Ophelia posted on my Facebook page - angry about live show
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:09 pm
Ophelia recently posted on my Facebook page (http://www.facebook.com/justinvacula/po ... re_comment) following the livestream/live podcast episode (http://www.justinvacula.com/2012/07/wom ... ssion.html) I had in which I -- with special guest Karla Porter in-studio -- discussed -- among other things -- sexual harassment, specific comments from bloggers/speakers/whatever (Watson, Zvan, Surly Amy, Benson, 'Lousy Canuck,' and more), and harassment policies.
Here is the photo album (screenshots):
Here's the discussion as a word document in Scribd:
Here are the comments from Ophelia:
Her first comment on the Facebook thread linking the podcast:
Very dishonest. You read a tiny fraction of one of the emails I got and then said "does that sound like a threat to you?" Well of course that one fraction doesn't! But the whole exchange is a different thing, *especially the last two paragraphs*. You're disgraceful.
Second:
Bullshit. It's dishonest to read a tiny fraction that is obviously not threatening or doubtful by itself and then say "Does that sound like a threat to you?" DISHONEST. Bad practice. Unethical.
Third:
Not too careful with the truth, you two, are you.
Fourth: (in response to me saying that we're not going to spend 20 minutes of the show on her letter)
If you don't have time to talk about it honestly THEN DON'T TALK ABOUT IT. Jeezis. You don't get a pass to distort things because of time constraints. You don't get to lie about me because you're in a hurry.
Fifth: (in response to my invitation for her to come on a future show to have a discussion with me and Karla.
Don't be ridiculous. You're a hack pursuing a vendetta; I'm not going near your poxy "show."
Sixth:
And you two misrepresented me. End of story? Sure. You're dishonest hacks. End of story.
Seventh:
Again, you're being ridiculous. I told you: you misrepresented what was in those emails. That is dishonest. It's very simple.
Here is the photo album (screenshots):
Here's the discussion as a word document in Scribd:
Here are the comments from Ophelia:
Her first comment on the Facebook thread linking the podcast:
Very dishonest. You read a tiny fraction of one of the emails I got and then said "does that sound like a threat to you?" Well of course that one fraction doesn't! But the whole exchange is a different thing, *especially the last two paragraphs*. You're disgraceful.
Second:
Bullshit. It's dishonest to read a tiny fraction that is obviously not threatening or doubtful by itself and then say "Does that sound like a threat to you?" DISHONEST. Bad practice. Unethical.
Third:
Not too careful with the truth, you two, are you.
Fourth: (in response to me saying that we're not going to spend 20 minutes of the show on her letter)
If you don't have time to talk about it honestly THEN DON'T TALK ABOUT IT. Jeezis. You don't get a pass to distort things because of time constraints. You don't get to lie about me because you're in a hurry.
Fifth: (in response to my invitation for her to come on a future show to have a discussion with me and Karla.
Don't be ridiculous. You're a hack pursuing a vendetta; I'm not going near your poxy "show."
Sixth:
And you two misrepresented me. End of story? Sure. You're dishonest hacks. End of story.
Seventh:
Again, you're being ridiculous. I told you: you misrepresented what was in those emails. That is dishonest. It's very simple.