Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

Old subthreads
strayling
.
.
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 7:58 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39241

Post by strayling »

papillon wrote:
BarnOwl wrote:
I suspect she's a bit tetchy because Poolon brought up the topic of age. For a person who's all over the internetz, all day every day, she's had a remarkable ability to suppress any obvious mention of her DOB.
I think the best estimates are in the region of 13.7bn years.
If you have a big enough telescope you can sometimes just make out the signature of a baby Oafie when she was just a few hundred thousand years old:

http://i639.photobucket.com/albums/uu11 ... 498536.jpg
So in a previous iteration of the Universe she was Mayor Amalfi?

BTW, something I've noticed is that any SJW comment which starts with the word, "so" will contain a strawman argument. The Pharyngula comments on the Feminist Logic meme are a perfect illustration.

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39242

Post by Badger3k »

Also, Avi has a "gamer" post up - real long, and I initially thought it might have been started from here with the mention of Breitbart, but that was all over the place, so it might not be. Very long, and I don't have time to read right now and digest it properly, but a few thoughts:

The "hags of lag" - rather sexist name for a video game group. Think of Auntie Ophelia!

He quotes a comment from somewhere:
No. What Milo here doesn’t get is that it isn’t political correctness but a desire to make gaming as a community more inclusive so we can ALL PLAY GAMES. Not so that I have to pretend to be white online lest I get called a variety of delightful slurs by the “Frustrated Male”.

It’s a fact of life that the video games industry is awash with marginalised, troubled people who have found it difficult to manage their lives in mainstream society. It’s particularly the case when you look at independent or “indie” video game developers, a remarkable proportion of whom suffer from depression or anxiety disorders. Many of these people end up as enthusiastic campaigners for one or more causes they feel deserve wider attention.
Ah yes! Gamers are damaged. Remind me again?

In what planet, in what century and in what country in the Western Developed World are the majority of gamers who are white, male and straight a marginalised and troubled group? I mean black people can still be shot for no adequate reason. Running while dark is a major problem. The GLBT still suffer incredible discrimination. Women suffer from discrimination still particularly in access to vital healthcare. So to claim that this bigotry is absent from games is just silly.
I'd disagree with both of them. While games have been that way in the past, I'd argue that twitter has far more broken and damaged people than gaming. I am also suspicious of the "gamers=white" trope - I know gamers of all races and sexes. Have no idea of the proportions, but the idea that gaming - white hobby is a bit old and false. Plus, I wasn't aware that by being white, you were unable to have psychological or other problems. Does this mean that my white soldier friends coming back from Iraq really don't have PTSD. I mean, they weren't even on twitter.

Also, way to completely miss or misrepresent the point (the italics are someone else he is quoting):
It’s hard to believe some of the allegations made about Quinn, who has been held up as an icon of probity by the liberal tech press, but web sleuths have provided copious evidence in support of their claims. Though she presents herself as a champion for depression sufferers, Quinn picked on a forum for depressed men called Wizardchan, misrepresenting content there to claim she was being harassed. She used her influence to torpedo a charity – a charity! – which was later hacked by one of her supporters.
Wait wait wait.

So is the crux of your argument that we shouldn’t listen to Quinn about video games because she sleeps about? What does her vagina status and what she chooses to insert into it have to do with the issue of games and women? Oh Wait! I know.

Zoe Quinn is not the ideal woman. She is “bad”. She cheated on a guy with 3 people. No. Not 5, but 3. You can’t break up with someone then moan about that person going off and having sex with other people. You can’t shotgun a vagina in perpetuity.

She is alleged to have used spurious copyright claims to stifle criticism. She threatened to end the careers of developers who disagreed with her in comment threads. She leveraged friendships with moderators at online forums to have nearly 25,000 comments deleted. She swept an allegation of sexual misconduct under the carpet using intimidation. There’s even a theory floating around that she is planning to have herself beaten up at an upcoming conference. It’s an unconfirmed internet rumour, but it illustrates Quinn’s credibility to gamers.
Oh there is an unconfirmed internet rumour that gazing upon my body brings people to orgasm. I can also shoot laser beams from my eyes and bench press a car.
Uh, no. Not even in your wildest imagination. I think there are comments from your ex that completely destroy the first one. His first point that we shouldn't listen to her because she slept around avoids the point the poster was making - that she has been deceitful, and has acted against the very interests she claims to support - it's the hypocrisy, stupid.

Then the last bit was used to show that she hasn't the credibility with a lot of people to be taken seriously, which works against the white knight idea that she is speaking truth to power. Her lies have hurt any real claim she might be making (I don't think she is making one, btw). Plus, he makes no comment on the false copyright claims and the deletions, but we expect that. Can't agree that your damsel does wrong.

He also comments that Depression Quest is free, so how is she making money off the publicity - avoiding the fact that she has set up some funding source to get herself money, and that people in the group of "game journalists" are supporting her that way (and vice versa) when they should not be, and that the more attention she gets over this manufactroversy means she can rake in the cash from gullible knights and rabid SJWs. If they want to spend their money that way, fine, just don't trash other people with lies to get it done.

