The ads. The ADs!! Some are only just sub-porn. Think they'll go full porn when the clicks continue to decrease?Really? wrote:Good job in the comment section at Miller's, you guys:
https://archive.today/VXJPl
The contrast is truly amazing. At Pharyngula, the comments are a thought-free echo chamber. At any site that allows free discourse? The baboons look like ridiculous liars.
Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Last one, I have things to do, but Ashley Miller lets loose a few howlers. This one in particular:
And Rorshach was agreeing with Steers? I missed it too, then. Maybe he was referring to another comment than what I read (I skimmed a bit). Although the "twat isn't mysogynistic because that's how I use it" from Steers deflates his own "argument" about a certain other word (and no, I won't respond to Steerzo - no point giving in to trolls).
That was #67, by the way. Oggie (assuming anyone really believes he was raped or raped anyone) has "worked to right wrongs"? Seriously? What has he done for his "victims"? Has he gone to the police? Put himself at the mercy of his "victims"? I can only assume that righting wrongs is code for "follows the FTB playbook and say the right things". She also does the typical "blame rapists for their own rape, they are victims and not responsible" card, even though such a statement is provable false. If Shermer says he was abused and raped as a child, would that make him less responsible? We all know it would only be that way if he accepted judgement and prostrated himself to Peezus Christ, but...feh. Is mental illness and stupidity a requirement for blogging at FtB? There are a few exceptions, but still...3. I think the parallels between shermer and ogvorbis (sp?) weaken your position by making you look like bullies because of the fundamental differences in the power, admission of guilt, and seeking of help of those individuals. You seem to be going after a victim who has worked to right wrongs and be honest about their past offense, both of which happened as a child. Shermer is no child. To someone who believes the accusations he is a repeat predator using his position of power to get away with mistreatment of many women. Providing places that make a reformed person who raped as a child because of their own rape feel welcome is materially different than providing places that make an active predator feel safe.
And Rorshach was agreeing with Steers? I missed it too, then. Maybe he was referring to another comment than what I read (I skimmed a bit). Although the "twat isn't mysogynistic because that's how I use it" from Steers deflates his own "argument" about a certain other word (and no, I won't respond to Steerzo - no point giving in to trolls).
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Rapist.Matt Cavanaugh wrote:Secular Woman is a hate forum.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Rapist.strayling wrote:I'm posting this merely in order to mess up the active user statistics.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Does anybody have a link for that story?free thoughtpolice wrote:Sally Strange has already confessed to sexually assaulting her younger brother by pinning him down and kissing him full on the mouth! :drool:Kirbmarc wrote:Always. No exceptions.Yes, Damion, and everyone else, when someone says they were raped, the reasonable response is to believe them.
I wonder what she'd say if someone accused her of raping them.
She really gets pissed when rape apologists remind her of it.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Rapist.mike150160 wrote:21 posts in 3 years is how many?
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Wankist.tina wrote:I'm leaving the SP and joining A+. Superior wanking there... :whistle:strayling wrote:I'm posting this merely in order to mess up the active user statistics.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
The baboons do seem absolutely hopeless in that thread, it really does seem that spending so much time in the FTB echo - chamber impairs any ability to hold a debate of any kind. What with accusations of "terrorist!" and of course "neo-con" it really makes them look dogmatic. Embarrassing.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Aratina, a rape apologist according to Sally Strange's standards.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
'Neo-con' also makes them look dated.Oglebart wrote:The baboons do seem absolutely hopeless in that thread, it really does seem that spending so much time in the FTB echo - chamber impairs any ability to hold a debate of any kind. What with accusations of "terrorist!" and of course "neo-con" it really makes them look dogmatic. Embarrassing.
It originated back in the Seventes but became a buzzword in the Nineties.
Shatterface
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Aratina agrees with the Slymepit, "rape apologist" isn't a very meaningful term:
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Wow, he's admitted there might be lots of reasons not to believe a rape accusation.Kirbmarc wrote:Aratina agrees with the Slymepit, "rape apologist" isn't a very meaningful term:
#RapeApologist.
