What's this got to do with rape, or Lolita? Lolita was, if I recall correctly around 13 or 14 (at the most) in that book. Michele is what, 21,22, 23? Miri is what, 25 to 30?John D wrote: I just finished reading Nabokov's "Lolita." Is it okay if I start calling you "Clarence Clarence?"
SOMEONE sent the "Clarence" signal.TiBo wrote:btw has anyone seen clarence lately ?
Yeah... you are right... this really has nothing to do with Miri... or Michelle. It just popped into my head.Clarence wrote:What's this got to do with rape, or Lolita? Lolita was, if I recall correctly around 13 or 14 (at the most) in that book. Michele is what, 21,22, 23? Miri is what, 25 to 30?John D wrote: I just finished reading Nabokov's "Lolita." Is it okay if I start calling you "Clarence Clarence?"
So, no, unless you can explain yourself better other than throwing vague pedophile accusations at me.
Considering the divorce rate among veterans, I think you're right. AVfM didn't just happen upon this alternative venue by chance.Clarence wrote:James Caruthers wrote:http://havenuproot.com/2014/06/19/nomra ... post-1146/
The twatter/feminist campaign to get the avfm meeting banned rolls on.
Well, when you don't really have a case, it's good to lie.
I predict this will fail.
http://imgur.com/PvEn24L.jpgbhoytony wrote:Ape+lust wrote:Heh. This might be the greatest breakup since Martin/Lewis or Lennon/McCartney. You knew Greg veered into the unforgivable when he called her a random blogger, slagging off his most stalwart defender. Whatta moron.
http://imgur.com/h8ak0TF.png
Memories light the corners of my mind
Misty water-colored memories of the way we were
Memories may be beautiful and yet
What's too painful to remember we simply choose to forget
So it's the laughter we will remember
Whenever we remember the way we were.
[youtube]xfJzZCXif7A[/youtube]
[youtube]IofUC8itDBI[/youtube]another lurker wrote: I need beat-off material.
Little girls singing about porn... thank you Clarence Clarence.Clarence wrote:[youtube]IofUC8itDBI[/youtube]another lurker wrote: I need beat-off material.
Mom! Get off the internet, and stop embarrassing me!Grwd wrote:Clarence seems like a really cool dude.
Folks. Haircuts like that just don't happen. This is the horrible horrible result of years of swirlies in high school.Tigzy wrote:http://i.imgur.com/Cx3oWeM.png
Whack it to Improbable Joe. He's certain you're doing it anyway.another lurker wrote:I need beat-off material.
I was thinking of you the whole time, John D. Aren't I considerate?John D wrote:Little girls singing about porn... thank you Clarence Clarence.Clarence wrote:[youtube]IofUC8itDBI[/youtube]another lurker wrote: I need beat-off material.
Haha. Now I am hooked. You will always be Clarence Clarence to me.Clarence wrote:I was thinking of you the whole time, John D. Aren't I considerate?John D wrote: Little girls singing about porn... thank you Clarence Clarence.
The anime is called Azimunga Diao and unlike this hilarious splicing of a song , there's not much raunchy humor involved with it. The little kid in this is a 10 year old prodigy who some how goes from elementary to high school, skipping a few grades. She's there to be cute, not sexy and the actual anime is popular with teen girls and is mostly humor and romance based. So in short, safe for family viewing (well, males will probably die of cooties or something if they watch it it's so 'cutesy female' oriented).
And yes, I figured you'd accuse me of being the male teacher :P
I have some smoking hot pix of a topless "Nazi" chick in my archives. I've been meaning to show them to the pit, but have not been able to find them. I also have a kickass pic of a chick with a generous bush, Castro tattoo above said bush, holding a cigar. And ninjas vs. bears. Just gotta find it all:( Best pix ever!Ape+lust wrote:Whack it to Improbable Joe. He's certain you're doing it anyway.another lurker wrote:I need beat-off material.
http://imgur.com/RJwB5aJ.png
What about Miri's?deLurch wrote:Folks. Haircuts like that just don't happen. This is the horrible horrible result of years of swirlies in high school.Tigzy wrote:http://i.imgur.com/Cx3oWeM.png
Life as a polysexual can be difficult.Hunt wrote:What about Miri's?deLurch wrote:Folks. Haircuts like that just don't happen. This is the horrible horrible result of years of swirlies in high school.Tigzy wrote:http://i.imgur.com/Cx3oWeM.png
:-)Tigzy wrote:http://i.imgur.com/Cx3oWeM.png
“The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom ….†Psalm (like it hot) 111:10Sulman wrote:It's not worship, it's fearROBOKiTTY wrote:Not to mention, if the Pit worships anyone, it would be ROBOKiTTY and Michelle Jenneke. Neither is a rapist (last I checked).
