
Oh man, what wouldn't I give to have Ape still around to make us a Shop of this.
I'd let Ophelia grind her dusty gums on my dick all day to see what he'd make of this.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Right into the eye.
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
From the surveillance camera footage. From where did you get your information on Tamir Rice?DW Adams wrote: ↑Jesus dude, do you get your news from Fox?Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ like the 1911 pistol replica (top, real below) that Tamir Rice drew and aimed at the cop:
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Looks like Trump is concerned about the Ukraine allegations:
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Okay. You are a socialist, a blank-statist, and a restorative justice fan, and therefore a triple dumbass.
Ohh, somebody has a crush on Pippi Såüerpüss! :romance-inlove:To mock a sixteen year old girl with some mental issues "severely mentally ill" makes you a tactless dolt.
Let's see -- chronic depression, OCD, Asberger's, paranoia, severe anorexia requiring hospitalization, although she does eat now, albeit only pancakes filled with rice, and only if there are no stickers or labels or her name written on her lunch bag, in which case she has a screaming meltdown before falling to the floor in a fetal position. I concede that those do constitute "some mental issues."
Why don't you go do some yoga or spinning or whatever anemic low-T city-dweller soyboys like yourself do?Take a trail ride to hell, asshole.
-
- .
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:32 am
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Don't worry about Greta's cult of no personality. I've already seen posts concerned that she's a white savior and that climate activist girls of color are being ignored.
Hugo of Hugo & Jake is transitioning. I figured Steve Shives would be first. Anyway... I have a bad feeling about this. It seems to be part of a downward spiral and not gender dysphoria, nor does he seem to fit into the Blanchard categories of extreme autogynephilia, nor extreme discomfort with his homosexuality, though he has claimed bisexuality in the past.
Hugo of Hugo & Jake is transitioning. I figured Steve Shives would be first. Anyway... I have a bad feeling about this. It seems to be part of a downward spiral and not gender dysphoria, nor does he seem to fit into the Blanchard categories of extreme autogynephilia, nor extreme discomfort with his homosexuality, though he has claimed bisexuality in the past.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
What the hell is a "blank-statist"? Is that some new moniker used by the libertarian tards? Are you a Randian? That's so cute. Trying to build that static electric ozone machine up there in Matt's Gulch. Let me give you a hint. The missing ingredient is...more cop dick!Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Okay. You are a socialist, a blank-statist, and a restorative justice fan, and therefore a triple dumbass.
-
- .
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:32 am
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Would you two fuck already? The sexual tension is killing me.Hunt wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 10:32 pmWhat the hell is a "blank-statist"? Is that some new moniker used by the libertarian tards? Are you a Randian? That's so cute. Trying to build that static electric ozone machine up there in Matt's Gulch. Let me give you a hint. The missing ingredient is...more cop dick!Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Okay. You are a socialist, a blank-statist, and a restorative justice fan, and therefore a triple dumbass.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Not yet. Matt has gotten used to horses and I don't have that much viagra.katamari Damassi wrote: ↑ Would you two fuck already? The sexual tension is killing me.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
My mistake. It was Jan who got the shits.KiwiInOz wrote: ↑I think that he caught a serious case of diarrhea from the Pit.Pitchguest wrote: ↑Whatever happened to Ape? Nothing serious, I hope?ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote: ↑ https://i.imgur.com/Nw4aLjg.png
Oh man, what wouldn't I give to have Ape still around to make us a Shop of this.
I'd let Ophelia grind her dusty gums on my dick all day to see what he'd make of this.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
In other news:
OK. Sounds reasonable right? Never mind I stopped reading anything the NYT had to say on anything around five years ago,
The responses though. Apparently a lot of people are pissed off at them outing the "whistleblower" ... speaking of which and from what I managed to piece together ... a guy who had no first hand knowledge of anything other than gossip is a whistlrblower?
Also some people have long memories and they bring up the Iraq war. And their position on that nice man Hitler before things went south.
Whatever man. Fuck (Die Amtwoord)
Speaking of which ... some very serious iconography. You have been warned.