Someone report him to Block Bot!
Shatterface
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
So, to clarify a few things, and/or to add some icing onto their Cake of Aggrievement…
http://i.imgur.com/4pOW7ZG.jpg
It was I, dogpuke, that made that shoop at the top of Ashley Miller's blog. It was in response to the "rape-grading" threads that were current at FTB at the time. (About 8 months ago, don't have the spoons or interest to dig further.)
PZ's side comment on that shoop about there being no tentacles just explains why he rated the Rape far lower than the rest of the Olympian Judges of Truth, Freedom and the 'Merican Way. (Fuckin' FTB neo-cons.)
It was posted alongside another shoop with a Rape Grader which, unlike any of the FTBers, is for heavy industrial style getting things done.
http://i.imgur.com/L7Y9SCE.jpg
(And while I do believe that the PeeZus is hilarious with his Dove Soap Rape Joke, that was not the inspiration for this shoop.)
Fuck them. Fuck them into the ground. Time for some gelato before perpetrating my next canine crime against womanity.
http://i.imgur.com/4pOW7ZG.jpg
It was I, dogpuke, that made that shoop at the top of Ashley Miller's blog. It was in response to the "rape-grading" threads that were current at FTB at the time. (About 8 months ago, don't have the spoons or interest to dig further.)
PZ's side comment on that shoop about there being no tentacles just explains why he rated the Rape far lower than the rest of the Olympian Judges of Truth, Freedom and the 'Merican Way. (Fuckin' FTB neo-cons.)
It was posted alongside another shoop with a Rape Grader which, unlike any of the FTBers, is for heavy industrial style getting things done.
http://i.imgur.com/L7Y9SCE.jpg
(And while I do believe that the PeeZus is hilarious with his Dove Soap Rape Joke, that was not the inspiration for this shoop.)
Fuck them. Fuck them into the ground. Time for some gelato before perpetrating my next canine crime against womanity.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
But why do Zvan and Canuck (and another couple of persons I don't recognize) rate the hypothetical rape so high? My Dark Mistress Miri seems to be less impressed anyway.dog puke wrote:So, to clarify a few things, and/or to add some icing onto their Cake of Aggrievement…
http://i.imgur.com/4pOW7ZG.jpg
It was I, dogpuke, that made that shoop at the top of Ashley Miller's blog. It was in response to the "rape-grading" threads that were current at FTB at the time. (About 8 months ago, don't have the spoons or interest to dig further.)
PZ's side comment on that shoop about there being no tentacles just explains why he rated the Rape far lower than the rest of the Olympian Judges of Truth, Freedom and the 'Merican Way. (Fuckin' FTB neo-cons.)
It was posted alongside another shoop with a Rape Grader which, unlike any of the FTBers, is for heavy industrial style getting things done.
http://i.imgur.com/L7Y9SCE.jpg
(And while I do believe that the PeeZus is hilarious with his Dove Soap Rape Joke, that was not the inspiration for this shoop.)
Fuck them. Fuck them into the ground. Time for some gelato before perpetrating my next canine crime against womanity.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
They call that condition 'voyeurism' - not to be confused with "tentaclism". :bjarte:Kirbmarc wrote:But why do Zvan and Canuck (and another couple of persons I don't recognize) rate the hypothetical rape so high? My Dark Mistress Miri seems to be less impressed anyway.dog puke wrote:Here I wrote amazing stuff and then Kirbmarc responds:
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Why is it seemingly so difficult to understand for SJWs like Al Dente that refusing to blindly believe an accusation is not the same thing as saying that the accuser is a liar? Okay, the fact that they are morons is part of the explanation, but I don't think it's the whole explanation. They are not just morons, they are dishonest morons. What we have here is a deliberate, transparent attempt to demonize your interlocutor. Calling an actual rape victim a liar is after all a pretty heartless thing to do. Right? Let's pretend that we do not have to establish that she is a victim in the first place. Likewise, the suggestion that anyone would actually think that women aren't real people is if course ludicrous. It's merely a cheap rhetorical trick to put your opponent on the defensive. These folks are dripping with dishonesty.Kirbmarc wrote:Yep, real people don't lie. Never. Lying is such a weird thing, nobody does it. Ever.Al Dente wrote:Sally Strange doesn’t understand Hunt’s argument. It’s basically “bitches be lying.†After all for slymepitters like Hunt, only real people don’t lie and women aren’t real people.