There may be more, but that is all I got out of a very quick spin. If I had more time and more interest in Mr Nobody, I might go back and do a better job when I get off work, but I do have other things to do. Plus, you know, he can't come here since he's been banned, so he won't get to see it. :naughty:

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39243

Post by Badger3k »

sinister wrote:Last one.
One evening, Patrick approaches Angelina in the parking lot as she's getting into her car. They get into a heated argument about ending their relationship and Patrick hits Angelina.
What should Angelina do?
Multiple choice:
[ ] Contact Campus Security to report the incident.
[ ] Contact local authorities to press charges against Patrick.
[ ] Contact the student counseling center if she feels it would be helpful.
How about all three?

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39244

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

James Caruthers wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote: My thesis, btw, showed how one could extract more accurate history and details of daily life of knights and courtiers from the medieval romances (written by practicing knights for an audience of practicing knights), than from the putatively historical chronicles written by ignorant monks.
:dance: My ninja. :clap:

I took a very similar class with a lady who was an expert in the field. She was from the Bronx, a short Italian. She was so much fun. :) We had people in the class bringing in french source material and comparing to translations, even though it wasn't required. We read Cretien de Troyes, Gottfried Von Strassburg (love his Tristan) and of course Le Morte D'Arthur. Great fun.

I did a presentation on arms and armor within medieval romance, comparing to history as you say you did. Probably a little less rigorous, but the conclusions were similar. One thing I noticed in medieval romance was the accounts mostly used weapons and armor as emblems of rank, which goes to the rigid class system. There weren't many stories I can think of where the knight used something other than a sword (arming sword) or lance, even though some of the stories were written in the late medieval period, when arming swords were falling out of favor and militias were becoming the future. This reality would have been at odds with the courtly ideals and beliefs a knight would have had about class structure. Then you have writers like Marie de France, who was probably some high lady, but no knight. Can't remember how accurate her writers were re: arms and armor. But I agree that the accounts written by people who were at least lesser knights (authorship is hard to trace) contain a wealth of information about medieval life.

Gottfried von Strassburg's Tristan is a masterpiece of literature, btw. I highly recommend it.
Ninja who? I wrote my paper in the late 80's.

In Wolfram's Willehalm (c.1215), the queen gives swords, armor & horses to a number of men, which makes them de facto "knights." (The whole dubbing thing is a late invention, & much overplayed in modern pop culture.) Outside of English, all the words for 'knight' derive from 'rider' (Ritter in German.) Wolfram makes a little pun on this. When Parzival is asked why he won't dismount, he answers naively, 'because King Arthur said I should be a ritter [/reiter = rider].'

I've read Chretien's Perceval. His characters are two-dimensional, his scenes stilted. Wolfram brings the story & characters to life. Then you have someone like Walter von der Vogelweide, whose writing is lyrical & enchanting, but, as he was not a practicing knight, his details are worthless historically. The author I found most useful for my research was Hartmann von Aue. His style is also quite witty and lively. I'm quite partial to this particular translator's version of Hartmann's Erec.

sinister
.
.
Posts: 1375
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:11 pm
Location: geo-synchronous orbit

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39245

Post by sinister »

Badger3k wrote:
sinister wrote:Last one.
One evening, Patrick approaches Angelina in the parking lot as she's getting into her car. They get into a heated argument about ending their relationship and Patrick hits Angelina.
What should Angelina do?
Multiple choice:
[ ] Contact Campus Security to report the incident.
[ ] Contact local authorities to press charges against Patrick.
[ ] Contact the student counseling center if she feels it would be helpful.
How about all three?
She should do all three but apparently there is no reason to press upon her the need to press charges... for unspecified reasons.

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39246

Post by James Caruthers »

sinister wrote:Almost without fail, those talking about bigotry and harassment in #GamerGate include either "Social Justice x*" or "Feminist" in their description. The victim narrative works, so never let it go! However, they ran into a little bump this time, gamers span the globe. The poor white women in the first world narrative doesn't work so well globally. Most "minorities" aren't in some places, so the "help help oppression" narrative doesn't fit either. Whining about video games seems pretty silly in the face of actual globe spanning issues.

* x being knight, mage, cleric, wizard, paladin, blah blah blah...
They sure love self-identification!

sinister
.
.
Posts: 1375
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:11 pm
Location: geo-synchronous orbit

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39247

Post by sinister »

Badger3k wrote: Mr Nobody
Isn't he DOCTOR Nobody now?

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39248

Post by James Caruthers »

sinister wrote: Oops, gender traitor located... DESTROY
"Nonfeminist women are just dumb slootz who internalized misogyny and rape culture and can't think for themselves."

^The female empowerment, equality movement known as feminism.

WELP

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39249

Post by James Caruthers »

sinister wrote:Okay, I'm not even going to post anymore of that. I'm sorry, this training is completely backwards to me. They don't even talk about reporting rape to the authorities as being necessary. Only if they want to, but still (internal) adjudication needs to take place against the accused. I'm just going to stop there.
Family courts, college boards and internal (feminist run or feminist-fearing) adjudication can handle all of these accusations of criminal misconduct! Don't go getting the criminal justice system involved in a little thing like rape! :snooty:

Opyt
.
.
Posts: 957
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 12:50 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39250

Post by Opyt »

Badger3k wrote:
sinister wrote:Last one.
One evening, Patrick approaches Angelina in the parking lot as she's getting into her car. They get into a heated argument about ending their relationship and Patrick hits Angelina.
What should Angelina do?
Multiple choice:
[ ] Contact Campus Security to report the incident.
[ ] Contact local authorities to press charges against Patrick.
[ ] Contact the student counseling center if she feels it would be helpful.
How about all three?
As a member of the public that has been assaulted in the same manner (a slap in the face for me, and then on a different occasion tackled to the ground and punched a few times), I can safely say that it's up to the person doing the reporting. If she feels it is necessary to contact the student counseling center, then she should certainly be contacting Campus Security.
If Campus Security feels it big enough for the college to take action upon Patrick, then she ought to contact the local authorities.