OK. Sounds reasonable right? Never mind I stopped reading anything the NYT had to say on anything around five years ago,
The responses though. Apparently a lot of people are pissed off at them outing the "whistleblower" ... speaking of which and from what I managed to piece together ... a guy who had no first hand knowledge of anything other than gossip is a whistlrblower?
Also some people have long memories and they bring up the Iraq war. And their position on that nice man Hitler before things went south.
Whatever man. Fuck (Die Amtwoord)
Speaking of which ... some very serious iconography. You have been warned.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
I want to see a cheesy seventies sitcom called "All in the Thunberg Family". There's potential there for some un-PC laughs.Keating wrote: ↑Especially with pictures like this around:ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑I wouldn't call it a table turn. It is exactly the kind of thing that anti-AGW campaigners can use to bolster their point, that climate change is a purely political issue dreamed up by the left and spread by moral scolding and emotional appeal. A child telling adults they're "abject failures" carries no authority whatsoever.Hunt wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:01 amThat's the entire point. Children aren't supposed to tell adults they're abject failures. Exactly why Thunberg has gotten attention and a thousand cerebral lectures have garnered a collective yawn. Adults talk down to children; children don't talk down to adults; it's an alarming table turn.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑ I don't have much time for children bitching about previous generations either.
https://www.document.no/wp-content/uplo ... unberg.jpg
-
- .
- Posts: 8652
- Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:52 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
I'm curious about this-- what would it look-like if he did fit into autogynephilia? Is there a specific 'sign' which seems absent in Hugo?katamari Damassi wrote: ↑
Hugo of Hugo & Jake is transitioning. .... nor does he seem to fit into the Blanchard categories of extreme autogynephilia
I ask because I think autogynephilia is a perfect description of my best friend: he basically seems like a regular dude. But, in his secret masturbatory fantasies, he gets-off on imagining himself as female or a chick-with-a-dick. I think this could have remained undetectable forever, had he not decided to tell people about it.
(He had a secret stash of women's clothing, to cross-dress. He secretly liked tranny porn. He even attended beauty school classes-- claiming he wanted to learn horror-movie make-up-- but secretly learning beauty make-up. He secretly played videogames like second-life and city of heroes --in-depth roleplaying as female and tranny characters, for months. He hooked up for secret sex with other cross-dressers. And he speculated-aloud about whether he would be happier if he fully transitioned or had facial-feminization surgery. He did have body hair lasered. But none of this might have been noticed by friends or coworkers, if he didn't stop hiding it.)
I know nothing about Hugo & Jake. To me, they look like average schmoes who might have all sorts of weird shit known only to their browser history.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
It is a Blank Slatist with extra t.Hunt wrote: ↑What the hell is a "blank-statist"? Is that some new moniker used by the libertarian tards? Are you a Randian? That's so cute. Trying to build that static electric ozone machine up there in Matt's Gulch. Let me give you a hint. The missing ingredient is...more cop dick!Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ Okay. You are a socialist, a blank-statist, and a restorative justice fan, and therefore a triple dumbass.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
CommanderTuvok wrote: ↑ Any other Pitters following the increasingly insane goings-on in Blighty?
Bo Jo used is accused of using 'threatening language' which has led to death threats, apparently. [remind you of GamerGate, anyone?] The word he is guilty of using? "Surrender" or "Betrayal"!!!
Now, naturally, MPs from all sides are saying: "hold on, you said [x] a few hours ago, which is equally bad if not worse". They're right. This is what happens when you lower the offence bar to words like "surrender" and "betrayal". Even "gobby" Jess Phillips has had to clarify why she has used bad language in the past, but half-defended it by mumbling something about power and privilege.
PS - Very little from the Guardianista types about their use of "Nazi", "fascist", or "racist" towards half the population. Even "gammon" would qualify as a offensive under these new "rules". The fucking whole lot of them are fucking useless.
Well worth recalling Parliament for, eh? Thanks, Supreme Court, for ensuring Parliament gets back to all that urgent business we were told we couldn't do without. First on the agenda: getting triggered by the words 'surrender bill'.
-
- .
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:30 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
I ended up turning the live streamed House of Commons coverage off . All very depressing.