TL;DR Al Dente is a devious little turd. :hankey: FLOOSH.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
I've been to Pycon in Montreal this year, which is the first time I've seen so many SJW's in the wild. The event was great, but the hand-wringing on the SocJus agenda got old very quickly.
I saw many excellent presentations. Two had direct swipes at Linus Torvalds, which was disappointing. He's rapidly becoming open source's favourite bogeyman.
I saw many excellent presentations. Two had direct swipes at Linus Torvalds, which was disappointing. He's rapidly becoming open source's favourite bogeyman.
-
- .
- Posts: 11165
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Sally Strange has already confessed to sexually assaulting her younger brother by pinning him down and kissing him full on the mouth! :drool:Kirbmarc wrote:[quote="free thoughtpolice]
I wonder what she'd say if someone accused her of raping them.
She really gets pissed when rape apologists remind her of it.[/quote]
Does anybody have a link for that story?[/quote][/quote][/quote][/quote]
She described doing it on a thread on Pharyngula some time ago. She was 16? and her brother 12?
On the first or one of the first posts Michael Nugent wrote about PZ she showed up in the comment section. I, posting as abear asked her if she was the same Sally Strange that sexually assaulted her younger brother. She admitted to it there, although was for some reason upset that I had brought up the incident. :P
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 11875
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
- Location: Nice, France
- Contact:
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
I was at church today. For realz this time! (okay, it was for a concert, but still, a Pitter at church on a sunday...)
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I was at church today. For realz this time! (okay, it was for a concert, but still, a Pitter at church on a sunday...)
I predict a pitkill.
-
- .
- Posts: 6257
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
We'll be invading Poland before they know it.Tony Parsehole wrote:Fucking class!
Edward Gemmer wins the prize.Edward Gemmer says
April 12, 2015 at 7:49 am
"The SlymePit is slowly dying. And even having an influx of eyeballs from a heavy-traffic site isn’t enough to reverse that trend."
You’re just thinking small. The Slymepit just took over the entire country of Ireland, the Secular Policy Institute, and The Richard Dawkins Foundation. The Friendly Atheist just gave it his endorsement. Pretty good for what is basically one thread on a message board.
Hat tip to Damion for the find.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/ashleymille ... ent-484435
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Seriously though, poor guy. He apparently stopped when he should, and then was thrown into the moving truck. Had it happened to Dillahaunty he would be accusing a Pitter of trying to kill him.Service Dog wrote:Looks like Dillahunty made reddit's front page today.
[youtube]tADvFcj7Cm4[/youtube]
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Only if it plays the appropriate music to invade Poland.James Caruthers wrote: We'll be invading Poland before they know it.
[youtube]kHmYIo7bcUw[/youtube]
-
- .
- Posts: 6257
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
The rape jokes are my favorite.Matt Cavanaugh wrote: They still don't get that The Slymepit has no aspirations to be an important player in Movement Atheismâ„¢. It's just a safe space to say 'nigger', 'cunt', punch down on oppressed intersectionalities, not believe victims, and post gifs of Jack Russells humping Holsteins. Duh.
Oh, and make rape jokes. Lots and lots of rape jokes.
-
- .
- Posts: 6257
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
[youtube]XZP5RsaRg6k[/youtube]Southern wrote:Only if it plays the appropriate music to invade Poland.James Caruthers wrote: We'll be invading Poland before they know it.
