You is all a bunch of poofs!

shoutinghorse
.
.
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1921

Post by shoutinghorse » Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:13 am

shoutinghorse wrote: I don't want to worry you all unnecessarily but two of the worlds nuclear powers appear to be at war. That's if shooting each others jets out of the sky constitutes as war like behaviour of course. :shifty:

https://www.rt.com/news/452536-india-do ... -aircraft/

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 12598
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1922

Post by Matt Cavanaugh » Wed Feb 27, 2019 8:40 am

shoutinghorse wrote: I don't want to worry you all unnecessarily but two of the worlds nuclear powers appear to be at war. That's if shooting each others jets out of the sky constitutes as war like behaviour of course. :shifty:

https://www.rt.com/news/452536-india-do ... -aircraft/
Any idea what aircraft were used? Both countries have quite a mix.

HelpingHand
.
.
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1923

Post by HelpingHand » Wed Feb 27, 2019 9:03 am

India is admitting to losing one: Mig-21bis

Not seeing any other specific airframe call outs.

shoutinghorse
.
.
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1924

Post by shoutinghorse » Wed Feb 27, 2019 9:05 am

Both MiG-21 fighter jets according to the report.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 12598
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1925

Post by Matt Cavanaugh » Wed Feb 27, 2019 9:07 am

So no great loss.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 12598
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1926

Post by Matt Cavanaugh » Wed Feb 27, 2019 9:09 am

I would've sent the Mirages in hopes of losing more....


CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1928

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Wed Feb 27, 2019 1:32 pm



Read the thread, it's good.

SM1957
.
.
Posts: 845
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:01 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1929

Post by SM1957 » Wed Feb 27, 2019 1:56 pm

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:

Read the thread, it's good.
Hold the press!

Transgender brain differences definitely exist.

While obviously scientists have proved there are no brain differences between men and women, doctors can use brain differences to decide to delay puberty in the hope of improving the success of a sex change later.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn ... rain-scan/

some guy
.
.
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:05 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1930

Post by some guy » Wed Feb 27, 2019 2:06 pm

Well, that explains it!

Am J Psychoanal. 2019 Feb 7.
Zaidel A.

Abstract
This article attempts to add another layer to our understanding of the phenomenon of hysterical duality. The author postulates that hysterical duality can be explained based on the dual-aspect model of feminine sexuality, which exhibits two initially contradictory paths: one derived from primary vaginal sensations and the other from clitoral pleasure. At first, these two paths create a fundamental split between representations of internal space, containment and motherhood and representations related to auto-eroticism and the effacement of the Other's presence and needs. The author argues that this manifest contradiction makes the attainment of integration in feminine development an intricate and protracted process, which involves an act of inversion. This inversion entails a post-Oedipal disavowal of primary vaginal sexuality, pending its rediscovery through the encounter with the Other. Hysteria is thus viewed as the result of a failure to perform this inversion and an inability to extract oneself from the position of a "Vaginal Girl", who defines herself through the desire of the other. This pathological course of development leaves the hysteric's sexuality in a split state and traps her in the duality of clitoral pleasure versus penetration, which unconsciously represents humiliation and exploitation.

KEYWORDS:
female sexual development; female sexuality; hysteria; hysterical duality

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30733551

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 4955
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1931

Post by KiwiInOz » Wed Feb 27, 2019 2:21 pm

First they came for the Slymepitters ...

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1932

Post by MarcusAu » Wed Feb 27, 2019 2:45 pm

shoutinghorse wrote: I don't want to worry you all unnecessarily but two of the worlds nuclear powers appear to be at war. That's if shooting each others jets out of the sky constitutes as war like behaviour of course. :shifty:

https://www.rt.com/news/452536-india-do ... -aircraft/

piginthecity
.
.
Posts: 1003
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:20 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1933

Post by piginthecity » Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:03 pm

MarcusAu wrote:
shoutinghorse wrote: I don't want to worry you all unnecessarily but two of the worlds nuclear powers appear to be at war. That's if shooting each others jets out of the sky constitutes as war like behaviour of course. :shifty:

https://www.rt.com/news/452536-india-do ... -aircraft/
I heard that it was "an argument about Kashmir" which started all this off. I must say i've had a few heated disagreements about which is the best song on Physical Graffiti myself but i never expected it to go nuclear.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 12598
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1934

Post by Matt Cavanaugh » Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:08 pm

some guy wrote: Well, that explains it!