Oooh! Love it! :-)BarnOwl wrote:It's their SOP to make shit up about people they don't like and to lie about things repeatedly, until it becomes "truth" in the eyes of their intellectually misfit followers. Myers routinely does this on his blog, so that he can smear people he doesn't like with accusations of misogyny, rape apology, actual rape, racism, actual bigotry, climate change denialism, environmental irresponsibility, unscientific mindsets, etc. He doesn't even have to state the link directly any longer, because through years of Hebbian synaptic training at the Pharyngula Institute, his followers will automatically make the ridiculous mental connection. At the same time, they're programmed to ignore any evidence of hypocrisy on the part of Institute staff.Tribble wrote: What, exactly, are they going on about? Who is 'worshiping rapists?' I mean, besides the FTB crowd and their love of Oggie (the admired/admitted child rapist), is the rapist?
If they mean Shermer, nobody has come even remotely close to putting on enough proof that we could reasonably believe ....
The most influential theory regarding how activity in individual neurons may translate into percept formation, the cell assembly hypothesis, was originally conceived by D.O. Hebb in 1949. Through their multiple connections, Hebb proposed that neurons formed cell assemblies that were collectively activated by sensory input and formed a brief closed system after stimulation had ceased. Activity from each cell assembly could propagate and activate additional connected cell assemblies in sequence, which he termed a phase sequence, and this was proposed to be the core of neuronal representation of a stimulus based percept.
LurkerPerson wrote:Military have to deal with bar skanks who are literally parasites. They just care about finding a host and draining him of his government monies. The younger and stupider the target the better. They hang around military frequented bars and speak of the men they are targetting as if they were prey. Rank especially is a consideration, as higher rank = more monies. The worst thing is that they are encouraged to get married and have children (with financial incentives and more), despite the ridiculous rate of divorce .
That's not even getting into the "normal" women who will cheat on, divorce, and then ask for alimony and child support as soon as their husband is deployed for more than a few months, because they are self-centered selfish whores with zero loyalty or self-control. And obviously they portray themselves as victims throughout the whole thing. Think I sound bitter? I've only ever been affected by this secondhand. Speak to actual military about it.
This strip may hit a bit too close to home for some. In all reality though, marriage in the Marine Corps is more of a problem than a blessing. Too often, especially in the infantry, Marines get married as an answer to financial problems. The problem lies within the foundation of the system itself. Where, in the “real world†as I like to call it, would you get paid to be married? Probably nowhere, but the military actually encourages it with the way it is handled.
While there are plenty of briefs and holes to jump through when it comes time to tie the knot, none of it truly works as a deterrent against a marriage. The result is an 80% divorce rate brought on by Marines that just don’t understand the consequences of what they’re getting themselves into. While I have no useful suggestions to fix the system, I can say that it definitely needs to be fixed. Encouraging Marines to get married at such a young age just isn’t right, and divorces and alimony end up ruining lives long before it really needs to. With that said, I’m obviously not going to completely condemn those who decide to wed, I simply think it’s worth noting how messed up it has become.
It truly is a rampant problem in the Marines, and probably the military as a whole. Single Marines need to stop being treated worse, stop getting fucked with 24/7, maybe have the option of receiving BAH, maybe be treated like human beings… ya know… little things like that will go a long way in fighting young marriage rates; as well as divorce rates.
Look at that. A way for her to get more attention to her videos and make them more fun through pure slap-stick style humor in lieu of the degradation of vast swaths of the population.Slither wrote:Since we've written a lot about women gamers, I thought I'd present the following antidote to Sarkeesian: Amy Dellen reviewing Hearthstone. Clearly Amy not only has played the games she talks about, but she also demonstrates her dedication to finishing her review. Enjoy!