[youtube]kHmYIo7bcUw[/youtube]
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Does anybody have a link for that story?[/quote][/quote][/quote][/quote]free thoughtpolice wrote:Sally Strange has already confessed to sexually assaulting her younger brother by pinning him down and kissing him full on the mouth! :drool:Kirbmarc wrote:[quote="free thoughtpolice]
I wonder what she'd say if someone accused her of raping them.
She really gets pissed when rape apologists remind her of it.
She described doing it on a thread on Pharyngula some time ago. She was 16? and her brother 12?
On the first or one of the first posts Michael Nugent wrote about PZ she showed up in the comment section. I, posting as abear asked her if she was the same Sally Strange that sexually assaulted her younger brother. She admitted to it there, although was for some reason upset that I had brought up the incident. :P[/quote][/quote][/quote][/quote][/quote][/quote][/quote][/quote][/quote]
SallyStrange's reconfession of her sexual assault that she doesn't like being reminded about:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B6m5QZaIMAI0CLH.jpg
Please don't remind her.
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 11875
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
- Location: Nice, France
- Contact:
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Wasn't it Pycon where Adria Richards pull her stunt?Sulman wrote:I've been to Pycon in Montreal this year, which is the first time I've seen so many SJW's in the wild. The event was great, but the hand-wringing on the SocJus agenda got old very quickly.
I saw many excellent presentations. Two had direct swipes at Linus Torvalds, which was disappointing. He's rapidly becoming open source's favourite bogeyman.
She can suck my dongle...
-
- .
- Posts: 6257
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
I'd like to apply for the position of Pit Hitler if that's alright with you all.Kirbmarc wrote:Oh God we're terrorists. Or mobsters. Gen can't decide.Gen, Uppity Ingrate and Ilk wrote:Oh no, you’re not over here spreading lies and smears at all. Just like you’re also not over the rest of the net, doing that.
What you slymers are doing, johngreg, is sitting around, smoking and looking around saying “Boy, it’s sure a mighty fine blog you’ve got here, it’d be a pity if something happens to it.†Because as soon as Ashley bans you, you’ll escalate the attacks on her and spread lies about her all over the internet. Right now you’re kind of leaving her alone, but boy howdy, if she provokes you, she’ll seriously be On Your Radar.
It’s fucking terrorism, and it’s part of your pattern of harassment.
You can be Pit Osama Bin Laden though.
I have a great plan for how we can fly a plane into University of Morris, Minnesota.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
They achieved Hug Gate. That was A+ at their highest.subbie1957 wrote:A big fat zero is the number that Atheism Plus acheive.Easy J wrote:You know what else hurt the Pit's numbers? The failure of Atheism+. I'm pretty sure the constant silliness that went on when Atheism+ was just starting gave the Pit a big boost. I know I started lurking here at that time & got addicted to their amusing antics & general craziness. I really miss those goofy bastards.
Can we get Hornbeck to give us a breakdown of their numbers?
-
- .
- Posts: 6257
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
(To the tune of "Thrift Shop")
I'm gonna pop some ass
only got a transcock in my pocket
I-I I'm hunting, looking for a straight man
this is social justice
I'm gonna pop some ass
only got a transcock in my pocket
I-I I'm hunting, looking for a straight man
this is social justice
-
- .
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 11:31 am
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Hopefully, this post will add to the stats.....
I have come across a blog by a friend of mine, whose opinion I admire, who discussed the "Rolling Stone" magazine debacle, in which it appears it was proved that a rape story was entirely made up and fraudulent. I'm afraid Sally Strange and her ilk would have a heart attack at the commentators there making remarks like, "False accusations ruin lives". How dare they?
I was interested in David Ainsworth's story, mainly because I knew about him from work, who killed himself due to being accused of making sexist remarks. Whether he was or was not has not been established, but I find it tragic that he felt 'abandoned' by a police force who seemed compelled to avoid asking the question, "Are these women making this story up?"
