Brive1987 wrote:Watson seems to do alright getting her barbs out there.
She almost certainly energised the charge against Dawkin's. She can snap her fingers and get 10K to put a stalwart like Radford back in his box. She got a speaking gig at Skepticon (such as that is). She has claws in the Mythmakers, time on her hands and blood to draw.
No. If it's alright with you, I will keep my lonely watch upon the wall.
:violin:
The charge against Dawkin's that resulted in he not going to one conference. Now isn't the basic opinion around here that cons are all big jokes anyway?
She has a small number of people who will give her money if she ask. Good for her, pot isn't free.
She got a speaking at a con which again many here say are big jokes.
Mythmakers? Mythbusters? That show that isn't on the air anymore? Good for her. Who cares? Are you jealous?
CaptainFluffyBunny wrote:
You might ask Skeptickle about that dox that Watson relayed, or the speakers she's blacklisted, or any other number of people she's stomped on. Or even those of us that don't like being accused of being MRAs or rape apologists.
She is not operating in a vacuum. She has hurt people and will happily hurt others out of spite.
Yes Skep was doxed. And the fall out was what exactly? If the ability to dox someone makes you powerful then lots of 14 year olds are to be feared. Again with the cons. Are cons really really important and controlled by important people who should be listened to or are they jokes? I don't care which people choose I just want consistency. She has talked shit about people. So have I. So have you. So have all of us. Outside of skeptic cons (which may or may not be important) what effects has that have?
She is a nobody. Focusing on her now is pointless.