You is all a bunch of poofs!

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.

BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are OFF

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: You is all a bunch of poofs!

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8341

by Service Dog » Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:19 pm

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: Which of the assertions in Dog's link are false, and which of Solomon's citations are 'jokes'?
free thoughtpolice wrote:
Solomon uncritically parrots Shokin a proven crook and liar:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 47001.html
My understanding is that the corruption investigation against Shokin was dropped & his seized property was returned. I buy that Shokin wasn't an angel-- at minimum he was about-as-corrupt as, say, Diane Feinstein during the Kavanaugh confirmation hearing. On the other hand-- Shokin survived an assassination attempt: 3 bullets in his office window. So the anti-Shokin forces aren't bastions of purity, either. So where's the proof of Shokin's corruption? As far as I can tell, the corruption claims against him stopped-- when he retired & stopped investigating Burisma.

The source which the Independent relies-on in their anti-Shokin article-- "faced a corruption investigation himself."
Does that mean the Independent "uncritically parrots ... a proven crook and liar" too?
free thoughtpolice wrote: Also:
Shokin claimed in May 2019 that he had been investigating Burisma Holdings.[13][34][35] However, Vitaly Kasko, who had been Shokin's deputy overseeing international cooperation before resigning in February 2016 citing corruption in the office, provided documents to Bloomberg News indicating that under Shokin, the investigation into Burisma had been dormant.[36][37] Also, the investigation into Burisma only pertained to events happening before Hunter Biden joined the company.[38]
Clearly Burisma didn't consider Shokin's investigation to be dormant: as soon as Shokin was removed/ Burisma arranged to meet Shokin's successor, lobbying for the investigation to Become Dormant.

And-- who cares if the investigation "only pertained to events happening before Hunter Biden joined the company" ? If Burisma did corrupt shit-- and afterward hired Hunter Biden to use his influence to get Burisma out-of-trouble... that's still bad & reflects poorly on Biden.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8340

by KiwiInOz » Wed Nov 20, 2019 10:41 pm

Brive1987 wrote: https://i.imgur.com/Xm3pPXx.jpg

Sydney is fucked again now approaching 40%. Once more we are back to having to use buckets to water gardens and only before 10:00am.

Between 1998 and 2019 the population increased by over 2 million people. Mostly via immigration. On the driest continent on earth. Rocket science in action.

From 2006 - “In 1998 Sydney was predicted to reach between 4.7 and 6.2 million by the middle of this century. It is currently around 5.1 million and will reach the higher forecast within a decade, 23 years early.”
https://mccrindle.com.au/insights/bloga ... opulation/
Sending you thoughts and prayers, Brive.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8339

by Brive1987 » Wed Nov 20, 2019 9:28 pm

I wonder if America has this level of creepy shit going on in schools, conference halls, sports fields and boardrooms

‪Australia’s Xinjiang re-education camps ....‬

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8338

by Brive1987 » Wed Nov 20, 2019 9:05 pm

https://i.imgur.com/Xm3pPXx.jpg

Sydney is fucked again now approaching 40%. Once more we are back to having to use buckets to water gardens and only before 10:00am.

Between 1998 and 2019 the population increased by over 2 million people. Mostly via immigration. On the driest continent on earth. Rocket science in action.

From 2006 - “In 1998 Sydney was predicted to reach between 4.7 and 6.2 million by the middle of this century. It is currently around 5.1 million and will reach the higher forecast within a decade, 23 years early.”
https://mccrindle.com.au/insights/bloga ... opulation/

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8337

by screwtape » Wed Nov 20, 2019 1:13 pm

And now Prince Andrew has fulfilled all of the potential he ever seemed to have. Someone really ought to tell him that adrenaline makes you sweat, and doesn't prevent it, never mind the fact it's bloodstream half-life is 2 minutes, and any from the Falklands in 1982 would probably be gone by Epstein time in 1999. The only conceivable connection I can think of would be if he was treated for PTSD with an alpha-blocker like prazosin, but that wasn't even postulated as a possible treatment until 2003. My view is that he should take the black and join the Night's Watch.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8336

by free thoughtpolice » Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:34 pm

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote:
Service Dog wrote: Well-sourced independent journalism, addressing misinformation about Ukraine/Biden/Trump/Impeachment...

https://johnsolomonreports.com/debunkin ... erference/

My favorite part-- is Ukraine opening a corruption investigation into the company Hunter Biden worked-for, 3 months before Trump is accused of bribing the Ukrainian president into opening a corruption investigation into the company Hunter Biden worked-for. :think:
John Solomon is a conspiracy theorist/ propagandeer that was fairly recently fired from The Hill. He has been thoroughly debunked on many of his stories over and over.

