If thou gazest long into the Pit, the Pit will also gaze into thee

#6707

Driftless wrote: ↑
Sat Aug 17, 2019 1:19 pm

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: ↑ Whatever anyone may think about climate change, children do not have the experience or cynicism needed to deal with such politically charged subjects.

She can be 100% right, but it still won't work on a more astute population. You know, the voting type...
I think the "climate crisis" people are mistaking the purpose of protests. In a democracy it is a way to raise awareness of an issue among voters so that the change can come through the ballot box. It seems that some of these people think the purpose of protest is to bypass democracy and get their agenda implemented directly. Even if they are right about what needs to be done, a democracy does not work that way.

I think one should be careful to differentiate between the political ideologues whose stance on climate is informed by their anti-conservative views and those people who have an understanding of the issue and genuinely want to inform.
Regarding progressive entitlement, in this video Robin Aitken explains the progressive mindset exemplified by the BBC. He thinks that the modern Left regard political history as moving inexorably toward their preferred destination and it is their moral right to ensure that it happens regardless of anyone else's opinion. I think he is absolutely right and it explains the deranged response to Trump, Brexit, "populism" and anti-EU sentiment. The prog Left seem genuinely incensed at the derailing of their righteous choo choo and they can't quite believe that it isn't Nazis and racist "gammons" doing it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aucDmK5E4bU

#6706

Good talk on narcissists. The title is a little screwy. It's about both male and female narcissists.

#6705

KiwiInOz wrote: ↑
Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: ↑ Whatever anyone may think about climate change, children do not have the experience or cynicism needed to deal with such politically charged subjects.

She can be 100% right, but it still won't work on a more astute population. You know, the voting type...
I don't know about. Joan and her Ark had quite a following. In fact you could say that she was on fire.

Hey Man!! Too soon!

#6704

I don't know about that. That, buggerit.

#6703

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: ↑ Whatever anyone may think about climate change, children do not have the experience or cynicism needed to deal with such politically charged subjects.

She can be 100% right, but it still won't work on a more astute population. You know, the voting type...

I don't know about. Joan and her Ark had quite a following. In fact you could say that she was on fire.

#6702

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: ↑ Whatever anyone may think about climate change, children do not have the experience or cynicism needed to deal with such politically charged subjects.

She can be 100% right, but it still won't work on a more astute population. You know, the voting type...

I think the "climate crisis" people are mistaking the purpose of protests. In a democracy it is a way to raise awareness of an issue among voters so that the change can come through the ballot box. It seems that some of these people think the purpose of protest is to bypass democracy and get their agenda implemented directly. Even if they are right about what needs to be done, a democracy does not work that way.

#6701

screwtape wrote: ↑ Seems like the Children's Crusade to me.

I wouldn't want to be too quick to accept a comparison. Not before someone has at least a rough estimate for what the carbon footprint of the first one was.

#6700

Whatever anyone may think about climate change, children do not have the experience or cynicism needed to deal with such politically charged subjects.

She can be 100% right, but it still won't work on a more astute population. You know, the voting type...

#6699

Seems like the Children's Crusade to me.

#6698

KiwiInOz wrote: ↑
She quite categorically states that she doesn't believe that the world is going to end. She also states that she was pissed off by the apparent inaction by leaders around climate change, so set up her one day a week protest. She did not expect to go viral (so it wasn't a Machiavellian plot by her parents to profit).

Youth see things in black and white. Autistic youth even more so.

Good on her. I wouldn't have had that gumption or composure at that age.

In a recent speech, she states climate change will "most likely lead to the end of civilization as we know it." Granted, "as we know it" is the weasliest of weasel words, but this is basically in the same ball park as "the world is going to end", another weasel phrase.