Am J Psychoanal. 2019 Feb 7.
Zaidel A.

Abstract
This article attempts to add another layer to our understanding of the phenomenon of hysterical duality. The author postulates that hysterical duality can be explained based on the dual-aspect model of feminine sexuality, which exhibits two initially contradictory paths: one derived from primary vaginal sensations and the other from clitoral pleasure. At first, these two paths create a fundamental split between representations of internal space, containment and motherhood and representations related to auto-eroticism and the effacement of the Other's presence and needs. The author argues that this manifest contradiction makes the attainment of integration in feminine development an intricate and protracted process, which involves an act of inversion. This inversion entails a post-Oedipal disavowal of primary vaginal sexuality, pending its rediscovery through the encounter with the Other. Hysteria is thus viewed as the result of a failure to perform this inversion and an inability to extract oneself from the position of a "Vaginal Girl", who defines herself through the desire of the other. This pathological course of development leaves the hysteric's sexuality in a split state and traps her in the duality of clitoral pleasure versus penetration, which unconsciously represents humiliation and exploitation.

KEYWORDS:
female sexual development; female sexuality; hysteria; hysterical duality

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30733551
Did it involve field research?

screwtape
.
.
Posts: 2400
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:15 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1935

Post by screwtape » Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:11 pm

I know Canada is boring (something I'm generally grateful for), and this doesn't have the cachet of added MiG-21 Fishbeds, but it seems my imagined screenplay of our Prime Minister's Office officials trying to browbeat the Attorney General into political interference with prosecutorial independence was right on the money. It's dry stuff, but it takes away any claims to moral superiority from Trudeau's government.

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/re ... -committee

CaptainFluffyBunny
.
.
Posts: 7556
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:39 am
Location: Somewhere in the pipes
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1936

Post by CaptainFluffyBunny » Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:34 pm

screwtape wrote: I know Canada is boring (something I'm generally grateful for), and this doesn't have the cachet of added MiG-21 Fishbeds, but it seems my imagined screenplay of our Prime Minister's Office officials trying to browbeat the Attorney General into political interference with prosecutorial independence was right on the money. It's dry stuff, but it takes away any claims to moral superiority from Trudeau's government.

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/re ... -committee
It's bandied about Twitter that this is a major scandal with potential resignation capacity. Could it rise to that?

shoutinghorse
.
.
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1937

Post by shoutinghorse » Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:36 pm

MarcusAu wrote:
shoutinghorse wrote: I don't want to worry you all unnecessarily but two of the worlds nuclear powers appear to be at war. That's if shooting each others jets out of the sky constitutes as war like behaviour of course. :shifty:

https://www.rt.com/news/452536-india-do ... -aircraft/
So two countries who have been independent from white man bad (Britain) for 72 years this august and have been fighting over Kashmir ever since but it's still the fault of white man bad. At what point do brown men good take responsibility for their own actions?

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 16840
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1938

Post by Brive1987 » Wed Feb 27, 2019 4:03 pm

Hey “the West!” This isn’t the best optics.



Hey “progressives” what the fuck?

Keating
.
.
Posts: 1966
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: South of anteater guy
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1939

Post by Keating » Wed Feb 27, 2019 4:49 pm

This is the most entertaining shit I've seen in a while:


Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 16840
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1940

Post by Brive1987 » Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:42 pm

Look what happens when the Democrats vote to kill little babies. :naughty: :mrgreen:


KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 4955
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1941

Post by KiwiInOz » Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:45 pm


dog puke
.
.
Posts: 1637
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:54 pm
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1942

Post by dog puke » Wed Feb 27, 2019 6:32 pm

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
screwtape wrote: I know Canada is boring (something I'm generally grateful for), and this doesn't have the cachet of added MiG-21 Fishbeds, but it seems my imagined screenplay of our Prime Minister's Office officials trying to browbeat the Attorney General into political interference with prosecutorial independence was right on the money. It's dry stuff, but it takes away any claims to moral superiority from Trudeau's government.