His sources are a joke. Talk about MSM fake news. This guy isw a fiction writer.
Which of the assertions in Dog's link are false, and which of Solomon's citations are 'jokes'?
In fact, Shokin told me in an interview he was making plans to interview Burisma board members, including Hunter Biden, at the time he was fired. And it was publicly reported that in February 2016, a month before Shokin was fired, that Ukrainian prosecutors raided one of Zlochevsky’s homes and seized expensive items like a luxury car as part of the corruption probe. You can read a contemporaneous news report about the seizure here.
Solomon uncritically parrots Shokin a proven crook and liar:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 47001.html

Also:
Shokin claimed in May 2019 that he had been investigating Burisma Holdings.[13][34][35] However, Vitaly Kasko, who had been Shokin's deputy overseeing international cooperation before resigning in February 2016 citing corruption in the office, provided documents to Bloomberg News indicating that under Shokin, the investigation into Burisma had been dormant.[36][37] Also, the investigation into Burisma only pertained to events happening before Hunter Biden joined the company.[38]
If you want another source:
https://www.rferl.org/a/why-was-ukraine ... 81445.html
Shokin made the claim he wanted to reopen the investigation on Burisma in an a statement intended to help Dymitro Firtash with his legal problems.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dmytro_Firtash

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8335

by Matt Cavanaugh » Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:34 am

free thoughtpolice wrote:
Service Dog wrote: Well-sourced independent journalism, addressing misinformation about Ukraine/Biden/Trump/Impeachment...

https://johnsolomonreports.com/debunkin ... erference/

My favorite part-- is Ukraine opening a corruption investigation into the company Hunter Biden worked-for, 3 months before Trump is accused of bribing the Ukrainian president into opening a corruption investigation into the company Hunter Biden worked-for. :think:
John Solomon is a conspiracy theorist/ propagandeer that was fairly recently fired from The Hill. He has been thoroughly debunked on many of his stories over and over.

His sources are a joke. Talk about MSM fake news. This guy isw a fiction writer.
Which of the assertions in Dog's link are false, and which of Solomon's citations are 'jokes'?

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8334

by free thoughtpolice » Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:18 am

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8333

by free thoughtpolice » Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:11 am

Rudy Giuliani used to quote Lutsenko before he changed his story, then decided Lutsenko was a dem operative. Lutsenko's later statement directly contradicted many of the biggest claims Solomon made.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump- ... g-n1060941
Another Solomon source is the now indicted Lev Parnas, who shares lawyers with Solomon (the crackpot husband and wife team of DiGenova and Toensing).
This stuff about how both sides lie is ridiculous. Whatever mistakes or bias in MSM is nothing compared to absolute BS Solomon has been slinging. It's like saying Hitler was an exact equivalent to Churchill because both men did bad things. I've followed Solomon's "opinion pieces" on the Hill for some time before he got his lying ass fired. He is about as much of a journalist as Alex Jones. The publisher of the Hill, Finkleman , a long time friend of Trump, hired Solomon to get some more "conservative" audience. Solomon's pieces went from"fact" pieces to opinion on the publication and eventually his writing was so badly discredited they gave him the boot.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8332

by ThreeFlangedJavis » Wed Nov 20, 2019 10:31 am

free thoughtpolice wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 9:29 am
Service Dog wrote: Well-sourced independent journalism, addressing misinformation about Ukraine/Biden/Trump/Impeachment...

https://johnsolomonreports.com/debunkin ... erference/

My favorite part-- is Ukraine opening a corruption investigation into the company Hunter Biden worked-for, 3 months before Trump is accused of bribing the Ukrainian president into opening a corruption investigation into the company Hunter Biden worked-for. :think:
John Solomon is a conspiracy theorist/ propagandeer that was fairly recently fired from The Hill. He has been thoroughly debunked on many of his stories over and over.
https://www.mediamatters.org/martha-mac ... ovanovitch
https://www.justsecurity.org/66962/a-do ... n-solomon/
His sources are a joke. Talk about MSM fake news. This guy isw a fiction writer.
Well, whoever is right that story about Lutsenko's denial does not really contradict Solomon as far as I can see. Aside from the fact that it is rather confusing, it is the reported denial which Solomon was referring to, the one which he claims Lutsenko subsequently told him resulted from a misunderstanding. I wouldn't trust Mediamatters as far as I could throw them. They're a Democrat media machine masquerading as a public service. I don't see any proof that Solomon is a fiction writer, only a fuzzy story which leads the reader to insert things between the lines. Both factions in this farce are prone to producing deliberately confusing stories missing out inconvenient facts or allegations. There's a lot of slimey reporting which frames things in a way that leads people to conclude what is not said.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8331

by free thoughtpolice » Wed Nov 20, 2019 9:29 am

Service Dog wrote: Well-sourced independent journalism, addressing misinformation about Ukraine/Biden/Trump/Impeachment...

https://johnsolomonreports.com/debunkin ... erference/

My favorite part-- is Ukraine opening a corruption investigation into the company Hunter Biden worked-for, 3 months before Trump is accused of bribing the Ukrainian president into opening a corruption investigation into the company Hunter Biden worked-for. :think:
John Solomon is a conspiracy theorist/ propagandeer that was fairly recently fired from The Hill. He has been thoroughly debunked on many of his stories over and over.
https://www.mediamatters.org/martha-mac ... ovanovitch
https://www.justsecurity.org/66962/a-do ... n-solomon/
His sources are a joke. Talk about MSM fake news. This guy isw a fiction writer.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8330

by ThreeFlangedJavis » Wed Nov 20, 2019 9:14 am

Service Dog wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:04 am
Well-sourced independent journalism, addressing misinformation about Ukraine/Biden/Trump/Impeachment...