Clearly there is no prospect of a deal by Oct 31st, Johnson has alienated those MPs , some on his side, that he needed to vote for a majority to pass any deal. or his office will be compelled to ask for an extension, which goes against everything he has said .
So popcorn time approaches , I expect it will , via legal force , be taken out of his hands and an extension granted
then we will have that general election, with him as the Brexit martyr , with many of the polls indicating likely another tiny majority for the Tories (back to square one if in a similarly anti no deal Commons ) or a minority Labour govt with the universally disliked Corbyn, (who is expected to resign if Labour loses though he said that last time)
All in all, still a shitstorm.
Clearly there is no prospect of a deal by Oct 31st, Johnson has alienated those MPs , some on his side, that he needed to vote for a majority to pass any deal. or his office will be compelled to ask for an extension, which goes against everything he has said .
So popcorn time approaches , I expect it will , via legal force , be taken out of his hands and an extension granted
then we will have that general election, with him as the Brexit martyr , with many of the polls indicating likely another tiny majority for the Tories (back to square one if in a similarly anti no deal Commons ) or a minority Labour govt with the universally disliked Corbyn, (who is expected to resign if Labour loses though he said that last time)
All in all, still a shitstorm.
-
- .
- Posts: 1495
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 9:09 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
One of the earliest and most egregious Title IX kangaroo court cases has ended in a victorious lawsuit.
The only problem is the size of the judgement: about $100K, kept low largely due to the Circuit Court Judge keeping out some of the most damning evidence, probably in contravention to the Appeals Court ruling that overturned her initial dismissal of the case. A couple of zeroes would probably have to be added before the financial pain makes universities think twice before empowering SJW-imbued administrative bodies. There should be plenty more kicks at the can, though, and hopefully no more Obama nominee judges running protection for the schools.
The only problem is the size of the judgement: about $100K, kept low largely due to the Circuit Court Judge keeping out some of the most damning evidence, probably in contravention to the Appeals Court ruling that overturned her initial dismissal of the case. A couple of zeroes would probably have to be added before the financial pain makes universities think twice before empowering SJW-imbued administrative bodies. There should be plenty more kicks at the can, though, and hopefully no more Obama nominee judges running protection for the schools.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
So, the OK sign is now a hate symbol: https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-49837898
-
- .
- Posts: 2181
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Article 50 is still in effect. The default is to leave on the 31st. There are European nations disaffected by the way the UK has been treated and there is absolutely no guarantee that an extension will be granted. I believe it only takes one veto. There is also nothing to stop Johnson from sending a request for an extension and following it up with a letter saying he doesn't want one. The surrender bill is an absurd piece of legislation which I am surprised, given the precedent which has now been set , is not open to legal challenge. The populace voted to leave Europe and now the ability to do so has been placed in the hands of Europe. I think that the polls are wrong again and there are a lot of people disgusted with the political elite placing themselves above the people. The Tories and Brexit Party will massacre the opposition. With all the shit coming out of Labour's conference a lot of people are going to have second thoughts at the voting station.InfraRedBucket wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2019 6:23 amI ended up turning the live streamed House of Commons coverage off . All very depressing.
Clearly there is no prospect of a deal by Oct 31st, Johnson has alienated those MPs , some on his side, that he needed to vote for a majority to pass any deal. or his office will be compelled to ask for an extension, which goes against everything he has said .
So popcorn time approaches , I expect it will , via legal force , be taken out of his hands and an extension granted
then we will have that general election, with him as the Brexit martyr , with many of the polls indicating likely another tiny majority for the Tories (back to square one if in a similarly anti no deal Commons ) or a minority Labour govt with the universally disliked Corbyn, (who is expected to resign if Labour loses though he said that last time)
All in all, still a shitstorm.
-
- .