Her shtick is recounting how she was taught climate change is an existential crisis, but no one acts like this is the case, and this dooms her future. You are correct that autistes are particularly prone to see things in black and white, but an even more defining characteristic is that they have difficulty seeing beyond the literal, or that people frequently say things that are not literally what they actually believe. Yes, almost no one behaves like we're in the onset of an existential crisis even while, in certain sets, there's an almost religious zeal competition to describe the consequences of climate change as apocalyptically as possible. The obvious explanation is people say it, but don't actually believe it, and are using hyperbolic scare mongering for political purpose. But in her damaged brain, it must mean people are incredibly short sighted and stupid and need to be woken up.

I think you are also correct that neither her nor her parents had her rise in stature planned out. Rather climate activist PR thought she would be a useful propaganda tool. But if they want to make a mentally ill Swedish adolescent the face of climate change alarmism, more power to them.

#6697

Talking of trans, will xir be alright waxing some sweaty hairy balls?

MWSnap015 2019-08-17, 10_46_10.jpg: (97.2 KiB) Downloaded 149 times

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/stories-4 ... t-can-help

#6696

Hunt wrote: ↑
KiwiInOz wrote: ↑
Hunt wrote: ↑ Believe it or not, this was 1980 uncontroversial:

I agree. You couldn't get away with throwing your cigarette butts on the ground like that any more.
It's funny, the guy seems like a decent one hit wonder, and they obviously threw this video together. But you think they would have considered a stand-in actor? He's 33 years old in this, singing to a teen girl, looks like Harvey Keitel with long hair and serial killer eyes. Today this would be career suicide.

On my small low res tablet screen thought that was a woman in the video thumbnail. If he calls themselves she/xir will that be alright?

#6695

KiwiInOz wrote: ↑
Hunt wrote: ↑ Believe it or not, this was 1980 uncontroversial:

I agree. You couldn't get away with throwing your cigarette butts on the ground like that any more.

It's funny, the guy seems like a decent one hit wonder, and they obviously threw this video together. But you think they would have considered a stand-in actor? He's 33 years old in this, singing to a teen girl, looks like Harvey Keitel with long hair and serial killer eyes. Today this would be career suicide.

#6694

screwtape wrote: ↑
Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑
SM1957 wrote: ↑ Greta Thunberg is making an environmental point by sailing across the Atlantic, not flying - to save CO2 emissions,

Five people are flying across to New York so they can sail the boat back.
Once upon a time, if you told me about millions of adults joining a thirteen-year-old retard's crusade to save the planet from destruction, I'd swear you were talking about a Kurt Vonnegut novel.
To take an autistic teenager with an eating disorder and other mental health issues and tell her the world is going to end and it's up to her to save it rather meets my definition of child abuse.

She quite categorically states that she doesn't believe that the world is going to end. She also states that she was pissed off by the apparent inaction by leaders around climate change, so set up her one day a week protest. She did not expect to go viral (so it wasn't a Machiavellian plot by her parents to profit).

Youth see things in black and white. Autistic youth even more so.

Good on her. I wouldn't have had that gumption or composure at that age.

#6693

Hunt wrote: ↑ Believe it or not, this was 1980 uncontroversial:

I agree. You couldn't get away with throwing your cigarette butts on the ground like that any more.

#6692

Keating wrote: ↑ So it's finally happened in real life. A person I unfortunately just met, with clear socialisation problems, is getting others to refer to them as "they". I'd give a clear pronoun myself, but I honestly can't tell.

What pronoun does the "they" use to refer to theyselves? "We"?

According to me, anyone who demands special pronouns is at-least required to jump thru their own hoop & consistently refer to themselves soley using their own rules.

#6691

Oh, my! Woke network promoting Islam run by UK Gummint!!!

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/reve ... -programme

#6690

David Frum continues his apostasy, to the point where he and Sam Harris can have a friendly conversation and agree that Trump is indefensible.

#6689

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑
SM1957 wrote: ↑ Greta Thunberg is making an environmental point by sailing across the Atlantic, not flying - to save CO2 emissions,

Five people are flying across to New York so they can sail the boat back.
Once upon a time, if you told me about millions of adults joining a thirteen-year-old retard's crusade to save the planet from destruction, I'd swear you were talking about a Kurt Vonnegut novel.

