another lurker wrote:I guess it can depend on the game. Planescape Torment, for example, is an RPG, but it's also a fucking book. I think there are over 20,000 lines of text in that game, or something crazy like that. The gameplay experience really did feel like an interactive book. And I do consider Torment to be a work of art.
There's terrible art, there are glamorous games, and vice versa.
When I say that I've never seen a game that I'd consider "art", I don't mean that games cannot entertain, please, or maybe even inspire. But if I'm supposed to consider a game "art", then I'd like to have something in the substance of the game itself which makes it a piece of art, and not just refer to the things it contains (graphics, music, script). I have no idea what that could be.
didymos wrote:TiBo wrote:
1. I suppose that's because the medium "game" just screams "free time activity". It's rather mundane, it's painfully stereotypical, and usually very limited in its scope of expression..
Yeah, you really don't have much experience with modern games, do you?
I do. I've been playing and enjoying games since I got my first c64 in 1984. I'm not an enemy of games.
Dave wrote:I think you are going in the wrong direction. Comparing to mass produced games to museum quality paintings is placing your thumb heavily on the side of the paintings. You want to compare games to paintings? Use this as the painting:
http://www.artofthesouth.com/search/ima ... ane_lg.jpg
(You introduced the comparison of medium quality games to (what you considered) medium quality painting, so I used the examples you gave)
I suppose you now inserted the 2nd picture as an example of "lesser art" ? I'd agree, and I find it telling that you also can tell them apart. Seems although both painters knew what they were doing, the outcome hasn't got the same overall quality. In the eyes of "the" viewer, that is. To me, that painting is borderline Kitsch. I'd have a very hard time calling it "art".
Southern wrote:So, you don't think chess is a sport too?
It isn't. And no, card games like Poker don't qualify either. Even if my definition of "sports" is fuzzy, that doesn't mean you can take away one of its core elements, namely the exercise of physical skills. Doing "click click" is below the threshold of bodily activity I would accept.