https://johnsolomonreports.com/debunkin ... erference/

My favorite part-- is Ukraine opening a corruption investigation into the company Hunter Biden worked-for, 3 months before Trump is accused of bribing the Ukrainian president into opening a corruption investigation into the company Hunter Biden worked-for. :think:
That's information that probably won't be widely heard because Schiffty Bugeyes is gatekeeping the fuck out of the hearings and the MSM will ramp up their characterisation of Solomon as a partisan hack if he makes any headway. If Fox had any sense they would stick to amplifying those points instead of their current tactic which seems to revolve around ridiculing the Democrats and mixing the actual pertinent facts in with obfuscatory propaganda. They are actually helping the Democrats to bury the facts.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8329

by Service Dog » Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:46 am

I was reading about the various candidates' campaign theme songs.
I'd love to hear your suggestions. These are mine...

Tulsi — Back in the USSR

Kamala — Bad Boys/ Theme from COPS

Trump — Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap - AC/DC (he has actually used Sympathy for the Devil at his rallies!)

Buttigieg — ~muzak~

Yang — Give It Away Now — Chili Peppers

Biden — that Midnight Oil song he plagiarized lyrics from… no, wait… Carry On My Wayward Son !!!

Mayor DiBlasio — Rudy Can’t Fail — The Clash (That’s on his actual playlist! Insane.)

Bloomberg — It’s Too Late, Baby — Carole King

Cory Booker — Mr. Potato Head jingle https://tinyurl.com/vruz67v

Bernie — The Communist L’Internationale

Marianne — MoonAge Daydream — Bowie

Warren — Running Bear and Little White Dove https://tinyurl.com/ss37gem

Beto — Pretty Fly (for a white guy)

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8328

by Service Dog » Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:04 am

Well-sourced independent journalism, addressing misinformation about Ukraine/Biden/Trump/Impeachment...

https://johnsolomonreports.com/debunkin ... erference/

My favorite part-- is Ukraine opening a corruption investigation into the company Hunter Biden worked-for, 3 months before Trump is accused of bribing the Ukrainian president into opening a corruption investigation into the company Hunter Biden worked-for. :think:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8327

by BoxNDox » Tue Nov 19, 2019 6:04 pm

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8326

by Brive1987 » Tue Nov 19, 2019 3:26 am

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Brive1987 wrote: I still dispute the criticism that my self selected paper on the 1920s and 30s politics of ‘Fortress Singapore’ and the Subsequent destruction of Force-Z did not address “a naval campaign”.
WTF? Did they confuse Force-Z with the X-Men? My submission for that one -- Lepanto: Or, Didn't we kick these goatfuckers out of Europe once already?

I still chafe at the criticism levied at my paper culminating my self-directed study on the 750 year history of Berlin. With so much ground to cover, I chose four seminal periods: early expansion under the Größer Kurfürst; blossoming of art, music, and architecture end of 18th century [Kaspar David Friedrich, Quantz, ETA Hoffmann, Knobelsdorff, et al.]; industrialization and incorporation of the late 19th-early 20th century; occupation and partition, 1945 -48. The reviewer: "From reading this paper, one would never know that the SPD held a majority in the Prussian parliament for many decades." My reply was: 1) The subject was the ethnographic, geographic, cultural history of one city, not the machinations of national political parties, 2) who held a majority in the largely powerless Prussian fucking Landtag had no bearing on my chosen topics; 3) there weren't even any fucking socialists in 1600's Brandenburg; 4) 750 years / 20 pages = I dunno a shitload of years per page, so something had to get cut; 5) if you've detected any errors or omissions relevant to my chosen topics, please indicate them, otherwise accept the goddamn paper as is and as previously green-lit.

I was too young and naive at the time to realize that academia had already been overrun by pinko commie bedwetters.
Maybe I triggered him?

https://i.imgur.com/cUVzn7m.jpg

Really, I think he was just being a prick. We were meant to confirm our topic but I was too busy enjoying the rich cultural diversity in Switzerland. So I self approved and pushed on.

You really can’t win with the bastards. In my Last research piece, for the literature review, I had a whole section explaining why the current historiography of the Gallipoli landing was full of holes, generalisation and assumptions based on confused chronology. Ie I established a gaping hole which I would then fill.

I was gently reminded by my supervisor to remember my lowly place in the scheme of things. So I replaced the chapter with a respectful vanilla overview of competing theories ... and received a final comment complaining I needed to “engage more and list less”.

:bjarte:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8325

by Matt Cavanaugh » Mon Nov 18, 2019 10:45 pm

Brive1987 wrote: I still dispute the criticism that my self selected paper on the 1920s and 30s politics of ‘Fortress Singapore’ and the Subsequent destruction of Force-Z did not address “a naval campaign”.
WTF? Did they confuse Force-Z with the X-Men? My submission for that one -- Lepanto: Or, Didn't we kick these goatfuckers out of Europe once already?