To take an autistic teenager with an eating disorder and other mental health issues and tell her the world is going to end and it's up to her to save it rather meets my definition of child abuse.

#6688

SM1957 wrote: ↑ Greta Thunberg is making an environmental point by sailing across the Atlantic, not flying - to save CO2 emissions,

Five people are flying across to New York so they can sail the boat back.

Once upon a time, if you told me about millions of adults joining a thirteen-year-old retard's crusade to save the planet from destruction, I'd swear you were talking about a Kurt Vonnegut novel.

#6687

Greta Thunberg is making an environmental point by sailing across the Atlantic, not flying - to save CO2 emissions,

Five people are flying across to New York so they can sail the boat back.

#6686

#6685

Keating wrote: ↑ So it's finally happened in real life. A person I unfortunately just met, with clear socialisation problems, is getting others to refer to them as "they". I'd give a clear pronoun myself, but I honestly can't tell.

What's wrong with "mate"? It is the perfect non gender specific catch all.

#6684

Even Skunk Anansie's Skin thinks the modern woke are numpties.

#6683

So it's finally happened in real life. A person I unfortunately just met, with clear socialisation problems, is getting others to refer to them as "they". I'd give a clear pronoun myself, but I honestly can't tell.

#6682

Hunt wrote: ↑ We just found our first female president.

What a bitch.

#6681

More Wisconsin news:

https://www.wsaw.com/content/news/Insid ... 21981.html

Jeremiah Button’s jury trial in Portage County was just two weeks away when he disappeared in early 2016. Charged with first degree child sexual assault and possession of child pornography, Button had been out on a $25,000 cash bond for about a year and a half when he vanished.

That was when he built the bunker, he would later tell deputies with the Marathon County Sheriff’s Office. Carved into an embankment near the Ice Age Trail on state land in the township of Ringle and protected from sight by thickened underbrush that he himself had helped create, Button would escape detection from law enforcement for almost three and a half years until a concerned hunter called police last Friday, Aug. 9.

#6680

Wow. Kamala Harris just called for banning gun sales "to those who make violent, hate-based threats online". Wanna bet that'd include mispronouning and 'deadnaming'?

#6679

InfraRedBucket wrote: ↑ Even the "woke" Guardian is now transphobic..

The Guardian Newspaper Has Lost Two Trans Employees Over Its Reporting On Trans Issues
“It suddenly became real,” one trans staff member told BuzzFeed News. “I’m entering this building with people who are denying my humanity.”

A transgender employee of The Guardian – which once called itself the “world’s leading liberal voice” – has resigned accusing the newspaper in an email to staff of being “an incredibly transphobic organisation”.

In a cutting resignation letter sent last month, the employee said the paper “fundamentally not only stands against my own values but also against what I am”. A second staff member resigned weeks later, also citing the “harm” they say the newspaper is doing to trans people.

Following the leak of the email to BuzzFeed News, the trans employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said she felt complicit in the newspaper’s "transphobic" reporting by continuing to work there, and revealed the damaging effect the Guardian’s coverage of transgender people has had on her wellbeing. This included fear of using the women’s toilet at work.

Such editorial lines, she said, are a “blind spot” for the largely progressive publication which last month published a long read criticising other news outlets for their stigmatizing coverage of refugees, another marginalised group.

The former employee also said colleagues had made transphobic remarks to her.

Her resignation marks a flashpoint in what multiple sources at the Guardian have described to BuzzFeed News as a deepening internal war over the rights of transgender people – and how the organisation reports on them. Staff members across several departments accused the paper of “institutional transphobia”, peddling transphobic tropes, and allowing a bitter schism to develop between pro- and anti-trans journalists.

