Bleeding from the Bunghole

Old subthreads
Locked
Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4291

Post by Pitchguest »

Forgot to link to the other post where I address Avicenna directly. Here it is:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/amilliongod ... ent-131925

Parody Accountant
.
.
Posts: 4529
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:16 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4292

Post by Parody Accountant »

aneris you can use mine also with or without attribution and at whatever frequency you wish. if you happen to start making shitloads of money (perhaps quadrillions) on merch (perhaps fake jewelry)... we can work out something where a tiny portion is donated to a charity. I'm against profits along these lines... but not intensely. in no way am I worried about blog ad revenue ... if you have that.

sorry if wall of text. on mobile.

FrankGrimes
.
.
Posts: 373
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:55 am
Location: Below a Bowling Alley

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4293

Post by FrankGrimes »

Is the solve world poverty with bottled water thing over?

Darren
.
.
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:40 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4294

Post by Darren »

Badger3k wrote:You got to love the egos - over at FfTB, I mean. Avicenna has a post on about something "big" - all the while tarring everyone here:
If you are unaware of this, I was accused of raping someone at TAM 2013 during a period of time that I was intensely busy with “work”. I didn’t know about the Michael Shermer incident. I just thought it was hate mail. Mabus was doing the rounds after all…
So I disposed it. Tam 2013? How weird!
Then other allegations started popping up. PZ Myers, Lousy Canuck (AKA Jason Thibeault) and I realised what it was. It was laying the ground work for something big.
Turns out Mr. Sanderson is a possible suspect in the fake accusation that I raped/molested someone at TAM 2013. Why? Because when I admitted publically about the accusation, I also pointed out that I had an alibi.
An alibi? So effing what? Farah Jama had an alibi, and was still wrongly convicted of rape (based on contaminated DNA evidence) despite no evidence a crime even took place.

From that 2009 article:
The Court of Appeal was told it was possible the woman had not been raped at all.

She had never complained of sexual assault and could not recall the evening.

The court was told it was "improbable" that Mr Jama had even been at the nightclub.

Justices Marilyn Warren, Robert Redlich and Bernard Bongiorno overturned his conviction after the prosecution conceded contamination of the only evidence against him was likely.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4295

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT!!!

So Shermer is a racist because a woman said so, and she could not have lied. The kind of sentence which Louis uses here, where one casts doubt by declaring there is no doubt, saw quite a number of people kicked off Meyers's grenade thread. Not only is Louis left unmolested when he does it, but Anthony Brownian specifically declares his support for the comment a few comments later:

http://i.imgur.com/sqFH0Jl.png

http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/ ... ent-678771

justinvacula
.
.
Posts: 1832
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:48 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4296

Post by justinvacula »

Apples wrote:
Guest wrote:
Apples wrote:Links are nice - it being the Internet and all:

http://www.motherjones.com/media/2013/0 ... ree-speech
yeah sorry about that I don't have a keyboard near me and my texting skills are terrible. thanks for posting the links, but please check your privilege.
roger that
From the article:
"The idea that a social-media network should be entirely neutral is a myth," says Jaclyn Friedman, the executive director for Women, Action and the Media, a nonprofit that advocates for gender equality in the media. "Neutral platforms are only neutral for straight white dudes. These companies need to make a decision: Do I want to be making a money off of a platform where abusers and harassers feel more comfortable than the abused and harassed?"

Online harassment can have serious consequences. The International Journal of Cyber Criminology says aggressive online conduct can trigger PTSD and, in worst case scenarios, lead to violence and suicide—although not all harassment rises to that level. The federal Violence Against Women Act outlaws cyberbullying but leaves a lot of room for uncertainty; when harassment occurs, it can be difficult to get sites to remove the offending content in a timely manner, if at all. Unsurprisingly, it's women, minorities, transgender people, and other marginalized groups who bear the brunt of the abuse.
Peezus Christ.

Matt Cavanaugh
.
.
Posts: 15449
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:38 pm
Contact:

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4297

Post by Matt Cavanaugh »

I'd have strong doubts if an FtB commenter claimed they didn't have clinical depression.

SoylentAtheist

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4298

Post by SoylentAtheist »

Badger3k wrote:You got to love the egos - over at FfTB, I mean. Avicenna has a post on about something "big" - all the while tarring everyone here:
I have no clue what Avicenna is talking about. Links from his blog would be nice.

And on a related note, I would like Avicenna to stop accusing the slymepit of running a circus with Wooly Mammoths.

AndrewV69
.
.
Posts: 8146
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:52 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4299

Post by AndrewV69 »

Toy Soldiers weighs in about rape, mentions Jason Thibeault and Michael Shermer.