I still chafe at the criticism levied at my paper culminating my self-directed study on the 750 year history of Berlin. With so much ground to cover, I chose four seminal periods: early expansion under the Größer Kurfürst; blossoming of art, music, and architecture end of 18th century [Kaspar David Friedrich, Quantz, ETA Hoffmann, Knobelsdorff, et al.]; industrialization and incorporation of the late 19th-early 20th century; occupation and partition, 1945 -48. The reviewer: "From reading this paper, one would never know that the SPD held a majority in the Prussian parliament for many decades." My reply was: 1) The subject was the ethnographic, geographic, cultural history of one city, not the machinations of national political parties, 2) who held a majority in the largely powerless Prussian fucking Landtag had no bearing on my chosen topics; 3) there weren't even any fucking socialists in 1600's Brandenburg; 4) 750 years / 20 pages = I dunno a shitload of years per page, so something had to get cut; 5) if you've detected any errors or omissions relevant to my chosen topics, please indicate them, otherwise accept the goddamn paper as is and as previously green-lit.

I was too young and naive at the time to realize that academia had already been overrun by pinko commie bedwetters.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8324

by Brive1987 » Mon Nov 18, 2019 7:41 pm

Well for four years I have waged attrition warfare on my Masters in Military History. One subject per semester juggled with stressful “real” work and the responsibilities of father and husband.

Done. Bagged. Tagged.

I managed to get a High-Distinction for my year long research piece. But alas, in general just fell below the mark, and so achieved an overall strong ‘Distinction’ for the course. I never recovered from a “credit” in naval strategy incurred during a semester marked by an extended overseas holiday. I still dispute the criticism that my self selected paper on the 1920s and 30s politics of ‘Fortress Singapore’ and the Subsequent destruction of Force-Z did not address “a naval campaign”.

Meh.

Now, finally, for a PhD. :?

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8323

by Service Dog » Mon Nov 18, 2019 7:01 pm

1h2m At the request of a viewer, Silverman recounts spitting in Beth Presswood's mouth.

It's jumbled & annoying & the two guys interviewing him are also bumbling molemen with delusions of adequacy... (now might be a good time to say that my obsessive notes on this video are NOT meant as my endorsement that this is interesting or new or worth listening to... it's lame. Buuut... )

I think, in a previous youtube interview, in telling this same story-- Silverman may have inadvertently told the tale-- so that it can be construed as a clear violation of consent. He claimed: he spit in Dillahunty's wife's mouth... then she said 'no' to him doing it again. Then he told her 'no' wouldn't make him stop... only the safeword 'red' would make him stop. <---That version makes it seem like the first time he spit in her mouth-- was without consent.

So, here he is, re-telling the story... but this time he emphasizes the word "remember": As in 'saying no won't make me stop. Remember?! the safe word is "red". Telling it this-way-- insinuates that there was some previous conversation establishing the safeword. Hence: previous consent.

Fuck, I don't know what happened. But I know this sounds like someone trying to cover his bases by invoking magic exculpatory words... rather than the harder task of questioning the entire notion that such magic exculpatory words were every actually required to establish consent. Silverman is playing along with the kinky-bdsm-SJW framing of 'asking for consent', and arguing that he didn't break the magic SJW sexword 'laws'. Rather than base his defense on not breaking the normal actual laws of the land-- as well as the normal social norms of normal adults.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8322

by Service Dog » Mon Nov 18, 2019 5:49 pm

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Service Dog wrote: Is he a total liar & actual rapist? Or a falsely-accused victim....
Rose St. Clair, of her own free will, choose to take Silverman's poxy pud in all three holes, in exchange for the possibility of a job offer. So, not a rapist, but a major league skeez and unethical piece of shit who abused his position of power nonetheless. And a serial liar, stunningly unaware of how obviously bullshit his lies are, to boot.
According to Silverman, they didn't have a condom, so he went straight to her butthole.
https://media.giphy.com/media/l4pTd67hg ... /giphy.gif

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8321

by Matt Cavanaugh » Mon Nov 18, 2019 5:45 pm

BoxNDox wrote: Any time you think Hollyweird couldn't get any weirder, it does.
No kidding.
From Hollywood Reporter:
GLAAD, Microsoft Collaborate on Major Playable Transgender Game Character


Brianna Wu must be :mrgreen: with envy

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8320

by Driftless » Mon Nov 18, 2019 5:42 pm

Aneris makes an appearance over at WEIT to eviscerate Sorrell-Till on whether or not there is such a thing as an SJW:

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... -i-hate-5/

In the same comments section the consensus seems to be that "OK Boomer" is ageist and therefore bad (presumably since most commenters are boomers), but "OK Trumper" is funny.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8319

by BoxNDox » Mon Nov 18, 2019 4:03 pm

Keating wrote:
This was true? I thought it was parody.
Hard to believe, but here it is in Variety:

https://variety.com/2019/film/news/nico ... 203406776/

And Hollywood Reporter:

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat- ... nt-1254626

Any time you think Hollyweird couldn't get any weirder, it does.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8318

by Keating » Mon Nov 18, 2019 3:01 pm

This was true? I thought it was parody.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8317

by Matt Cavanaugh » Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:53 pm

Service Dog wrote: Is he a total liar & actual rapist? Or a falsely-accused victim....
Rose St. Clair, of her own free will, choose to take Silverman's poxy pud in all three holes, in exchange for the possibility of a job offer. So, not a rapist, but a major league skeez and unethical piece of shit who abused his position of power nonetheless. And a serial liar, stunningly unaware of how obviously bullshit his lies are, to boot.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8316

by Service Dog » Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:53 am

And why on Earth did he pour himself a drink while his honesty about drinking is being questioned?!!