Shortly after, during two separate incidents at informal drinks with colleagues, one member of staff who had previously been Victoria’s friend at work defended the article, she said, and began citing trans women in sports as a reason to attack trans rights. Another colleague, she said, “poked fun” at her, asked if she was trans, and told her, “If you went to prison I’m not sure which prison you should go to.”
More here:
https://www.buzzfeed.com/patrickstrudwi ... ransphobia

The Graun has printed the odd article that defends the TERF POV, and even those bent over backwards and scattered the usual caveats to state that they are not opposed to trans rights, etc.

But, despite many more pro-trans, anti-TERF articles appearing in the Graun, the "world's leading liberal voice" is not "woke" enough for the crazies.

Hate to tell them "I told you so".

#6678

Even the "woke" Guardian is now transphobic..

The Guardian Newspaper Has Lost Two Trans Employees Over Its Reporting On Trans Issues
“It suddenly became real,” one trans staff member told BuzzFeed News. “I’m entering this building with people who are denying my humanity.”

A transgender employee of The Guardian – which once called itself the “world’s leading liberal voice” – has resigned accusing the newspaper in an email to staff of being “an incredibly transphobic organisation”.

In a cutting resignation letter sent last month, the employee said the paper “fundamentally not only stands against my own values but also against what I am”. A second staff member resigned weeks later, also citing the “harm” they say the newspaper is doing to trans people.

Following the leak of the email to BuzzFeed News, the trans employee, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said she felt complicit in the newspaper’s "transphobic" reporting by continuing to work there, and revealed the damaging effect the Guardian’s coverage of transgender people has had on her wellbeing. This included fear of using the women’s toilet at work.

Such editorial lines, she said, are a “blind spot” for the largely progressive publication which last month published a long read criticising other news outlets for their stigmatizing coverage of refugees, another marginalised group.

The former employee also said colleagues had made transphobic remarks to her.

Her resignation marks a flashpoint in what multiple sources at the Guardian have described to BuzzFeed News as a deepening internal war over the rights of transgender people – and how the organisation reports on them. Staff members across several departments accused the paper of “institutional transphobia”, peddling transphobic tropes, and allowing a bitter schism to develop between pro- and anti-trans journalists.

Shortly after, during two separate incidents at informal drinks with colleagues, one member of staff who had previously been Victoria’s friend at work defended the article, she said, and began citing trans women in sports as a reason to attack trans rights. Another colleague, she said, “poked fun” at her, asked if she was trans, and told her, “If you went to prison I’m not sure which prison you should go to.”

More here:
https://www.buzzfeed.com/patrickstrudwi ... ransphobia

#6677

Hunt wrote: ↑ At least in the 60s they had a sense of proportion. BTW what was it with double breasted jackets and the 60s?

Probably the Edwardian Dandy look (around late 60s) eg influenced by the Stones etc

#6676

At least in the 60s they had a sense of proportion. BTW what was it with double breasted jackets and the 60s?

#6675

Believe it or not, this was 1980 uncontroversial:

#6674

We just found our first female president.

#6673

#6672

Ocasio's campaign finance business model... resembles Rebecca Watson's patreon contributors.

#6671

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑
Hey, have you seen UnReal?

I've never heard of it. I'll keep an eye out. Thanks.

#6670

some guy wrote: ↑
Sat Aug 10, 2019 4:58 am
In a web page begging for money, Skepticon gave an run down of how deep in debt they are, both for their conference (which is going on right now) and for their legal fees for that law suit by Carrier. Archived link below, but here the summary of their legal situation:

"And then the legal defense fund:

- Amount of legal bills on credit card: $20,754
- Legal bills unpaid: $8,533
- Balance in the legal fund: $1,490
- Net legal bills needing to be covered: $27,797
"(We’ll be receiving another large bill next week for July. Yay us.)"
It's unclear if they paid for other legal bills with funds they raised in the past, but at least now, they are net deficit of nearly $28K, and they are expecting another bill to arrive shortly to add to that deficit.