On people questioning the extraordinary claims about rape
http://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2013/08 ... bout-rape/
Jason Thibeault appears to disagree with that position. He wrote about his experience being falsely accused several years ago. That topic came up again when he wrote about a rape accusation against Michael Shermer, founder of he Skeptics Society. Rohn, a commenter, posted a response, which Thibeault wrote about. Thibeault’s comments reveal the inherent problem many feminists have in dealing with false accusations.

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4300

Post by Badger3k »

Pitchguest wrote:Forgot to link to the other post where I address Avicenna directly. Here it is:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/amilliongod ... ent-131925
So, the original allegation (or report) of false rape was done by Avicenna himself?

I saw someone point out that 4 people related to FtB have been accused of rape (falsely). If we went with that insane 4% figure dropped by one commenter, doesn't that make the probability of all four being falsely accused as .04^4? I'm not good at statistics, but that seems to be the way that I've seen it done. One person .04, two people is .016, etc. Awfully small numbers for 4 bloggers related to one network. Who's lying?

(I did like the dig at Oolon's liking for kiddy porn)

rpguest

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4301

Post by rpguest »

Angry_Drunk wrote:
Za-zen wrote:I've hugged a lot of guys in my lifetime, are the "huggers=comeon" crowd suggesting that unbeknown to me, i was actually flirting with them?
Did you rub your boobs on them, apparently that's the Rubicon.
-
-

-
-
-
-
Boobicon

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4302

Post by Skep tickle »

FWIW, there's now a connection between Mother Jones & atheist-SJW that there didn't used to be - the trio who defected from CFI's radio program.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4303

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

Badger3k wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:Forgot to link to the other post where I address Avicenna directly. Here it is:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/amilliongod ... ent-131925
So, the original allegation (or report) of false rape was done by Avicenna himself?

I saw someone point out that 4 people related to FtB have been accused of rape (falsely). If we went with that insane 4% figure dropped by one commenter, doesn't that make the probability of all four being falsely accused as .04^4? I'm not good at statistics, but that seems to be the way that I've seen it done. One person .04, two people is .016, etc. Awfully small numbers for 4 bloggers related to one network. Who's lying?

(I did like the dig at Oolon's liking for kiddy porn)
Is Richard Sanderson the cunt who asked people to walk out of some Con, and declared it was equivalent to the protests in Egypt?

Cunt.

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4304

Post by Badger3k »

SoylentAtheist wrote:
Badger3k wrote:You got to love the egos - over at FfTB, I mean. Avicenna has a post on about something "big" - all the while tarring everyone here:
I have no clue what Avicenna is talking about. Links from his blog would be nice.

And on a related note, I would like Avicenna to stop accusing the slymepit of running a circus with Wooly Mammoths.
Normally, I think FtB policy is to only link when it can help you. If there is any doubt, leave it out.

Of course, there is the serious answer - I have no idea why he didn't link to it. It means we only get one side of the story, and have to try to make a judgement (if one is possible) based on that. Not a good thing, and not part of the skeptic's toolset.

I did want to comment on Pitchguest too - the comment by Colon saying that since this Sanderson reads the pit, that makes him a pitter. What does that make Svan and Ophie? Can we grant them honorary Pitter status?

SoylentAtheist

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4305

Post by SoylentAtheist »

Zenspace wrote:
KiwiInOz wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:I guess it's true. When we're not eating FtB, we're eating eachother.
The over-population thread is elsewhere Pitchguest.
Soylent Green is people!!! :o
This doesn't look good for me.

Garlic

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4306

Post by Garlic »

Badger3k wrote: If we went with that insane 4% figure dropped by one commenter, doesn't that make the probability of all four being falsely accused as .04^4?
No. IIRC the 4% (really 2 to 10%) only applies to rape accusations that are reported to the police. I don't think any of the FTB cases qualify.

Of course, neither does the Shermer thing.

rpguest

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4307

Post by rpguest »

Guest lurker wrote:Pit has sure been boring lately: Hugs and whether Trophy has a dick. Sure hope something interesting happens soon...
what are you some kind of hug apologist?

Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4308

Post by Pitchguest »

Badger3k wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:Forgot to link to the other post where I address Avicenna directly. Here it is:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/amilliongod ... ent-131925
So, the original allegation (or report) of false rape was done by Avicenna himself?

I saw someone point out that 4 people related to FtB have been accused of rape (falsely). If we went with that insane 4% figure dropped by one commenter, doesn't that make the probability of all four being falsely accused as .04^4? I'm not good at statistics, but that seems to be the way that I've seen it done. One person .04, two people is .016, etc. Awfully small numbers for 4 bloggers related to one network. Who's lying?

(I did like the dig at Oolon's liking for kiddy porn)
Avicenna mentioned in a previous blog post that he had gotten an email which accused him of rape. However when Rich alluded to that:
Avicenna assumed Rich was the one who made the original claim, because he mentioned it.


Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4310

Post by Pitchguest »

I'm sorry, did Stephanie Zvan just dox AmbrosiaX?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... es-missed/

The fuck?

SoylentAtheist

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4311

Post by SoylentAtheist »

Pitchguest wrote:
Badger3k wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:Forgot to link to the other post where I address Avicenna directly. Here it is:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/amilliongod ... ent-131925
So, the original allegation (or report) of false rape was done by Avicenna himself?
I did a quick check on the cached copy of that More Will Be Named website. Avicenna isn't even on there unless some butthole made him a late addition.

So again, we have no clue WTF he is talking about. Is this some new form of claiming victim points? pz, canuck, avicenna. They all seem to want to add it to their resume.

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4312

Post by Badger3k »

Garlic wrote:
Badger3k wrote: If we went with that insane 4% figure dropped by one commenter, doesn't that make the probability of all four being falsely accused as .04^4?
No. IIRC the 4% (really 2 to 10%) only applies to rape accusations that are reported to the police. I don't think any of the FTB cases qualify.

Of course, neither does the Shermer thing.
I've seen a much wider variety posted here throughout the past few months (I guess, whenever this CF started), but you bring up an interesting point - were any of those accusations made to the police? Were they investigated, or were they just a case of "he's my friend, so he could never have done it" kinda thing (or subordinate, in PZs case)?

Be interesting (from a purely intellectual point) to find out.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4313

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

rpguest wrote:
Guest lurker wrote:Pit has sure been boring lately: Hugs and whether Trophy has a dick. Sure hope something interesting happens soon...
what are you some kind of hug apologist?
I think we're all spending every free minute working out our wanking arm in preparation for Shermer's next move.

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4314

Post by Badger3k »

Pitchguest wrote:I'm sorry, did Stephanie Zvan just dox AmbrosiaX?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... es-missed/

The fuck?
Expect to see that woman get harassed, a lot.

Badger3k
.
.
Posts: 3466
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 6:53 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4315

Post by Badger3k »

Pitchguest wrote:
Badger3k wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:Forgot to link to the other post where I address Avicenna directly. Here it is:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/amilliongod ... ent-131925
So, the original allegation (or report) of false rape was done by Avicenna himself?

I saw someone point out that 4 people related to FtB have been accused of rape (falsely). If we went with that insane 4% figure dropped by one commenter, doesn't that make the probability of all four being falsely accused as .04^4? I'm not good at statistics, but that seems to be the way that I've seen it done. One person .04, two people is .016, etc. Awfully small numbers for 4 bloggers related to one network. Who's lying?

(I did like the dig at Oolon's liking for kiddy porn)
Avicenna mentioned in a previous blog post that he had gotten an email which accused him of rape. However when Rich alluded to that:
Avicenna assumed Rich was the one who made the original claim, because he mentioned it.
So, they decided to jump in feet first without looking for evidence or any corroborating information? Why am I not surprised. I did laugh at the egotism on display in the Nanny Ophie piece. People like Avicenna are minor dogs, bit players, the wannabe SJWs. Avicenna seems to actually do something real, though, so he at least gets props for walking the walk, something most of them don't do.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4316

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

Pitchguest wrote:I'm sorry, did Stephanie Zvan just dox AmbrosiaX?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... es-missed/

The fuck?
I don't get your claim from that post. Seems like Ambrosia doxxed herself first, somewhat, much as Anthony Brownian did (leading to the famous photo of him taking a selfie in a bathroom, with a cat covering his cock).

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4317

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

Badger3k wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:Forgot to link to the other post where I address Avicenna directly. Here it is:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/amilliongod ... ent-131925
So, the original allegation (or report) of false rape was done by Avicenna himself?

I saw someone point out that 4 people related to FtB have been accused of rape (falsely). If we went with that insane 4% figure dropped by one commenter, doesn't that make the probability of all four being falsely accused as .04^4? I'm not good at statistics, but that seems to be the way that I've seen it done. One person .04, two people is .016, etc. Awfully small numbers for 4 bloggers related to one network. Who's lying?

(I did like the dig at Oolon's liking for kiddy porn)

For fuck's sake. Is that now THREE of the FfTB men who have had false rape claims made against them? How many more are going to slither out of the closet and admit they have, too. The place is a fucking den of falsely-accused non-rapists, plus a regular commenter who admitted downloading child porn, and yet they pull that Shermer shit publically, instead of through the legal system?

Cunts, cunts, cunts.

Guest

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4318

Post by Guest »

Skep tickle wrote:FWIW, there's now a connection between Mother Jones & atheist-SJW that there didn't used to be - the trio who defected from CFI's radio program.
can you name them for n00bs playing the home game and trying to keep up?