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8315

by Service Dog » Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:52 am

37m44s Silverman is being pressed on how he has characterized sexual consent... he manages to defend himself from the insinuation that he's engaging in "rape apologetics", but he doesn't defend himself With Ease... he struggles, gets a little huffy... he kinda 'seems' guilty.

At 37m57s-- the host realizes he gave-out the wrong email address... resulting in disproportionately-boisterous laughter. Sure-- it's an understandable release of tension in an awkward moment... but, again, it reads as "fake". And feels inappropriate to shift from serious accusations to ho!ho!ho!

Why is Silverman even doing this, again? I think he has little to gain from a strong performance, and much to lose.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8314

by Service Dog » Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:33 am

Silverman:

34m "I had one drink." Earlier in the video-- Silverman denied drinking during his day with Rose St. Clair, but-- after the slightest bit of pushback-- allowed that maybe he had one drink. At first he denied the place where they met was a bar. Then he conceded it was a 'sports bar'. Later he slips & says "in the bar"... then catches himself, finishing his phrase... "bar restaurant".

Is he a total liar & actual rapist? Or a falsely-accused victim... who is so desperate to clear his name, that he's padding his defense with false details?

Either way: self-sabotaging idiot.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8313

by Service Dog » Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:25 am

Service Dog wrote: Silverman
21m27s Silverman goes to his closet & shows-off his bulletproof vest, to prove he has faced real death threats. Silverman sez that tweeting "I hope you choke on a chicken bone" isn't a real death threat... a real death threat is "I'm going to shoot you onstage tonight". Fair enough. He gets self-righteous and puffs at the camera "Don't claim you've received death threats if you haven't!" Ok, buuuut... at about 17 minutes... Silverman talks about his new job at a global atheist organization. Silverman describes the real threats faced by atheists worldwide. Namely, Silverman mentions Uganda's death penalty for gay sex. Silverman sez being an atheist is Even Worse than being gay in Uganda-- because there's a law sentencing gays to death in Uganda... but there's Isn't Even A Law sentencing Atheists to death there... they don't need a law! If you say you're an atheist in Uganda... an impromptu mob will for-sure deal with you. How terrible! Unless it's not true. In which case-- what was it Silverman said about how you shouldn't falsely claim death threats? Here's time magazine, reporting on a monthly public debate event in Uganda-- promoting Atheism. http://content.time.com/time/world/arti ... 16,00.html Here's Silverman's own employer, telling a less-exaggerated tale: https://www.atheistalliance.org/campaig ... in-uganda/

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8312

by ThreeFlangedJavis » Mon Nov 18, 2019 10:58 am

A question for the physicists. This guy is clearly mentally ill. What I'm not sure of is whether his physics babble is at all coherent. Is it? It sounds to me as if he is just mumbling rubbish. "Magnetism isn't a force, dielectric acceleration is increasing inertia and acceleration. Its not force i.e. force in motion" is a typical statement. Much like creationists and climate "skeptics", the certainty with which the fanboys regard established science as fraudulent seems proportional to their own ignorance.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8311

by Service Dog » Mon Nov 18, 2019 9:49 am

MarcusAu wrote: ...is this what the atheist 'community' has come to?...
I'm a connoisseur of cringe & Dave Silverman is a master chef. So I started watching the 2 hour version of that youtube video:


6m25s Silverman tells a story about appearing on The O’Reilly Factor & realizing Bill O’Reilly’s public persona was a ’fictional character’. According to Silverman, Bill O’Reilly is an “intelligent, rational man” playing-dumb on TV.

Silverman is entirely oblivious of the irony— that Silverman’s own moralizing public persona was revealed to be a fictional character.
In Silverman’s case, the “intelligent rational man” was the fake part!

9m35s Silverman on Bill O’Reilly: “I think he actually assaulted women”
(O’Reilly was accused of sexual harassment & verbal abuse. Not sexual assault.)
After all he’s been thru— Silverman is still comfortable with careless false accusations— as long as it’s not male-feminist Silverman being accused.

Silverman doesn't just re-tell his same-old beloved stories/ oblivious that he's no-longer the same-old beloved guy... he also punctuates his stories by re-enacting emotions and reactions to his own tale: as if this is a genuine off-the-cuff first-time conversation... not a well-worn routine. In other words, he's fake.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8310

by Matt Cavanaugh » Mon Nov 18, 2019 8:29 am

screwtape wrote:
Bhurzum wrote: So, what's a "yobbo" then?