It is up to her how far it goes, and since I don't have proper context for the "test", I cannot tell if Patrick is a harasser, or merely lacking in self-control, now can I tell if Angelina hit him first. At the very least though, if one box is to be ticked, then more than one box should be ticked.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39251

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

another lurker wrote:Anyone here ever play Dwarf Fortress? Not my style, but my bf loves it. His dwarf craftsman created a legendary barrel, then went insane and took all of his clothes off.
Don't you get a Save roll for that kinda thing?

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39252

Post by James Caruthers »

sinister wrote:The narrative over at #GamerGate is getting another hard push. Evil bad gamers just won't let it go... Don't they see no one cares?

Heh, yeah except for the thousands of people tweeting about it. Seems legit.
[youtube]rSjK2Oqrgic[/youtube]

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39253

Post by deLurch »

AndrewV69 wrote:Someone might have mentioned this earlier?

On Twatter the #GamerGate hashtag is still going strong. Also #NotYourShield which has Gamers who say they are not white male neckbeards calling out the SJW and telling them to fuck off and stop being offended on their behalf.

http://imagizer.imageshack.com/img540/879/8e488f.jpg
Isn't it a tad bit racist to think that POC don't know their own minds and can't form their own correction opinions and conclusions, and must be corrected, cattle and corralled by white college educated white women and men? Why of course they are ignorant fools and pawns of the patriarchy... they just don't know any better.

Opyt
.
.
Posts: 957
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 12:50 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39254

Post by Opyt »

"now can I tell if Angelina hit him first." should be "nor can I..."

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39255

Post by James Caruthers »

sinister wrote:
Angelina continues dating Patrick, but soon her colleagues start showing concern over his behavior.
What actions by Patrick are possible signs of a problem?

Multiple Choice:
[ ] He insists Angelina always tell him where she is and who she's with.
[ ] He calls her everyday.
[ ] He wants her to stop spending time with any male friends.
Am I supposed to parse each of those answers on their own? As a whole? How many times a day does he call?
Christ, this is written to make you feel like you have no ability to discern anything, therefore everything is harassment.
Of course, no woman would engage in ANY of these controlling behaviors.

Søren Lilholt
.
.
Posts: 1025
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:41 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39256

Post by Søren Lilholt »

free thoughtpolice wrote:
Scented Nectar wrote:
didymos wrote:
Wait a minute, she's not even an atheist?

Wait a minute, I'm surprised?
She's a feminist and a Muslim. True Islam isn't sexist, it's that Islam was hijacked by the patriarchy. :geek:
That fuckwit has clearly never read a book in her life. It doesn't surprise me she's as ignorant about 'her' religion as she is seemingly about everything else.

I know SJWers aren't exactly shining beacons of intellect, but this specimen is just unreal. What do you reckon her IQ is? I'm struggling to see how it could be above 40 - 45.

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39257

Post by deLurch »

dogen wrote:
If one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter, this puts a whole new spin on fapping to the leaked pictures. For great justice!
If terrorists did nothing but post naked pictures online, I think the world would be a much better place. Join the pornhub jihad!

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39258

Post by Southern »

deLurch wrote:
dogen wrote:
If one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter, this puts a whole new spin on fapping to the leaked pictures. For great justice!
If terrorists did nothing but post naked pictures online, I think the world would be a much better place. Join the pornhub jihad!
#DrawMohamedHentaiDay

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39259

Post by deLurch »

BlueShiftRhino wrote:Maybe you all have noted this already, but I was chatting with a lawyer friend who pointed out that Sarkeesian (or whomever is really controlling all this) is either smarter than he or she appears or is really fucking lucky. The tweet asking for donations does not directly reference the threats that supposedly drove her from her house. Therefore, if and when it comes out that she orchestrated the tweets, those who donated in response to the subsequent request will not be able to (successfully) sue for fraud and she'll get to keep the money.
I am not convinced that Sakeesian faked those tweets. Possible? Sure. There have been plenty of SJWers that have faked stuff before. But there are also plenty of assholes who will pump that shit out at the drop off a hat. And Sarkeesian has sufficient notoriety & has ruffled enough feathers to get someone like that to troll her.

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39260

Post by Southern »

Well, as said by the Prophet Muhammad Peace Be Unto Him: "Ask, and Allah shall deliver" (sutra 34:69).

NSFW

You're welcome.

sinister
.
.
Posts: 1375
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:11 pm
Location: geo-synchronous orbit

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39261

Post by sinister »

Archon wrote:As I have mentioned earlier, I have been drafting a Publisher's Note relating to some of the topics being discussed here. Among other things, the Publisher's Note will include a complete set of revised ethical guidelines for The Escapist. These guidelines have been completed and are currently being reviewed by Defy Media's in-house counsel.

The bad news is that in order to give our counsel time for the review, the release of the Publisher's Note has been delayed until tomorrow. These guidelines are important and are being given a high standard of review.