Anyway, the commentators at Ashley's blog seem rather detached from reality - I came to the Slyme pit from Greta's blog, ready to take on the horrible people here who said horrible things that weren't true. The problem is that when I tried to take posts apart and prove them incorrect, I couldn't. They had links to show that what they said was accurate. I just wish the FtB lot would at least try the same thing.
I have come across a blog by a friend of mine, whose opinion I admire, who discussed the "Rolling Stone" magazine debacle, in which it appears it was proved that a rape story was entirely made up and fraudulent. I'm afraid Sally Strange and her ilk would have a heart attack at the commentators there making remarks like, "False accusations ruin lives". How dare they?
I was interested in David Ainsworth's story, mainly because I knew about him from work, who killed himself due to being accused of making sexist remarks. Whether he was or was not has not been established, but I find it tragic that he felt 'abandoned' by a police force who seemed compelled to avoid asking the question, "Are these women making this story up?"
Anyway, the commentators at Ashley's blog seem rather detached from reality - I came to the Slyme pit from Greta's blog, ready to take on the horrible people here who said horrible things that weren't true. The problem is that when I tried to take posts apart and prove them incorrect, I couldn't. They had links to show that what they said was accurate. I just wish the FtB lot would at least try the same thing.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:http://files.meilleurduchef.com/mdc/pho ... -1-400.jpg
Pro-tip for the perplexed: the above object is called a "rape" in French. For some reason French people are absolutely convinced that the English verb "rape" has the same meaning in the French "raper" ("to grate").
Example:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/languages/yoursay/ ... ench.shtml
-
- .
- Posts: 6555
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Maybe you can answer my question then: is the word "motherfucker' kink shaming?GenerallyFading wrote:I came to the Slyme pit from Greta's blog,
-
- .
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 11:31 am
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Sorry, is there some really good reason as to why Sally Strange didn't know that what she did was wrong? I'm reading that post of hers being really weirded out.......
Oh, should I be saying "Xe" and "Xers"? I get confused...
Oh, should I be saying "Xe" and "Xers"? I get confused...
-
- .
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 11:31 am
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
I hope not.ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:Maybe you can answer my question then: is the word "motherfucker' kink shaming?GenerallyFading wrote:I came to the Slyme pit from Greta's blog,
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Aratina was right: both you and franc are church-going Christians pretending to be atheists just to be able to sin.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I was at church today. For realz this time! (okay, it was for a concert, but still, a Pitter at church on a sunday...)
Or maybe you ARE franc, hmmmmm? Can you provide evidence that you and franc hoggle were ever seen at the same time? Have you ever wished to kick an old lady in the cunt?
http://images6.fanpop.com/image/photos/ ... 45-160.gif
-
- .
- Posts: 6257
- Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Because rape = privilege+power, shitlord!GenerallyFading wrote:Sorry, is there some really good reason as to why Sally Strange didn't know that what she did was wrong? I'm reading that post of hers being really weirded out.......
Oh, should I be saying "Xe" and "Xers"? I get confused...
An oppressed PoC cannot rape a white privileged cis man, because the oppressed PoC does not have systematic power and privilege!
:naughty: :naughty: :naughty:
Get some transcocks up your ass already!
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
:lol:James Caruthers wrote: [youtube]XZP5RsaRg6k[/youtube]
[youtube]6hcSpSC8T0M[/youtube]
-
- .
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 11:31 am
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Ahhh. That explain everything.James Caruthers wrote:Because rape = privilege+power, shitlord!GenerallyFading wrote:Sorry, is there some really good reason as to why Sally Strange didn't know that what she did was wrong? I'm reading that post of hers being really weirded out.......
Oh, should I be saying "Xe" and "Xers"? I get confused...
An oppressed PoC cannot rape a white privileged cis man, because the oppressed PoC does not have systematic power and privilege!