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/re ... -committee
It's bandied about Twitter that this is a major scandal with potential resignation capacity. Could it rise to that?
IMHO - yep. The whole bottom could fall out of the federal government. Trudeau is a disaster.

dog puke
.
.
Posts: 1637
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:54 pm
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1943

Post by dog puke » Wed Feb 27, 2019 6:37 pm

This is extremely damning testimony from the former Attorney General. If proven, this is serious criminal behaviour that Trudeau and his lackeys have engaged in.

TheMudbrooker
.
.
Posts: 786
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:15 pm
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1944

Post by TheMudbrooker » Wed Feb 27, 2019 6:52 pm

dog puke wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
screwtape wrote: I know Canada is boring (something I'm generally grateful for), and this doesn't have the cachet of added MiG-21 Fishbeds, but it seems my imagined screenplay of our Prime Minister's Office officials trying to browbeat the Attorney General into political interference with prosecutorial independence was right on the money. It's dry stuff, but it takes away any claims to moral superiority from Trudeau's government.

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/re ... -committee
It's bandied about Twitter that this is a major scandal with potential resignation capacity. Could it rise to that?
IMHO - yep. The whole bottom could fall out of the federal government. Trudeau is a disaster.
Maybe they just need a good old fashioned Canadian style pep talk.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96FY6aIKUXE

Pseudomonas
.
.
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2015 3:47 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1945

Post by Pseudomonas » Wed Feb 27, 2019 7:24 pm

shoutinghorse wrote:
Wed Feb 27, 2019 4:12 am
Labour could go into a coalition with the SNP if they have the numbers but that's the point, with this statement yesterday that they will now back a 2nd referendum they will lose so much support in the north and midlands of England and South Wales that even with the sweaties on side they won't get there.And that's assuming the SNP keep their own support, polls suggest they're losing ground.
I'm watching the BBC's 'Politics Live' program as I sit here writing this and Labour MP Kate Hoey (a staunch Brexiteer) has been saying the very same, to paraphrase her "People don't understand that when you get out of London and speak to people in the north and midlands as I do, labour voters are very angry and will not vote labour again if they renege on their 2017 manifesto pledge)

So yes, right now Labour are unelectable. But then again, so are the Tories. the next election will throw up some interesting results. Local elections are in May with 270 English councils up for grabs, could be very telling.
Looking from the outside now, having once been a voter in the UK, I'd be hard put to decide where to put my cross.

I still have a reflexive dislike of the Tories from growing up in the north at the height of Thatcherism, and the current mob are useless. I'd have probably voted remain in the Brexit referendum, but the behaviour of the EU (and remainers) have put me firmly in the 'out now, no deal is fine', camp. So not likely to be my first choice.

Labour - not under Corbyn and his red mafia. I voted Labour consistently to get Thatcher and Major out, but once they were in power, I realised that there wasn't much difference, and that Blair was (in many ways) Thatcher-lite.

Lib Dems - no real point. SNP - put it this way, I would have voted to remain in the UK in the Indyref, principally because the SNP couldn't govern their way out of a we t paper bag (their policies all seemed to rely on every negotiation - separating from the UK, joining the EU as a separate entity, etc - going entirely their way... ). The rest :o :shock: :) :fpig: .

Mind you, the choice here in Oz isn't much better...

Pseudomonas

shoutinghorse
.
.
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1946

Post by shoutinghorse » Thu Feb 28, 2019 3:04 am

Pseudomonas wrote: I still have a reflexive dislike of the Tories from growing up in the north at the height of Thatcherism,
And there you have it, people from the traditional Labour heartlands like the north would vote Labour come what may (no pun intended) I lived and worked in South Yorkshire for 20 years and there were two sayings that used to be rolled out come election day.

"You could put a red rosette on a pig and people round here would vote for it"

"They don't count vote for Labour up here, they weigh it"

But the pits and mills and steelworks and shipyards and engineering/manufacturing jobs have largely gone and the old guard of trade union 'socialists' are dying off. People have seen their neighbourhoods change demonstrably with mass migration which brings its own social problems, housing, health care, schools, wage stagnation, crime etc. They no longer see Labour as the party for them, which of course they no longer are, but they will never vote Tory.
As other party's and movements emerge people are starting to shift allegiances, especially if those movements are addressing the real concerns they have that the political elite won't touch with a ten foot pole.