The good news is that the ethical guidelines in my Publisher's Note will also become the foundation for a set of public guidelines for other properties within our division. You'll have impacted not just The Escapist but dozens of other websites in segments as disparate as humor, mixed martial-arts, fashion, and motherhood, with a total reach of more than 50 million people per month.

That is a noble accomplishment. Perhaps it will go unnoticed by oblivious web visitors who are unaware entirely of the battle you have fought. You will probably never receive a thank you from any of the millions of working mothers, fashionistas, comedy fans, and others who will be the beneficiaries of more transparent and candid online journalism you demanded. But I salute you for it.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/ ... 7.21351631

Git
.
.
Posts: 1271
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:31 pm
Location: Engerland

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39262

Post by Git »

deLurch wrote:
dogen wrote:
If one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter, this puts a whole new spin on fapping to the leaked pictures. For great justice!
If terrorists did nothing but post naked pictures online, I think the world would be a much better place. Join the pornhub jihad!
Allāhu Fapbar!

Tribble
.
.
Posts: 5102
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39263

Post by Tribble »

sinister wrote:
Tribble wrote: Some things to note on the origin of that stat:

The sample was too small to be statistically valid (about 130 girls) with any reasonable confidence level.
3/4ths of women disagreed with the conclusion that they'd been raped in any way, shape or form.
4/10 of those women continued to date or were still in the relationship with those men.

There was another researcher involved in the project at the University of Georgia (forgot her name). Her rate was under 5% and her sample was over 1,000 co-eds. She resigned from the project in disgust because pressure was put on her to inflate the numbers.

25% is, literally, impossible unless you abandon reason when one considers the actual number of rapes (NCVS) reported in the Nataional Victimization Survey (that surveys' about 50,000 households annually) give a 0.2% chance of a woman being sexually assaulted (attempted or completed). Even in the 1990s, at peak, the assault rate was 0.5% with an 8% life-time risk. If current trends hold, a woman has a 3.2% chance of facing an attempted or completed sexual assault.

Considering 63% of High School students go to college giving us about 2 million college students at any one time and about 60% of them are women (1.2 million). The numbers just don't work and the proportions are ludicrously off.

Truth is, while college women are one of the two highest-victimization age cohorts, it's not anywhere near 25%. If I had to guess, based on the victimization distribution and actual risk, I'd say it's less than 2%. (HS age girls, btw, and college age girls have almost the same exact rate and com. Also, most college rapes are acquaintance-date rapes during a girls' freshman year and involve alcohol and binge drinking, not roofies, not force, not other drugs. Just plain old booze and no skill in handling it.)
I would love a link to that if you have one handy. If not, I do know how Google works. :lol:
I am just astounded that these numbers are used with a straight face. I would patrol the campus with a shotgun if I actually believed those stats. How do these people continue to get grants or be allowed to continue researching anything?
Sorry, I just know this stuff for the most part. The source of the Georgia teacher was Christina Sommers (Clarke University) who has written a great deal about Mary Koss' total bullshit number. She has also written extensively about the 4/10 who continued to date their 'rapist' and the 3/4ths who disagreed with Koss' interpretation of whether they were raped.

There are other sources of that critique as well. Sommers is not the only person to call bullshit on it.

The rape numbers are well available, too and come from the National Crime Victimization Survey put out by the DoJ every year. This is from an AP report reprinted by the Huffington Post:
By PETE YOST, The ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department says the rate of sexual violence against women and girls age 12 or older fell 64 percent in a decade and has remained stable for five years.

In 2010, women and girls nationwide experienced about 270,000 rapes or sexual assaults, compared with 556,000 in 1995, according to a Bureau of Justice Statistics survey released Thursday.

Rates declined from a peak of 5 per 1,000 women in 1995 to 1.8 per 1,000 women in 2005. The figure remained unchanged from 2005 to 2010.
I don't link the HuffPo, but this article is correct in its numbers.

BTW, last time I checked the numbers, it has gone down again since 2010. Not that it's something to appreciate if you're Mary Fucking Koss:
"The rate of rape has stopped declining, while the rate of other violent crimes has continued to decline," said Mary P. Koss, a professor of public health at the University of Arizona.
Cry moar. All crime stats fluctuate. That's the nature of the beast. I small plateau and, once again, SJW whinging. Funny thing is, she still beats the 25% drum even though the reports tell everyone with a brain she's completely full of shit.

The lifetime risk is from a Department of Justice paper I copied years ago and is based on an annual risk of 0.5% (5/1000). There's probably a link to it somewhere, but it's paper copy for me.

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39264

Post by deLurch »

Scented Nectar wrote:
didymos wrote:No, she's a muslim. She spends a lot of time arguing that Islam isn't sexist or homophobic with people on Twitter.
Holy shit!!!! In current times, islam is probably the most sexist and anti-gay of all the current major religions. Religions, and the theocracies they run, are the only place one can truly find patriarchal laws where women are property and an actual rape culture (forced marriages plus rape victims are killed if they tell). I consider forced marriages to be a mix of sexual slavery and labour slavery. and Nerd considers herself a feminist!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!??!?!!?!?

Fucking bizarro world. How does that work?