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5543
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4319

Post by Gumby »

AndrewV69 wrote: I for one am all in favour about you talking about penises. You make more sense than some of the people all up in arms about me honking tits.
You're the idiot who thinks that a woman shouldn't hug someone if she doesn't expect to fuck the other person.

We simply pointed out your idiocy.

JackRayner
.
.
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:27 am
Location: In the basement of the University of Minnesota Morris
Contact:

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4320

Post by JackRayner »

Søren Lilholt wrote:
JackRayner wrote: I agree that morality's purpose is to minimize suffering, however, again, you seem to be missing a significant chunk of the picture: minimize suffering for whom?....and from what?
Well, if taken to the logical conclusion, everyone and everything with the capacity to suffer.
The so-called "universals" of human morality that some tout aren't objective. Killing is bad...but for whom, and in what context? Stealing is bad...but from who? Lying is bad....but to whom? Forced sex is bad...but against whom? (And if you look at our own culture, this point becomes plainly obvious. For example, there are forms of forced sex committed by women, on men or on other women, that the law nor the public seems to give two shits about.) All of these are contextual. Black and white thinking doesn't work here whatsoever.
I thought my analogy with healthy lifestyle was pretty clear - that you can't prescribe an EXACT way to live a fully healthy life, but there are objective facts that lead us to GENERAL principles for healthy living which TEND TO lead to better health IN GENERAL. And so it is with morality.

How on earth this sort of approach can qualify as "black and white thinking" is just beyond me.
Dafuq? LOL! No. I'm not following you on this jump you're attempting to make from talking about morality to talking about health. If it wasn't apparent [from my previous, 600+ word spiel] that my definition of morality is concerned with the reduction of harm, and that "harm" is something each culture defines differently [whether based on quantifiable variables or not], then I don't know what to tell you. [*Sniff* Is that goal shifting that I'm smelling? Nah...couldn't be!]

If the issue is that you disagree with that definition, then that's fine. The discussion's pretty much over if that's the case, though.
Now, for you to assert that culture A is "more moral" than culture K, you'd need a nearsightedness of such a depth and resilience that I'm doubtful I'm prepared to dive into it.
What total, utter rubbish.

There are indicators of wellbeing that you can draw on to make general conclusions about the relative wellbeing of societies. Life expectancy, for one.

The life expectancy in Afghanistan is diabolical. This is an objective fact. It just is. Sorry. Not my fault. You go off on one about the "unique mix of issues" in Afghanistan, as if the historical reasons for Afghanistan's present-day failures have any bearing whatsoever on my argument, which is simply that there are facts that can be known about competing moral systems. Even if every single failure of that society can be excused, accounted for, etc, it is still objectively failing when compared to many other societies' indices of wellbeing. (And, in fairness, there may be indicators in which it scores well. I don't know of any, but I'm not ruling out the possibility.)

And OF COURSE Sweden has its own issues. Everywhere does. Of course they do, for fuck's sake! I'm not claiming otherwise! That doesn't mean that objective data isn't available. And it is just an insult for you to try and make out this is just down to some sort of western imperialist BS on my part.

There was a study done a couple of years back which tried to rank countries by their citizen's wellbeing (I can't remember the measures they used), and Bhutan came 7th - far higher than the UK or the US despite its relative poverty. Most societies probably score well on some indicators, and not so well on others. That is PRECISELY why gathering objective data on these things, with a view to improving the morality of our species, is both possible and worthwhile.
*Sigh* More of the same. [Why am I wasting my time?]http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x17/ ... epalm2.gif

This is all a complete change of topic. The discussion was about morality, systems concerned with "right" and "wrong" in place to reduce harm [this harm being real or imagined, Sweden's fear of male sexuality falling under the latter], and whether it is subjective or objective. How health & life expectancy comes into this, I have no idea. What next? Will you tell me American blacks are objectively less moral than American whites because they don't live as long? :think:
Just know that you come across as not only a dummy that can't tell the difference between objective and subjective, but also a hopeless cultural fascist.


Jesus Christ...for someone that takes such delight in criticising the emotional hysterics of the baboon board you really are sounding like one of them.

Look. Do you HONESTLY think data on, say, life expectancy is subjective? And it is nothing other than "cultural facism" to use that as one of many indicators of wellbeing of a society?


:angry-banghead:
Concerning baboons, their hysterics, threat narratives, and other phenomena: My use of cultural fascism here has little to do with emotion, much to do with your myopia.

I never claimed things like numbers and life expectancies were subjective, you're the one that sprung this shit up at the last minute! :lol: So, yeah, let's not pretend it was ever part of the discussion, or ever in my mind when I went on my [obviously wasted on you] spiel.

Anyways, I think it's clear we're done here. Your apparent attempt to goal shift to *health*, while you should've been trying to show that morality is [or can be] objective, is pretty much a fail.