The first part of the post outlines the finances of the conference. The TL;DR version: total conference cost estimated at a bit over $30K, but still short almost $11K.

https://web.archive.org/web/20190810005 ... challenge/

Never let it be said that Dr. Spooge Fetish, PHD never did anything good for the skeptic community.

#6669

Rolling Stone interviews the Russian trojan horse, Dictator-lovin', SP, Tulsi Gabbard:

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/p ... 3J6XjOdxg4

#6668

In June the UK Advertising Standards Authority acquired the power to nix ads using depictions of gender "that are likely to cause harm, or serious or widespread offense."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/14/media/uk ... index.html

Claims were made that they would not be wielding the ban hammer with wild abandon:

Ads that show men or women carrying out tasks with which their genders are sometimes associated, such as women doing the shopping or men doing DIY tasks, will also be permitted.

VW tweeted this 20 second ad in December of 2018.

The tweet came out well before the new regulations came into force. Perhaps the video is still getting airplay in the UK or perhaps the terminally offended are just sanitizing history.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/14/media/uk ... index.html

"We acknowledged that becoming a parent was a life-changing experience that required significant adaptation, but taking care of children was a role that was stereotypically associated with women," the body added in its ruling.

Using that justification wouldn't any shot of a woman, sans man, caring for a child now be in the Bad Things category?

#6667

Service Dog wrote: ↑ Now I have a righteous excuse to yell 'fuck you' at people wearing Soul Cycle leggings & t-shirts.

I believe you always did.

Hey, have you seen UnReal? It's a TV show about a reality TV show (basically, The Bachelor by another name.) A lot of the behind-the-scenes craziness my sister described from her Hollywood days, but I imagine very similar to the craziness you encounter. UnReal is funny and dark at the same time, plumbs the depths of bent human nature, and is infinitely engrossing.

#6666

katamari Damassi wrote: ↑ Do you think he's instructed Muscato in how to insert a tampon?

They've both experts on douches.

#6665

katamari Damassi wrote: ↑
AndrewV69 wrote: ↑
Do you think he's instructed Muscato in how to insert a tampon?

Possibly. Just in case he is called upon to instruct a young girl.

#6664

AndrewV69 wrote: ↑

Do you think he's instructed Muscato in how to insert a tampon?

#6663

#6662

Today I'm working for that company Ocasio chased out of New York. 3 hour break in the middle of my day.
They're promoting back-to-school stuff for college students.
When the event is over, all the whimsical decor merchandise will be donated to charity, after event staff picks it over.
I already scored... a sweet guitar!...

It's a small event, just #influencers. They get drinks, a gift bag, a performance by some Amazon Music chick-- if you like 2019-style music-- oh man do I have a big steaming homogenous glob of it, for you...

Also performing is an Instagram-famous comedienne. I didn't check out her stuff... but apparently there was a bit of a kerfuffle-- when the world discovered her mother is Pamela Geller. As-in the Draw Muhammed Day shoot-em-up lady! All I wanted to do this evening is get-home & rest my feet for 3 hours & play that new guitar... but if Pamela Geller was on the guest-list, I'd have been tempted to stick around for the show. I'm surprised the company AOC and Elizabeth Warren loves-to-hate... the one Bernie sez "doesn't a pay a NICKEL" in taxes... would hire Geller's daughter for their event. Kinda cool that they didn't censor-themselves from doing so.

Speaking of SJW outrage & guilt by association...there's a Soul Cycle across the street from the event. I like that protest. Now I have a righteous excuse to yell 'fuck you' at people wearing Soul Cycle leggings & t-shirts.

My boss on this job is a very normal girl from down south. She's actually pretty gutsy, but she's mainstream-normie.
She was overflowing with excitement about this Chris Cuomo FREDO thing. Boss isn't the type to rant at work about politics or news-outrage.

Maybe-- post-epstien?-- trollish internet political meme-nerdery has gone fully majority-mainstream?