Plus her religion promotes the killing of blasphemers and infidels (like all her atheist friends over at fftb) when their holy rule books are followed, and they are often followed in islamic theocracies. What the fuck is wrong with her?
The more radical the liberal philosophy, the more likely it will wrap around and meet the far right radicals on the other side.

sinister
.
.
Posts: 1375
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:11 pm
Location: geo-synchronous orbit

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39265

Post by sinister »

Tribble wrote:
sinister wrote:
Tribble wrote: Some things to note on the origin of that stat:

The sample was too small to be statistically valid (about 130 girls) with any reasonable confidence level.
3/4ths of women disagreed with the conclusion that they'd been raped in any way, shape or form.
4/10 of those women continued to date or were still in the relationship with those men.

There was another researcher involved in the project at the University of Georgia (forgot her name). Her rate was under 5% and her sample was over 1,000 co-eds. She resigned from the project in disgust because pressure was put on her to inflate the numbers.

25% is, literally, impossible unless you abandon reason when one considers the actual number of rapes (NCVS) reported in the Nataional Victimization Survey (that surveys' about 50,000 households annually) give a 0.2% chance of a woman being sexually assaulted (attempted or completed). Even in the 1990s, at peak, the assault rate was 0.5% with an 8% life-time risk. If current trends hold, a woman has a 3.2% chance of facing an attempted or completed sexual assault.

Considering 63% of High School students go to college giving us about 2 million college students at any one time and about 60% of them are women (1.2 million). The numbers just don't work and the proportions are ludicrously off.

Truth is, while college women are one of the two highest-victimization age cohorts, it's not anywhere near 25%. If I had to guess, based on the victimization distribution and actual risk, I'd say it's less than 2%. (HS age girls, btw, and college age girls have almost the same exact rate and com. Also, most college rapes are acquaintance-date rapes during a girls' freshman year and involve alcohol and binge drinking, not roofies, not force, not other drugs. Just plain old booze and no skill in handling it.)
I would love a link to that if you have one handy. If not, I do know how Google works. :lol:
I am just astounded that these numbers are used with a straight face. I would patrol the campus with a shotgun if I actually believed those stats. How do these people continue to get grants or be allowed to continue researching anything?
Sorry, I just know this stuff for the most part. The source of the Georgia teacher was Christina Sommers (Clarke University) who has written a great deal about Mary Koss' total bullshit number. She has also written extensively about the 4/10 who continued to date their 'rapist' and the 3/4ths who disagreed with Koss' interpretation of whether they were raped.

There are other sources of that critique as well. Sommers is not the only person to call bullshit on it.

The rape numbers are well available, too and come from the National Crime Victimization Survey put out by the DoJ every year. This is from an AP report reprinted by the Huffington Post:
By PETE YOST, The ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department says the rate of sexual violence against women and girls age 12 or older fell 64 percent in a decade and has remained stable for five years.

In 2010, women and girls nationwide experienced about 270,000 rapes or sexual assaults, compared with 556,000 in 1995, according to a Bureau of Justice Statistics survey released Thursday.

Rates declined from a peak of 5 per 1,000 women in 1995 to 1.8 per 1,000 women in 2005. The figure remained unchanged from 2005 to 2010.
I don't link the HuffPo, but this article is correct in its numbers.

BTW, last time I checked the numbers, it has gone down again since 2010. Not that it's something to appreciate if you're Mary Fucking Koss:
"The rate of rape has stopped declining, while the rate of other violent crimes has continued to decline," said Mary P. Koss, a professor of public health at the University of Arizona.
Cry moar. All crime stats fluctuate. That's the nature of the beast. I small plateau and, once again, SJW whinging. Funny thing is, she still beats the 25% drum even though the reports tell everyone with a brain she's completely full of shit.

The lifetime risk is from a Department of Justice paper I copied years ago and is based on an annual risk of 0.5% (5/1000). There's probably a link to it somewhere, but it's paper copy for me.
I appreciate it. Not that I think I will be emailing this to HR or anything. I am sure that would go over real well. :snooty:

dogen
.
.
Posts: 2585
Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 1:06 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39266

Post by dogen »

Git wrote:
deLurch wrote:
dogen wrote: If one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter, this puts a whole new spin on fapping to the leaked pictures. For great justice!
If terrorists did nothing but post naked pictures online, I think the world would be a much better place. Join the pornhub jihad!
Allāhu Fapbar!
...to be ululated while performing cunnilingus.

sinister
.
.
Posts: 1375
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:11 pm
Location: geo-synchronous orbit

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39267

Post by sinister »

Crickets.

James Caruthers
.
.
Posts: 6257
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39268

Post by James Caruthers »

Carrie doesn't use the blockbot.

sinister
.
.
Posts: 1375
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:11 pm
Location: geo-synchronous orbit

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39269

Post by sinister »

Oops, she just got back to me god damn, she got all ethical on me!
LOL at the focus on famous part though, as though there were any non-famous people studied.

sinister
.
.
Posts: 1375
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:11 pm
Location: geo-synchronous orbit

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39270

Post by sinister »

HAHA well at least she was honest. She admitted it was only about famous people. RETREAT!

Søren Lilholt
.
.
Posts: 1025
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:41 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39271

Post by Søren Lilholt »

didymos wrote:Also:
Ah, I dunno if it's that particularly.

Maybe it's more to do with the fact YOU HAVEN'T FUCKING GOT PTSD and are a preposterous attention-seeking moron.