ThreeFlangedJavis
.
.
Posts: 1397
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1947

Post by ThreeFlangedJavis » Thu Feb 28, 2019 3:41 am

Pseudomonas wrote:
Wed Feb 27, 2019 7:24 pm
shoutinghorse wrote:
Wed Feb 27, 2019 4:12 am
Labour could go into a coalition with the SNP if they have the numbers but that's the point, with this statement yesterday that they will now back a 2nd referendum they will lose so much support in the north and midlands of England and South Wales that even with the sweaties on side they won't get there.And that's assuming the SNP keep their own support, polls suggest they're losing ground.
I'm watching the BBC's 'Politics Live' program as I sit here writing this and Labour MP Kate Hoey (a staunch Brexiteer) has been saying the very same, to paraphrase her "People don't understand that when you get out of London and speak to people in the north and midlands as I do, labour voters are very angry and will not vote labour again if they renege on their 2017 manifesto pledge)

So yes, right now Labour are unelectable. But then again, so are the Tories. the next election will throw up some interesting results. Local elections are in May with 270 English councils up for grabs, could be very telling.
Looking from the outside now, having once been a voter in the UK, I'd be hard put to decide where to put my cross.

I still have a reflexive dislike of the Tories from growing up in the north at the height of Thatcherism, and the current mob are useless. I'd have probably voted remain in the Brexit referendum, but the behaviour of the EU (and remainers) have put me firmly in the 'out now, no deal is fine', camp. So not likely to be my first choice.

Labour - not under Corbyn and his red mafia. I voted Labour consistently to get Thatcher and Major out, but once they were in power, I realised that there wasn't much difference, and that Blair was (in many ways) Thatcher-lite.

Lib Dems - no real point. SNP - put it this way, I would have voted to remain in the UK in the Indyref, principally because the SNP couldn't govern their way out of a we t paper bag (their policies all seemed to rely on every negotiation - separating from the UK, joining the EU as a separate entity, etc - going entirely their way... ). The rest :o :shock: :) :fpig: .

Mind you, the choice here in Oz isn't much better...

Pseudomonas
I don't think Blair shared very much at all with Thatcher. He set the UK on it's current PC authoritarian course with a big increase in new legislation. I've heard it said that Alastair Campbell, a political appointee of Blair's, had an unprecedented level of control over public servants. Campbell was of the opinion that civil servants should parrot the Labour's political spin and he had Blair's backing to the extent that he was regarded by many as the de facto deputy PM. I think Blair and Thatcher had very different inclinations with regard to control of people's personal lives.

shoutinghorse
.
.
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1948

Post by shoutinghorse » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:16 am

shoutinghorse wrote: Alastair Campbell, a political appointee of Blair's, had an unprecedented level of control over public servants. Campbell was of the opinion that civil servants should parrot the Labour's political spin and he had Blair's backing to the extent that he was regarded by many as the de facto deputy PM.
Armando Iannucci's BBC satirical comedy 'The Thick Of It' allegedly based the character Malcolm Tucker on Campbell.

(This was when the BBC still did comedy of course)


MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1949

Post by MarcusAu » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:21 am

ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: I think Blair and Thatcher had very different inclinations with regard to control of people's personal lives.
Both agreed that control was needed. But differed on what aspects of people lives should be regulated by the government.

screwtape
.
.
Posts: 2400
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:15 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1950

Post by screwtape » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:19 am

CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
screwtape wrote: I know Canada is boring (something I'm generally grateful for), and this doesn't have the cachet of added MiG-21 Fishbeds, but it seems my imagined screenplay of our Prime Minister's Office officials trying to browbeat the Attorney General into political interference with prosecutorial independence was right on the money. It's dry stuff, but it takes away any claims to moral superiority from Trudeau's government.