Good day to you again, xir! :hand:

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5543
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4321

Post by Gumby »

Aneris wrote:
That was awesome. :clap:

While we are it, I have a general question, to Gumby, Ape+Lust, Dick Strawkins, Parody Accountant, Jan Steen and all the others. I just assume you want your work to be spread out, but are you actually okay when your work is featured on a blog (mine for example), of course always with proper credits? Or do you have some reservations (do you want a specific link to one of your pages for example?)
Simple credit is fine for me. Anyone can use my stuff, it's not like it's art or I make money off it or anything.

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4322

Post by Southern »

JackRayner wrote:While the topic of the issues in the Middle East are still warm, here's something I found on BuzzFeed.

http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhance ... 565-35.jpg
If that's true, Middle West's politics must have been programmed by some douchebag with his ass firmly over the Spaggethi School of Coding. Lots and lots of GOTOs and BREAKs and deliberate uses of linked lists.

God I hate my job right now.

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4323

Post by Ape+lust »

So... for the billionth time I saw Rebecca ham-handedly shoehorn ELEVATORGATE into something that had fuck all to do with it. She's a farkin' one-note wonder...

http://i.imgur.com/vYAzn8b.jpg

uberfeminist
.
.
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:12 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4324

Post by uberfeminist »

Guest wrote:
Skep tickle wrote:FWIW, there's now a connection between Mother Jones & atheist-SJW that there didn't used to be - the trio who defected from CFI's radio program.
can you name them for n00bs playing the home game and trying to keep up?
I name some of them here -

http://uberfeminist.blogspot.com/2013/0 ... ssive.html

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4325

Post by Southern »

AndrewV69 wrote:
Southern wrote:Is this "she shouldn't have hugged a guy if she didn't want to hump him" a cultural thing to Andrew69? Down there, it's expected to greet people with a hug (of course, not the same hug you would give to your Significant Other, but a hug nonethless). If a man and a woman are being introduced to each other, it's usual for them to greet each other with a mutual kiss on both cheeks (the facial cheeks, not the butt-checks, of course). No guy, however, would think that the woman was flirting with him (well, maybe if she hugs him and grab his ass...).

Care to clrify, Andrew? I hope you understand that, to most of us, it does seem like a weird proposition.
*shrug*

I doubt that anything I have to say will clarify anything. I think I am so deep into the hole right now the only thing to do is double down and keep digging.
Well, you don't need to clarify anything to me, you know. But now I'm sure you are guilty of raping the lead singer from Paramore, or maybe Avril Lavigne, I can't really tell the difference between those talentless hacks. Which one of those is married to that Canadian fucker, Chad Kroeger?

Gumby
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 5543
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:40 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4326

Post by Gumby »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
rpguest wrote:
Guest lurker wrote:Pit has sure been boring lately: Hugs and whether Trophy has a dick. Sure hope something interesting happens soon...
what are you some kind of hug apologist?
I think we're all spending every free minute working out our wanking arm in preparation for Shermer's next move.
I'm ready.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_MtSzrzv1bGs/S ... angers.jpg

Southern
.
.
Posts: 3464
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:28 pm
Location: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4327

Post by Southern »

AndrewV69 wrote:
Did I mention I frequently wear a kilt?

Just saying.
Pics or it didn't happend.

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4328

Post by Skep tickle »

Guest wrote:
Skep tickle wrote:FWIW, there's now a connection between Mother Jones & atheist-SJW that there didn't used to be - the trio who defected from CFI's radio program.
can you name them for n00bs playing the home game and trying to keep up?
I had just popped in before going to a meeting. Haven't read the Mother Jones article, & now after looking at that Zvan post I'm unclear whether MoJo was applauding, decrying, or taking some other approach to Elevatorgate's use of Storify. (Funny thing, a search of mother jones and storify brings up mother jones' own storifies (or whatever the plural of Storify is)).

So, anyway, this may be completely moot to the MoJo story, but in late 6/2013, Watson announced at Skepchick that "Point of Inquiry Team Resigns, Launches New Show with Mother Jones", source being "a press release written by Chris Mooney, Indre Viskontas, and Adam Isaak", Adam Isaak being (currently? formerly, at least) her boyfriend. The mass resignation was in protest over the whole Ron Lindsay/CFI thing that started at Women in Secularism 2 Conference. (Christina had resigned from any association including talks in protest over the CFI thing, but then later in light of Lindsay's subsequent not-pology she revoked her resignation.)

Did any of that sound at all familiar?