Yeah, pretty sure it's that.

jugheadnaut
.
.
Posts: 1495
Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 9:09 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39272

Post by jugheadnaut »

Tribble wrote: 25% is, literally, impossible unless you abandon reason when one considers the actual number of rapes (NCVS) reported in the Nataional Victimization Survey (that surveys' about 50,000 households annually) give a 0.2% chance of a woman being sexually assaulted (attempted or completed). Even in the 1990s, at peak, the assault rate was 0.5% with an 8% life-time risk. If current trends hold, a woman has a 3.2% chance of facing an attempted or completed sexual assault.
It really is stunning seeing the difference in rates between studies like the NCVS where respondents self-report whether they have been a victim of rape/sexual assault and studies where the researchers make this determination based on the answers to questions. According to the NCVS, when people are asked if they've been raped or sexually assaulted in a given year, not only are the rates relatively low but dropping precipitously. Here are the per thousand rates since 1993 with the F/M breakdown (from the NCVS Victimization Analysis Tool):

1993: 4.3 (7.7 / 0.6)
1994: 3.2 (5.6 / 0.5)
1995: 2.6 (4.4 / 0.7)
1996: 2.0 (3.5 / 0.4)
1997: 2.5 (4.5 / 0.4)
1998: 1.8 (3.2 / 0.2)
1999: 2.6 (4.8 / 0.4)
2000: 1.6 (3.0 / 0.1)
2001: 2.1 (3.6 / 0.4)
2002: 1.5 (2.5 / 0.4)
2003: 1.4 (2.5 / 0.2)
2004: 1.1 (2.0 / 0.1)
2005: 0.8 (1.5 / 0.1)
2006: 1.9 (2.8 / 0.9)
2007: 1.0 (1.8 / 0.1)
2008: 1.4 (2.4 / 0.3)
2009: 1.2 (2.2 / 0.2)
2010: 1.0 (1.9 / 0.1)
2011: 0.9 (1.6 / 0.3)
2012: 1.3 (1.6 / 1.0)

This means there has been a 70% drop in the self-reported rate of rape since 1993. And this drop is entirely due to the decline in rape against women, which in isolation has been 79%. When I first saw numbers like this a few years ago, I was incredulous, since I had absolutely no idea this was true. Sure, one can argue that self-reporting of rape undercounts at least somewhat, but isn't the fact that is has gone down by such a huge amount newsworthy? I guess it violates the narrative of a rape epidemic and must be concealed. Instead, we get a broadening of the definition of rape so that it becomes uncountable in any kind of practical empirical way. Which leaves the door open to results-driven 'social scientists' to come up with pseudo-studies that have more feminist-amenable conclusions.

And isn't this the ultimate rebuke of Anita Sarkeesian? She claims that the reason sexualized violence in games is such an important issue is because of the current 'rape epidemic'. But it looks like the time period over which games have become a major social phenomenon is correlated with a radical decrease in rape against women.

sinister
.
.
Posts: 1375
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:11 pm
Location: geo-synchronous orbit

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39273

Post by sinister »

Søren Lilholt wrote:
didymos wrote:Also:
Ah, I dunno if it's that particularly.

Maybe it's more to do with the fact YOU HAVEN'T FUCKING GOT PTSD and are a preposterous attention-seeking moron.

Yeah, pretty sure it's that.
I would say something to her, but it would just reinforce her in-group narrative.

Tribble
.
.
Posts: 5102
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39274

Post by Tribble »

BlueShiftRhino wrote:While I might agree with your criticisms of the design, data-collection, and, therefore, the conclusions, the following really pissed me off:
Tribble wrote:The sample was too small to be statistically valid (about 130 girls) with any reasonable confidence level.
No.

Inferential statistics automatically take sample-size into account. The analysis of a small sample is no less "statistically valid" than the analysis of a large sample. As you seem to note, the confidence intervals will be wider for the smaller sample, so the odds of finding a significance difference will be lower, but the stats, themselves, are still valid.

The problem is that many folks break the most-basic rule of inferential statistics: never give a best guess about the population as a whole without providing -- right next to it -- an estimate of how wrong you might be. Never say, for example, that our best guess is that 25% of women will be raped in college. A best guess without an error term should be ignored. You need to say something along the lines of "between 10 and 40% of women will be raped in college" or "25+/-15% of women ... yadda yadda yadda."

Don't blame inferential statistics or small samples for any of this. You should still have an error term for every best guess even if the sample is huge.

/rant
lol. MARY FUCKING KOSS, before it made her famous, said it (the sample) was too small to draw any conclusions. But it made her famous and got her tenure. So she's stuck with it.

JacquesCuze
.
.
Posts: 1666
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 2:32 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39275

Post by JacquesCuze »

No, I am not above laughing at my own jokes however tiny they might be

JayTeeAitch
.
.
Posts: 595
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:54 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39276

Post by JayTeeAitch »

Good old Maddox tackles spider woman's arse:

[youtube]CB6TiRJNI-Q[/youtube]

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39277

Post by AndrewV69 »

In other news: Dreadnoughtus, a 130,000-Pound Dinosaur That Wasn’t Done Growing

http://static01.nyt.com/images/2014/09/ ... 050-v3.jpg
Eighty-five feet long, 30 feet tall, 130,000 pounds and still growing when it died, this dinosaur is among the largest land animals that ever lived — so big its discoverers are calling it the Dreadnoughtus.

sinister
.
.
Posts: 1375
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:11 pm
Location: geo-synchronous orbit

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39278

Post by sinister »

Have there been studies that women get proportionally more harassment then men online? My GoogleFu is weak. I am just finding articles about stories of harassment.