:naughty: :naughty: :naughty:
Get some transcocks up your ass already!
(Gets coat) I'm just popping out for some Transcocks.
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 11875
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
- Location: Nice, France
- Contact:
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Well yes, I'm Franc. As for the old lady stuff, nope.Southern wrote:Aratina was right: both you and franc are church-going Christians pretending to be atheists just to be able to sin.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I was at church today. For realz this time! (okay, it was for a concert, but still, a Pitter at church on a sunday...)
Or maybe you ARE franc, hmmmmm? Can you provide evidence that you and franc hoggle were ever seen at the same time? Have you ever wished to kick an old lady in the cunt?
http://images6.fanpop.com/image/photos/ ... 45-160.gif
-
- .
- Posts: 11165
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Someone is trying to turn the baboons against Carrier? So far no bites.
https://archive.today/bp1xBWe are Plethora, Protectors of the Orb of Tranquility ~+~ Seated on the Throne of Fantasia says
April 11, 2015 at 12:14 am CDT
Any sexual contact or sexual act in which not all parties consent is sexual assault, at minimum.
Consent is paramount. You can do any damn thing you please, with however many people you want, as long as all parties are informed and capable of uncoerced consent at the time the proposed transaction is negotiated, and as long as that consent is not revoked in the moment when circumstances change.
This and also QFT. “Consent is Paramount†is pithy enough for a slogan or tagline and it should also be the foundational lesson when teaching boys and men not to rape.
What about the issue of informed consent in the context of a marriage or other type of committed relationship though? How does that factor into this if at all? That seems more complicated and harder to parse but was hoping you could elucidate.
To take a simple case of a heteronormative marriage where one party desires to seek intimacy outside the marriage. Could it be considered a type of assault if the one party fails to obtain informed consent from the spouse prior to going outside the marriage? Or is that stretching the definition too far? Is it some kind of lesser violation if not assault?
What if the one party that goes outside the marriage doesn’t inform the spouse and yet continues to have intimate relations with them? Could that be considered a type of assault in the sense that the relations would be had under false pretenses and that the consent so obtained would therefore not be informed consent?
Trying to figure out where those boundaries lie. Any clarification you might provide to help us untangle this mess would be greatly appreciated.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Indeed, in 2013. I wasn't at that one, though. That incident doesn't get mentioned, although a room full of adults still applauded the fact that there's a 'code of conduct' now.Lsuoma wrote: Wasn't it Pycon where Adria Richards pull her stunt?
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Fucking 15 years old girl didn't knew that holding and forcing a kiss (in her brother, but that's not relevant) was wrong because nobody told her.
You know, if I ever did that and I told my dad that excuse, I would bet beaten so hard, they would give my name to the Germany x Brazil match on the last World Cup.
That excuse might be acceptable for a toddler. Not a teenager which can, if Wikipedia is telling me the truth, to DRIVE in some states in the US.
Fucking hell, the idiocy of these people.
You know, if I ever did that and I told my dad that excuse, I would bet beaten so hard, they would give my name to the Germany x Brazil match on the last World Cup.
That excuse might be acceptable for a toddler. Not a teenager which can, if Wikipedia is telling me the truth, to DRIVE in some states in the US.
Fucking hell, the idiocy of these people.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Re a Ashely Millers second post.
She is keen to work in the evidence that she "needed" a wheelchair.
Less keen to factor in Jeff Wagg returning straight to work that morning without so much as a how do you do.
Less keen to address the continued socialising with and employment of Shermer by both Wagg and Alison.
Less keen to address the implications of waiting many years to make a complaint. And then anonymously.
She is keen to work in the evidence that she "needed" a wheelchair.
Less keen to factor in Jeff Wagg returning straight to work that morning without so much as a how do you do.
Less keen to address the continued socialising with and employment of Shermer by both Wagg and Alison.