#6661

That doesn't look like Barry White!!

#6660

Hunt wrote: ↑
Tue Aug 13, 2019 6:10 am

John D wrote: ↑ I would consider voting for Tulsi. She is young and that is a worry to me, but she is really tough and presidential in my opinion. When my wife watched Joe Biden at the debate, and I pointed out he would probably win the nom., she put her head in her hands and said "I think I will not vote. " Haha. We both like Tulsi.
I still like Sanders. Yeah, he's such an old shoe, but he still seems to be the only genuine contender. And he got screwed in the 2016 primary. Something tells me he'd be great for the country, I don't know why. He'd fill all the gaps created by Trump. Trump plus Sander equals some kind of superposition of sanity. Biden is horrible establishment, and too much a knee jerk SJW. Harris is a horrible ex-prosecutor. Gabbard is just just too ambitious, like a little pubescent Hillary Clinton. Also, the little toughy, "shipping out to go on active duty for a training exercise" shtick is truly annoying. Bitch, you're a politician now, not a girl scout.

As long as it's not Gabbard and her "monstrous ideas" and Assad toadyism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS-sxJFn6O0
This is a supposedly serious mainstream journo, Jerry Coyne's sensible darling.

#6659

Hunt wrote: ↑ I still like Sanders.... And he got screwed in the 2016 primary.

How, precisely, did he get screwed? Did the DNC allot some of his delegates to Hillary from a primary she didn't even run in? Did it only count half the delegates from a state he won? Did it turn a blind eye when Hillary bused in thousands of out-of-state voters to vote in the Iowa caucus? Did it break its own rules to make sure no floor vote was held at the convention?

Oh wait, never mind -- that was what the DNC did in 2008 for Obama.

Something tells me he'd be great for the country, I don't know why. He'd fill all the gaps created by Trump. Trump plus Sander equals some kind of superposition of sanity.

He's spent thirty years in the Senate, and has been the driving force behind exactly zero pieces of legislation. His policy proposals are unworkable pipe dreams. He's a full-blown socialist who truly believes in The Revolution. He's praised Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez. He's an angry, grumpy old man with a short temper and no personal charisma or people skills. Bernie as POTUS would be a complete disaster.

#6658

John D wrote: ↑ I would consider voting for Tulsi. She is young and that is a worry to me, but she is really tough and presidential in my opinion. When my wife watched Joe Biden at the debate, and I pointed out he would probably win the nom., she put her head in her hands and said "I think I will not vote. " Haha. We both like Tulsi.

I still like Sanders. Yeah, he's such an old shoe, but he still seems to be the only genuine contender. And he got screwed in the 2016 primary. Something tells me he'd be great for the country, I don't know why. He'd fill all the gaps created by Trump. Trump plus Sander equals some kind of superposition of sanity. Biden is horrible establishment, and too much a knee jerk SJW. Harris is a horrible ex-prosecutor. Gabbard is just just too ambitious, like a little pubescent Hillary Clinton. Also, the little toughy, "shipping out to go on active duty for a training exercise" shtick is truly annoying. Bitch, you're a politician now, not a girl scout.

#6657

Phil_Giordana_FCD wrote: ↑ Those were jokes? I thought they were snippets of the Orbit's comment section.

There's one there that was quite witty, even if not super side-splitting:

I'm living the American dream, which since 2016 has been NOT being in America.

#6656

With respect to Tulsi Gabbard:

#6655

Those were jokes? I thought they were snippets of the Orbit's comment section.

#6654

SM1957 wrote: ↑ The BBC has top jokes from the Edinburgh Festival.

They are all awful.

Of course, the BBC doesn't have any Titania McGrath jokes.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articl ... -edinburgh

Jesus Christ - those "jokes" are so bad, they registered 9.6 Mega-Smurthwaites on the Crapometer!

https://mriqd.files.wordpress.com/2012/ ... 266&zoom=2

#6653

The BBC has top jokes from the Edinburgh Festival.