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4329

Post by Skep tickle »

uberfeminist wrote:
Guest wrote:
Skep tickle wrote:FWIW, there's now a connection between Mother Jones & atheist-SJW that there didn't used to be - the trio who defected from CFI's radio program.
can you name them for n00bs playing the home game and trying to keep up?
I name some of them here -

http://uberfeminist.blogspot.com/2013/0 ... ssive.html
Excellent. Way more useful than what I posted (at least for filling in those who didn't catch that bit of history).

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4330

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

Gumby wrote:
ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
Guest lurker wrote:Pit has sure been boring lately: Hugs and whether Trophy has a dick. Sure hope something interesting happens soon...

I think we're all spending every free minute working out our wanking arm in preparation for Shermer's next move.
I'm ready.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_MtSzrzv1bGs/S ... angers.jpg
I'm frothing! Somebody get the children!

http://i.imgur.com/tjbvSAf.jpg

16bitheretic
.
.
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:00 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4331

Post by 16bitheretic »

Pitchguest wrote:I'm sorry, did Stephanie Zvan just dox AmbrosiaX?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... es-missed/

The fuck?

IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT IT'S NOT BAD WHEN THEY DO IT

Aneris
.
.
Posts: 3198
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:36 am
Location: /°\

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4332

Post by Aneris »

Part 2 of the Epic Saga is out...

http://i.imgur.com/SJS99yx.jpg

Stop by, and say hello! :)

Lsuoma
Fascist Tit
Posts: 11692
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 5:58 pm
Location: Punggye-ri

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4333

Post by Lsuoma »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
Gumby wrote:
ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
I think we're all spending every free minute working out our wanking arm in preparation for Shermer's next move.
I'm ready.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_MtSzrzv1bGs/S ... angers.jpg
I'm frothing! Somebody get the children!

http://i.imgur.com/tjbvSAf.jpg
Because everyone knows children can NEVER have enough froth...

free thoughtpolice
.
.
Posts: 11165
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4334

Post by free thoughtpolice »

[/quote][/quote]
Gumby wrote:
Aneris wrote:
That was awesome. :clap:

While we are it, I have a general question, to Gumby, Ape+Lust, Dick Strawkins, Parody Accountant, Jan Steen and all the others. I just assume you want your work to be spread out, but are you actually okay when your work is featured on a blog (mine for example), of course always with proper credits? Or do you have some reservations (do you want a specific link to one of your pages for example?)
Simple credit is fine for me. Anyone can use my stuff, it's not like it's art or I make money off it or anything.
Raging Bee

August 27, 2013 at 7:31 pm (UTC -5)

I’m starting to smell another David Mabus… :idea:

Leave a Reply

Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4335

Post by Pitchguest »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:I'm sorry, did Stephanie Zvan just dox AmbrosiaX?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... es-missed/

The fuck?
I don't get your claim from that post. Seems like Ambrosia doxxed herself first, somewhat, much as Anthony Brownian did (leading to the famous photo of him taking a selfie in a bathroom, with a cat covering his cock).
Not sure, but it could have something to do with this:

Aneris
.
.
Posts: 3198
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:36 am
Location: /°\

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4336

Post by Aneris »

SoylentAtheist wrote:
Badger3k wrote:You got to love the egos - over at FfTB, I mean. Avicenna has a post on about something "big" - all the while tarring everyone here:
I have no clue what Avicenna is talking about. Links from his blog would be nice.

And on a related note, I would like Avicenna to stop accusing the slymepit of running a circus with Wooly Mammoths.
Just reading the fist line and already wondering, is anyone here Richard Sanderson? I know that name from Twitter, but never seen it here.

Guest

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4337

Post by Guest »

Skep tickle wrote:
uberfeminist wrote:
I name some of them here -

http://uberfeminist.blogspot.com/2013/0 ... ssive.html
Excellent. Way more useful than what I posted (at least for filling in those who didn't catch that bit of history).
Thank you both.

Chris Looney, oh yeah, has an annual feature where he publishes yet another article proving republican brains are smaller than democratic brains. Science!

JackRayner
.
.
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:27 am
Location: In the basement of the University of Minnesota Morris
Contact:

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4338

Post by JackRayner »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:I'm sorry, did Stephanie Zvan just dox AmbrosiaX?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... es-missed/

The fuck?
I don't get your claim from that post. Seems like Ambrosia doxxed herself first, somewhat, much as Anthony Brownian did (leading to the famous photo of him taking a selfie in a bathroom, with a cat covering his cock).
Yyyyyeah... Sorry, but a bit of a self-doxxing is what this is looking like to me... :?

Like, maybe it's just me, but I don't see the point of using a pseudo-pseudonym if I'm just going to be telling people my True Name upon request...