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/re ... -committee
It's bandied about Twitter that this is a major scandal with potential resignation capacity. Could it rise to that?
It ought to, but I doubt it will. At one time, such a scandal would result in the immediate resignation of the government; they have been caught with their hand in the till and there should be no question about their leaving. Trudeau will hang on, relying on short attention spans and public disinterest in the arcane rules of parliamentary procedure. He will frame it as bravely fighting for Canadian jobs and some will believe him, especially as the alternative governments don't look particularly palatable. I am used to seeing a governing party become progressively more corrupt over two or three terms in power, and elections at that stage feel like squeezing a particularly ripe and putrid pustule. I have not seen a party in power go from idealism to such disregard for the constitution in one term before. As always, the quality of corruption in Canadian politics is inferior stuff - our politicians show little imagination in the ways they abuse power and stick to simple, sordid self-interest. We don't seem to be able to produce proper Machiavellian slyness here, which is one reason for our boring nature. One might admire the cleverness and nerve of a real schemer like Harold Wilson, but our political acne really is vulgaris and we just keep popping the pustules and move on. I am beginning to realise my function as a voter is simply to remove an unwanted government, rather than to vote for the policies of a new one. This is depressing, but rational.
For those who don't follow it, the issue is that a giant construction contractor has been spreading bribes very liberally to gain work abroad. Millions handed over to Gaddafi for contracts in Libya, which not only is illegal, but tarnishes Canada's reputation, and ensures that other Canadian firms will be expected to offer bribes as that's what Canada is now known to do. SNC paid for one of Gaddafi's sons to make 'educational' visits to Canada, and is alleged to have paid $30,000 for prostitutes for one son during one visit. That is the kind of thing that made a remediation agreement (non-criminal wrist slapping provided for by legislation specifically passed, it seems, to resolve this case) unacceptable to the Director of Public Prosecutions. But brave Justin preferred to improve his re-election chances by pressuring the Attorney General to overrule the DPP rather than see justice be done to a rich and powerful Québec corporation.

screwtape
.
.
Posts: 2400
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:15 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1951

Post by screwtape » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:21 am

Ha! "Very liberally". Unintended, but juste.

screwtape
.
.
Posts: 2400
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:15 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1952

Post by screwtape » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:26 am

shoutinghorse wrote:
Armando Iannucci's BBC satirical comedy 'The Thick Of It' allegedly based the character Malcolm Tucker on Campbell.

(This was when the BBC still did comedy of course)
You might also nominate it in the tragedy category as well as the comedy. It was that good.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10730
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1953

Post by Lsuoma » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:31 am

And documentary.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1954

Post by MarcusAu » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:02 am

Someone has to keep us in the loop.

ThreeFlangedJavis
.
.
Posts: 1397
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1955

Post by ThreeFlangedJavis » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:17 am

MarcusAu wrote:
Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:21 am
ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: I think Blair and Thatcher had very different inclinations with regard to control of people's personal lives.
Both agreed that control was needed. But differed on what aspects of people lives should be regulated by the government.
I would argue that Thatcher was not that interested in controlling speech and thought, which I think was a tendency favoured by the Blair gov.

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1956

Post by MarcusAu » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:37 am

ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: I would argue that Thatcher was not that interested in controlling speech and thought...
There is at least some evidence to the contrary...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjHC3vgGdFI

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10730
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1957

Post by Lsuoma » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:39 am

MarcusAu wrote:
Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:02 am
Someone has to keep us in the loop.
http://www.readjunk.com/wp-content/uplo ... ection.jpg

ThreeFlangedJavis
.
.
Posts: 1397
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1958

Post by ThreeFlangedJavis » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:39 am

screwtape wrote:
Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:19 am
I am used to seeing a governing party become progressively more corrupt over two or three terms in power, and elections at that stage feel like squeezing a particularly ripe and putrid pustule. I have not seen a party in power go from idealism to such disregard for the constitution in one term before.
I would have expected this from Trudeau. His assumed moral superiority comes from empty virtue signalling. Acting unethically is a given if it keeps the virtuous in power. Ends justify the mens and all that. It certainy isn't unusual. Obama had a bit more substance and charisma, which is how he got away with promising transparency and then running the most opaque administration ever. If people think Trump is a threat to the free press it is only because they don't know how vindictive Obama's administration was toward disobedient reporters. The Blair gov was the same. They came in with a fanfare proclaiming their virtue, promising a new dawn after Tory corruption (most of that manufactured by Labour spin) and ethical foreign policy. It didn't take long before they were mired in various scandals.

Service Dog
.
.
Posts: 4669
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:52 pm
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1959

Post by Service Dog » Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:33 am

A while back, I made a joke about how unfair it was to black cucks that they always have to be the guy fucking the white cuck's wife in cuck porn-- the black dude never gets to whimper in the corner & watch his wife get humped.

