#4
by Matt Cavanaugh » Wed Feb 10, 2021 9:28 am
I'm interested in discussing each element one at a time. No more data dumps.
Above, I reiterated my assessment of their physical and mental state at the time of the disaster. You don't concur, so let's move on to something else for now.
How about the decision to leave the tent?
We agree that they perceived an ongoing threat, or other compelling reason, to quickly exit the tent and head downhill. Whatever that was, they perceived it to be such an immense threat, that traipsing in subzero temps, in the dark, without adequate attire, and abandoning their only shelter, looked good in comparison.
- Do you completely dismiss the mini-avalanche hypothesis?
- What do you consider [a] more plausible phenomen[on/a}?
- Were the internal injuries sustained in the tent or later?
- Why did they need to cut their way out of the tent?
- Were they heading to the cache and got lost, or simply fleeing in any direction?
I'm interested in discussing each element one at a time. No more data dumps.
Above, I reiterated my assessment of their physical and mental state at the time of the disaster. You don't concur, so let's move on to something else for now.
How about the decision to leave the tent?
We agree that they perceived an ongoing threat, or other compelling reason, to quickly exit the tent and head downhill. Whatever that was, they perceived it to be such an immense threat, that traipsing in subzero temps, in the dark, without adequate attire, and abandoning their only shelter, looked good in comparison.
- Do you completely dismiss the mini-avalanche hypothesis?
- What do you consider [a] more plausible phenomen[on/a}?
- Were the internal injuries sustained in the tent or later?
- Why did they need to cut their way out of the tent?
- Were they heading to the cache and got lost, or simply fleeing in any direction?