Ape+lust
Pit Art Master
Pit Art Master
Posts: 7364
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4339

Post by Ape+lust »

[quote="free thoughtpolice"
Aneris wrote:
That was awesome. :clap:

While we are it, I have a general question, to Gumby, Ape+Lust, Dick Strawkins, Parody Accountant, Jan Steen and all the others. I just assume you want your work to be spread out, but are you actually okay when your work is featured on a blog (mine for example), of course always with proper credits? Or do you have some reservations (do you want a specific link to one of your pages for example?)
I reserve no claim to anything I post here. Anyone is free to repost, repurpose, recolor, cut up, recaption, whatever they like.

Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4340

Post by Pitchguest »

Aneris wrote:
SoylentAtheist wrote:
Badger3k wrote:You got to love the egos - over at FfTB, I mean. Avicenna has a post on about something "big" - all the while tarring everyone here:
I have no clue what Avicenna is talking about. Links from his blog would be nice.

And on a related note, I would like Avicenna to stop accusing the slymepit of running a circus with Wooly Mammoths.
Just reading the fist line and already wondering, is anyone here Richard Sanderson? I know that name from Twitter, but never seen it here.
No, that's the thing. He's supportive of the Slymepit, but he has never actually posted here. Not once. But according to their logic, if you read it, you're a member. Which would make many of us honorary FtBers, and many FtBers honorary Slymepitters. It's a viscious circle. Or viscous, depending on how much you froth.

Aneris
.
.
Posts: 3198
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:36 am
Location: /°\

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4341

Post by Aneris »

Ape+lust wrote:[quote="free thoughtpolice"
Aneris wrote:
That was awesome. :clap:

While we are it, I have a general question, to Gumby, Ape+Lust, Dick Strawkins, Parody Accountant, Jan Steen and all the others. I just assume you want your work to be spread out, but are you actually okay when your work is featured on a blog (mine for example), of course always with proper credits? Or do you have some reservations (do you want a specific link to one of your pages for example?)
I reserve no claim to anything I post here. Anyone is free to repost, repurpose, recolor, cut up, recaption, whatever they like.
That's very cool, perhaps we agree on the discordian Copyleft All Rights Reversed then. I was also wondering what others might do with an empty template of Pharyngulanas etc. (Pharyangulanas - Extended Universe / non-canon) or something, to distinguish it from the "official storyline". :)

Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4342

Post by Pitchguest »

Ape+lust wrote:[quote="free thoughtpolice"
Aneris wrote:
That was awesome. :clap:

While we are it, I have a general question, to Gumby, Ape+Lust, Dick Strawkins, Parody Accountant, Jan Steen and all the others. I just assume you want your work to be spread out, but are you actually okay when your work is featured on a blog (mine for example), of course always with proper credits? Or do you have some reservations (do you want a specific link to one of your pages for example?)
I reserve no claim to anything I post here. Anyone is free to repost, repurpose, recolor, cut up, recaption, whatever they like.
Unless they patent it, and package it, slap it on a plastic lunchbox and then *bang table* selling it, *bang* selling it.

Cunning Punt
.
.
Posts: 1335
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:50 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4343

Post by Cunning Punt »

Scented Nectar wrote: I vote for the subtle one, but that might partly be because the first guy looks like his parts must be uncomfortable in those tights. If this poll had a write in category, I'd have voted for loose jogging pants with no underwear.
There's the difference between men and women for you right there. What guy is going to say, "I was going to go for the first pair of tits, but that woman looks uncomfortable in those pasties."

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4344

Post by Skep tickle »

Linus wrote:
Skep tickle wrote:
VAXherd wrote:Regarding the Ashley Paramore (Heathy Addict) Conference Assault. RazorBladeKandy has just posted a walk through of her video from an MRA perspective. I think it's perceptive and fair (if a bit long).

The commenters pointed out an older video by DarkMatter2525 that might illustrate the context of the event. It's a pack of the YouTube Atheists at a conference (all drunk), possibly including the principals.

[ youtube ] qesM2_z6QBE [ /youtube ]

[ youtube ] b6usE1yy5xU [ /youtube ]
Thanks for posting those. RBK's perspective (showing what Jim Bob's perspective might have been) was interesting & could have been spot-on. I thought his analysis went downhill near the end; he could have just stopped with "miscommunication" & the bit about reporting vs not reporting. (Can't wait till Zvan sees RBK's video & decides to take it apart line by line.)

I didn't make it all the way through the 2nd video, but it gives a sense of the background they might have developed in prior interactions; who knows, maybe Jim Bob left TAM 2011 with a sense of promise about future meetings that @healthyaddict hadn't intended to leave him with.
I can't relate to any of the Paramore bashing at all. She gave a detailed account of an actual sexual assault. She did not attempt to publicly shame anyone. She did not bash TAM (much the opposite in fact). She wasn't vindictive or malicious at all. Her point was merely that sexual harassment/sexual assault does happen at conferences/conference parties. Did she handle the situation with Jimbob optimally? No. But so what? Many of us handle awkward situations poorly and realize it in retrospect. That kinda has fuckall to do with anything.