They are all awful.

Of course, the BBC doesn't have any Titania McGrath jokes.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articl ... -edinburgh

#6652

John D wrote: ↑ Autistics LOVE being trans or non-gendered! The several "non-gendered" friends of my daughter's are all on the Austism spectrum. Most of her trans friends are also either autistic or suffer from very high levels of social anxiety with symptoms of family abuse and PTSD.

Yes, because in addition to the usual homosexual and autoerotic types, I think there is a third type of person who decides that this is happening to them because they self-assess as being closer to the stereotypes of the other sex. While stereotypes tend to be somewhat accurate - they are a pretty poor guide to figuring out who you are. Most people have some characteristics which go sharply against stereotype.

I think there is a big problem if as soon as a kid starts asking questions about his/her sexual identity - a whole lot of the people surrounding him/her decide that it is their duty to be "affirming."

B.

#6651

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑
ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑ An honest question for Merkins. Why is Gabbard getting so little support? While I disagree to a certain extent with her attitude toward military intervention, I think it is at least considered and probably amenable to argument. She is light years ahead of the Dem front-runners in terms of apparent honesty and integrity and willingness to engage people in dialogue. The mainstream media all appear to be aligned against her with their incessant dredging up of old smears. Is it as simple as the media being slaves to the military industrial supporting elite? Is it her refusing to play the intersectional anti-white game?
Cuz her poise, eloquence, straight-shooting, and refusal to play identity politics is a threat to the MSM's darlings with their socialism, white guilt, & open borders agenda. That suppurating cunt, Rachel Maddow, will never forgive Gabbard for saying antigay things as a teenager. To the regressive left, Gabbard, despite her fairly progressive views, is an SP who must be crushed.

Tulsi fucking knee-capped Kamala Harris, and it was awesome. If she makes it into the next debate, Lizzie Warren will be next.

I would consider voting for Tulsi. She is young and that is a worry to me, but she is really tough and presidential in my opinion. When my wife watched Joe Biden at the debate, and I pointed out he would probably win the nom., she put her head in her hands and said "I think I will not vote. " Haha. We both like Tulsi.

#6650

Matt Cavanaugh wrote: ↑ US public schools promoting ROGD:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/ ... 546527001/

Autistics LOVE being trans or non-gendered! The several "non-gendered" friends of my daughter's are all on the Austism spectrum. Most of her trans friends are also either autistic or suffer from very high levels of social anxiety with symptoms of family abuse and PTSD.

It's like all the young people who feel like they don't fit in eventually try to be a different gender.

When I was young I was depressed and bitter and angry with the world, but I never speculated that I was a woman..... maybe things would be different if all my teachers told me I might be a chick.

#6649

ThreeFlangedJavis wrote: ↑ An honest question for Merkins. Why is Gabbard getting so little support? While I disagree to a certain extent with her attitude toward military intervention, I think it is at least considered and probably amenable to argument. She is light years ahead of the Dem front-runners in terms of apparent honesty and integrity and willingness to engage people in dialogue. The mainstream media all appear to be aligned against her with their incessant dredging up of old smears. Is it as simple as the media being slaves to the military industrial supporting elite? Is it her refusing to play the intersectional anti-white game?

Cuz her poise, eloquence, straight-shooting, and refusal to play identity politics is a threat to the MSM's darlings with their socialism, white guilt, & open borders agenda. That suppurating cunt, Rachel Maddow, will never forgive Gabbard for saying antigay things as a teenager. To the regressive left, Gabbard, despite her fairly progressive views, is an SP who must be crushed.

Tulsi fucking knee-capped Kamala Harris, and it was awesome. If she makes it into the next debate, Lizzie Warren will be next.

#6648

I'm back in the blogging saddle again:

https://trueliberalnexus.wordpress.com/ ... ck-voters/

Post a reply

Expand view Topic review: You is all a bunch of poofs!