[youtube]fo91yyyI8BQ[/youtube]
Indeed. Going to the bank for a loan, or going to work, could be characterized as “meeting people who are willing to give you moneyâ€: frequently or generally a quid pro quo involved in all cases. Although I expect it’s been a long time since one could get a pro for a quid ….Notice Me Senpai! wrote:I don't see what's wrong with meeting people who are willing to give you money. It was their choice. Unless of course they're pretending to be in love with them and keeping it up for months before draining them. But "skanks" asking for $$ and a good time? Totally their choice to spend their $$ on attractive girls. Is there some way they're extorting it out of them?
hahahahahaha!Tigzy wrote:http://i.imgur.com/Cx3oWeM.png
Too bad I couldn't fit the whole thing in:Søren Lilholt wrote:Massive lol on a crowded train.Tony Parsehole wrote:https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5559/142 ... f1c0_o.jpg
Cheers, mate. :oops: :lol: :lol:
He's the type of guy who'd do a big shit on his own feet and claim a win when others around him are annoyed by the smell.ShameMaggot wrote:Oolon has never ceased being one of the dumbest cocksuckers I've ever seen on the internet.
I notice he makes an astute observation about Rebecca Watson on that twitter timeline.Tony Parsehole wrote:He's the type of guy who'd do a big shit on his own feet and claim a win when others around him are annoyed by the smell.ShameMaggot wrote:Oolon has never ceased being one of the dumbest cocksuckers I've ever seen on the internet.
The bar whores are fine. It's the predatory skanks that are the problem.Notice Me Senpai! wrote:I don't see what's wrong with meeting people who are willing to give you money. It was their choice. Unless of course they're pretending to be in love with them and keeping it up for months before draining them. But "skanks" asking for $$ and a good time? Totally their choice to spend their $$ on attractive girls. Is there some way they're extorting it out of them?
Right because 18 and 19 year old boys have the wisdom of Solomon.LurkerPerson wrote:Of course, because a man falling for a literal predator is always his own fault for being a dumbass. I'm not even kidding, that's exactly the way it's handled. Even other military have no sympathy for them, much less other men. They just call them retards. A man is reponsible for himself. If the genders were reversed of course it would be rape and evil patriarchic manipulation that teaches men to see women as nothing more than objects for their own pleasure.
And yes, random monies is just the start, the big payoff is marriage. You get american citizenship and the umbrella of ridiculously favourable divorce laws on your side. Merely being in the military is already a huge drawback in divorces, on top of just being a man. You think the average man is unfairly stigmatized as unable to head a family without the awesome and natural superiorty of a vagina-enabled parent? Wait until a lawyer starts pointing out that you're a war-damaged psycho killer because of your training and job.
What a total arse.Dick Strawkins wrote:I notice he makes an astute observation about Rebecca Watson on that twitter timeline.Tony Parsehole wrote:He's the type of guy who'd do a big shit on his own feet and claim a win when others around him are annoyed by the smell.ShameMaggot wrote:Oolon has never ceased being one of the dumbest cocksuckers I've ever seen on the internet.
http://i.imgur.com/w8gXT2i.jpg
Sums him perfectly, but he seems to have gotten worse on twitter than when he was shitposting on the old school Infidels board.Tony Parsehole wrote:He's the type of guy who'd do a big shit on his own feet and claim a win when others around him are annoyed by the smell.ShameMaggot wrote:Oolon has never ceased being one of the dumbest cocksuckers I've ever seen on the internet.
This was fun to watch if you forget that she ate a chilli pepper, and instead imagine Clarence Clarence is under the desk, lapping at her clitoris with his big sweaty tongue.deLurch wrote:Look at that. A way for her to get more attention to her videos and make them more fun through pure slap-stick style humor in lieu of the degradation of vast swaths of the population.Slither wrote:Since we've written a lot about women gamers, I thought I'd present the following antidote to Sarkeesian: Amy Dellen reviewing Hearthstone. Clearly Amy not only has played the games she talks about, but she also demonstrates her dedication to finishing her review. Enjoy!
[youtube]fo91yyyI8BQ[/youtube]
Kawaii.deLurch wrote:Look at that. A way for her to get more attention to her videos and make them more fun through pure slap-stick style humor in lieu of the degradation of vast swaths of the population.Slither wrote:Since we've written a lot about women gamers, I thought I'd present the following antidote to Sarkeesian: Amy Dellen reviewing Hearthstone. Clearly Amy not only has played the games she talks about, but she also demonstrates her dedication to finishing her review. Enjoy!
[youtube]fo91yyyI8BQ[/youtube]
ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:This was fun to watch if you forget that she ate a chilli pepper, and instead imagine Clarence Clarence is under the desk, lapping at her clitoris with his big sweaty tongue.deLurch wrote:Look at that. A way for her to get more attention to her videos and make them more fun through pure slap-stick style humor in lieu of the degradation of vast swaths of the population.Slither wrote:Since we've written a lot about women gamers, I thought I'd present the following antidote to Sarkeesian: Amy Dellen reviewing Hearthstone. Clearly Amy not only has played the games she talks about, but she also demonstrates her dedication to finishing her review. Enjoy!