This guy literally complains about Always A Bull, Never A Cuck!

I also like his link to the white woman in Memphis who called the cops on a black guy for wearing socks in the swimming pool.

Poor guy. The worst part of the objectified black man's lived experience is-- the white women who control book publishing & want to fuck him--
are all under 300 lbs. & don't shop at Wal-mart.

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 10730
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1960

Post by Lsuoma » Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:05 am

Andrew Preview has died.


Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 16840
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1961

Post by Brive1987 » Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:27 pm

PZ has waded into the Captain Marvel, Rotton Tomatoes white knighting drama.

The background tl/dr is that RT have removed the “want to see” option for pre release movies. This after Femi-Mavel hit the lowly 20% mark. Because clearly this couldn’t be actual audience sentiment.

Of course PZ accidentally gets it’s all wrong. Luckily in a way that favours his bias.
You might be wondering how they did it, and what they did. Rotten Tomatoes noticed that movies that hadn’t been released yet, that no one had even seen, were being swarmed by people downvoting them, making their reviews unreliable and even more biased than usual. So they made a rule: you don’t get to rate a movie until after it has been released. This, of course, is a colossal threat to democracy!
Yeah PZ, that’s exactly what happened. Now wait for the post release apocalypse.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 16840
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1962

Post by Brive1987 » Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:28 pm

Rotten effort there.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 16840
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1963

Post by Brive1987 » Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:43 pm

PZ’s take on the RT critics.
The people are shrieking through their ball gags on Twitter about this criminal assault on democracy.
Now where would a Minnesota-nice boy like that discover such a term? Mary needs to have a sneak at his browser history.

Steersman
.
.
Posts: 10154
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:58 pm
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1964

Post by Steersman » Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:59 pm

screwtape wrote:
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
screwtape wrote: I know Canada is boring (something I'm generally grateful for), and this doesn't have the cachet of added MiG-21 Fishbeds, but it seems my imagined screenplay of our Prime Minister's Office officials trying to browbeat the Attorney General into political interference with prosecutorial independence was right on the money. It's dry stuff, but it takes away any claims to moral superiority from Trudeau's government.

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/re ... -committee
It's bandied about Twitter that this is a major scandal with potential resignation capacity. Could it rise to that?
It ought to, but I doubt it will. At one time, such a scandal would result in the immediate resignation of the government; they have been caught with their hand in the till and there should be no question about their leaving. Trudeau will hang on, relying on short attention spans and public disinterest in the arcane rules of parliamentary procedure. ....
Certainly a possibility, though I certainly hope Trudeau winds up with his ass in a sling - and toot sweet. ICMYI, a National Post interview of Andrew Coyne weighing-in on those points a week or so ago:



Saw him and several others - Chantal Hebert & woman columnist at HuffPost - on the CBC National News last night - after JWR's testimony, and he emphasized those points again. Bit moot though whether Trudeau - and his "gang" - crossed a line or not, though they're certainly looking rather sleazy - as has become increasingly evident.

But interesting too that several of the nominally leftist media - Mope & Wail, and MacLean's for examples - have come out with some rather critical articles of JT after JWR's testimony. He might yet get stabbed in the rotunda, and well before the Ides of March. Couldn't happen to a nicer fellow ...

In any case, in some unrelated news, even if of "The Pope is Catholic" "astoundingness", Arthur Chu is a gutless wonder, having blocked me immediately after my last tweet to him:


Tweets_ArthurChu_Vocabulary1A.jpg
(89.53 KiB) Downloaded 194 times

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1965

Post by MarcusAu » Thu Feb 28, 2019 3:00 pm

PZ's irrelevancy is under-rated. He's been asymptotically approaching zero for some time now.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6512
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1966

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM » Thu Feb 28, 2019 3:22 pm

Brive1987 wrote: PZ’s take on the RT critics.
The people are shrieking through their ball gags on Twitter about this criminal assault on democracy.
Now where would a Minnesota-nice boy like that discover such a term? Mary needs to have a sneak at his browser history.
Ha! Flashback (it made sense at the time, I'm sure...)

https://i.imgur.com/g9jquUX.jpg

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 16840
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1967

Post by Brive1987 » Thu Feb 28, 2019 4:14 pm


KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 4955
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1968

Post by KiwiInOz » Thu Feb 28, 2019 4:18 pm

Service Dog wrote:
A while back, I made a joke about how unfair it was to black cucks that they always have to be the guy fucking the white cuck's wife in cuck porn-- the black dude never gets to whimper in the corner & watch his wife get humped.