Asking for a friend...
A brassy, uncouth, henpecked meathead? ;)
Same as a "boob"?
surgeonsage.jpg
(66.38 KiB) Downloaded 230 times

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8309

by screwtape » Mon Nov 18, 2019 4:10 am

Bhurzum wrote:
screwtape wrote: Trivia time. The last couple of pages have mentioned Winged Victory and it's obscure WW1 slang, and, separately, oikophobia. I remembered today that the ack-emmas (air mechanics) were referred to as oiks. Volume X of the OED tells me that oik or oick, a contraction of oickman, was first recorded in a dictionary of slang in 1925 ('a member of a rival school, a labourer, a clot'). Sadly, oikophobia does not designate the vanishingly rare irrational fear or loathing of air mechanics. Shame, really.
So, what's a "yobbo" then?

Asking for a friend...
A brassy, uncouth, henpecked meathead? ;)

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8308

by Bhurzum » Mon Nov 18, 2019 1:47 am

screwtape wrote: Trivia time. The last couple of pages have mentioned Winged Victory and it's obscure WW1 slang, and, separately, oikophobia. I remembered today that the ack-emmas (air mechanics) were referred to as oiks. Volume X of the OED tells me that oik or oick, a contraction of oickman, was first recorded in a dictionary of slang in 1925 ('a member of a rival school, a labourer, a clot'). Sadly, oikophobia does not designate the vanishingly rare irrational fear or loathing of air mechanics. Shame, really.
So, what's a "yobbo" then?

Asking for a friend...

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8307

by free thoughtpolice » Sun Nov 17, 2019 6:31 pm

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8305

by ConcentratedH2O, OM » Sat Nov 16, 2019 6:24 pm

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: The Hill, a mostly reliable source for US political news, albeit with a certain left bias, just launched a new full Woke section called Changing America (double entendre certainly intended). Categories and subs include:

Matt, your link is bust.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8304

by fuzzy » Sat Nov 16, 2019 5:00 pm

:rimshot: Yeah, my Dad described himself as a 'backsliding Baptist', while allowing Mom to raise us as Christian Scientist. He'd drop us off at church and Sunday school, prepare the best meal of the week, then come pick us up. Mom was raised as CS too, I'm pretty sure, the religion was pretty popular in the earlyish 1900s, although technically I qualify as Jewish via a chain of mother-blood, as I understand they define these things.
Chri-Sci is a pretty woo-ish religion that believes and old schmoe can self-heal if he gets his mind right. And how many religions are founded by wimmin? Chri-sci is also very short jump from atheism, in that they encourage a highly abstract view of what God is, and allow for plenty of symbolic interpretation of biblical verbiage. It had a pretty good grip on me which I never really broke away from until my late teens. My sister is a practitioner.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8303

by Lsuoma » Sat Nov 16, 2019 4:06 pm

fuzzy wrote: The lesson I've learned over the last decade from the atheist 'community' is that I'd rather hang around a roomful of Baptists. At least a few of them will have open minds.
In general, I have nothing against Baptists, but I don't think they hold them under long enough.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8302

by fuzzy » Sat Nov 16, 2019 11:01 am

The lesson I've learned over the last decade from the atheist 'community' is that I'd rather hang around a roomful of Baptists. At least a few of them will have open minds.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8301

by MarcusAu » Sat Nov 16, 2019 9:53 am

Please escuse me if this is off the topic - but is this what the atheist 'community' has come to?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Y7Ig_ejCAE

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8300

by Matt Cavanaugh » Sat Nov 16, 2019 8:26 am

The Hill, a mostly reliable source for US political news, albeit with a certain left bias, just launched a new full Woke section called Changing America (double entendre certainly intended). Categories and subs include:

Respect
- Equality
- Diversity + Inclusion
- Accessibility
- Poverty

Sustainability
- Climate Change
- Energy
- Infrastructure
- Conservation

Resilience
- Natural Disasters
- Refugees
- Urban Renewal

Enrichment
- Education
- Arts & Culture

Well-Being
- Prevention & Cures
- Medical Advances
- Mental Health
- Longevity

Articles include:

Brooklyn club puts creatives of color first
[Yes, 'creatives' is a noun, and yes, it's a racially-segregated club]

Mattel's new doll hailed as a breakthrough for inclusivity at playtime
Mattel's new Creatable World dolls have no assigned name or gender, but instead offer optional hairstyles and a gender-neutral wardrobe.


Always eliminates female symbol from sanitary pad packaging
The move seeks to foster greater inclusivity for the brand’s transgender and nonbinary customers.


'Immigrant Food' opens a block away from the White House
What happens when you stir together award-winning chefs and immigration reform in D.C.? 


Kids are learning about race from an early age. Just not from their parents
A new report says more than 60 percent of teachers are comfortable talking to their students about race and ethnicity. Why aren't parents?


:suimouth:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8299

by screwtape » Sat Nov 16, 2019 5:18 am

Trivia time. The last couple of pages have mentioned Winged Victory and it's obscure WW1 slang, and, separately, oikophobia. I remembered today that the ack-emmas (air mechanics) were referred to as oiks. Volume X of the OED tells me that oik or oick, a contraction of oickman, was first recorded in a dictionary of slang in 1925 ('a member of a rival school, a labourer, a clot'). Sadly, oikophobia does not designate the vanishingly rare irrational fear or loathing of air mechanics. Shame, really.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8298

by Brive1987 » Sat Nov 16, 2019 3:12 am

Keating wrote:
Sat Nov 16, 2019 2:32 am
My grandmother came from Danzig. Krakow is still nice though. I love the castle.
Alas. So did Hans Frank.