[youtube]fo91yyyI8BQ[/youtube]
Sorry for being a bit unclear. What I was trying to say was that most of the people trying to point to Roger's mental issues as the crucial factor behind the deed did so in direct self defense. Feminists pointed to "men's entitlement to sex" as the primary reason for the shootings - that to many men is a attack, directed at them personally. What feminists were doing were basically telling men "This is how you men think, and that's why you men are killing women!". The spontaneous, gut reaction for many men at to being told something like that is to go "WTF?! First of all, I do not think like that, and second, this person was freaking crazy, he though he was a God ffs! We are nothing alike!".Aneris wrote:I don't think I missed that, just put it differently.acathode wrote:You're missing what I'd say is the most crucial reason as to why people point out that mental illness is the crucial part to understanding Roger's actions - a reaction to seeing men as a group <snip>Aneris wrote:It's interesting that Elliot Roger's conditions are a proxy where different sides argue for much more than what they say.
The question is: why do they deem it important, whether he did it because of misogyny or mental illness. What do these words actually represent?
Perhaps, demonizing men as inherently evil is a variant which I indeed haven't covered, but that is arguably a fringe position and most likely not on Christina Rad's mind who put the emphasis on misogyny.The second interest of those who only want to attribute his actions to misogyny seems to be to substantiate Teh Patriarchyâ„¢ as something that is pervasive and dangerous to women, or everyone.
This prank originated on 4chan’s news and politics board, /pol/, a board known for its radicalism, offensiveness and free speech, and it’s clear that it was success. What’s more interesting is that this isn’t your typical black propaganda, because it actually fooled the people that it was satirizing into joining in.
The hashtag topped twitter’s trending lists, sweeping up thousands of bona fide feminists in the apparently empowering anti-holiday frenzy. Plenty of savvier feminist tweeters pointed out that such tweets needed to stop – not because the rhetoric is fucking crazy, but because of who is originating the hashtag, since the internet is public and any group of people planning such thing will be uncovered with a little digging./From the start of the segment, Tucker Carlson explicitly states that he is aware that of the trend’s beginnings as a joke. Carlson literally opening the program explicitly recognizing something as fake didn’t stop just about every news source that covered the fiasco from commentating on how he was “totally fooled†by the prank, instead of covering the eeriness of the fact that the prank snapped perfectly into place with feminist doctrine. Salon, after being notified of the trend’s origin as a prank and not from reputable feminists, pretends that the are totally in on the now “patently fake†joke, and silly old Fox is not (pastebinned.) Even if Carlson had been legitimately fooled, that would have just been further indictment of this satire being indistinguishable from the real thing. If notable academics and writers had actually started the hashtag, it wouldn’t have been even a slight deviation from or innovation of the rhetoric that we’re used to.This satire passed the Turing-Poe test with flying colors. Those unfamiliar with the source of the prank were utterly convinced, even if they were on the side being satirized. Savvy inter-nauts denouncing the trend because of its origin as a prank don’t get it off the hook either, since being ignorant of the origination of a machine’s intelligent message in the Turing test is an essential component of the exercise. This should really be an appeal to moderation for feminists and social justice types: If your ideology is so insane that the only thing 4chan manchildren have to do to cause a shitstorm is sound completely indistinguishable from you, it’s time to take a long and hard look at yourself and your worldview.
Is there any reason for this sudden recap of Oolio's mental prowess?ShameMaggot wrote:Oolon has never ceased being one of the dumbest cocksuckers I've ever seen on the internet.
Well..I *had* asked for beat off material.Southern wrote:Is there any reason for this sudden recap of Oolio's mental prowess?ShameMaggot wrote:Oolon has never ceased being one of the dumbest cocksuckers I've ever seen on the internet.
Sometimes it just hits you, again. A few days ago I was amazed, again, at how terrible Surly Amy's 'art' is. It's so fucking bad. How can a grown adult be proud of themselves for generating that garbage? HOW???Southern wrote:Is there any reason for this sudden recap of Oolio's mental prowess?ShameMaggot wrote:Oolon has never ceased being one of the dumbest cocksuckers I've ever seen on the internet.
Nah. It just needs doing every now and then.Southern wrote:Is there any reason for this sudden recap of Oolio's mental prowess?ShameMaggot wrote:Oolon has never ceased being one of the dumbest cocksuckers I've ever seen on the internet.