This guy literally complains about Always A Bull, Never A Cuck!

I also like his link to the white woman in Memphis who called the cops on a black guy for wearing socks in the swimming pool.

Poor guy. The worst part of the objectified black man's lived experience is-- the white women who control book publishing & want to fuck him--
are all under 300 lbs. & don't shop at Wal-mart.
My heart went out to him, too.

Keating
.
.
Posts: 1966
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:18 pm
Location: South of anteater guy
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1969

Post by Keating » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:08 pm

KiwiInOz wrote: My heart went out to him, too.
You should offer to fuck his wife.

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 7970
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1970

Post by AndrewV69 » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:00 pm


Bhurzum
Brassy, uncouth, henpecked meathead
Posts: 4094
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:08 am
Location: Lurking in a dumpster
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1971

Post by Bhurzum » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:59 pm

This has always been my #1 Lannucci offering...and my dream job.


AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 7970
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1972

Post by AndrewV69 » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:18 pm

I guess I should mention that there are some interesting bits to that tweet. Click on the link to the tweet to see the thread.

Among other things there is allegedly a link to Sara Bronfman for example (she of the sex cult #NXIVM fame)

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 16840
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1973

Post by Brive1987 » Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:16 pm

Fun fact. Fascist Tit is user ID 2.

(((Who))) is pulling his strings .... ?

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 16840
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1974

Post by Brive1987 » Fri Mar 01, 2019 3:15 am

PZs Rotton Tomato rant keeps,giving.

Here with zero self awareness...
It’s kind of creepy how one small, loud segment of the internet has become a hate-filled clique that feeds on their own rage.
Here he passes judgement on the orbit and his own defence funds
One of the leaders of the anti-woman mob is mentioned above: Ethan Van Sciver. He’s a Mormon comic book artist who has apparently alienated all the big publishers and is reduced to begging for money on the internet,

Service Dog
.
.
Posts: 4669
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:52 pm
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1975

Post by Service Dog » Fri Mar 01, 2019 5:10 am

Keating wrote:
KiwiInOz wrote: My heart went out to him, too.
You should offer to fuck his wife.
The story about how he lost a book deal because he wouldnt go to the editor woman's house... so sad. So wrong.
I'll not give him a book deal, with no quid pro quo.


shoutinghorse
.
.
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2017 6:01 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1977

Post by shoutinghorse » Fri Mar 01, 2019 6:14 am

London innit bruv .. That cosmopolitan melting pot with its rich tapestry of cultural adherence and diversity.



https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8537929/s ... ight-life/

ThreeFlangedJavis
.
.
Posts: 1397
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:13 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1978

Post by ThreeFlangedJavis » Fri Mar 01, 2019 6:15 am

Don't know if this is common knowledge. First I've heard of it. It really is absurd that people are getting worked up about Russian trolls when a few powerful US companies are surreptitiously controlling political discussion and effectively handicapping moderate conservative commentators. That arguably has a much greater influence on the democratic process.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewohflU4PIA

MarcusAu
.
.
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:49 am
Location: Llareggub
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1979

Post by MarcusAu » Fri Mar 01, 2019 6:59 am

Brive1987 wrote: PZs Rotton Tomato rant keeps,giving.

Here with zero self awareness...
It’s kind of creepy how one small, loud segment of the internet has become a hate-filled clique that feeds on their own rage.
Here he passes judgement on the orbit and his own defence funds
One of the leaders of the anti-woman mob is mentioned above: Ethan Van Sciver. He’s a Mormon comic book artist who has apparently alienated all the big publishers and is reduced to begging for money on the internet,
Is it the hypocrisy you dislike? Or is there a second point about not all e-begging being created equal hidden in there too?

Hunt
.
.
Posts: 3071
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:04 am
Contact:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#1980

Post by Hunt » Fri Mar 01, 2019 7:44 am

Brive1987 wrote: Fun fact. Fascist Tit is user ID 2.

(((Who))) is pulling his strings .... ?
Obvious answer is obvious: Vladimir Putin.

Post Reply