- Posts: 1495
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 9:09 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
The problem is that it isn't mutually exclusive. Yes, there are some genuinely concerning climate science findings, and most people advocating for climate change policies are doing so under the good faith belief these policies are beneficial based on their understanding of the science. But there are more than a few who no longer follow or really care about the science, and just want to use it as a cudgel to get their preferred policies into place, and these are disproportionately in groups with the largest microphones and greatest political power. The whole Greta phenomenon and the media lockstep behind her reminds me of why I think the risk that some truly awful policies will be enacted in the name of combating climate change is greater than the risk that damages from climate change will be significantly worse than I currently believe likely.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑I wouldn't call it a table turn. It is exactly the kind of thing that anti-AGW campaigners can use to bolster their point, that climate change is a purely political issue dreamed up by the left and spread by moral scolding and emotional appeal. A child telling adults they're "abject failures" carries no authority whatsoever.Hunt wrote: ↑Thu Sep 26, 2019 4:01 amThat's the entire point. Children aren't supposed to tell adults they're abject failures. Exactly why Thunberg has gotten attention and a thousand cerebral lectures have garnered a collective yawn. Adults talk down to children; children don't talk down to adults; it's an alarming table turn.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑ I don't have much time for children bitching about previous generations either.
-
- .
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:32 am
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
I know only them from their videos but Hugo has be rather forthcoming. The only cross dressing he's ever reported is in kindergarten they had a dress-up area and he put on a tutu to make the other kids laugh. I'm not a psychologist but I think an autogynephile(and or someone genuinely suffering dysmorphia)would have an extensive history of cross dressing, even if it's just wearing women's underwear under his jeans. He might be in Blanchard's 25% that are homosexual but so uncomfortable with the concept of being an effeminate gay that they think that being a woman would be easier, but it doesn't strike me as that in his case. While not a very masculine guy, he's not ultra fem either. My uneducated opinion is that he's depressed, troubled, looking for the answer that will make him feel better, add social contagion and a dash of trans trender. I kind of think this was Muscato's case as well but know even less about her. I don't see transitioning ending well for Hugo.Service Dog wrote: ↑I'm curious about this-- what would it look-like if he did fit into autogynephilia? Is there a specific 'sign' which seems absent in Hugo?katamari Damassi wrote: ↑
Hugo of Hugo & Jake is transitioning. .... nor does he seem to fit into the Blanchard categories of extreme autogynephilia
I ask because I think autogynephilia is a perfect description of my best friend: he basically seems like a regular dude. But, in his secret masturbatory fantasies, he gets-off on imagining himself as female or a chick-with-a-dick. I think this could have remained undetectable forever, had he not decided to tell people about it.
(He had a secret stash of women's clothing, to cross-dress. He secretly liked tranny porn. He even attended beauty school classes-- claiming he wanted to learn horror-movie make-up-- but secretly learning beauty make-up. He secretly played videogames like second-life and city of heroes --in-depth roleplaying as female and tranny characters, for months. He hooked up for secret sex with other cross-dressers. And he speculated-aloud about whether he would be happier if he fully transitioned or had facial-feminization surgery. He did have body hair lasered. But none of this might have been noticed by friends or coworkers, if he didn't stop hiding it.)
I know nothing about Hugo & Jake. To me, they look like average schmoes who might have all sorts of weird shit known only to their browser history.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Meanwhile:
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
I must concede in the face of the impeccable logic of Hunt's arguments*. You win the Internet, Hunt; congratulations.wingtardery
nit-witted
tactless dolt
Brokeback Mountain
asshole
completely off your rocker
Trailride to Hell
libertarian tards
"Duke"
Randian
* Or was that just his spot-on PZ Myers impression?
-
- .
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:30 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
I know Art 50 is still in effect "by automatic operation of the law" is the phrase you are looking for.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑Article 50 is still in effect. The default is to leave on the 31st. There are European nations disaffected by the way the UK has been treated and there is absolutely no guarantee that an extension will be granted. I believe it only takes one veto. There is also nothing to stop Johnson from sending a request for an extension and following it up with a letter saying he doesn't want one. The surrender bill is an absurd piece of legislation which I am surprised, given the precedent which has now been set , is not open to legal challenge. The populace voted to leave Europe and now the ability to do so has been placed in the hands of Europe. I think that the polls are wrong again and there are a lot of people disgusted with the political elite placing themselves above the people. The Tories and Brexit Party will massacre the opposition. With all the shit coming out of Labour's conference a lot of people are going to have second thoughts at the voting station.InfraRedBucket wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2019 6:23 amI ended up turning the live streamed House of Commons coverage off . All very depressing.