Tribble
.
.
Posts: 5102
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:34 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39279

Post by Tribble »

Søren Lilholt wrote:
didymos wrote:Also:
Ah, I dunno if it's that particularly.

Maybe it's more to do with the fact YOU HAVEN'T FUCKING GOT PTSD and are a preposterous attention-seeking moron.

Yeah, pretty sure it's that.

You know, sometime back she actually claimed to have General Anxiety Disorder that got from her 'abusive parents.' Then, a few years later, she got a new therapist and suddenly it PTSD. Then she walked back from PTSD and went to PTSD-like symptoms. Then it went back to "Twitter-Based" PTSD.

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5543
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39280

Post by Gumby »

AndrewV69 wrote:In other news: Dreadnoughtus, a 130,000-Pound Dinosaur That Wasn’t Done Growing

[.img]http://static01.nyt.com/images/2014/09/ ... 050-v3.jpg[/img]
Eighty-five feet long, 30 feet tall, 130,000 pounds and still growing when it died, this dinosaur is among the largest land animals that ever lived — so big its discoverers are calling it the Dreadnoughtus.
That's nothing. Stephanie Zvan can eat one of those for breakfast.

sinister
.
.
Posts: 1375
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:11 pm
Location: geo-synchronous orbit

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39281

Post by sinister »

Am I about to get told? I guess we will see.

Kirbmarc
.
.
Posts: 10577
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:29 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39282

Post by Kirbmarc »

JacquesCuze wrote: No, I am not above laughing at my own jokes however tiny they might be
http://stephentudor.com/images/2011-07- ... roWing.png

Parody Accountant
.
.
Posts: 4529
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:16 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39283

Post by Parody Accountant »

Tony Parsehole wrote:Parody Accountant is the best thing to happen to the internet since our mam decided to ditch dial-up and buy Broadband.
Shine on, you twat.
Will do.
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lfrjr ... o1_500.jpg

feathers
.
.
Posts: 6113
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:12 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39284

Post by feathers »

Git wrote:Actually, It was an attempted pun on "pussy pass" as in "pass the pussy".
By the left hand side?

Kirbmarc
.
.
Posts: 10577
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:29 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39285

Post by Kirbmarc »

And isn't this the ultimate rebuke of Anita Sarkeesian? She claims that the reason sexualized violence in games is such an important issue is because of the current 'rape epidemic'. But it looks like the time period over which games have become a major social phenomenon is correlated with a radical decrease in rape against women.
There's always a "rape epidemic". Or a "Satanic ritual abuse" epidemic. Or a "Red Menace" epidemic. Facts just get in the way of a good fear campaign. Sarkeesian knows it, since she's gaming the system for profit.

The only difference between her and Jack Thompson is that no one cares about Thompson, who can be mocked and ridiculed at will, while since she's a precious snowflake thousands of white knights come to her rescue. Including famous people like Joss Whedon (who should take a good look in the mirror when it comes to sexualized violence).

Curiously enough, for a person who claims to be so disgusted by the "Damsel in Distress" trope, Anita seems to love being rescued.

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4740
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39286

Post by another lurker »

sinister wrote:I'm a dumbass. Just, go ahead, laugh. Reading, not my strong suit apparently.
if you had tits, you'd get a pussy pass on that

I blame The Patriarchy:(

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4740
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39287

Post by another lurker »

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
another lurker wrote:Anyone here ever play Dwarf Fortress? Not my style, but my bf loves it. His dwarf craftsman created a legendary barrel, then went insane and took all of his clothes off.
Don't you get a Save roll for that kinda thing?
Fuck if I know.

One player, his craftsman Dwarf made a legendary cog which is all kinds of awesome.

sinister
.
.
Posts: 1375
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:11 pm
Location: geo-synchronous orbit

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39288

Post by sinister »

I guess Carrie Poppy doesn't have a link to a study that shows women are more harassed online then men. Strange, as a journalist you think she would be willing to source her assertions.

jugheadnaut
.
.
Posts: 1495
Joined: Tue May 20, 2014 9:09 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39289

Post by jugheadnaut »

Søren Lilholt wrote: That fuckwit has clearly never read a book in her life. It doesn't surprise me she's as ignorant about 'her' religion as she is seemingly about everything else.

I know SJWers aren't exactly shining beacons of intellect, but this specimen is just unreal. What do you reckon her IQ is? I'm struggling to see how it could be above 40 - 45.
Just like the camera adds 10 pounds, Twitter appears to take off 20-30 IQ points from its most of its active users, and she's an extreme case of this. She's not as dumb as her Twitter feed. She had an article published in the HuffPo a few months ago that, while full of SJW gibberish, was coherent and reasonably well written.