Coincidence?

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8297

by Keating » Sat Nov 16, 2019 2:32 am

My grandmother came from Danzig. Krakow is still nice though. I love the castle.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8296

by Brive1987 » Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:47 pm

Keating wrote: I lived in Warsaw for 3 years in the early 90s. I went back to Warsaw in 2012 to visit. I didn't like it as much as I did as a young teenager.
I’m focusing on Krakow with the later half of Jan and all of February in Italy or Greece. Cold and smog...

This would be perfect. Went to Barangaroo yesterday, Jesus. I wasn’t sure what dystopian Blade Runner sequel I was in, but it wasn’t set in Australia.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8295

by free thoughtpolice » Fri Nov 15, 2019 10:25 am

Take that millenial tards:
future generations.PNG
(978.18 KiB) Downloaded 473 times

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8294

by MarcusAu » Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:15 am

Cnut showed the futility of opposing the endless tides of...um...water I suppose. (Though he may have been doing one of those metaphorical things).

In any case Churchill did not take his example to heart when proposing his own version of coastal activism.

It would seem that the dichotomy has been defined - either sit with Alfred in the kitchen or follow along after brave Sir Robin.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8293

by Keating » Fri Nov 15, 2019 4:04 am

I lived in Warsaw for 3 years in the early 90s. I went back to Warsaw in 2012 to visit. I didn't like it as much as I did as a young teenager.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8292

by Brive1987 » Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:00 am

Pondering the logistics of selling the house, clearing the small mortgage, purchasing a good property to rent out, moving to 🇵🇱 and living largely off the rent. Learn the language and consume culture and history. If and when someone nose-dives, the option is to return ‘home’.

Restoring an MG sports and chasing a blonde are more traditional symptoms. :think:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8291

by Matt Cavanaugh » Thu Nov 14, 2019 8:06 pm

Further details emerge on the Santa Clarita school shooting:

- Confirmed .45 semiautomatic, no rounds left;

- It was the rodent's birthday;

- Entire incident took 16 seconds in the quad [so STFU about arming teachers in classrooms];

- Rodent had a girlfriend, who was not a victim, and is cooperating with the police.


https://www.yahoo.com/gma/shooting-repo ... ories.html

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8290

by Matt Cavanaugh » Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:03 pm

Seattle joins the PRSF in the "municipal mass hysteria" category:
Seattle voters turned out for the progressive-socialist slate. All but one of the most progressive candidates won their districts—including Trotskyist incumbent Kshama Sawant, who demands the nationalization of Boeing and Amazon, and Democratic Socialists of America-affiliated candidate Tammy Morales. Seattle elected its most liberal city council in history...

The progressive-socialist alliance has wasted no time laying out an ambitious agenda. It includes ordinances for rent control, drug-consumption sites, decriminalization of prostitution, legalization of homeless encampments, defunding critical police programs, free public transit, and an array of new taxes, including a “mansion tax,” “excess compensation tax,” and an “Amazon tax” three times larger than the original levy that was repealed last year. Amazon tried to unseat Seattle’s progressive regime, but the progressives have only strengthened their hold on municipal power—and now they’re out for revenge.
https://www.city-journal.org/seattle-pr ... cil-amazon

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8289

by free thoughtpolice » Thu Nov 14, 2019 5:58 pm

Driftless wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote: We had a strange episode in BC this summer. Two young adults from a town near here on Vancouver Island, apparently hopped up on pretend Rambo paintball games drove 800 miles north, killed a young couple, American and Australian tourists, then drove west for a considerable distance where they murdered a botany lecturer, stole his camera, SUV, and who knows what else and then headed 1000s of mile east to the sub-arctic Hudson's Bay region. They fucked up trying to boat down a river and ended up shooting themselves. Apparently they had some goofy adolescent fantasy of hijacking a boat and heading to South America to form some sort Lord of the Flies thing. the assholes.
https://vancouversun.com/news/local-new ... nd-manhunt
As irony has it, I'm sure I met the botanist guy a few months earlier in the park next door. He was taking pictures of some indigenous flora, possibly with the same camera the goofs stole. Presumably he was doing the same thing 800 miles north of here when he ran across 2 losers living out a childish fantasy.
They were going to boat down to Hudson Bay and from there to South America? Wow.

They should have watched this first:

Driftless wrote:
free thoughtpolice wrote: We had a strange episode in BC this summer. Two young adults from a town near here on Vancouver Island, apparently hopped up on pretend Rambo paintball games drove 800 miles north, killed a young couple, American and Australian tourists, then drove west for a considerable distance where they murdered a botany lecturer, stole his camera, SUV, and who knows what else and then headed 1000s of mile east to the sub-arctic Hudson's Bay region. They fucked up trying to boat down a river and ended up shooting themselves. Apparently they had some goofy adolescent fantasy of hijacking a boat and heading to South America to form some sort Lord of the Flies thing. the assholes.
https://vancouversun.com/news/local-new ... nd-manhunt
As irony has it, I'm sure I met the botanist guy a few months earlier in the park next door. He was taking pictures of some indigenous flora, possibly with the same camera the goofs stole. Presumably he was doing the same thing 800 miles north of here when he ran across 2 losers living out a childish fantasy.
They were going to boat down to Hudson Bay and from there to South America? Wow.