Clearly there is no prospect of a deal by Oct 31st, Johnson has alienated those MPs , some on his side, that he needed to vote for a majority to pass any deal. or his office will be compelled to ask for an extension, which goes against everything he has said .
So popcorn time approaches , I expect it will , via legal force , be taken out of his hands and an extension granted
then we will have that general election, with him as the Brexit martyr , with many of the polls indicating likely another tiny majority for the Tories (back to square one if in a similarly anti no deal Commons ) or a minority Labour govt with the universally disliked Corbyn, (who is expected to resign if Labour loses though he said that last time)
All in all, still a shitstorm.
However the Eu are not going to be the ones to be seen pushing a current member state out yet , however much they would love to see the back of the UK if it comes to it, it will be that member state that jumps out with no deal , of its own accord. This is also very much about blame and responsibility ON BOTH SIDES before negotiations for a trade treaty have even begun.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-49847804
Secondly, the wheeze that BJ would send a second letter disclaiming the first has been pretty much debunked , he cannot subvert the Benn Act that way, as I said, if necessary, it will be taken out of his hand by legal force, he could resign as PM or a refusal to obey the specific requirements of the Benn Act would amount to that in practice and there would if it came to it, be swift moves to replace him, even by his own party.
And his successor (whoever that might be from whatever party) would still be bound by the same requirement in the same circumstances,
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
All right you cunts! Let's chat about tanks again! This is a really good video.... and I look forward to more stuff from this creator.
Enjoy! (and fuck the Panther....)
Enjoy! (and fuck the Panther....)
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Is Biden done? Could be!
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
I thought you'd see things my way, eventually. Seriously, "asshole" is the only one that even remotely verges on PZ territory, and I probably wouldn't have written that except that I was feeling cranky.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ I must concede in the face of the impeccable logic of Hunt's arguments*. You win the Internet, Hunt; congratulations.
This is the pit. I know there are people here who don't share my view. I enjoy it anyway, unabridged. You've got some seriously bad poop up there in your noggin, but the only thing that really pissed me off is your lackadaisical attitude toward gunning down the niggas. Blindly accepting cop propaganda in the face of clear video evidence, that anyone, anywhere can confirm in the space of five minutes, demonstrates an intellectual indolence I find unfathomable.
I know, know, you're the butch realist and I'm the fairy leftist. Save it.
-
- .
- Posts: 11165
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
John Solomon is a notorious bullshitter that parrots Trump propaganda and Tim Pool went full Trump apologist since Trump invited him to the white house to bask in the choden one's glory.
The fired prosecutor wrapped up his investigation of Burisma before Hunter Biden was hired and his firing was called for by the EU and the US state department because he wasn't rigorous enough in investigating corruption. The new prosecutor looked into Biden and found no wrongdoing.
He is on the record- inviting the DOJ to come over and investigate. Trump's DOJ didn't do that, no doubt because they had nothing to investigate either.
https://thebulwark.com/truth-lies-and-t ... uivalency/
https://www.msnbc.com/andrea-mitchell-r ... 0088773730
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Why'd you have to go and make it about race? I'm enthusiastic about cops gunning down perps of all backgrounds! :dance:
Your 'video evidence' consists of posting the Walter Scott and Philandro Castile shootings over and over. Nobody is defending those. Why do you continue to engage in the intellectually dishonest tactic of strawmanning?clear video evidence, that anyone, anywhere can confirm in the space of five minutes, demonstrates an intellectual indolence I find unfathomable.
There are hundreds and hundreds of videos on the internet of cops shooting perps with cause. Just search for 'justifiable shooting'. You can also find all to many videos of cops getting stabbed & shot during routine traffic stops, etc.
You've still failed to quantify the extent of the alleged police abuse of force, and failed to provide realistic alternatives to neutralizing armed & dangerous perps. Indeed, you declared it "excessive" to continue firing at a criminal who'd fired on the LEO and was brandishing a gun while civilians were in close proximity.