Less keen to address the implications of waiting many years to make a complaint. And then anonymously.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
The "she" above is obviously Alison.
-
- .
- Posts: 5357
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
I was also at church today. UU - probably most people in my congregation are a-theistic humanist types but people own their own beliefs. Solid social justice activism going on, with particular focus on environmentalism and on poverty & homelessness. All people valued. Some people there have particular demographic groups they work with or advocate for, but there's always reminders that anyone & everyone can have good times & bad, and all lives matter.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:I was at church today. For realz this time! (okay, it was for a concert, but still, a Pitter at church on a sunday...)
[/evangelism]
-
- .
- Posts: 11165
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
That crappy excuse of not being taught to rape little brothers makes her a rape apologist in my opinion.GenerallyFading wrote:Sorry, is there some really good reason as to why Sally Strange didn't know that what she did was wrong? I'm reading that post of hers being really weirded out.......
Oh, should I be saying "Xe" and "Xers"? I get confused...
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
I came to aconclusion that people love to be told how to behave. It's sad.Sulman wrote:Indeed, in 2013. I wasn't at that one, though. That incident doesn't get mentioned, although a room full of adults still applauded the fact that there's a 'code of conduct' now.Lsuoma wrote: Wasn't it Pycon where Adria Richards pull her stunt?
-
- That's All Folks
- Posts: 11875
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:56 pm
- Location: Nice, France
- Contact:
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Ok, no one wants to take on my "I'm Franc" pun?
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Re Smith/Shermer
There's always the possibility that Smith got herself shitfaced after she got boinked my Shermer
I'm thinking about the Daisy Coleman case and how that finally turned out.
There's always the possibility that Smith got herself shitfaced after she got boinked my Shermer
I'm thinking about the Daisy Coleman case and how that finally turned out.
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Only if you can rap like Hitler.James Caruthers wrote: I'd like to apply for the position of Pit Hitler if that's alright with you all.
[youtube]4zpYQJkBQp0[/youtube]
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
No, you're too 'Nice'.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Ok, no one wants to take on my "I'm Franc" pun?
:cdc:
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Also, I have a frog in my throat - makes it tough to type.dog puke wrote:No, you're too 'Nice'.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Ok, no one wants to take on my "I'm Franc" pun?
:cdc:
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
I'm paging PZ right now. It's all the proof he'll ever need that the Pit is just a Hogglean conspiracy against the Freethoughtland.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Ok, no one wants to take on my "I'm Franc" pun?
-
- .
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 10:17 am
- Location: France
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
Yes, but don't call me Shirley.Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote:Ok, no one wants to take on my "I'm Franc" pun?
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
For me it was Dillahunty-gate. By a hair. He took himself down with the ship on that one by ignoring the obvious after setting out to find it.Southern wrote:They achieved Hug Gate. That was A+ at their highest.subbie1957 wrote:A big fat zero is the number that Atheism Plus acheive.Easy J wrote:You know what else hurt the Pit's numbers? The failure of Atheism+. I'm pretty sure the constant silliness that went on when Atheism+ was just starting gave the Pit a big boost. I know I started lurking here at that time & got addicted to their amusing antics & general craziness. I really miss those goofy bastards.
Can we get Hornbeck to give us a breakdown of their numbers?
-
- .
- Posts: 5470
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:40 pm
- Contact:
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
There's that, and then there are the effects of guilt (assuming that you aren't Dr. Richard Carrier PhD) when you realize that you just had consensual (and likely not very satisfying) sex at a conference that you're attending with your boyfriend, after a bunch of people saw you leaving a party with the guy.Stout wrote:Re Smith/Shermer
There's always the possibility that Smith got herself shitfaced after she got boinked my Shermer
I'm thinking about the Daisy Coleman case and how that finally turned out.
But none of this matters. If you've decided that
-
- .
- Posts: 15449
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...
You must be joking.dog puke wrote:Rapist.Matt Cavanaugh wrote:Secular Woman is a hate forum.