They should have watched this first:

Not the brightest bulbs on the Christmas tree. They had no idea of the rapids that stranded them, or the fact there was a dam a few miles downstream.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8288

by Driftless » Thu Nov 14, 2019 5:49 pm

free thoughtpolice wrote: We had a strange episode in BC this summer. Two young adults from a town near here on Vancouver Island, apparently hopped up on pretend Rambo paintball games drove 800 miles north, killed a young couple, American and Australian tourists, then drove west for a considerable distance where they murdered a botany lecturer, stole his camera, SUV, and who knows what else and then headed 1000s of mile east to the sub-arctic Hudson's Bay region. They fucked up trying to boat down a river and ended up shooting themselves. Apparently they had some goofy adolescent fantasy of hijacking a boat and heading to South America to form some sort Lord of the Flies thing. the assholes.
https://vancouversun.com/news/local-new ... nd-manhunt
As irony has it, I'm sure I met the botanist guy a few months earlier in the park next door. He was taking pictures of some indigenous flora, possibly with the same camera the goofs stole. Presumably he was doing the same thing 800 miles north of here when he ran across 2 losers living out a childish fantasy.
They were going to boat down to Hudson Bay and from there to South America? Wow.

They should have watched this first:

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8287

by free thoughtpolice » Thu Nov 14, 2019 5:03 pm

We had a strange episode in BC this summer. Two young adults from a town near here on Vancouver Island, apparently hopped up on pretend Rambo paintball games drove 800 miles north, killed a young couple, American and Australian tourists, then drove west for a considerable distance where they murdered a botany lecturer, stole his camera, SUV, and who knows what else and then headed 1000s of mile east to the sub-arctic Hudson's Bay region. They fucked up trying to boat down a river and ended up shooting themselves. Apparently they had some goofy adolescent fantasy of hijacking a boat and heading to South America to form some sort Lord of the Flies thing. the assholes.
https://vancouversun.com/news/local-new ... nd-manhunt
As irony has it, I'm sure I met the botanist guy a few months earlier in the park next door. He was taking pictures of some indigenous flora, possibly with the same camera the goofs stole. Presumably he was doing the same thing 800 miles north of here when he ran across 2 losers living out a childish fantasy.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8286

by Matt Cavanaugh » Thu Nov 14, 2019 4:35 pm

free thoughtpolice wrote: It could be argued that it is a good thing he didn't show up with a semi automatic rifle with a large capacity magazine carrying more lethal high velocity rounds.Might have been a larger body count.
Small comfort to the families of the two dead. I guarantee this little freak had a long record of mental health issues, anti-social behavior, and raised tons of red flags that the system ignored.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8285

by Matt Cavanaugh » Thu Nov 14, 2019 4:31 pm

screwtape wrote: Six rounds isn't even a full magazine from any .45 automatic pistol (and is the limit of .45 revolvers). Suggests he wasn't after a body count, but was targeting a girl and the boyfriend he wished he was.
Many of the .45 semis only have c. seven-round mags. And, yeah, it sounds like a targeted shooting as you postulate.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8284

by screwtape » Thu Nov 14, 2019 4:16 pm

free thoughtpolice wrote:
Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 3:34 pm
Killer used a scary-looking assault rifle .45 pistol, fired hundreds of bullets from a bullet-hopper thingie six rounds, last one to his own head.

https://nypost.com/2019/11/14/saugus-hi ... -a-victim/
It could be argued that it is a good thing he didn't show up with a semi automatic rifle with a large capacity magazine carrying more lethal high velocity rounds.Might have been a larger body count.
Six rounds isn't even a full magazine from any .45 automatic pistol (and is the limit of .45 revolvers). Suggests he wasn't after a body count, but was targeting a girl and the boyfriend he wished he was. But I may not be as charitable towards him as I should be; Tylenol and J&B Rare can only do so much for post-op pain.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8283

by free thoughtpolice » Thu Nov 14, 2019 4:01 pm

Matt Cavanaugh wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 3:34 pm
Killer used a scary-looking assault rifle .45 pistol, fired hundreds of bullets from a bullet-hopper thingie six rounds, last one to his own head.

https://nypost.com/2019/11/14/saugus-hi ... -a-victim/
It could be argued that it is a good thing he didn't show up with a semi automatic rifle with a large capacity magazine carrying more lethal high velocity rounds.Might have been a larger body count.

Re: You is all a bunch of poofs!

#8282

by Matt Cavanaugh » Thu Nov 14, 2019 3:34 pm

Killer used a scary-looking assault rifle .45 pistol, fired hundreds of bullets from a bullet-hopper thingie six rounds, last one to his own head.

https://nypost.com/2019/11/14/saugus-hi ... -a-victim/

Top