You might try doing so and make this an actual intellectual debate. Or you could just go back to accusing me of gay sex with animals.
... not that there's anything wrong with that, so long as they're either dogs or dolphins.
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
-
- .
- Posts: 8652
- Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:52 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
At 18m20, Ben Shapiro sez Schiff tweeted on August 28 about Trump's Ukraine call about Biden-- 2 and a half weeks before the whistleblower complaint reached congress by via proper channels. 2 and a half weeks before Schiff was supposed to know about the whistleblower complaint.
The first reply to Schiff's tweet was Alexandria Chalupa, described by Shapiro as the DNC source-- in contact with the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Ukraine Embassy-- to discredit Trump in 2016. In her reply to Schiff, Chalupa offers Schiff 'a lot of information'.
This looks like a smoking-gun that the Democrats are guilty of the very thing they accuse Trump of-- collusion with foreign-govt Ukraine to politically damage their political rival Trump.
The first reply to Schiff's tweet was Alexandria Chalupa, described by Shapiro as the DNC source-- in contact with the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Ukraine Embassy-- to discredit Trump in 2016. In her reply to Schiff, Chalupa offers Schiff 'a lot of information'.
This looks like a smoking-gun that the Democrats are guilty of the very thing they accuse Trump of-- collusion with foreign-govt Ukraine to politically damage their political rival Trump.
-
- .
- Posts: 8652
- Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:52 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
My knowledge is limited to skimming the wikipedia entry for Blanchard, a few years ago.katamari Damassi wrote: ↑
...I think an autogynephile(and or someone genuinely suffering dysmorphia)would have an extensive history of cross dressing, even if it's just wearing women's underwear under his jeans.
...
He might be in Blanchard's 25% that are homosexual but so uncomfortable with the concept of being an effeminate gay that they think that being a woman would be easier, but it doesn't strike me as that in his case. While not a very masculine guy, he's not ultra fem either. My uneducated opinion is that he's depressed, troubled, looking for the answer that will make him feel better, add social contagion and a dash of trans trender. I kind of think this was Muscato's case as well but know even less about her. I don't see transitioning ending well for Hugo.
But it seems to me that autogynephile would describe anyone who is turned on by imagining themselves as a woman at-all... like if you enjoy fucking a corpse just-once you'd be a necrophile, even if it's a one-time thing. If we count autogynephiles that-way, then the category isn't limited to those who are transgender. The 75% of transgenders who Blanchard said were autogynephiles are thus a subset of all autogynephiles.
Framed that way, the question becomes whether autogynephiles are better-served by being considered trans-- with transitioning being recommended as the best path for them.
Or whether some-or-all autogynephiles would be better-off regarding that aspect of themselves as a fetish or sexual proclivity-- so it's ok to limit autogyne stuff to bedroom-play & not-necessarily reassign one's entire gender. That's where I'm going with this-- in today's trans-trans-trans publicity culture, I don't know if being 'just' an autogynephile is considered a valid option.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
So, you're saying it was just a one time thing.Service Dog wrote: ↑My knowledge is limited to skimming the wikipedia entry for Blanchard, a few years ago.katamari Damassi wrote: ↑
...I think an autogynephile(and or someone genuinely suffering dysmorphia)would have an extensive history of cross dressing, even if it's just wearing women's underwear under his jeans.
...
He might be in Blanchard's 25% that are homosexual but so uncomfortable with the concept of being an effeminate gay that they think that being a woman would be easier, but it doesn't strike me as that in his case. While not a very masculine guy, he's not ultra fem either. My uneducated opinion is that he's depressed, troubled, looking for the answer that will make him feel better, add social contagion and a dash of trans trender. I kind of think this was Muscato's case as well but know even less about her. I don't see transitioning ending well for Hugo.
But it seems to me that autogynephile would describe anyone who is turned on by imagining themselves as a woman at-all... like if you enjoy fucking a corpse just-once you'd be a necrophile, even if it's a one-time thing. If we count autogynephiles that-way, then the category isn't limited to those who are transgender. The 75% of transgenders who Blanchard said were autogynephiles are thus a subset of all autogynephiles.