Twitter really is inimical to critical thinking. Arguments on Twitter tend to be just throwing empty proclamations around, with the winner being who has the best snark. And for someone low on reasoning skills to begin with like Aaminah Khan, Twitter use leads them to leave the land of rationality entirely. And, at the same time, it exposes the rest of us to this kind of damaged, defective irrelevancy of a human being.

deLurch
.
.
Posts: 8447
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:11 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39290

Post by deLurch »

Guest wrote:"Stolen Nudes Prompt Changes at 4chan"
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-29061358
Yeah, like that'll go over well. People are already complaining that moot is acquiescing to 'the man'.
It has already been noted that following the DMCA is pretty much a non-issue. Most threads die out & disappear before the DMCA kicks in anyway.

feathers
.
.
Posts: 6113
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:12 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39291

Post by feathers »

sinister wrote:Last one.
One evening, Patrick approaches Angelina in the parking lot as she's getting into her car. They get into a heated argument about ending their relationship and Patrick hits Angelina.
What should Angelina do?
Multiple choice:
[ ] Contact Campus Security to report the incident.
[ ] Contact local authorities to press charges against Patrick.
[ ] Contact the student counseling center if she feels it would be helpful.
[ ] Hit back.
[ ] Appreciate he's a man who can take her in hand and have steamy make-up sex.
[ ] Go home, online and create a hashtag.

Parody Accountant
.
.
Posts: 4529
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:16 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39292

Post by Parody Accountant »

RIP Joan Rivers.

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5543
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39293

Post by Gumby »

Yes, Melody, because agreement with someone's opinion automatically means "hero worship". :doh:
Hey Joe! You just described FtB/Skepchick/A+ perfectly.

another lurker
.
.
Posts: 4740
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:39 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39294

Post by another lurker »

Parody Accountant wrote:RIP Joan Rivers.
I usually tape Fashion Police. I wonder if the show will end. Hmmm.

Cliché Guevara
.
.
Posts: 271
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 5:21 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39295

Post by Cliché Guevara »

http://www.wwtdd.com/2014/09/dmv-dont-p ... ying-game/
Besides uniting people from nations without indoor plumbing for a an afternoon of waiting in lines, the DMV is really good with rules. One of those rules is, you can’t wear shit on your face when taking your DMV photo. The cops need to match your photo to your face. You can’t wear glasses, excessive makeup, Groucho Marx mustaches, or Justin Verlander’s sperm. Sorry, Kate Upton. Now, the immovable rock that is DMV rules and regulations is up against the unstoppable force that is gender identification rights.

Chase Culpepper says he’s gender non-conforming. I don’t know what that means, but it sounds impressive. Like most teenagers today, Chase has grown up believing that the world should conform to him as opposed to the other way around. The Greatest Tranny Generation. The DMV made Chase remove all his female accoutrements for his photo. Because them’s the rules. Now Chase is suing with the help of some transgender rights legal groups.
I left the DMV feeling humiliated. I want to be myself and have a driver’s license photo that reflects that.
We’ve come a long way from boys donning slips in their shame closets in fear for their lives to every indulged teen suing the DMV because they wouldn’t let him look like one of the Designing Women on his license photo. Millions of people every year are asked to remove shit for their DMV photos, But Chase is the special flower who must be served.

You want to be yourself? Head to Aaron Brothers and craft yourself up the most darling dummy driver’s license ever. Then use it in your fake car around your yard while your parents make honking and beeping noises. Everybody else on the public roads had to follow the fucking rules. I just got a ticket making a right turn on a red when not another living soul was within five miles. Welcome to adulthood, Chase.

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39296

Post by Brive1987 »


[youtube]OdvCqUguIh8[/youtube]

Brive1987
.
.
Posts: 17791
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:16 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39297

Post by Brive1987 »

sinister wrote:
Brive1987 wrote:Sinister, apologies if you still have PTSD from MattusMaximus. I should have provided a trigger warning to my post above.
I'm moblie right now and I have an oppressive data limit so I haven't watched yet. I believe I am done at JREF between the memory holing, and timeout I will take my posts elsewhere (aren't you guys blessed). Do I need to go over there and make a really long self-pitying post about it? That's a requirement right?
Where else do you get to annoy such an array of sanctimonious pricks while ripping divots in their lawn?

BlueShiftRhino
.
.
Posts: 1422
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 9:41 am

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39298

Post by BlueShiftRhino »

Hey, one of you FtB lurkers needs to tell Jason Thibeault that he's a pussy.

Don't worry. He'll know why I said it.

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39299

Post by AndrewV69 »

In other news:

Remember Jenn Frank ?

http://i.imgur.com/HkWh7j2.png

Apparently she had a meltdown on twatter and apparently has resigned (from the Guardian as a witer?) :
I started to feeel sorry for her, then wound up not giving a fuck.

Apparently as well as supporting Zoe Quin (who BTW apparently was at one point sleeping with Maya Krama of Silverstring Media) it turns out she was being supported to the tune of $1,790 by among others Maya Felix Kramer of Silverstring Media and Ben Kuchera and possibly others (did not check further).

You know, something is rotten in the state of Denmark when even the most "reasonable" of these "journalists" has so many of conflicts of interest.

KiwiInOz
.
.
Posts: 5425
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:28 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: Nerds. Nerds EVERYWHERE...

#39300

Post by KiwiInOz »

1264 modern music genres. Lots of new stuff to listen to, e.g. "fallen angel is where calamitously overwrought female-led symphonic rock meets fantastically melodramatic, shred-happy power metal. If that sounds a bit like Bonnie Tyler on both ice and drugs with everything turned up to eleventy-seven then, damn it all, you’re sort of right. Expect twinkly pianos, blankly personal lyrics and window-bending, hair-shaking riff-bombs. Perhaps even a violin here and there. Fallen angel is, literally, the uncoolest music of all time. Which makes it awesomely cool."

Locked