I had to tap out of this video when RBK kept describing a hug as "pressing her soft breasts against him".
(Delayed response due to work)

I gritted my teeth at that part ("pressing soft breasts against him"), but I kept watching. Turns out, RBK acknowledges that some people will feel he's gone too far with that, however he chose those words on purpose in an attempt to show how Jim Bob might have experienced the encounter (the first 2/3, anyway), to show how there might have been significant but mutual miscommunication.

AP has told her side, including (as RBK points out) quite a bit about what she was thinking & feeling at the time, but it seems that the message she was conveying may have been less clear than she intended.

(As I think someone mentioned w/in the past 2 pages or so, at least one other person has said he/she was in the same room and would have been happy to help AP but apparently thought AP & JB were engaging in a mutually agreeable encounter - or at least had no idea she didn't want JB to do what he was doing.)

Not that any of that excuses a hand up the skirt to the privates without consent. But there's a shred of possibility that JB experienced the encounter in a very different way than AP and thought he was getting an invitation - or at least that his forays were not unwelcome. I'm glad she didn't name him publicly, but also note that we have not heard his side of the story. Note that if there turned out to be a significant mismatch between their experiences, recollections, & assumptions, it would not be the first time such a discrepancy had ever happened.

*ready to be pelted with ripe tomatoes*

didymos
.
.
Posts: 1458
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 6:59 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4345

Post by didymos »

Pitchguest wrote:I'm sorry, did Stephanie Zvan just dox AmbrosiaX?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... es-missed/

The fuck?
AmbrosiaX outed herself last year:
Of course, Steffy spreading it around like this is basically the same as one of the things they complain about Elevatorgate doing: bringing unwanted attention to people.

welch
.
.
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:05 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4346

Post by welch »

ConcentratedH2O, OM wrote:
Badger3k wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:Forgot to link to the other post where I address Avicenna directly. Here it is:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/amilliongod ... ent-131925
So, the original allegation (or report) of false rape was done by Avicenna himself?

I saw someone point out that 4 people related to FtB have been accused of rape (falsely). If we went with that insane 4% figure dropped by one commenter, doesn't that make the probability of all four being falsely accused as .04^4? I'm not good at statistics, but that seems to be the way that I've seen it done. One person .04, two people is .016, etc. Awfully small numbers for 4 bloggers related to one network. Who's lying?

(I did like the dig at Oolon's liking for kiddy porn)

For fuck's sake. Is that now THREE of the FfTB men who have had false rape claims made against them? How many more are going to slither out of the closet and admit they have, too. The place is a fucking den of falsely-accused non-rapists, plus a regular commenter who admitted downloading child porn, and yet they pull that Shermer shit publically, instead of through the legal system?

Cunts, cunts, cunts.
At this point, I think you need pivot tables to keep track of the FTB idiocy

Skep tickle
.
.
Posts: 5357
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:04 am

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4347

Post by Skep tickle »

Dick Strawkins wrote:There's another 'best-of-the-slymepit' on youtube - this time by skepsheik.

[ youtube ] UcPKmEpqfhc [ /youtube ]
:clap: :clap: (especially love the song Skepsheik used, lol)
Gefan wrote: ... [ youtube ] 2J2jK3QdVzQ [ /youtube ] ...
:clap: :clap: (oh ho ho, the Rolex & Popehat)

Pitchguest
.
.
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4348

Post by Pitchguest »

didymos wrote:
Pitchguest wrote:I'm sorry, did Stephanie Zvan just dox AmbrosiaX?

http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamo ... es-missed/

The fuck?
AmbrosiaX outed herself last year:
Of course, Steffy spreading it around like this is basically the same as one of the things they complain about Elevatorgate doing: bringing unwanted attention to people.
Ah. Then I stand corrected.

SoylentAtheist

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4349

Post by SoylentAtheist »

Pitchguest wrote:Ah. Then I stand corrected.
You'll never make it at FtB.

ConcentratedH2O, OM
.
.
Posts: 6555
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Bleeding from the Bunghole

#4350

Post by ConcentratedH2O, OM »

Ape+lust wrote:[quote="free thoughtpolice"
Aneris wrote:
That was awesome. :clap:

While we are it, I have a general question, to Gumby, Ape+Lust, Dick Strawkins, Parody Accountant, Jan Steen and all the others. I just assume you want your work to be spread out, but are you actually okay when your work is featured on a blog (mine for example), of course always with proper credits? Or do you have some reservations (do you want a specific link to one of your pages for example?)
I reserve no claim to anything I post here. Anyone is free to repost, repurpose, recolor, cut up, recaption, whatever they like.
You're a gentleman.

Are you a gentleman?

Locked