Framed that way, the question becomes whether autogynephiles are better-served by being considered trans-- with transitioning being recommended as the best path for them.
Or whether some-or-all autogynephiles would be better-off regarding that aspect of themselves as a fetish or sexual proclivity-- so it's ok to limit autogyne stuff to bedroom-play & not-necessarily reassign one's entire gender. That's where I'm going with this-- in today's trans-trans-trans publicity culture, I don't know if being 'just' an autogynephile is considered a valid option.
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
So.... I designed the longest bridge ever made... and... you would think they would call me John the bridge builder......... and I cured are rare type of disease.... and you would think they would call me John the healer... but NO.... NO... they don't call me these things... but.... suck one cock....
-
- Brassy, uncouth, henpecked meathead
- Posts: 5059
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:08 am
- Location: Lurking in a dumpster
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Sorry, my childish shit-posting must continue...
(the accent is flawless!)
(the accent is flawless!)
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
So, Trudeau's Coongate disappeared pretty quickly from the news, eh?
:think: :think:
:think: :think:
-
- .
- Posts: 11165
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
Not entirely from Canadian news. It is brought up, including stories about who dug up the treasure.
It has been reported as significant and also as no big deal in some provinces like Quebec but it is still circulating.
It doesn't hurt him particularly with conservative voters, but they wouldn't vote for him anyway. Where it hurts him is driving his otherwise supporters to the NDP or the Greens.
My prediction from what is happening now is that Liberals form a minority government with NDP support.
-
- .
- Posts: 2181
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am
Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!
TBH I'm not sure who makes the decision to allow an extension. I've heard, and am inclined to believe that it is down to the member states and it is not clear at all that there will be no veto.InfraRedBucket wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2019 10:32 amI know Art 50 is still in effect "by automatic operation of the law" is the phrase you are looking for.ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑Article 50 is still in effect. The default is to leave on the 31st. There are European nations disaffected by the way the UK has been treated and there is absolutely no guarantee that an extension will be granted. I believe it only takes one veto. There is also nothing to stop Johnson from sending a request for an extension and following it up with a letter saying he doesn't want one. The surrender bill is an absurd piece of legislation which I am surprised, given the precedent which has now been set , is not open to legal challenge. The populace voted to leave Europe and now the ability to do so has been placed in the hands of Europe. I think that the polls are wrong again and there are a lot of people disgusted with the political elite placing themselves above the people. The Tories and Brexit Party will massacre the opposition. With all the shit coming out of Labour's conference a lot of people are going to have second thoughts at the voting station.InfraRedBucket wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2019 6:23 amI ended up turning the live streamed House of Commons coverage off . All very depressing.
Clearly there is no prospect of a deal by Oct 31st, Johnson has alienated those MPs , some on his side, that he needed to vote for a majority to pass any deal. or his office will be compelled to ask for an extension, which goes against everything he has said .
So popcorn time approaches , I expect it will , via legal force , be taken out of his hands and an extension granted
then we will have that general election, with him as the Brexit martyr , with many of the polls indicating likely another tiny majority for the Tories (back to square one if in a similarly anti no deal Commons ) or a minority Labour govt with the universally disliked Corbyn, (who is expected to resign if Labour loses though he said that last time)
All in all, still a shitstorm.
However the Eu are not going to be the ones to be seen pushing a current member state out yet , however much they would love to see the back of the UK if it comes to it, it will be that member state that jumps out with no deal , of its own accord. This is also very much about blame and responsibility ON BOTH SIDES before negotiations for a trade treaty have even begun.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-49847804
Secondly, the wheeze that BJ would send a second letter disclaiming the first has been pretty much debunked , he cannot subvert the Benn Act that way, as I said, if necessary, it will be taken out of his hand by legal force, he could resign as PM or a refusal to obey the specific requirements of the Benn Act would amount to that in practice and there would if it came to it, be swift moves to replace him, even by his own party.
And his successor (whoever that might be from whatever party) would still be bound by the same requirement in the same circumstances,